I'm currently using Windows 10, MSVC v142 (with VS2019) and wxWidgets 3.1.3. I have an old Windows C++ application that uses WinAPI for its GUI features, i.e Windows message loop, using "CreateWindow", and having to "manually" create all window procedures and event handling.
I want to improve this application by gradually replacing the UI using wxWidgets so I don't have to start over from scratch. I would implement new, independent UI features in wxWidgets (e.g specific dialogs), and then work my way back and replace all the old UI code with a wxWidgets implementation, without having to break the app along the way.
Below is a skeleton of how my app is currently set up:
LRESULT CALLBACK MainWndProc(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
// Handling window messages, e.g menus, buttons, etc.
}
int __stdcall WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, char* lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow)
{
// Initialize resources, register main window class using MainWndProc, etc.
// ...
HWND mainwnd = CreateWindow(/* CreateWindow args... */);
do
{
MSG msg = {};
while (PeekMessage(&msg, nullptr, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE))
{
TranslateMessage(&msg);
DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
// Per-frame application logic
// ...
} while (msg.message != WM_QUIT);
// Clean up resources
// ...
return 0;
}
How would I need to modify this so that all the WinAPI objects continue to function, but I can now also create windows using wxWidgets? I previously tried replacing the message loop above by initializing wxWidgets through a custom class derived from wxApp, but my application kept crashing during the cleanup code (which it sometimes wouldn't even reach).
EDIT: I managed to make it work, updated skeleton can be found below.
// Main WinAPI window procedure
LRESULT CALLBACK MainWndProc(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (uMsg)
{
// Code to handle other messages
// ...
case WM_CLOSE:
// Closing this window should shut down the app
PostQuitMessage(0);
break;
}
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
}
class MyApp : public wxApp
{
public:
virtual bool OnInit() override
{
if(!Old_Init())
{
// Perform cleanup in case something goes wrong
Old_Exit();
return false;
}
// Wrap the WinAPI window in a dummy wxWindow
m_dummyMainWindow = new wxWindow();
m_dummyMainWindow->SetHWND(m_mainWnd);
return true;
}
int OnExit() override
{
// Unset the dummy window HWND and delete it (is this necessary?)
m_dummyMainWindow->SetHWND(NULL);
delete m_dummyMainWindow;
// Clean up everything else
return Old_Exit();
}
private:
bool Old_Init()
{
// Perform the old initialization
// ...
m_mainWnd = CreateWindow(/* CreateWindow args... */);
if(m_mainWnd)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
int Old_Exit()
{
// Perform the old cleanup (previously done after exiting the Windows message loop)
// ...
return 0;
}
HWND m_mainWnd;
wxWindow* m_dummyMainWindow;
};
wxIMPLEMENT_APP_NO_MAIN(MyApp);
// App entrypoint
int __stdcall WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, char* lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow)
{
if (wxEntry())
{
// Exit if something goes wrong (this might not be the correct way to do it?)
wxExit();
}
return 0;
}
This does seem to function, all the old UI elements are working as before, but I am not 100% sure this is a stable solution. My debugger is warning me about memory leaks, which appear to increase in number when I activate UI elements (e.g open and close dialogs). I suspect WinAPI resources might not be cleaned up correctly. Am I missing anything?
EDIT2: I did some more debugging, and the code in my original app (i.e without wxWidgets) causes those "memory leaks" as well, and I can't replicate it in a minimal working example, so I suspect the issue is not related to wxWidgets at all. I am therefore confident that the approach described above should solve my problem, but I would not mind a second opinion.
I recommend looking at the MFC sample to see a working example of something close to what you want to do. MFC is, of course, not quite the same as Win32 API, but it should still be a good starting point.
Notably it shows how to pass the messages to wx event loop when you're running your own one (this part is in wxMFCApp class in include/wx/msw/mfc.h). Of course, if you can switch to running wx event loop, it would be even simpler.
You may also find it helpful to know that you can wrapp HWNDs you create into wxWindows using AssociateHandle() and handle their messages by overriding MSWHandleMessage() or even just using wxNativeWindow directly.
