I'm attempting to use SwiftUI's Binding members from #Binding variables (via its support for #dynamicMemberLookup), but even with a simple example I can recreate multiple issues. My best guess is that I'm using it incorrectly, but documentation and examples online would suggest otherwise.
The main issue (reproducible on Catalina, Big Sur, and iPadOS 13 and 14) is deleting an item while the view is open triggers a crash with an index out of range error.
Fatal error: Index out of range: file /AppleInternal/BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/swiftlang/swiftlang-1103.8.25.8/swift/stdlib/public/core/ContiguousArrayBuffer.swift, line 444
The secondary issue occurs in the text field on Catalina, attempting to edit the text hides the left/navigation view. (On Big Sur, editing the text hides the right/detail view, which I assume is a different manifestation of the same issue due to the improvements to navigation views.)
struct Child: Identifiable, Hashable {
var id = UUID()
var bar: String = "Text"
func hash(into hasher: inout Hasher) {
self.id.hash(into: &hasher)
}
}
struct ChildView: View {
let child: Child
var body: some View {
Text(child.bar)
}
}
struct ChildEditor: View {
#Binding var child: Child
var body: some View {
TextField("Text", text: self.$child.bar)
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
#State var children: [Child] = []
func binding(for child: Child) -> Binding<Child> {
guard let it = children.firstIndex(of: child) else {
fatalError()
}
return $children[it]
}
var plusButton: Button<Image> {
return Button(action: {
self.children.append(Child())
}) {
Image(systemName: "plus")
}
}
func ParentList<Content: View>(_ content: () -> Content) -> some View {
#if os(macOS)
return List(content: content)
.toolbar {
ToolbarItem {
self.plusButton
}
}
// uncomment for 10.15
// return List {
// self.plusButton
// content()
// }
#elseif os(iOS)
return List(content: content)
.navigationBarItems(trailing: self.plusButton)
#endif
}
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
ParentList {
ForEach(children) { child in
NavigationLink(destination: ChildEditor(child: self.binding(for: child))) {
ChildView(child: child)
}
}
.onDelete { offsets in
self.children.remove(atOffsets: offsets)
}
}
}
}
}
My base assumption would be that Binding essentially stores a pointer, so on delete the pointer would become invalid and trigger a crash, and that editing the text field is triggering a view update of the parent view, invalidating the current content (this is backed up by Big Sur sometimes complaining that a state variable was modified during view update, even though it's properly only used to the init of a TextField). However, changing to use a class type and #ObservedObject/#EnvironmentObject (or #StateObject) delays the crash (on Catalina and iPadOS 13/14) to when any other navigation action is taken or has no effect (on Big Sur). Using the tag option in NavigationLink to dismiss the view if deleted also failed.
The first question is: what am I doing wrong? If the answer to that is "Everything", how should one manage an array of data in a top-level view and create bindings to members for nested subviews?
Related
I faced the problem when NavTestChildView called more one times. I don't understand what going wrong. I tested on a real device with iOS 16.0.3 and emulator Xcode 14.0.1
I replaced original code to give more info about the architecture why I create NavTestService into navigationDestination.
enum NavTestRoute: Hashable {
case child(Int)
}
class NavTestService: ObservableObject {
let num: Int
init(num: Int) {
self.num = num
print("[init][NavTestService]")
}
deinit {
print("[deinit][NavTestService]")
}
}
struct NavTestChildView: View {
#EnvironmentObject var service: NavTestService
init() {
print("[init][NavTestChildView]")
}
var body: some View {
Text("NavTestChildView \(service.num)")
}
}
struct NavTestMainView2: View {
var body: some View {
VStack {
ForEach(1..<10, id: \.self) { num in
NavigationLink(value: NavTestRoute.child(num)) {
Text("Open child \(num)")
}
}
}
}
}
struct NavTestMainView: View {
var body: some View {
NavigationStack {
NavTestMainView2()
.navigationDestination(for: NavTestRoute.self) { route in
switch route {
case let .child(num):
NavTestChildView().environmentObject(NavTestService(num: num))
}
}
}
}
}
logs:
[init][NavTestChildView]
[init][NavTestService]
[deinit][NavTestService]
[init][NavTestChildView]
[init][NavTestService]
Looks like there is a period when instance of NavTestService is not held by anyone and it leaves the heap. In practice this would hardly ever happen because .environmentObject vars are usually held somewhere up the hierarchy.
