How to hide the arrow in Omnet++ v5.6.1 ?
I'm newbie, I'm using connectTo() method to create arrows.
gate->connectTo(gatein);
How to hide it ?
Thank you. This is my simulation's image:
my simulation
Sorry, it don't work for me. This is my code to create conection:
if (id != this->myId)
{
cGate *g;
cGate *g0;
int items;
int dist = distanceCal(x, y,this->xpos,this->ypos);
if (dist <= trRange)
{
items = this->gateSize("out");
ritems = mod->gateSize("in");
this->setGateSize("out",items+1);
mod->setGateSize("in",ritems+1);
g0 = this->gate("out",items);
g = mod->gate("in",ritems);
g0->connectTo(g);
//cDisplayString & disp = g0->getDisplayString();
//disp.setTagArg("ls",1,long (0));
}
}
This is my ned file:
// Base Station
simple BaseStation
{
parameters:
#display("i=device/antennatower_l");
int id;
int randInit;
int numNodes;
int xpos;
int ypos;
gates:
input in[];
output out[];
}
// Sensor node
simple SensorNode
{
parameters:
#display("i=misc/node");
int id;
int energy;
int xpos;
int ypos;
gates:
input in[];
output out[];
}
// ARPEES network
network WSN
{
parameters:
//numeric energy;
int energy;
//numNodes: numeric,
int numNodes;
//trRange: numeric,
int trRange;
//trRangeD0: numeric,
int protocol;
//protocol: numeric,
//showHideRange: numeric,
int showHideRange;
int ssRange;
int kRequire;
int rounds;
int frames;
int sRand;
int xMax;
int yMax;
#display("p=0,0;b=$xMax,$yMax,rect;o=white");
submodules:
bs: BaseStation {
parameters:
id = 1;
randInit = sRand;
xpos = int (xMax/2);
ypos = yMax+40;
numNodes = numNodes;
}
node[numNodes]: SensorNode {
parameters:
energy = energy;
id = index+2;
xpos = intuniform(10,xMax-10);
ypos = intuniform(10,yMax-10);
}
connections allowunconnected:
//{display("p=0,0;b=$xMax,$yMax,rect;o=white");} //DarkSeaGreen
}
}
What i need to do now ?
A connection may be hidden by setting its width to zero. The following code may be used to do it:
cDisplayString & disp = gate->getDisplayString();
disp.setTagArg("ls", 1, "0"); // 1 indicates argument of the Tag, 0 - width
Reference: Display String Tags.
Related
I have an array in my MainProcessor
float waveforms[2][1080] = { {0}, {0} };
And I pass it to a SynthVoice like this:
osc1Voice->setWavetable(waveforms, 0); //[1]
osc2Voice->setWavetable(waveforms, 1);
There I read it like this in SynthVoice.h:
typedef float array_of_wavetable[1080];
void setWavetable(array_of_wavetable* waveform, int number)
{
wavetable = waveform;
id = number;
}
so i can use it like this in my SynthVoice class:
wavetable[id][first_sample + int(phase_0)]
Now I have moved [1] in a new class (OscilatorProcessor.h) and I want to set a pointer from MainProcessor -> OscillatorProcessor -> SynthVoice in a way that I can use it as wavetable[id][phase].
Now I don't know how to pass it from my MainProcessor to my OscillatorProcessor in the middle. So I can read it in the same way in the SynthVoice class.
