Related
I want to generate VBO and EBO for subdivided plane, I draw with GL_TRIANGLES, I want to know effective way to do this.
Eventually it will be a huge cube consists from 6 subdivided plane, so, i can't imagine alghorithm to generate VBO and EBO for subdivide.
What i have as input data:
cube
std::vector<float> vertices =
{
// +Y SIDE //Colors
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
// -Y SIDE
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
// +X SIDE
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
// -X SIDE
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
// +Z SIDE
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
// -Z SIDE
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f
};
std::vector<unsigned int> indices =
{
// +Y
1, 2, 0, 3, 2, 1,
// -Y
4, 6, 5, 5, 6, 7,
// +X
8, 9, 10, 9, 11, 10,
// -X
14, 13, 12, 14, 15, 13,
// +Z
17, 18, 16, 19, 18, 17,
// -Z
20, 22, 21, 21, 22, 23
};
So, i want to write a function witch accept subdivision and change my indeces and vertices vectors, just loop over existed planes in cube and subdivide it
I'm trying to render a cube and rotate it along it's Y axis using OpenGL ES 2.0, however the cube does not render as a cube but rather as some sort of very flat trapezium. A few images showing the odd behaviour:
Very flat:
beginning to rotate:
mid-rotation:
and after rotation:
I'm not exactly sure what is causing the strange behaviour. I am utilising the Pigs in a Blanket library for rendering on PS Vita.
These are my cube vertices. The first 3 values in each row are the vertex data, the last 2 values are for texture mapping
GLfloat vertices[] = {
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f
};
This is my initialization function. surface_width = 960, surface_height = 544 and aspect = 1.764706
void TestScene::init(EGLint s_width, EGLint s_height)
{
surface_height = s_height;
surface_width = s_width;
model = glm::mat4(1.0f);
projection = glm::mat4(1.0f);
glGenBuffers(1, &VBO);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, VBO);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertices), vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
texture.load_texture("app0:assets/wall.jpg");
if (!shader.load_shaders("app0:shaders/vert.cg", "app0:shaders/frag.cg"))
sceKernelExitProcess(0);
}
This is my rendering function
void TestScene::render(EGLDisplay display, EGLSurface surface, double deltaTime)
{
glViewport(0, 0, surface_width, surface_height);
glClearColor(0.2f, 0.3f, 0.3f, 1.0f);
glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);
glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture.ID);
glUseProgram(shader.ID);
GLint mvpLoc = glGetUniformLocation(shader.ID, "mvp");
GLint position = glGetAttribLocation(shader.ID, "vPosition");
GLint texLoc = glGetAttribLocation(shader.ID, "vTexCoord");
GLfloat aspect = (GLfloat)surface_width/(GLfloat)surface_height;
projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(camera.Zoom), aspect, 0.1f, 100.0f);
view = camera.GetViewMatrix();
model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(1.0f), glm::vec3(0.0f, -1.0f, 0.0f));
glm::mat4 mvp = projection * view * model;
glUniformMatrix4fv(mvpLoc, 1, GL_FALSE, glm::value_ptr(mvp));
// Bind vertex positions
glEnableVertexAttribArray(position);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, VBO);
glVertexAttribPointer(position, 3, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 5 * sizeof(float), (void*)0);
// Bind texture positions
glEnableVertexAttribArray(texLoc);
glVertexAttribPointer(texLoc, 2, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 5 * sizeof(float), (void*)(3 * sizeof(float)));
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 36);
glDisableVertexAttribArray(position);
glDisableVertexAttribArray(texLoc);
eglSwapBuffers(display, surface);
}
My cameras zoom value is 45.0f and this is the GetViewMatrix method:
glm::mat4 Camera::GetViewMatrix()
{
return glm::lookAt(Position, Position + Front, Up);
}
and finally the shaders:
vert.cg
void main
(
uniform float4x4 mvp,
float4 vPosition,
float2 vTexCoord: TEXCOORD0,
out float4 oPosition: POSITION,
out float2 fTexCoord: TEXCOORD
)
{
oPosition = mul(mvp, vPosition);
fTexCoord = vTexCoord;
};
frag.cg
float4 main
(
in float2 fTexCoord: TEXCOORD0,
uniform sampler2D texture1: TEXUNIT0
)
{
float4 col;
col = tex2D(texture1, fTexCoord);
return col;
}
I have a feeling it has something to do with my projection matrix but I'm not entirely sure. Any help is greatly appreciated, thank you
UPDATE:
If I update the near value in glm::perspective from 0.1f to 1.0f it produces a better looking but still false result, so I'm pretty sure the issue is in my projection matrix. What am I doing wrong here?
projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(camera.Zoom), aspect, 0.1f, 100.0f);
becomes
projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(camera.Zoom), aspect, 1.0f, 100.0f);
for the following results:
Wider but still incorrect
Another angle
Again
I've found the issue. I was multiplying the model view projection matrix incorrectly in the vert shader.
oPosition = mul(mvp, vPosition);
should be
oPosition = mul(vPosition, mvp);
this works with a near value of 0.1f
EDIT
Also the missing faces were due to incorrect winding order with my vertices. Here is a corrected set of vertices, they are in clockwise order glFrontFace(GL_CW);
GLfloat vertices[] = {
// Back face
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // Bottom-left
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-right
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // top-left
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-left
// Front face
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-left
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-right
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-left
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // top-left
// Left face
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // top-right
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // bottom-left
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-left
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // bottom-left
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // top-right
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-right
// Right face
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // top-left
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // bottom-right
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // bottom-right
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-left
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // top-left
// Bottom face
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-left
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-left
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-left
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-right
// Top face
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f, // top-left
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f, // top-right
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-right
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-right
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f, // bottom-left
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f // top-left
};
Consider the following code, I've marked the important line with #this symbol:
#include <glad/include/glad/glad.h>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#ifndef LAMP_H
#define LAMP_H
namespace lmp{
class genLamp{
unsigned int lmpVAO;
static const float flag{1}; //#this is allowed
static const float default_shape[]{ //#this is not allowed
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f
};
genLamp(std::string vShaderPath, std::string fShaderPath){
glGenVertexArrays(1, &lmpVAO);
glBindVertexArray(lmpVAO);
}
unsigned int getVAO(){
return this->lmpVAO;
}
};
}
#endif
First of all, why is this even not allowed, what problem is the language trying to prevent by preventing this? And,
Since the default_shape array is going to be the same across objects no matter what, I was trying to share this array by making it static. But, this doesn't seem to be possible. The only thing I can think of is declaring the variable into a global scope, which is not so good in my case. Does c++ have any syntax to declare and initialize static const arrays ? I'm compiling with c++17 in case the information is useful.
EDIT: if possible please also explain #user's answer
Make them inline. The following code compiles.
class Temp {
inline static const float values[] = { 0.0f, 1.0f };
};
Or even better,
class Temp {
constexpr static float values[] = { 0.0f, 1.0f };
};
Thanks to John for pointing this out.
