Is it possible to detect if Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Document has been auto-generated by a tool?
For example:
foreach(var document in project.Documents)
{
if (!document.IsGeneratedCode())
{
// TODO
}
}
Looking at the source code on GitHub, I found out that extension methods IsGeneratedCode and IsGeneratedCodeAsync exist, but only as internal helpers. Implementation calls IGeneratedCodeRecognitionService language service that is also internal.
Is there any way to use similar functionality in external console application?
Not ideal, but you could copy the internal logic. Basically, code is considered "generated" if:
File begins with auto-generated comment // <autogenerated />
File name starts with TemporaryGeneratedFile_
File name ends with .designer, .generated, .g, or .g.i right before the extension
Related
I'm trying to use LestMove to be more precise
the second implementation method where it says:
Option 2:
Copy the following files into your project:
PFMoveApplication.h
PFMoveApplication.m
If your project has ARC enabled, you'll want to disable ARC on the above files. You can do so by adding -fno-objc-arc compiler flag to your PFMoveApplication.m source file. See How can I disable ARC for a single file in a project?
If your application is localized, also copy the 'MoveApplication.string' files into your project.
Link your application against Security.framework.
In your app delegate's "-[applicationWillFinishLaunching:]" method, call the PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary function at the very top.
but I'm not able to call the method / Class, could someone help me with this issue? Thanks in advance!
In general, there are a couple of ways to set up an Objective-C class in your AppleScriptObjC project:
Add the file(s) to the project - the Objective-C class name will be
the one used in the #interface/#implementation declarations
Add an outlet property in the AppleScript class/script you are using, e.g. property someProperty : missing value
Instantiate the class programmatically:
set someProperty to current application's ClassName's alloc's init()
or
Connect stuff up with the Interface Builder:
Add an NSObject (blue cube) from the library to your project
Set the class of the object/cube to the class name of the Objective-C file(s) in the Identity Inspector
Connect the AppDelegate IB Outlet to the object/cube in the Connections Inspector
After setting up the outlet property, the Objective-C methods can be used like any other script/class:
someProperty's handler()
That LetsMove project wasn't really set up for AppleScriptObjC, but I was able to tweak it a bit to get it running. I'm not that great at writing Objective-C, but the following worked for me using a new default AppleScript project with Xcode 10 in Mojave (the original file is over 500 lines long, so I'm just highlighting the changes):
Add PFMoveApplication.h and PFMoveApplication.m files to the project (the class name is LetsMove)
Add Security.framework to Link Binary With Libraries in Build Phases
As described in the original project README, add the compiler flag -fno-objc-arc to the Objective-C file in Compile Sources of the Build Phases
-- Now to alter the Objective-C files a bit:
Move the #interface declaration to the .h file and include the redefined method signatures below in it:
The PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary and PFMoveIsInProgress methods are redefined as instance methods:
- (void)PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary;
- (BOOL)PFMoveIsInProgress;
Redefine the above method signatures in the .m file, and include those methods in the #implementation section - to do this, move the #end to just before the helper methods (after the PFMoveIsInProgress method)
Remove the isMainThread statement at the beginning of the PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary method - this is not not needed (AppleScript normally runs on the main thread), and fixes another issue
There is still a little stuff in there from the original app such as NSUserDefaults, so for your own project, give it a look to see if anything else needs changing (dialog text, etc)
And finally, in the AppDelegate.applescipt file, the following was added to applicationWillFinishLaunching:
current application's LetsMove's alloc's init()'s PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary()
I am trying to understand project structure in c++, I am finding it difficult to get my head around class structure and header files.
Extract from article 1 (linked at bottom of this post)
By convention, include directory is for header files, but modern practice > suggests that include directory must strictly contain headers that need
to be exposed publicly.
My first question of this process is with regards to a separate class file that is within the include directory.
What is purpose of exposing your headers?
Following on from this, looking at an example of an exposed header file. Linked in the following GH repo: https://github.com/AakashMallik/sample_cmake
How does the Game_Interface class relate back to the Game_Engine?
game_interface.h
#pragma once
#include <game_engine.h>
class GameInterface
{
private:
GameEngine *game;
public:
GameInterface(int length);
void play(int num);
};
I have looked else where for a simple explanation of this process but, all I have found so far is nothing that can be understood in the context of this example.
Fairly new to C++ background in web technologies.
Link to article 1: https://medium.com/heuristics/c-application-development-part-1-project-structure-454b00f9eddc
What is purpose of exposing your headers?
Sometimes you may be developing some functionality or a library. You might want to help some other person or customer or client by sharing the functionality of your code. But you don't want to share the exact working details.
So for instance you wish to share an Image processing functionality which applies beautiful filters to it. But at the same time you don't want them to exactly know how did you implement it. for such scenarios, you can create a header file, say img_filter.h having function declaration -
bool ApplyFilter(const string & image_path);
Now you can implement entire details in img_filter.cpp:
bool ApplyFilter(const string & image_path)
{
....
// Implementation detail
...
}
Next you can prepare a dll of this file which could be used by your client. For reference of working, parameters, usage etc. you can share the img_filter.h.
Relation with Interface:
A well defined interface is generally nice to have so you can change implementation details transparently, which means, that HOW you implement the details don't matter as long as the interface or the function name and parameters are kept intact.