Good luck!
Related
I've been looking at creating a custom control with WinApi for my application, and I have made a class which contains the CustomDialogProc and CreateWindowEx and RegisterClass() functions.
I can set a breakpoint inside the CustomDialogProc and it hits, so the class is registered correctly.
However, I have to declare the CustomDialogProc function as static int he header of my class
static LRESULT CALLBACK CustomDialogProc(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam,LPARAM lParam);
If I don't set it to static, I get the error
Error C3867 'CustomControl::CustomDialogProc': non-standard syntax; use '&' to create a pointer to member
IS this necessary, this requires all my controls created within this control to be static as well. What if I want multiple instances of this control?
How can I get around this? The main MsgProc doesn't seem to be a static function. Neither is the UpDownDialogProc in the first link shown below
Below is my code for CustomControl.h in case anyone needs it.
Put together from code found at:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh298353(v=vs.85).aspx
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/485767/True-Windows-control-subclassing
Thanks,
#pragma once
#include <windows.h>
#include <commctrl.h>
#pragma comment(lib, "comctl32.lib")
class CustomControl
{
public:
CustomControl();
~CustomControl();
LRESULT CALLBACK CustomDialogProc(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam,LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_CREATE:
//DO STUFF HERE
break;
}
}
bool CreateControl(HWND hwnd, HINSTANCE* m_hApp_instance)
{
g_hInst = m_hApp_instance;
RegisterSubClass(*g_hInst, WC_LISTBOX, TEXT("CustomControl"), CustomDialogProc);
HWND hwndCustom = CreateWindow(TEXT("CustomControl"), NULL, WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE,
0, 0, 0, 0, hwnd, (HMENU)100, *g_hInst, NULL);
return true;
}
private:
HINSTANCE* g_hInst;
WNDPROC RegisterSubClass(HINSTANCE hInstance, LPCTSTR ParentClass, LPCTSTR ChildClassName, WNDPROC ChildProc) {
WNDCLASSEX twoWayStruct;
WNDPROC parentWndProc;
if (GetClassInfoEx(NULL, ParentClass, &twoWayStruct)) {
parentWndProc = twoWayStruct.lpfnWndProc; // save the original message handler
twoWayStruct.cbSize = sizeof(WNDCLASSEX); // does not always get filled properly
twoWayStruct.hInstance = hInstance;
twoWayStruct.lpszClassName = ChildClassName;
twoWayStruct.lpfnWndProc = ChildProc;
/* Register the window class, and if it fails return 0 */
if (RegisterClassEx(&twoWayStruct))
return parentWndProc; // returns the parent class WndProc pointer;
// subclass MUST call it instead of DefWindowProc();
// if you do not save it, this function is wasted
}
return 0;
}
};
The most common way is to use SetWindowLongPtr to store a pointer to the object associated with the window handle.
HWND hWnd = CreateWindow(...);
SetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWLP_USERDATA, (LONG_PTR) this);
And then in your dialog proc, get that pointer and call into your class:
// this static method is registered with your window class
static LRESULT CALLBACK CustomDialogProcStatic(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam,LPARAM lParam)
{
auto pThis = (CustomControl*) GetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWLP_USERDATA);
if (pThis != NULL)
return pThis->CustomDialogProcInstance(hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
return DefWindowProc(hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam);
}
// this instance method is called by the static method
LRESULT CustomDialogProcInstance(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
...
}
Make sure you manage your window and class life cycle appropriately to prevent the window proc from calling a deleted object instance. In many cases, this is as simple as ensuring DestroyWindow is called if your class is destructed.
The Windows API is C language based. It knows nothing about C++, non-static member functions, objects, etc.
So yes, all of your functions that will communicate with the Windows API directly must be static class member functions, or non-class / global / "free" functions.
That doesn't preclude you from writing a C++ wrapper for a C API. That's what libraries such as Microsoft's MFC or the old Borland OWL libraries accomplish. Other independent groups have also written wrappers for the Windows API.
