termios settings on USB modem serial get ignored - c++

I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 and try to read AT commands from a modem. I need to do some changes to the serial interface to properly communicate these commands. However, if I try setting the baudrate, it stays the same. I use the following code:
#include <iostream>
#include <exception>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <termios.h>
#include <string.h>
#define DEVICE "/dev/ttyUSB2"
using namespace std;
class ATException : public exception {
public:
ATException(string msg) : msg(msg) { }
virtual const char* what() const throw() {
return msg.c_str();
}
private:
string msg;
};
void set_speeds(int fd, speed_t ispeed, speed_t ospeed) {
struct termios term_args;
int result = tcgetattr(fd, &term_args);
if (result != 0) throw ATException ("unable to tcgetattr device");
term_args.c_cflag = CS8 | CREAD | CLOCAL;
if (cfsetispeed(&term_args, ispeed) != 0) throw ATException("error setting i speed");
if (cfsetospeed(&term_args, ospeed) != 0) throw ATException("error setting o speed");
if (tcsetattr(fd, TCSANOW, &term_args) != 0) throw ATException("unable to set device attr");
}
void get_speeds(int fd, speed_t& ispeed, speed_t& ospeed) {
struct termios term_args;
memset(&term_args, 0, sizeof term_args);
int result = tcgetattr(fd, &term_args);
if (result != 0) throw ATException ("unable to tcgetattr device");
ispeed = cfgetispeed(&term_args);
ospeed = cfgetospeed(&term_args);
}
int main (int argc, char** argv) {
speed_t ispeed;
speed_t ospeed;
struct termios term_args;
int device_fd = open(DEVICE, O_RDWR);
if (device_fd == -1) {
cerr << "unable to open device " << DEVICE << endl;
exit(1);
}
try {
cout << " B9600 speed: " << B9600 << endl;
cout << " B38400 speed: " << B38400 << endl;
cout << "B115200 speed: " << B115200 << endl;
cout << "B230400 speed: " << B230400 << endl << endl;
get_speeds(device_fd, ispeed, ospeed);
cout << "current i speed: " << ispeed << endl;
cout << "current o speed: " << ospeed << endl;
speed_t test_speeds [] = {B38400, B115200, B230400};
for (int i = 0; i < (sizeof(test_speeds) / sizeof(speed_t)); i++) {
cout << "setting speeds to " << test_speeds[i] << endl;
set_speeds(device_fd, test_speeds[i], test_speeds[i]);
get_speeds(device_fd, ispeed, ospeed);
cout << "current i speed: " << ispeed << endl;
cout << "current o speed: " << ospeed << endl;
}
int chars_written;
// writing/reading
chars_written = write(device_fd, "AT\r", 3);
cout << "written " << chars_written << " chars" << endl;
char read_buf [16];
int chars_read = read(device_fd, read_buf, sizeof(read_buf));
cout << "read (" << chars_read << "): " << read_buf << endl;
usleep(50000);
chars_read = read(device_fd, read_buf, sizeof(read_buf));
cout << "read (" << chars_read << "): " << read_buf << endl;
} catch (ATException& e) {
cerr << "ERROR: " << e.what() << DEVICE << endl;
}
close(device_fd);
}
If I execute this, I get the following output:
B9600 speed: 13
B38400 speed: 15
B115200 speed: 4098
B230400 speed: 4099
current i speed: 13
current o speed: 13
setting speeds to 15
current i speed: 13
current o speed: 13
setting speeds to 4098
current i speed: 13
current o speed: 13
setting speeds to 4099
current i speed: 13
current o speed: 13
written 3 chars
...
It seems like the baudrate hasn't changed. Why is this? Did I miss something? Thanks for help. Let me know if there's something which needs to be clarified, please!
If you consider down rating my question, please also leave a comment why, so I can improve my question or learn for the future. Thanks.

Related

SDL audio callback stops after two iterations

Given the following code:
#include <SDL2/SDL.h>
#include <SDL2/SDL_audio.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
#include <thread>
static void SDLCallback(void *userData, Uint8 *data, int bytes) {
std::cerr << "SDLCallback: " << bytes / sizeof(float) << "\n";
}
int main() {
using namespace std::literals;
SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_AUDIO);
SDL_AudioDeviceID m_deviceId{};
SDL_AudioSpec m_desired, m_obtained;
m_desired.freq = 48000;
m_desired.format = AUDIO_F32SYS;
m_desired.channels = 2;
m_desired.samples = 1024;
m_desired.callback = SDLCallback;
m_desired.userdata = nullptr;
m_deviceId = SDL_OpenAudioDevice(nullptr, 0, &m_desired, &m_obtained, 0);
std::cerr << "SDL device: " << m_deviceId << std::endl;
if (m_deviceId < 2) {
std::cerr << "SDL: Couldn't open audio: " << SDL_GetError() << std::endl;
exit(1);
}
std::cerr << "rate: " << m_obtained.freq << "\n";
std::cerr << "samples: " << m_obtained.samples << "\n";
std::cerr << "bytes: " << m_obtained.size << "\n";
std::cerr << "channels: " << (int)m_obtained.channels << "\n";
SDL_PauseAudioDevice(m_deviceId, 0);
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(100ms);
std::cerr << (SDL_GetAudioDeviceStatus(m_deviceId) == SDL_AUDIO_PLAYING)
<< std::endl;
}
SDL_CloseAudioDevice(m_deviceId);
SDL_Quit();
}
I am seeing the following output:
$ ./a.out
SDL device: 2
rate: 48000
samples: 1024
bytes: 8192
channels:
SDLCallback: 2048
SDLCallback: 2048
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
<program gets stuck on SDL_CloseAudioDevice>
That is, the SDLCallback function is called only twice at the beginning then not anymore, yet the audio is still marked as running. I am using PulseAudio.
What can I do to prevent that ? Where is my program wrong ? It works if I kill PulseAudio, but PulseAudio works fine for all my other software.
And if it is not wrong, how can I make sure that my users will never encounter that issue ? How can I recover without getting the program stuck on SDL_CloseAudioDevice ? As PulseAudio is very common among Linux users.