If you change NavTestMainView accordingly:
struct NavTestMainView: View {
let navTestService = NavTestService()
var body: some View {
NavigationStack {
NavigationLink(value: NavTestRoute.child) {
Text("Open child")
}
.navigationDestination(for: NavTestRoute.self) { route in
switch route {
case .child:
NavTestChildView().environmentObject(navTestService)
}
}
}
}
}
... you get no deinits and no extra init as well. The console will output:
[init()][NavTestService]
[init()][NavTestChildView]
[init()][NavTestChildView]
Also note that if you comment out let navTestService = NavTestService() and wrap NavTestChildView().environmentObject(NavTestService()) in LazyView you'll get the following output:
[init()][NavTestChildView]
[init()][NavTestService]
Where LazyView is:
struct LazyView<Content: View>: View {
let build: () -> Content
init(_ build: #autoclosure #escaping () -> Content) {
self.build = build
}
var body: Content {
build()
}
}
It's not "firing" it's just initing the View struct multiple times which is perfectly normal and practically zero overhead because View structs are value types. It tends to happen because UIKit's event driven design doesn't align well with SwiftUI's state driven design.
You can simplify your code by replacing the router enum / case statement with multiple navigationDestination for each model type.
I'm having trouble with what I think may be a bug, but most likely me doing something wrong.
I have a slightly complex navigation state variable in my model that I'm using for tracking/setting state between tab and sidebar presentations when multitasking on iPad. That all works fine except in tab mode, once I use a navigation link once I can't seem to use one again, whether the binding is on my tab view or navigation links in a list.
Would really appreciate any thoughts on this,
Cheers!
Example
NavigationItem.swift
enum SubNavigationItem: Hashable {
case overview, user, hobby
}
enum NavigationItem: Hashable {
case home(SubNavigationItem)
case settings
}
Model.swift
final class Model: ObservableObject {
#Published var selectedTab: NavigationItem = .home(.overview)
}
SwiftUIApp.swift
#main
struct SwiftUIApp: App {
#StateObject var model = Model()
var body: some Scene {
WindowGroup {
ContentView()
.environmentObject(model)
}
}
}
ContentView.swift
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
AppTabNavigation()
}
}
AppTabNavigation.swift
struct AppTabNavigation: View {
#EnvironmentObject private var model: Model
var body: some View {
TabView(selection: $model.selectedTab) {
NavigationView {
HomeView()
}
.tabItem {
Label("Home", systemImage: "house")
}
.tag(NavigationItem.home(.overview))
NavigationView {
Text("Settings View")
}
.tabItem {
Label("Settings", systemImage: "gear")
}
.tag(NavigationItem.settings)
}
}
}
HomeView.swift
I created a binding here because selection required an optional <NavigationItem?> not
struct HomeView: View {
#EnvironmentObject private var model: Model
var body: some View {
let binding = Binding<NavigationItem?>(
get: {
model.selectedTab
},
set: {
guard let item = $0 else { return }
model.selectedTab = item
}
)
List {
NavigationLink(
destination: Text("Users"),
tag: .home(.user),
selection: binding
) {
Text("Users")
}
NavigationLink(
destination: Text("Hobbies"),
tag: .home(.hobby),
selection: binding
) {
Text("Hobbies")
}
}
.navigationTitle("Home")
}
}
Second Attempt
I tried making the selectedTab property optional as #Lorem Ipsum suggested. Which means I can remove the binding there. But then the TabView doesn't work with the property. So I create a binding for that and have the same issue but with the tab bar!
Make the selected tab optional
#Published var selectedTab: NavigationItem? = .home(.overview)
And get rid of that makeshift binding variable. Just use the variable
$model.selectedTab
If the variable can never be nil then something is always selected IAW with that makeshift variable it will just keep the last value.