I hope this made sense. Thank you for your time
edit: minimal reproducible example
#include <iostream>
typedef float array_of_wavetable[1080];
class SynthVoice
{
public:
void setWavetable(array_of_wavetable* waveform, int number)
{
wavetable = waveform;
id = number;
}
void outputWavetable()
{
for(int i = 0; i < 1080; i++)
{
std::cout << wavetable[id][i];
}
}
private:
array_of_wavetable * wavetable;
int id;
};
class OscillatorProcessor
{
public:
void setWavetable(array_of_wavetable * waveform, int number)
{
wavetable = waveform;
id = number;
}
void sendWaveToVoice()
{
SynthVoice voice;
voice.setWavetable(wavetable, id);
voice.outputWavetable();
}
private:
array_of_wavetable * wavetable;
int id;
};
int main() {
float waveform_templates[4][1080] = { {0}, {0}, {0}, {0} };
OscillatorProcessor oscillator;
oscillator.setWavetable(waveform_templates, 2);
return 0;
}
This is my code:
#include <cstdlib>
#include <ctime>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <vector>
#define ENTITY(A) entity##A
#define ALM(A) alm##A
struct TEntity{
private:
int sumx;
int sumy;
const char * rep;
int m_ix;
int m_iy;
public:
TEntity(int x, int y, int sum_x, int sum_y, const char * txt);
};
TEntity::TEntity(int x, int y, int sum_x, int sum_y, const char * txt) {
m_ix = x;
m_iy = y;
sumx = sum_x;
sumy = sum_y;
rep = txt;
}
class IAlmacenable {
private:
void * element;
public:
IAlmacenable(void * e);
IAlmacenable();
void * getValue();
};
IAlmacenable::IAlmacenable(void *e) {
element = e;
}
IAlmacenable::IAlmacenable() {
element = nullptr;
}
void * IAlmacenable::getValue() {
return element;
}
class TList {
private:
std::vector<IAlmacenable*> elementos;
int position;
public:
TList();
int Size();
int Push(IAlmacenable* psz);
};
TList::TList() {
elementos = std::vector<IAlmacenable*>();
position = 0;
}
int TList::Size() {
return elementos.size();
}
int TList::Push(IAlmacenable* psz) {
int res = 0;
if (elementos.size() >= elementos.max_size()) {
res = -1;
}
else {
elementos.push_back(psz);
}
return res;
}
int main(){
srand(time(NULL));
TList *list = new TList();
//we can put entities in the list and the rest will be filled up to 5
int size = list->Size();
for(int i = size; i<5;i++){
const char c[] = {(rand() % 2 ? 65 + rand() % 25 : 97 + rand() % 25), '\0'};
TEntity ENTITY(i)(rand() % 10, rand() % 10, rand() % 5, rand() % 5, c);
IAlmacenable ALM(i)(&ENTITY(i));
list->Push(&ALM(i));
size++;
}
//do things like printing their value...
delete list;
return 0;
}
I need to create a new variable everytime it run the "TEntity ENTITY(i)" line,
the problem is that it creates the same variable always, I think it is because it creates the variable entityi and therefore it is overwriting on the same variable, besides it seems that the random it generates is always the same number since all entities have the same values in all its parameters. The c variable create a const char * random variable between a-z, A-Z , I don't put the print code because it is unnecessary, so what can I do? Is there any way to dynamically create variables of entities whose values are random?
EDIT
Here is the new code fixed (the macros have been eliminated since they were not necessary and the necessary code has been included to be able to execute it) but there is still the same problem that they are generated with the same parameters (since they are still the same variable):
#include <cstdlib>
#include <ctime>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <vector>
#include <conio.h>
#include <windows.h>
struct TEntity{
private:
int sumx;
int sumy;
const char * rep;
int m_ix;
int m_iy;
public:
TEntity(int x, int y, int sum_x, int sum_y, const char * txt);
void movimiento();
void pinta();
};
TEntity::TEntity(int x, int y, int sum_x, int sum_y, const char * txt) {
m_ix = x;
m_iy = y;
sumx = sum_x;
sumy = sum_y;
rep = txt;
}
void TEntity::movimiento() {
m_ix += sumx;
m_iy += sumy;
}
void TEntity::pinta() {
gotoxy(static_cast<short int>(m_ix), static_cast<short int>(m_iy));
printf("%s", rep);
}
void gotoxy(short int x, short int y)
{
COORD pos = {x, y};
HANDLE output = GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE);
SetConsoleCursorPosition(output, pos);
}
void clear()
{
system("cls");
}
class IAlmacenable {
private:
void * element;
public:
IAlmacenable(void * e);
IAlmacenable();
void * getValue();
};
IAlmacenable::IAlmacenable(void *e) {
element = e;
}
IAlmacenable::IAlmacenable() {
element = nullptr;
}
void * IAlmacenable::getValue() {
return element;
}
class TList {
private:
std::vector<IAlmacenable*> elementos;
int position;
public:
TList();
int Size();
int Push(IAlmacenable* psz);
IAlmacenable* First();
IAlmacenable* Next();
};
TList::TList() {
elementos = std::vector<IAlmacenable*>();
position = 0;
}
int TList::Size() {
return elementos.size();
}
int TList::Push(IAlmacenable* psz) {
int res = 0;
if (elementos.size() >= elementos.max_size()) {
res = -1;
}
else {
elementos.push_back(psz);
}
return res;
}
IAlmacenable* TList::First() {
IAlmacenable* res;
if (elementos.empty()) {
res = nullptr;
}
else {
res = elementos.front();
position = 1;
}
return res;
}
IAlmacenable* TList::Next() {
IAlmacenable* res;
if (elementos.empty()) {
res = nullptr;
}
else {
int pos = position;
int size = elementos.size();
if (pos < size) {
res = elementos.at(position);
position++;
}
else {
res = this->First();
}
}
return res;
}
int main(){
srand(time(NULL));
TList *list = new TList();
//we can put entities in the list and the rest will be filled up to 5
int size = list->Size();
for(int i = size; i<5;i++){
const char c[] = {(rand() % 2 ? 65 + rand() % 25 : 97 + rand() % 25), '\0'};
TEntity *entity = new TEntity(rand() % 10, rand() % 10, rand() % 5, rand() % 5, c);
IAlmacenable *alm = new IAlmacenable(entity);
list->Push(alm);
size++;
}
while(true){
clear();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
reinterpret_cast<TEntity *>(list->Next()->getValue())->pinta();
reinterpret_cast<TEntity *>(list->Next()->getValue())->movimiento();
}
Sleep(2000);
}
delete list;
return 0;
}
There is some confusion here.