Note that these differing libraries accomplish the goal of hooking a C based API to C++ in different ways. One is to use the SetWindowLongPtr method mentioned in the answer given by #MichaelGunter. Another method is to use maps to associate window handles and static Window procedures.
I would suggest before you try this on your own (creating a wrapper), you investigate how others have done this already, and choose the best approach that fits. Another suggestion is that before you even create a wrapper, you should know the C based API on much more than a cursory level. You need advanced to expert knowledge of any C API you plan to create a C++ wrapper for if you want the wrapper to work relatively flawless under different scenarios.
I am writing a test automation program, that must interact with a grid control in a legacy MFC application. My program must connect to the legacy app, and read the data from the grid.
I know the HWND of the window that contains the grid, and so now I need to find the CWnd-derived class pointer associated with that HWND. CWnd::FromHandlePermanent seems to be my friend, but yes, I know, you cannot call CWnd::FromHandlePermanent from outside the application, as the AFX window map (afxMapHWND()) is only contained in the target application.
Therefore, I inject a DLL (using CreateRemoteThread/LoadLibrary) into the target app, and get it to call FromHandlePermanent. But even this is not good enough, because I am not in the thread of the HWND, and afxMapHWND() is looking at the wrong local thread storage.
Therefore, in my injected DLL, I also (temporarily) subclass the WndProc of the HWND (SetWindowLong etc), then call SendMessage. Now I am in the correct thread (the main thread of the target application) and I try to call CWnd::FromHandlePermanent with my HWND, but it returns NULL!!
If I look at afxMapHWND()->m_permanentMap->m_nCount, we see it is 0. So there are NO attached classes in the permanentMap, which seems wrong to me.
So how can I get the derived CWnd pointer??
Some other info:
The Target application is statically linked to MFC
It's a different version of MFC, the windowclass is AfxWnd70s
I am using VS2010 to compile the injected DLL
The injected DLL also links statically to the (VS2010) MFC libraries.
Here is the code in the injected DLL:
// this is how we pass the HWND to the target DLL
// (this shared segment is also loaded in calling app)
#pragma data_seg (".shared")
__declspec(dllexport) HWND g_hWnd = 0;
#pragma data_seg ()
#pragma comment(linker,"/SECTION:.shared,RWS")
BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CLibSpyMFCDllApp, CWinApp)
END_MESSAGE_MAP()
CLibSpyMFCDllApp::CLibSpyMFCDllApp()
{
}
CLibSpyMFCDllApp theApp;
extern CHandleMap* PASCAL afxMapHWND(BOOL bCreate = FALSE);
UINT g_WM_GETGRIDDATA = 0;
WNDPROC wpOrigEditProc;
LRESULT CALLBACK SpySubProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
if (g_WM_GETGRIDDATA != 0 && message == g_WM_GETGRIDDATA) {
CWnd * target1 = CWnd::FromHandlePermanent(hWnd);
// fails - target1 is null
return 0;
}
return CallWindowProc((WNDPROC ) wpOrigEditProc, hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
BOOL CLibSpyMFCDllApp::InitInstance()
{
CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED);
CWinApp::InitInstance();
if (g_hWnd) {
g_WM_GETGRIDDATA = RegisterWindowMessage(L"GetGridData");
wpOrigEditProc = (WNDPROC) SetWindowLong(g_hWnd, GWL_WNDPROC, (LONG) SpySubProc);
::SendMessage(g_hWnd, g_WM_GETGRIDDATA, 0, 0);
SetWindowLong(g_hWnd, GWL_WNDPROC, (LONG) wpOrigEditProc);
}
return TRUE;
}
I wrote an application. There is a class named APP, with handle to the window, and message loop inside it, and all this stuff.
It is intended to "run" some objects of this class, each with its own window based on a set of variables necessary for a standard window.
Message loop is allowed for public use, it is ran by RunMessageLoop method.
int nCmdShow - of course, it is used to tell how to display a window.
Now, when i create some objects like this:
vector <APP *> App;
for (int i=0; i<3; i++)
{
App.push_back(&APP(nCmdShow))
App[i]->RunMessageLoop();
}
program waits for each message loop to end before it starts another.