I have a simple watchOS 6.2.8 SwiftUI application in which I present a list of messages to the user.
These messages are modelled as classes and have a title, body and category name. I also have a Category object which is a view on these messages that only shows a specific category name.
I specifically mention watchOS 6.2.8 because it seems SwiftUI behaves a bit different there than on other platforms.
class Message: Identifiable {
let identifier: String
let date: Date
let title: String
let body: String
let category: String
var id: String {
identifier
}
init(identifier: String, date: Date, title: String, body: String, category: String) {
self.identifier = identifier
self.date = date
self.title = title
self.body = body
self.category = category
}
}
class Category: ObservableObject, Identifiable {
let name: String
#Published var messages: [Message] = []
var id: String {
name
}
init(name: String, messages: [Message] = []) {
self.name = name
self.messages = messages
}
}
Category itself is an #ObservableObject and publishes messages, so that when a category gets updated (like in the background), the view that is displaying the category message list will also update. (This works great)
To store these messages I have a simple MessageStore, which is an #ObservableObject that looks like this:
class MessageStore: ObservableObject {
#Published var messages: [Message] = []
#Published var categories: [Category] = []
static let sharedInstance = MessageStore()
func insert(message: Message) throws { ... mutage messages and categories ... }
func delete(message: Message) throws { ... mutage messages and categories ... }
}
(For simplicity I use a singleton, because there are problems with environment objects not being passed properly on watchOS)
The story keeps messages and categories in sync. When a new Message is added that has a category name set, it will also create or update a Category object in the categories list.
In my main view I present two things:
An All Messages NavigationLink that goes to a view to display all messages
For each Category I display a NavigationLink that goes to a view to display messages just in that specific category.
This all works, amazingly. But there is one really odd thing happening that I do not understand. (First SwiftUI project)
When I go into the All Messages list and delete all messages containing to a specific category, something unexpected happen when I navigate back to the main view.
First I observe that the category is properly removed from the list.
But then, the main view automatically quickly navigates to the All Messages list and then back.
The last part is driving me .. crazy .. I don't understand why this is happening. From a data perspective everyting looks good - the messages have been deleted and the category too. The final UI state, after the automagical navigation, also looks good - the message count for All Messages is correct and the category with now zero messages is not shown in the list anymore.
Here is the code for the main ContentView and also for the AllMessagesView. If helpful I can post the complete code here of course.
struct AllMessagesView: View {
#ObservedObject var messageStore = MessageStore.sharedInstance
#ViewBuilder
var body: some View {
if messageStore.messages.count == 0 {
Text("No messages").multilineTextAlignment(.center)
.navigationBarTitle("All Messages")
} else {
List {
ForEach(messageStore.messages) { message in
MessageCellView(message: message)
}.onDelete(perform: deleteMessages)
}
.navigationBarTitle("All Messages")
}
}
func deleteMessages(at offsets: IndexSet) {
for index in offsets {
do {
try messageStore.delete(message: messageStore.messages[index])
} catch {
NSLog("Failed to delete message: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
}
}
}
//
struct CategoryMessagesView: View {
#ObservedObject var messageStore = MessageStore.sharedInstance
#ObservedObject var category: Category
var body: some View {
Group {
if category.messages.count == 0 {
Text("No messages in category “\(category.name)”").multilineTextAlignment(.center)
} else {
List {
ForEach(category.messages) { message in
MessageCellView(message: message)
}.onDelete(perform: deleteMessages)
}
}
}.navigationBarTitle(category.name)
}
func deleteMessages(at offsets: IndexSet) {
for index in offsets {
do {
try messageStore.delete(message: category.messages[index])
} catch {
NSLog("Cannot delete message: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
}
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
#ObservedObject var messageStore = MessageStore.sharedInstance
var body: some View {
List {
Section {
NavigationLink(destination: AllMessagesView()) {
HStack {
Image(systemName: "tray.2")
Text("All Messages")
Spacer()
Text("\(messageStore.messages.count)")
.font(messageCountFont())
.bold()
.layoutPriority(1)
.foregroundColor(.green)
}
}
}
Section {
Group {
if messageStore.categories.count > 0 {
Section {
ForEach(messageStore.categories) { category in
NavigationLink(destination: CategoryMessagesView(category: category)) {
HStack {
Image(systemName: "tray") // .foregroundColor(.green)
Text("\(category.name)").lineLimit(1).truncationMode(.tail)
Spacer()
Text("\(category.messages.count)")
.font(self.messageCountFont())
.bold()
.layoutPriority(1)
.foregroundColor(.green)
}
}
}
}
} else {
EmptyView()
}
}
}
}
}
// TODO This is pretty inefficient
func messageCountFont() -> Font {
let font = UIFont.preferredFont(forTextStyle: .caption1)
return Font(font.withSize(font.pointSize * 0.75))
}
}
Apologies, I know this is a lot of code, but I feel I need to give enough context and visibility to show what is going on here.