Some points:
The macro is not fit-for-purpose, as you already know; you're just creating a variable name entityi each time;
That doesn't matter! The object only exists for the duration of the loop iteration anyway; C++ doesn't let you create multiple objects with the same name at the same time. In fact you can get rid of the entire macro stuff and just call the object entity;
Now that that's out of the way, you're getting repeated results because you're storing a pointer to each iteration of that local variable — on each occasion, that's a dangling pointer to an object that's been destroyed. Don't store dangling pointers!
You can either:
Dynamically allocate the objects that you're adding to the list, or
Store actual objects rather than pointers-to-objects.
Either way, the local-scope name is irrelevant and certainly need not change repeatedly for each loop iteration.
I've created a class called Box that is pretty much what it sounds like. I want to sort these box objects, and I have created a function to do so.
void boxSort(Box array[], int size) {
Box temp;
bool swap;
do {
swap = false;
for(int count=0; count<(size-1); count++) {
int volume1 = array[count].getVolume(array[count].height, array[count].width, array[count].length);
int volume2 = array[count+1].getVolume(array[count+1].height, array[count+1].width, array[count+1].length);
if(volume1 > volume2) {
temp = array[count];
array[count] = array[count+1];
array[count+1] = temp;
swap = true;
}
}
}
while(swap);
}
This function sorts an array of objects of class Box.
Box class:
class Box {
public:
double height, width, length;
double getVolume(double, double, double);
double getSurfaceArea(double, double, double);
void setHeight(double);
void setWidth(double);
void setLength(double);
Box() {
height = width = length = 1;
}
Box(double h, double w, double l) {
setHeight(h);
setWidth(w);
setLength(l);
}
};
#endif
void Box::setHeight(double h) {
height = h;
}
void Box::setWidth(double w) {
width = w;
}
void Box::setLength(double l) {
length = l;
}
double Box::getVolume(double h, double w, double l) {
double volume = h*w*l;
return volume;
}
double Box::getSurfaceArea(double h, double w, double l) {
double surfaceArea = (h*w)*2 + (h*l)*2 + (l*w)*2;
return surfaceArea;
}
When I run this program I get an error:
linker command failed with exit code 1
This doesn't shown up on any particular line, and I have no idea what it means, so I'm a little lost on how to debug this.
The linker errors are reported if you have any problem with libraries or object files linked. Were you able to successfully build the executable?
I think this error is occurring due to more than one main() function in your code.You can have only one main() function.
Not sure about the error. But I would suggest changing boxSort function to something like this.
change getVolume to this
double Box::getVolume() {
return height*width*length;
}
and boxSort to this
void boxSort(std::array<Box, 3> boxes)
{
struct
{
bool operator()(Box x, Box y)
{
return x.getVolume() < y.getVolume();
}
}compFunc;
std::sort(boxes.begin(), boxes.end(), compFunc);
for(Box a: boxes)
{
std::cout<<a.getVolume()<<" ";
}
}
function call:
std::array<Box,3> boxes = {box1, box2, box3};
boxSort(boxes);
Since I cannot answer my own question in 8 hours after asking, I'm posting my solution here.
Made some mistakes in the incoming channel number and number of the vector element. Setting the value of channel-1 instead of channel fixed to problem.
My new function is as follows:
void input(long inlet, t_symbol *s, long ac, t_atom *av){
// GET VARIABLES
long channel = atom_getlong(av);
double value = atom_getfloat(av + 1);
long v_size = v_chan.size();
if(channel && v_size < channel){
for(int i = v_size; i < channel; i++){
v_chan.push_back(n_chan);
}
v_chan[channel - 1].value = value;
}
else if(channel){
v_chan[channel - 1].value = value;
}
}
I've got a vector containing structs, which I like to push_back with a new, empty struct.
