C++ Declaring an inherited constructor? - c++

I'm having difficulties in defining a constructor for a class that inherits the properties of another class
class Transportation {
public:
int ID;
string company;
string vehicleOperator;
Transportation(int,string,string) {
}
};
class SeaTransport: public Transportation {
public:
int portNumber;
SeaTransport(int)::Transportation(int,string,string) {
}
};
I'm having issues with line 18 (SeaTransport(int)::Transportation(int,string,string)).
The error I receive occurs at the pont where I declare Transportation.
As seen in the code, a class Transportation is the body class and class SeaTransport inherits the properies of Transportation.
Transportation::Transportation(int, std::string, std::string)
+2 overloads
type name is not allowed
This error occurs at the int
typedef std::__cxx11::basic_string std::string
type name is not allowed
and this final error occurs at both string variables.

It seems you mix together scoping and a constructor initializer list.
The double-colon operator :: is for scope, while a constructor followed by a single colon and a list of initializations is an initializer list.
You must declare the SeaTransport constructor to take all the arguments, including those for the parent class (assuming you want to pass them on to the base constructor):
SeaTransport(int port, int id, string company, string operator);
Then in the definition (implementation) of the constructor you "call" the parent constructor in the constructor initializer list:
SeaTransport(int port, int id, string company, string oper)
: Transport(id, company, oper), // "Call" the parent class constructor
portNumber(port) // Initialize the own members
{
}

As Mr Some Programmer Dude said, you've a Scope problem in your code,
I will try to answer for your second question which is, how to add featured variables on your constructor.
Same as what you did for the port attribute.
You can define before all your Attribute which is boatNumber as int boadNumber = 0 then, you'll overload your
constructor with boatNumber(num) after the initializer operator and int num before the initializer operator.
class Transportation {
public:
int ID;
string company;
string vehicleOperator;
Transportation(int,string,string) {
}
~Transportation(){}
};
class SeaTransport: public Transportation {
public:
int portNumber;
int boatNumber;
SeaTransport(int num, int port, int id, string company, string oper)
:Transportation(id, company, oper), boatNumber(num),portNumber(port) {}
~SeaTransport(){}
};
But, if you want to get things more specific, you can create another class which is derived from SeaTransport
And then you'll define the number of your boat and more other details, if you want.
I'll draw you an instance of it :
class Boat: public SeaTransport {
public:
int boatNumber;
Boat(int bNum,int num, int port, int id, string company, string oper):
SeaTransport( num, port, id, company, oper),boatNumber(bNum){}
~Boat(){}
};

Related

Explicitly initalize abstract base class constructor with value determined by parameter of derived class constructor

Within my vehicle base class, I have a private member variable, string type (for type of vehicle, ie car, motorbike, tricycle, etc).
#pragma once
using namespace std;
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
class vehicle {
public:
vehicle(string reg, string make, string model, int age, string type);
virtual ~vehicle() = default;
virtual double costPerDay() = 0;
protected:
int age;
int perDayCostCap(int costPD);
double penceToPounds(int pence);
private:
const string type;
string const reg, make, model;
};
One of the derived classes, bike, has a numberOfWheels variable which is to be passed into its constructor. I want to initialize the base class constructor with type bicycle or tricycle depending on the numberOfWheels.
I can not figure out how to achieve this, seeing as the base class constructor has to be initialized before the function body of the child class.
The following shows what I would like to achieve (though, I know this is not possible):
bike::bike(int engineCC, int numOfWheels, string reg, string make, string model, int age)
:engineCC(engineCC), numOfWheels(numOfWheels) {
string tricOrBic = (numOfWheels == 2) ? "bicicle" : "tricicle";
vehicle:reg=reg, make=make, model=model, age=age, type=tricOrBic;
};
Like this?
bike::bike(int engineCC, int numOfWheels, string reg, string make, string model, int age)
: vehicle(reg, make, model, age, numOfWheels == 2 ? "bicycle" : "tricycle")
, engineCC(engineCC)
, numOfWheels(numOfWheels)
{
}
This is normal programming, maybe you had some problem I'm not seeing.