Full project at https://github.com/st3fan/LearningSwiftUI/tree/master/MasterDetail - I don't think more code is relevant, but if it is, let me know and I'll move it into the question here.
The problem is in updated ForEach which result in recreating List and thus breaks link. This looks like SwiftUI defect, so worth submitting feedback to Apple.
The tested workaround is to move All Messages navigation link out of list (looks a bit different but might be appropriate). Tested with Xcode 12 / watchOS 7.0
struct ContentView: View {
#ObservedObject var messageStore = MessageStore.sharedInstance
var body: some View {
VStack {
NavigationLink(destination: AllMessagesView()) {
HStack {
Image(systemName: "tray.2")
Text("All Messages")
Spacer()
Text("\(messageStore.messages.count)")
.font(messageCountFont())
.bold()
.layoutPriority(1)
.foregroundColor(.green)
}
}
List {
ForEach(messageStore.categories) { category in
NavigationLink(destination: CategoryMessagesView(category: category)) {
HStack {
Image(systemName: "tray") // .foregroundColor(.green)
Text("\(category.name)").lineLimit(1).truncationMode(.tail)
Spacer()
Text("\(category.messages.count)")
.font(self.messageCountFont())
.bold()
.layoutPriority(1)
.foregroundColor(.green)
}
}
}
}
}
}
// ... other code
I've been writing my first SwiftUI application, which manages a book collection. It has a List of around 3,000 items, which loads and scrolls pretty efficiently. If use a toggle control to filter the list to show only the books I don't have the UI freezes for twenty to thirty seconds before updating, presumably because the UI thread is busy deciding whether to show each of the 3,000 cells or not.
Is there a good way to do handle updates to big lists like this in SwiftUI?
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
Toggle(isOn: $userData.showWantsOnly) {
Text("Show wants")
}
ForEach(userData.bookList) { book in
if !self.userData.showWantsOnly || !book.own {
NavigationLink(destination: BookDetail(book: book)) {
BookRow(book: book)
}
}
}
}
}.navigationBarTitle(Text("Books"))
}
Have you tried passing a filtered array to the ForEach. Something like this:
ForEach(userData.bookList.filter { return !$0.own }) { book in
NavigationLink(destination: BookDetail(book: book)) { BookRow(book: book) }
}
Update
As it turns out, it is indeed an ugly, ugly bug:
Instead of filtering the array, I just remove the ForEach all together when the switch is flipped, and replace it by a simple Text("Nothing") view. The result is the same, it takes 30 secs to do so!
struct SwiftUIView: View {
#EnvironmentObject var userData: UserData
#State private var show = false
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
Toggle(isOn: $userData.showWantsOnly) {
Text("Show wants")
}
if self.userData.showWantsOnly {
Text("Nothing")
} else {
ForEach(userData.bookList) { book in
NavigationLink(destination: BookDetail(book: book)) {
BookRow(book: book)
}
}
}
}
}.navigationBarTitle(Text("Books"))
}
}
Workaround
I did find a workaround that works fast, but it requires some code refactoring. The "magic" happens by encapsulation. The workaround forces SwiftUI to discard the List completely, instead of removing one row at a time. It does so by using two separate lists in two separate encapsualted views: Filtered and NotFiltered. Below is a full demo with 3000 rows.