Example code:
struct channels{
double value;
// eventually more variables
};
vector<channels> v_chan;
channels n_chan;
void push(){
v_chan.push_back(n_chan);
}
The problem is, if my vector contains elements, push_back add an element, but also overwrites the last element.
For example, if my vector size is 1 and element 0 has a value of 0.2, after push_back my vector size is 2, but element 0 and 1 have a value of 0.
What am I doing wrong here?
Real Code: (MAX/MSP external, function input is called in Max)
#include <maxcpp6.h>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
struct bind{
string param;
double* value;
int track;
double base;
double multiplier;
};
struct channels{
double value;
vector<int> bind;
};
vector<channels> v_chan;
vector<bind> v_bind(19);
channels n_chan;
class rec : public MaxCpp6<rec> {
public:
rec(t_symbol * sym, long ac, t_atom * av) {
setupIO(1, 1); // inlets / outlets
}
~rec() {}
// methods:
//SET BIND FUNCTION
void setBind(long inlet, t_symbol *s, long ac, t_atom *av){
}
void output(long track, long type){
}
void input(long inlet, t_symbol *s, long ac, t_atom *av){
// GET VARIABLES
long channel = atom_getlong(av);
double value = atom_getfloat(av + 1);
long v_size = v_chan.size();
if(v_size <= channel){
v_chan.push_back(n_chan);
}
else{
v_chan[channel].value = value;
}
}
void dump(long inlet){
for(int i = 1; i <= v_chan.size(); i++){
post("%d %.2f", i, v_chan[i].value);
}
}
void clearTrackBinds(long inlet){
}
void reset(long inlet){
clearTrackBinds(0);
}
};
C74_EXPORT int main(void) {
// create a class with the given name:
rec::makeMaxClass("solar_receiver");
REGISTER_METHOD_GIMME(rec, input);
REGISTER_METHOD_GIMME(rec, setBind);
REGISTER_METHOD(rec, dump);
REGISTER_METHOD(rec, clearTrackBinds);
REGISTER_METHOD(rec, reset);
}
I have made a class and it compiles with no syntax errors, but I get 6 unresolved external symbols?
THE CLASS:
struct CELL {
private:
static bool haslife;
static int x;
static int y;
public:
static bool has_life()
{
return haslife;
}
static void set_coords(int xcoord, int ycoord)
{
x = xcoord;
y = ycoord;
}
static void get_coords(int &xcoord, int &ycoord)
{
xcoord = x;
ycoord = y;
}
};
class cell_grid {
private:
static int cell_size;
static int cell_count_x;
static int cell_count_y;
CELL **cell;
public:
cell_grid();
cell_grid(unsigned int width,unsigned int height, unsigned int cellsize)
{
//set size based on cellsize
this->cell_size = cellsize;
this->cell_count_x = floor((double)width / this->cell_size);
this->cell_count_y = floor((double)height / this->cell_size);
this->cell = new CELL*[this->cell_count_y];
for(int i = 0; i < this->cell_count_y; i++)
{
cell[i] = new CELL[this->cell_count_x];
}
for(int y = 0; y < this->cell_count_y; ++y)
{
for(int x = 0; x < this->cell_count_x; ++x)
{
int cur_x = x * this->cell_size;
int cur_y = y * this->cell_size;
this->cell[x][y].set_coords(cur_x,cur_y);
}
}
} //end of constructor
static int get_cell_size()
{
return cell_size;
}
static void render(BITMAP *buff)
{
circlefill(buff,70,70,60,makecol(27,37,0));
}
};
MAIN
int main()
{
start_allegro();
cell_grid *grid = new cell_grid(scr_w,scr_h,10);
grid->render(buffer);
//Main Loop
while (!done && !key[KEY_ESC]) //until 'X' pressed or ESC
{
//***** Start Main Code Here *****
while (speed_counter > 0)
{
//render the buffer to the screen
blit(
buffer,
screen,
0,0,0,0,
scr_w,
scr_h);
clear_bitmap(buffer);
speed_counter --;
}
//***** End Main Code Here *****
rest(1); //Normalize cpu usage
}
return 0;
}
END_OF_MAIN()
Thanks
Don't define all of the class variables as static.
When you define a data member as static it means there is only one single instance of it. This doesn't seem to be what you want to do here.
Instead of
private:
static bool haslife;
static int x;
static int y;
write:
private:
bool haslife;
int x;
int y;
Further more, when you define a static member, you need to define it again in the CPP file and initialize it with a value. It doesn't look like you're doing that and that's why you're getting the linker errors.
Also, next time you post something, make sure you actually ask a question rather than just simply stating facts.