Can constructor Initializer fields be called with class objects, c++

I have two classes, one "bank" and one "account". Account's constructor takes an int and a string. Bank is supposed to have two objects of type "account" in it. Is it possible to have the two "account" objects in the fields initializer list be allocated dynamically and not with static values?
Here is the code I have that allocates it statically
class Bank
{
public:
Bank():checkings( 500, "C"), saving( 300, "s"){} //predfined int and string
private:
Account checkings;
Account saving;
};
Is it possible to do this? I want the constuctor to have its fields allocated dynamically according to user input. I keep getting errors so I am unsure if my syntax is wrong.
class Bank
{
public:
Bank():checkings( int val, string s), saving( int val, string s){} //dynamic
private:
Account checkings;
Account saving;
};
Also, how do I call this type of constructor in the .cpp file?
You can't put declarations (like int val) in a member initializer, only expressions (which can be/include previously declared variables).
It looks like maybe you want:
class Bank
{
public:
Bank(int val, std::string s) : checkings(val, s), saving(val, s) {}
// ...
};
or:
class Bank
{
public:
Bank(int check_val, std::string check_s,
int sav_val, std::string sav_s) :
checking(check_val, check_s), saving(sav_val, sav_s) {}
// ...
};

class inheritance code not working

I have checked the class inheritance syntax and I'm pretty sure I don’t have a mistake ? did anything slip away from me ?
class person
{
public:
int personid;
string personname;
string personadress;
person( int apersonid, string apersonname, string apersonadress )//constructor
{
personid=apersonid;
personname=apersonname;
personadress=apersonadress;
}
int getpersonid()
{
return personid;
}
string getpersonname()
{
return personname;
}
string getpersonadress()
{
return personadress;
}
};
class employee: public person
{
public:
int commission;
employee(int _commission, int apersonid, string apersonname, string apersonaddress) : person(apersonid, apersonname, apersonaddress)
{
commission= _commission;
}
int getcommission()
{
return commission;
}
};
The error I'm getting is
Error 1 error C2512: 'person' : no appropriate default constructor
available
I suspect your problem is that your base class doesn't define a default constructor (with 0 arguments). Instead you have a constructor with multiple arguments.
person( int apersonid, string apersonname, string apersonadress )//constructor
{
personid=apersonid;
personname=apersonname;
personadress=apersonadress;
}
Your employee class inherits from person but it's constructor only takes one argument and does not initialize the base class using it's constructor.
employee( int _commission )
{
commission= _commission;
}
This is an issue b/c when you create an instance of the employee, it's trying to call the person class constructor as well. Since you don't have a default constructor (again, no arguments), you will need to explicitly call the person constructor in the employee constructor.
You have two options.
First, Modify the person constructor to take no arguments
person()
If you use this method, your signature for your employee class won't have to change.
Or you can Modify the employee constructor to take all the arguments the person constructor expects:
class employee: public person
{
public:
int commission;
employee(int _commision, int apersonid, string apersonname, string apersonadress ) : person(apersonId, apersonname, apersonadress)
{
commission = _commission;
}
int getcommission()
{
return commission;
}
};
In the constructor, the code after the colon (:) is a call to the person constructor using the arguments specified (apersonid, apersonname, apersonadress).
The employee constructor then assigns the value of _commission since it's scope is only relevant within the employee class.
Does that make sense?
In C++, if constructors are explicitly defined for a class, but they are all non-default, the compiler will not implicitly define a default constructor, leading to a situation where the class does not have a default constructor. You have defined a non default constructor in your class, this one :
person( int apersonid, string apersonname, string apersonadress )
So you need to define one default constructor yourself. E.g.
person() {}
Keep in mind, that in this case, when you construct an object of employee class the default constructor of person would be called. If that is not desired you need to call the non-default constructor of person in the constructor of employee.

error: no matching function for call to 'Employee::Employee()'