import SwiftUI
class UserData: ObservableObject {
#Published var showWantsOnly = false
#Published var bookList: [Book] = []
init() {
for _ in 0..<3001 {
bookList.append(Book())
}
}
}
struct SwiftUIView: View {
#EnvironmentObject var userData: UserData
#State private var show = false
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
VStack {
Toggle(isOn: $userData.showWantsOnly) {
Text("Show wants")
}
if userData.showWantsOnly {
Filtered()
} else {
NotFiltered()
}
}
}.navigationBarTitle(Text("Books"))
}
}
struct Filtered: View {
#EnvironmentObject var userData: UserData
var body: some View {
List(userData.bookList.filter { $0.own }) { book in
NavigationLink(destination: BookDetail(book: book)) {
BookRow(book: book)
}
}
}
}
struct NotFiltered: View {
#EnvironmentObject var userData: UserData
var body: some View {
List(userData.bookList) { book in
NavigationLink(destination: BookDetail(book: book)) {
BookRow(book: book)
}
}
}
}
struct Book: Identifiable {
let id = UUID()
let own = Bool.random()
}
struct BookRow: View {
let book: Book
var body: some View {
Text("\(String(book.own)) \(book.id)")
}
}
struct BookDetail: View {
let book: Book
var body: some View {
Text("Detail for \(book.id)")
}
}
Check this article https://www.hackingwithswift.com/articles/210/how-to-fix-slow-list-updates-in-swiftui
In short the solution proposed in this article is to add .id(UUID()) to the list:
List(items, id: \.self) {
Text("Item \($0)")
}
.id(UUID())
"Now, there is a downside to using id() like this: you won't get your update animated. Remember, we're effectively telling SwiftUI the old list has gone away and there's a new list now, which means it won't try to move rows around in an animated way."
I think we have to wait until SwiftUI List performance improves in subsequent beta releases. I’ve experienced the same lag when lists are filtered from a very large array (500+) down to very small ones. I created a simple test app to time the layout for a simple array with integer IDs and strings with Buttons to simply change which array is being rendered - same lag.
Instead of a complicated workaround, just empty the List array and then set the new filters array. It may be necessary to introduce a delay so that emptying the listArray won't be omitted by the followed write.
List(listArray){item in
...
}
self.listArray = []
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + .milliseconds(100)) {
self.listArray = newList
}
Looking for how to adapt Seitenwerk's response to my solution, I found a Binding extension that helped me a lot. Here is the code:
struct ContactsView: View {
#State var stext : String = ""
#State var users : [MockUser] = []
#State var filtered : [MockUser] = []
var body: some View {
Form{
SearchBar(text: $stext.didSet(execute: { (response) in
if response != "" {
self.filtered = []
self.filtered = self.users.filter{$0.name.lowercased().hasPrefix(response.lowercased()) || response == ""}
}
else {
self.filtered = self.users
}
}), placeholder: "Buscar Contactos")
List{
ForEach(filtered, id: \.id){ user in
NavigationLink(destination: LazyView( DetailView(user: user) )) {
ContactCell(user: user)
}
}
}
}
.onAppear {
self.users = LoadUserData()
self.filtered = self.users
}
}
}
This is the Binding extension:
extension Binding {
/// Execute block when value is changed.
///
/// Example:
///
/// Slider(value: $amount.didSet { print($0) }, in: 0...10)
func didSet(execute: #escaping (Value) ->Void) -> Binding {
return Binding(
get: {
return self.wrappedValue
},
set: {
execute($0)
self.wrappedValue = $0
}
)
}
}
The LazyView is optional, but I took the trouble to show it, as it helps a lot in the performance of the list, and prevents swiftUI from creating the NavigationLink target content of the whole list.
struct LazyView<Content: View>: View {
let build: () -> Content
init(_ build: #autoclosure #escaping () -> Content) {
self.build = build
}
var body: Content {
build()
}
}
This code will work correctly provided that you initialize your class in the 'SceneDelegate' file as follows:
class SceneDelegate: UIResponder, UIWindowSceneDelegate {
var window: UIWindow?
var userData = UserData()
func scene(_ scene: UIScene, willConnectTo session: UISceneSession, options connectionOptions: UIScene.ConnectionOptions) {
// Use this method to optionally configure and attach the UIWindow `window` to the provided UIWindowScene `scene`.