I have a base class that contains an unassigned pointer _vertices, and I want to populate it from the derived class constructor:
class GameRenderable {
bool _indexed;
int _vertSize;
int _idxSize;
unsigned int VAO, VBO, EBO;
unsigned int _texture0;
protected:
float *_vertices;
unsigned int *_indices;
public:
GameRenderable(GameRenderableMode grm);
~GameRenderable();
void Render();
protected:
void SetupBuffer(int, int);
};
void GameRenderable::SetupBuffer(int vs, int is) {
_indexed = false;
glGenVertexArrays(1, &VAO);
glGenBuffers(1, &VBO);
glBindVertexArray(VAO);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, VBO);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vs, _vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
// position attribute
glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 5 * sizeof(float), (void*)0);
glEnableVertexAttribArray(0);
// texture coord attribute
glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 5 * sizeof(float), (void*)(3 * sizeof(float)));
glEnableVertexAttribArray(1);
_idxSize = is;
_vertSize = vs;
}
void GameRenderable::Render() {
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, _texture0);
glBindVertexArray(VAO);
glm::mat4 model = glm::mat4(1.0f);
GetShader()->setMat4("model", model);
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, _vertSize);
}
The derived classes:
class Cube : public GameRenderable {
public:
Cube();
~Cube();
};
Cube::Cube():GameRenderable(GameRenderableMode::_3D) {
/* Cube ASCII
E--------F A -0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f
/| /| B 0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f
A--------B | C -0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f
| | | | D 0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f
| G------|-H E -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f
|/ |/ F 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f
C--------D G -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f
H 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f
*/
float vertices[] = {
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f
};
_vertices = new float[sizeof(vertices)];
memcpy_s(_vertices, sizeof(vertices), vertices, sizeof(float));
SetupBuffer(36, 0);
SetupTexture("container.jpg");
}
Cube::~Cube() {
}
When I call SetupBuffer() the array passed to openGL is always only 1 element, and nothing is drawn. If I put the code of SetupBuffer() directly inside the constructor, it works.
GL Buffer Issues
The sizeof( type ) operator returns the size in bytes, so for example the code:
std::cout << sizeof(float) << std::endl;
will print the output: 4
so on the following line:
_vertices = new float[sizeof(vertices)];
you are allocating 4 times the amount of data that you need to store the array vertices. It should be something like:
_vertices = new float[sizeof(vertices) / sizeof(float)];
//this is more ugly but could also be:
_vertices = (float*)(new char[sizeof(vertices)]);
//that works since an ascii 'char' is 1 byte
the function memcpy_s from MSDN:
Parameters
dest
New buffer.
destSize
Size of the destination buffer, in bytes for memcpy_s and wide characters (wchar_t) for wmemcpy_s.
src
Buffer to copy from.
count
Number of characters to copy.
so the call should be something like:
memcpy_s(_vertices, sizeof(vertices), vertices, sizeof(vertices));
//although, I would just use the regular 'memcpy':
memcpy(_vertices, vertices, sizeof(vertices));
Your SetupBuffer function takes the parameter vs which is input directly into glBufferData, however glBufferData also takes the size in bytes:
size
Specifies the size in bytes of the buffer object's new data store.
so entering the value 36 will not suffice. You want to find a way to pass the value of sizeof(vertices), although since you know the stride of each vertex (5 floats), you could change the call to:
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vs * 5 * sizeof(float), _vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
As many of the comments mentioned, you could also use the std::vector class to simplify some of the code, however I think it is much more important to address the misunderstandings in the code you have already written.
OOP Issues
I am fairly sure the above will fix your problem. However, just to make sure the constructor:
Cube::Cube() : GameRenderable(GameRenderableMode::_3D) {
doesn't overwrite the GameRenderable constructor, the GameRenderable constructor will be called first (with the parameter _3D) so ensure that the code within the GameRenderable constructor doesn't break anything (as I can't see it).
I am trying to pass coordinates of a cube to a main function in C++. This function is located in a seperate cpp file and the method looks like this:
GLfloat * Cube::getVertices()
{
// Set up our vertex data (and buffer(s)) and attribute pointers
GLfloat vertices[] = {
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 1.0f, 1.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 1.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, 0.5f, 0.0f, 0.0f,
-0.5f, 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, 1.0f
};
// GLfloat *vert = vertices;
return vertices;
}
In the main method I do this
Cube cube1;
GLfloat * vertices;
vertices = cube1.getVertices();
Whenever my coordinates are in main the cube comes out correctly but when it is in this seperate method it seems like I am getting addresses instead of values and no square appears. Does it have something to do with the way I pass the array?
In this case you seem to have constant data that you want to return. Make it static and const. Then it won't go out of scope.
const GLfloat* Cube::getVertices() {
static const GLfloat vertices[] = {
// Data here.
};
return vertices;
}
Does it have something to do with the way I pass the array?
You don't pass an array. You pass a pointer. To a local array, those lifetime ends when the function is left. What you have here is just undefined behavior.