Looked at similar threads and this doesn't show up. Basically I want chef to inherit the functions and data from employee (base class) but i'm having issues with the constructor for the derived class. I'm getting the error: no matching function for call to 'Employee::Employee()' Could someone show me how to declare my constructors for this derived class and my future derived classes for this program. Tried a bunch of things and can't seem to get it working.
class Employee
{
public:
Employee(int theempID, string thefirstName, string thelastName, char theempClass, int thesalary)
{
this->empID = theempID;
this->firstName = thefirstName;
this->lastName = thelastName;
this->empClass = theempClass;
this->salary = thesalary;
};
protected:
int empID;
string firstName;
string lastName;
char empClass;
int salary;
};
class Chef : public Employee
{
public:
Chef(int theempID, string thefirstName, string thelastName, char theempClass, int thesalary, string theempCuisine) : Employee() {}
{
this->empID = theempID;
this->firstName = thefirstName;
this->lastName = thelastName;
this->empClass = theempClass;
this->salary = thesalary;
this->empCuisine = theempCuisine;
};
string getCuisine()
{
return empCuisine;
}
protected:
string empCuisine;
};
#endif // EMPLOYEE
Employee() is trying to default construct an Employee but there is no default constructor for Employee. Instead, construct it with the parameters your constructor it expects.
The Chef constructor should look like this:
Chef(int theempID, string thefirstName, string thelastName, char theempClass, int thesalary, string theempCuisine) :
Employee(theempID, thefirstName, thelastName, theempClass, thesalary), empCuisine(theempCuisine)
{}
Note the body of the constructor is empty. The Employee base class and the member variable are initialized in the initialization list. No assignment necessary in the body. You should also change the base class constructor so it uses initialization instead of assignment.

How is a constructor for a derived class supposed to be like in c++ when derived class has added data member

I am new to c++. I have been trying to get past this error. I know when a class in derived, it inherits everything from the base class, but what if the derived class has other data members? How is the constructor suppose to be?
When I try putting only the new I try to pass parameters to the newly made class members in the constructor I get an error to say it doesn't match that of the base class. When I try using that of the base class and adding the new data members it tells me I am redefining. So I wonder whats left to do to get past this error below is my code.
This is the base class:
class movielibrarybase
{
public:
movielibrarybase(string name, string dirname, string gen, int price);
void setname(string name);
string getname();
void setdirector_name(string dirname);
string getdirector_name();
void setgenre(string gen);
string getgenre();
void setprice(int price);
int getprice();
void display();
~movielibrarybase();
protected:
string name;
string director_name;
string genre;
int price;
};
And this is the derived class:
class songlibrary: public movielibrarybase
{
public:
songlibrary();
void setartist_name(string name);
string getartist_name();
void setsong_position(string position);
string getsong_position;
~songlibrary();
protected:
string artist_name;
string song_postion;
};
I am getting the following errors:
songlibrary.cpp||In constructor 'songlibrary::songlibrary(std::string, std::string, std::string, int, std::string, std::string)':|
songlibrary.cpp|6|error: no matching function for call to 'movielibrarybase::movielibrarybase()'|
movielibrarybase.cpp|3|note: candidates are: movielibrarybase::movielibrarybase(std::string, std::string, std::string, int)|
movielibrarybase.h|8|note: movielibrarybase::movielibrarybase(const movielibrarybase&)|
songlibrary.cpp|34|error: no 'std::string songlibrary::getsong_position()' member function declared in class 'songlibrary'|
For that case you use the member initializer list in the constructor to invoke the right constructor in the base class:
songlibrary::songlibrary(string name, string dirname, string gen, int price,
string artist_name, string song_position)
: movielibrarybase(name, dirname, gen, price), // initialize base class
artist_name(artist_name), // initialize member in this class
song_position(song_position) {
// other ctor stuff
}
If you do not state the parent class on that list, it will default to the default constructor. Since there is no default constructor in your movielibrarybase class, a compiler error occurred.
In your case it would be something like:-
songlibrary::songlibrary( string n, string director, string gen,
int pri, string artist, string song )
: movielibrarybase( n, director, gen, pri ),
artist_name( artist ), song_postion( song )
One thing to note here is sequence in member initializer list matters. First calls should be to base classes and then derived classes members should be initialized in the order in which they are declared in a class.
Also, class members are initialized in the order of their declaration in the class, the order in which they are listed in a member initialization list makes not a whit of difference