// If using a storyboard, the `window` property will automatically be initialized and attached to the scene.
// This delegate does not imply the connecting scene or session are new (see `application:configurationForConnectingSceneSession` instead).
// Create the SwiftUI view that provides the window contents.
let contentView = ContentView()
// Use a UIHostingController as window root view controller.
if let windowScene = scene as? UIWindowScene {
let window = UIWindow(windowScene: windowScene)
window.rootViewController = UIHostingController(rootView:
contentView
.environmentObject(userData)
)
self.window = window
window.makeKeyAndVisible()
}
}
So I tried to put a print statement while debugging in a SwiftUI View.
print("landmark: \(landmark)")
In the following body.
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
Toggle(isOn: $userData.showFavoritesOnly) {
Text("Favorite only")
}
ForEach(landmarkData) { landmark in
print("landmark: \(landmark)")
if !self.userData.showFavoritesOnly || landmark.isFavorite {
NavigationButton(destination: LandmarkDetail(landmark: landmark)) {
LandmarkRow(landmark: landmark)
}
}
}
}
.navigationBarTitle(Text("Landmarks"))
}
}
Compiler errors out:
So, what is the proper way to print to console in SwiftUI?
EDIT:
I made Landmark conform to CustomStringConvertible:
struct Landmark: Hashable, Codable, Identifiable, CustomStringConvertible {
var description: String { name+"\(id)" }
var id: Int
var name: String
.....
I still get the "String is not convertible to any" error. Should it work now?
You can easily add a print statement anywhere in a function builder by simply storing its return value in a wildcard, effectively ignoring it:
let _ = print("hi!")
No setup or other verbosity needed!
Why does this work while a regular print() doesn't?
The way SwiftUI's #ViewBuilder (and result builders in general) is that they consume any values in a closure that aren't used otherwise (e.g. if you just have 42 on its own line). The print function returns Void (nothing), which the builder would have to build into a view, so it fails. By instead assigning it to a variable (in this case _, basically a variable that you can never access), the Void is never offered to the view builder in the first place.
You could argue the builder should simply accept and ignore Void values, but the idea is that your builder closures should not have side effects (I'd remove print statements after finishing debugging too)—you should not rely on these closures being called at certain times.
Here's a helper Print( ... ) View that acts like a print( ... ) function but within a View
Put this in any of your view files
extension View {
func Print(_ vars: Any...) -> some View {
for v in vars { print(v) }
return EmptyView()
}
}
and use inside of body like so
Print("Here I am", varOne, varTwo ...)
or inside a ForEach {} like so
self.Print("Inside ForEach", varOne, varTwo ...)
Note: you might need to put Print() into a Group {} when combining with existing views
Try right-clicking on the live preview play button and selecting 'Debug Preview from the popup
You can print in the body structure but to do so you have to explicitly return the view you want to render. The body property inside a View is just a computed property like any other in Swift that implicitly returns the view. And just like any other computed property, you can perform operations inside the computed property as long as a value is explicitly returned. For example, this will throw an error when you try to print because there is no explicit return:
struct SomeView: View {
#State var isOpen = false
var body: some View {
print(isOpen) // error thrown here
VStack {
// other view code
}
}
}
But if we explicitly return the view we want then it will work e.g.
struct SomeView: View {
#State var isOpen = false
var body: some View {
print(isOpen) // this ok because we explicitly returned the view below
// Notice the added 'return' below
return VStack {
// other view code
}
}
}
The above will work well if you're looking to view how state or environment objects are changing before returning your view, but if you want to print something deeper down within the view you are trying to return, then I would go with #Rok Krulec answer.