I have two files in a Unity3d project. One is a test script that runs in edit mode. The other is a single class with static functions that I'd like to call from the test scripts.
here's my test script:
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.TestTools;
using NUnit.Framework;
using System.Collections;
public class NewTestScript
{
[Test]
public void TestAnotherStaticFunction()
{
int a = NewBehaviourScript.FunctionUnderTest(1);
int b = 1;
// Use the Assert class to test conditions.
Assert.IsTrue(a == b);
}
}
here's my function under test:
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using UnityEngine;
public class NewBehaviourScript : MonoBehaviour
{
/// <summary>
/// the stupidest function in the world,
/// used to verify tests.
/// </summary>
public static int FunctionUnderTest(int a)
{
return a;
}
}
This gives me the error from the Unity compiler (I'm not building outside of Unity):
Assets/TestS/NewTestScript.cs(12,17): error CS0103: The name `NewBehaviourScript' does not exist in the current context
These are running in edit-mode.
I've tried adding and removing the SuperTestNameSpace namespace from the function under test and the calling code.
I've attempted adding/removing files from the .asmdef file that was autogenerated by unity, although this usually leads to other compile errors.
My previous unit test experience is largely in Visual Studio or VSCode, and I'm trying to get my unity3d test experience to match my prior test environment experiences.
Is there a fundamentally limited functionality in the edit-mode tests, or am I missing something stupid?
Further elaboration on the assemblies involved. It looks like there are two assemblies at play here: Assembly-CSharp.dll contains my code under test and TestS.dll contains my testing code. I believe my questions boils down to: how do I add a reference from the TestS.dll assembly to the Assembly-CSharp.dll. I'd know how to do this in Visual Studio (either via the context menu in VS or directly editing the csproj file), however I don't see how to do it in Unity3d. Any edit I make to the csproj file is frequently overwritten by unity, and while there is a 'references' section in the inspector (see picture) I can't add Assembly-CSharp.dll as a reference.
These are the inspector settings for TestS.asmdef. While there's an option to add references, I can't add a reference to Assembly-CSharp.dll, which is where my code-under-test lives.
Ok, I figured this out. There were two things going on:
Editor tests need to be underneath a folder called editor. It's really annoying that the unity editor doesn't do this for you.
You need to have an assembly definition for the code under test and add a reference from the test code to the newly created assembly definition. This must be done in the Unity editor UI.
by default, unity adds your script code to an assembly called Assembly-CSharp.dll, and, for reasons unknown, this assembly isn't referenced by my edit mode test code. I'm not sure if this is a bug in Unity or if it's by design, but explicitly creating and referencing the assembly definition has cleared things up.
The main issue is currently you are trying to call the
NewBehaviourScript(1);
constructor which does not exist...
instead of the method
using SuperTestNameSpace;
//...
NewBehaviourScript.FunctionUnderTest(1);
or alternatively with the namespace in the call directly
SuperTestNameSpace.NewBehaviourScript.FunctionUnderTest(1);
Also make sure the filename matches exactly the class name. So in your case it should be
NewBehaviourScript.cs
Note that the .cs is not printed by Unity in the Project view so there it should say NewBehaviourScript.
Why does it not compile with the using SuperTestNameSpace;? What is the error?
If that exception
Assets/TestS/NewTestScript.cs(14,17): error CS0103: The name `NewBehaviourScript' does not exist in the current context
is only shown in VisualStudio but the script compiling fine in Unity especially after adding a new script it helps to simply close and restart VS.
In some cases it also helps to close Unity and VS, remove all files and folders except Assets and ProjectSettings (and if you are under version control anything that belongs to it like e.g. .git, .gitignore, .gitattributes etc) in particular delete the Library, .vs folder and all .csproj and .sln files.
Than open Unity again and let it recompile everything.
Make sure the file that contains your NewBehaviourScript class IS NOT inside an Editor folder.
Move both the scripts in the Assets (root) folder and try again.
I created a DiagnosticAnalyzer + CodeFixProvider that checks all public properties/methods of a class if they have virtual modifier (because of NHibernate proxies). But this should only be done on classes that implements some interface. For now I hardcoded those interfaces into analyzer code. What is the best option to make them configurable via configuration file included in project? Example configuration file:
<VirtualAnalzyer>
<ValidTypes>
<ValidType>IEntity</ValidType>
<ValidType>IVersionedEntity</ValidType>
</ValidTypes>
<VirtualAnalzyer>
I solved it by using additional files. Read this answer on how to include AdditionalFile in csproj.
I think this would increase the quality of life when devving, but google came up with nothing and I couldn't find anything specific inside inside Netbeans either.
What I want is to start with this header:
class bla
{
public:
static void gfg(somearg asd);
};
Then I open the blank bla.cpp and pressed 'autoimplement'. After that, it would look like this:
#include "bla.h"
static void bla::gfg(somearg asd)
{
//TODO: implement
throw unimplemented("void bla::gfg(somearg) is unimplemented");
}
Anyone know of a tool like this?
I found http://www.radwin.org/michael/projects/stubgen/
"stubgen is a C++ development tool that keeps code files in sync with their associated headers. When it finds a member function declaration in a header file that doesn't have a corresponding implementation, it creates an empty skeleton with descriptive comment headers."
This looks like it does exactly what you want it to do.
Some time has passed and in the meantime the requested feature seems to have been implemented in netbeans. Refer to https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213811 , which also gives a description on how to use it:
Note:
Implemented CTRL+SPACE.
IDE suggest implementing of class method if CTRL+SPACE was pressed:
- inside file that already has at least one method definition
- between method declarations