I figured out to make it this way:
vector <APP *> App;
for (int i=0; i<3; i++)
{
App.push_back(&APP(nCmdShow))
}
for (int i=0; i<3; i++)
{
App[i]->RunMessageLoop();
}
When i know how many windows I want at startup to be run, it seems to be ok.
But I don't know how to create new windows dynamically, with complete independence of other windows. It should invoke message loops and immediately return to WinMain() without ending message loops.
I thought about multi-threaded app, each thread per one instance of an APP class. But don't know how to build multithreaded app, though.
Any ideas for a possible solution?
I see what you are trying to do now, I have achieved this in my application framework called Lucid (it is still a work in progress). For the sake of the answer, your window class will be called Window instead of APP.
This is done by passing a global procedure to every window you create. All windows share this same procedure. Every time any window gets a message, that message is sent to the global procedure, the global procedure checks if the HWND belongs to a Window that you created, and if it does, sends the message to that Windows' procedure. Here's an overview of how this works.
class Window
{
public:
// The contents of this function can vary from window to window
// provided that you make a subclass and override this method.
virtual LRESULT procedure(HWND wnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wp, LPARAM lp);
// When you create a Window object, add a pointer to it in this map.
// Eg. if (this->hwnd != NULL) createdWindows[this->hwnd] = this;
static map<HWND, Window*> createdWindows;
// When you create a window, make this its procedure.
static LRESULT CALLBACK routeMessage(HWND wnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wp, LPARAM lp)
{
if (createdWindows.find(wnd) != createdWindows.end()) {
// Message belongs to one of our 'Window' objects.
// Pass the message to that window and return the result.
return createdWindows[wnd]->procedure(wnd, msg, wp, lp);
} else {
// It seems you made 'routeMessage' the procedure
// of a window that doesn't belong in the map. Go ahead
// and process the message in the default manner.
return DefWindowProc(wnd, msg, wp, lp);
}
}
};
Now you will only need a single message loop and a single thread. I have a test project using Lucid that creates 2 windows with different procedures on a single thread with a single message loop:
#include "Lucid.h"
using namespace Lucid;
void sayBye(MessageEventArgs& e)
{
MessageBox(NULL, "Goodbye!", "Form 2", MB_OK);
e.handled = true;
}
void Program::onStart()
{
Form* myForm1 = new Form("Hello World!");
myForm1->show();
Form* myForm2 = new Form("Hello World!");
myForm2->addMessageHandler(WM_CLOSE, sayBye);
myForm2->show();
// This Program::onStart() function is called
// immediately before the single message loop is entered.
}
Create the threads with _beginthreadex equal to the number of window you need to run. Then, run message loop in the thread procedure and wait until all thread has been terminated with WaitForMultipleObjects.
I think I've fallen in the same trap as many before me where I try to impose a nice OO methodology on win32 API programming. No MFC, no AFX, I'm not even using VC++, I'm using C::B with gcc.
I think what I'm trying to do is impossible, but since MFC exists (although I'm not using it) there must be some way.
I've created a class to contain several window controls. It implements handlers for WM_CREATE and WM_COMMAND, and keeps track of all the associated data around my small group of controls (ID codes and HWNDs).
It works great for buttons, static controls, even light GDI methods, but it all breaks down when I try to subclass an edit control.
Really, I just want to capture the "enter" key, but as anybody who's been down that road before will attest, when an edit control has focus, the parent window doesn't receive WM_KEYDOWN or WM_COMMAND, we are left to implement our own proc. Super lame.
OK, so subclassing an edit control is fine, if the editProc is global or static. I know that is because SetWindowLongPtr needs a function address, and that concept is nebulous for a member function.
So the object of my class is declared as "static" inside the parent WndProc. But the function is not "static" because then I wouldn't have access to non-static data members (completely defeating the purpose of this exercise). I'm hoping that because the objest is itself static, I should be able to properly define the address of one of its member functions.
Readers that have tried this before will either have given up and used MFC or something else, or perhaps have found a clever work-around.