It is possible to use print() remembering that all SwiftUI View content are (a) implicit closures and (b) it is highly recommended to decompose views as much as possible to have simple structure, so it might look like the following...
struct Model: Identifiable {
let value: String
var id: String {
value
}
init (_ value: String) {
self.value = value
}
}
struct TestView: View {
#State var showFavoritesOnly = false
#State var listData: [Model] = [Model("one"), Model("two"), Model("three")]
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
Toggle(isOn: $showFavoritesOnly) {
Text("Favorite only")
}
ForEach(listData) { data in
self.rowView(data: data)
}
}
}
}
private func rowView(data: Model) -> some View {
#if DEBUG
print(">> \(data.value)")
#endif
return NavigationLink(destination: Text("Details")) {
Text("Go next from \(data.value)")
}
}
}
... and right clicking in Preview to select run as Debug Preview we get:
2019-10-31 14:28:03.467635+0200 Test[65344:11155167] [Agent] Received connection, creating agent
2019-10-31 14:28:04.472314+0200 Test[65344:11155168] [Agent] Received display message
>> one
>> two
>> three
You can declare a printing() method that includes print() and returns EmptyView struct.
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var offset = CGSize.zero
func printing(_ items: Any...) -> some View {
let _ = print(items)
return EmptyView()
}
var body: some View {
#if DEBUG
printing(offset) // prints [(0.0, 0.0)]
#endif
ZStack {
Text("Hello")
}
}
}
The safest and easiest way to print while debugging in a SwiftUI View.
extension View {
func Print(_ item: Any) -> some View {
#if DEBUG
print(item)
#endif
return self
}
}
Usage Example:
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
VStack {
ForEach((1...5), id: \.self) { number in
Text("\(number)")
.Print(number)
}
}
}
}
Console output:
1
2
3
4
5
It can be generalized to:
extension View {
func Perform(_ block: () -> Void) -> some View {
block()
return EmptyView()
}
}
So in your example:
ForEach(landmarkData) { landmark in
Perform { print("landmark: \(landmark)") }
if !self.userData.showFavoritesOnly || landmark.isFavorite {
NavigationButton(destination: LandmarkDetail(landmark: landmark)) {
LandmarkRow(landmark: landmark)
}
}
}
Here you go. It will just work like simple print but inside a view.
func printv( _ data : Any)-> EmptyView{
print(data)
return EmptyView()
}
and use it like that
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
VStack() {
Text("hello To SwiftUI")
printv("its easy to code in SwiftUI")
Text("And Good to have you here")
}
}
}
The following extension on View is as intuitive as print because it's made to replicate the default print(_:separator:terminator:) function signature & behavior.
extension View {
func printUI(_ args: Any..., separator: String = " ", terminator: String = "\n") -> EmptyView {
let output = args.map(String.init(describing:)).joined(separator: separator)
print(output, terminator: terminator)
return EmptyView()
}
}
Usage Example:
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
VStack {
printUI("ContentView", "1")
printUI("ContentView", "2", separator: ", ", terminator: "\n.\n.\n")
printUI("ContentView", "3", separator: "; ")
Text("Hello, World!")
}
}
}
Console Output:
ContentView 1
ContentView, 2
.
.
ContentView; 3
EDIT: Debug Preview is no longer supported in the latest versions of Xcode.
Very easy way to debug your Preview:
Open your Swift project in Xcode 11.
Right-click (or Control-click) on the Live Preview button in the bottom right corner of the preview.
Select Debug Preview.
How to debug your SwiftUI previews in Xcode
// Try this, add a 'return' on a view then the 'print' can stay alive in.
struct ContentView: View {
var num: Int = 1
var body: some View {
print(num)
return Text("hello")
}
}
You can't because you're in a computed property. You need for example a button and in the action you define the print. Or work with breakpoints
You can not print in body structure i.e. a structure which is some view type.For print you need to make function out of body structure and call it using button or something else.
This should work
if true {
print(aVar, "xx")
}
return ZStack {
...
}