I'll let this sample code do the rest of the talking: (simplified - will not compile as such)
/**** myprogram.c ****/
#include "MyControlGroup.h"
int winMain(){ // etc... }
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
// object is static becuse it only needs to be initialized once
static MyControlGroup myControl;
if (msg == WM_CREATE)
myControl.onWMCreate(hWnd);
else if (msg == WM_COMMAND)
myControl.onWMCommand( wParam, lParam );
else if (msg == WM_DESTROY)
PostQuitMessage(0);
return DefWindowProcW(l_hWnd, l_msg, l_wParam, l_lParam);
}
The header file for my class:
/**** MyControlGroup.h ****/
class MyControlGroup
{
private:
HWND m_hWndParent;
HWND m_hWndEditBox;
int m_editBoxID;
public:
MyControlGroup();
void onWMCreate(HWND);
void onWMCommand(WPARAM, LPARAM);
// want to find a way to pass the address of this function to SetWindowLongPtr
LRESULT myEditProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam);
};
...and the implementation:
/**** MyControlGroup.cpp ****/
static int staticID = 1;
MyControlGroup::MyControlGroup()
{
m_editBoxID = staticID++;
}
void MyControlGroup::onWMCreate(HWND hWnd)
{
// My control group has buttons, static controls, and other stuff which are created here with CreateWindowW. It also has an edit control:
m_hWndEditBox = CreateWindowW(L"EDIT", L"initial text", WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_BORDER, 10, 10, 150, 20, hWnd, (HMENU)m_editBoxID, NULL, NULL);
/*
To subclass the edit control, I need a pointer to my customized proc. That means I
need a pointer-to-member-function, but SetWindowLongPtr needs a pointer to global or
static function (__stdcall or CALLBACK, but not __thiscall).
*/
// I'd like to do something like this, adapted from a great write-up at
// http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/7150/Member-Function-Pointers-and-the-Fastest-Possible
LERSULT (MyControlGroup::*myEditProcPtr)(HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
myEditProcPtr = &MyControlGroup::myEditProc;
// Up to now it compiles ok, but then when I try to pass it to SetWindowLongPtr, I get
// an "invalid cast" error. Any ideas?
SetWindowLongPtr(m_hWndEditBox, GWLP_WNDPROC, (LPARAM)myEditProcPtr);
}
void MyControlGroup::onWMCommand(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam){ /* process parent window messages. Editboxes don't generate WM_COMMAND or WM_KEYDOWN in the parent :''( */}
LRESULT MyControlGroup::myEditProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
// process messages like IDOK, WM_KEYDOWN and so on in the edit control
}
Even once I get this done, I'll still need to figure out a way to pass the address of the parent WndProc to myEditProc for the return value, but until I get past this there is no point in worrying about that.
Thanks in advance for reading!
myEditProc needs to be a static function.
Once you've done that you can pass the address of the function directly without going through the intermediate variable:
static LRESULT myEditProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam);
...
SetWindowLongPtr(m_hWndEditBox, GWLP_WNDPROC, (LPARAM)myEditProc);
To access your class data from the static function, you can save it in the userdata field of the edit control, e.g.:
// before sub-classing the control
SetWindowLongPtr(m_hWndEditBox, GWLP_USERDATA, (LPARAM)this);
// in the sub-class procedure
MyControlGroup* pThis = (MyControlGroup*)GetWindowLongPtr(m_hWndEditBox, GWLP_USERDATA);
But as #K-ballo suggested, SetWindowSubclass is definitely the way to do this unless you want compatibility with pre-XP. It handles the sub-classing procedure for you automatically, lets you associate a userdata pointer (e.g. this) that is automatically passed to the sub-class procedure, and safely handles removing the sub-class at the end.
So I'm writing some wrapper classes for GUI programming in Win32. I'm starting with a Window class, and so far it contains a MainLoop method that is basically a clone of the standard Win32 WinMain function. That way, one can do something like this:
int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE hInst, HINSTANCE hPrev, LPSTR szCmdLine, int nCmdShow) {
Window *win = new Window();
// Do all your widget creation and add it to the window object...
return win->MainLoop(hInst, hPrev, szCmdLine, nCmdShow);
}
Inside the window object's MainLoop method, it must create the new Win32 window by setting its lpfnWndProc member. This member, as any Win32 programmer knows, is a function pointer to a specifically defined WndProc function. The problem is, if I were to create a WndProc function, I would need access to that window object's members (so that it knew what to draw on the window, etc.). This leaves me two options (that I know of):
I can define WndProc at the top level, but that cuts off access to the object's members.
I can define it as a class method, but then it's not the exact function type that lpfnWndProc asks for, so I can't set it!
Can anyone help me unravel this catch-22?
You could also make it a static member function. :)
Anyways, a solution depends on if you need only one window or if you need multiple windows.
First a solution for single windows:
// in .h
class Window{
public:
static LRESULT WINAPI MessageProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam);
LRESULT InternalMessageProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam);
// ...
};
// in .cpp
#include "Window.h"
Window* global_window = 0;
Window::Window(/*...*/){
if(!global_window)
global_window = this;
else
// error or exception... or something else
}
LRESULT WINAPI Window::MessageProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam){
return global_window->InternalMessageProc(hWnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
Now if you want to allow multiple windows, use a std::map (or if your compiler supports std::unordered_map).
Edit: This solution comes with some subtle problems. As #Ben Voigt points out in his comment, you get a chicken and egg problem as the MessageProc is called inside of CreateWindow(Ex), but only after the CreateWindow(Ex) call you have the window handle. Here's a solution based on Ben's next comment (thanks!):
// Window.h stays the same
// in .cpp
#include "Window.h"
#include <map>
std::map<HWND, Window*> window_map;
Window* currently_created_window = 0;
Window::Window(){
currently_created_window = this;
window_handle = CreateWindow(/*...*/);
}
LRESULT WINAPI Window::MessageProc(HWND hWnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam){
// if the key 'hWnd' doesn't exist yet in the map
// a new key-value pair gets created and the value gets value-initialized
// which, in case of a pointer, is 0
if(window_map[hWnd] == 0){
// window doesn't exist yet in the map, add it
window_map[hWnd] = currently_created_window;
}
window_map[hWnd]->InternalMessageProc(hWnd, msg, wParam, lParam);
}
Be cautious though, as the above example isn't thread-safe. You need to mutex-lock the creation of the window:
Window::Window(/*...*/){
Lock lock_it(your_mutex);
currently_created_window = this;
window_handle = CreateWindow(/*...*/);
lock_it.release();
// rest of the initialization
}
The above should do for the thread-safety (I hope).
You need to create window map and when you create new window just add it to this global map. You can use simple linked list instead of course.
map<HWND, Window *> wndmap;
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hwnd, UINT Message, WPARAM wparam, LPARAM lparam)
{
Window *pWnd = wndmap [hwnd];
....
}
WndProc cannot be an instance member function, because Windows will not pass any hidden this parameter. It can be namespace scope or a static member.
One simple solution is to use a map<HWND, Window*> to find the object, and then forward parameters to a method on the object.
Note that WndProc can maintain the map itself, since CreateWindow provides an opaque user parameter that shows up in WM_CREATE which is useful for carrying the Window *, and then you remove the entry in WM_DESTROY.
Define your WndProc as a static class member - this will then be compatible (for all compilers I'm aware of) with non-member function pointer, such as those used in Win32 programming.
But I have to say that this is a bit of a waste of time - there are a zillion Windows class libraries out there, and I don't think the world really needs another one.
Sounds you need to declare the function without defining it. That's what prototypes are for.
class Object;
void f(Object* o);
class Object {
public:
...
void some_method() {
... &f ...
}
void another_method() {
...
}
...
};
void f(Object* o) {
...
o->another_method();
...
}
The other way around might also be possible.
class Object {
public:
...
void some_method();
void another_method();
...
};
void f(Object* o) {
...
o->another_method();
...
}
void Object::some_method() {
... &f ...
}
void Object::another_method() {
...
}