Linux File Locking with fcntl and C++

I did two months search on the web for a proper file locking mechanism to be used in a C++ program.
I found a lot on "C and fnctl" which I could proof to work. But all really proper working locking mechanism, that I could proof to work in Linux are only based on file descriptors.
As this seems to be something really old fashined and in actual C++17 style of writing C++ code with file- and ip-streams not using that mechanism, I only came up with something that works with using what was presented here:
Not able to ofstream using __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf
My Question is, is this really the only mechanism working? To connect both worlds?
I looked in all these books to find anything about fcntl and C++, but was not successful:
[Der C++ Programmierer Cxx20]
(https://www.hanser-elibrary.com/doi/book/10.3139/9783446465510)
[The C++ Programming Language] (https://www.stroustrup.com/C++.html)
[C++ Das Umfassende Handbuch]
(https://www.rheinwerk-verlag.de/c-plusplus-das-umfassende-handbuch/)
[Modern C++ Programming Cookbook Second Edition]
(https://www.packtpub.com/product/modern-c-programming-cookbook-second-edition/9781800208988)
My question to the C++ gurus here is, if I missed something, or if the following code is, today, begin of 2021 the best we could do.
Short explanation of what the code is a proof for:
We have a C++ Code which adds usernames and its LSF-processes to a conf-file, which is read by SSH-server to allow user access to that machine. As at the same time two or more running processes of this code could lead to concurrent attempts of adding or deleting users from this file could occur, we have to proof that proper file locking is preventing that. Without using an extra "access" file, which also could be a solution.
This is some example code I tested:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <thread>
#include <chrono>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <ext/stdio_filebuf.h>
using namespace std::this_thread; // for sleep_for
int main( ) {
// set unbuffered concole output
std::cout.setf(std::ios::unitbuf);
const char* filename {"testfile.txt"};
// get input from input_from_user
std::string input_from_user_string;
std::cout << "Please give input to change in the file: ";
std::cin >> input_from_user_string;
int add_1_del_2 = 0;
std::cout << "Please give 1 if you want to add to the file or 2 if you want to delete from file: ";
std::cin >> add_1_del_2;
int input_from_user_time;
std::cout << "Please give seconds to wait: ";
std::cin >> input_from_user_time;
// opening file
std::cout << "Opening File" << std::endl;
mode_t mode = S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IRGRP|S_IWGRP|S_IROTH; //664
int fd;
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, mode);
// printing out information about file descriptor
std::cout << " Dexc:" << fd << std::endl;
// generating C++-streams on filedescriptor
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char> sourcebufin(fd, std::ios::in);
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char> sourcebufout(fd, std::ios::out);
std::istream myfilein(&sourcebufin);
std::ostream myfileout(&sourcebufout);
// -----------
// check for file Locking or exit
// -----------
// creating structure for file locking
struct flock fl;
fl.l_type = F_RDLCK;
fl.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
fl.l_start = 0;
fl.l_len = 0;
// set file locking for read
fl.l_type = F_RDLCK;
std::cout << "Checking for Lock on file" << std::endl;
// check for file locking on file for read only once
(void) fcntl(fd, F_GETLK, &fl);
if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) {
std::cout << "File is locked for reading by process "
<< fl.l_pid
<< ", in status"
<< ((fl.l_type == F_WRLCK) ? 'W' : 'R')
<< ", start="
<< fl.l_start
<< ", end="
<< fl.l_len
<< std::endl;
}
else {
(void) printf("File is unlocked for reading\n");
}
// set file locking for write
fl.l_type = F_WRLCK;
// check for file locking on file for write in a loop
for (int i = 1; i < 11; i++) {
//printf("Checking for lock %d of 10 times...\n", i);
std::cout << "Checking for lock "
<< i
<< " of 10 times..."
<< std::endl;
(void) fcntl(fd, F_GETLK, &fl);
if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) {
//(void) printf("File is locked by process %d, in status %c, start=%8ld, end=%8ld\n", fl.l_pid,
// , fl.l_start, fl.l_len);
std::cout << "File is locked by process "
<< fl.l_pid
<< ", in status"
<< ((fl.l_type == F_WRLCK) ? 'W' : 'R')
<< ", start="
<< fl.l_start
<< ", end="
<< fl.l_len
<< std::endl;
sleep(10);
}
else {
(void) printf("File is unlocked\n");
break;
}
}
// -----------
// apply lock for write on file
// -----------
// locking file
std::cout << "Locking file for write" << std::endl;
// set file locking for write again, as checking on lock resets it
fl.l_type = F_WRLCK;
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETLKW, &fl) == -1) {
perror("fcntl");
abort();
}
// -----------
// wait some time
// -----------
std::cout << "Now waiting for " << input_from_user_time << " seconds, keeping the file locked..." << std::endl;
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(input_from_user_time));
// -----------
// read from file
// -----------
std::cout << "Reading from file... " << std::endl;
myfilein.seekg(0, std::ios::end);
size_t size_before = myfilein.tellg();
myfilein.seekg(0);
std::string filecontent{""};
filecontent.reserve(size_before);
std::cout << "Length of file is: " << size_before << std::endl;
// read full content of file in string "filecontent"
filecontent.assign((std::istreambuf_iterator<char>(myfilein)),
std::istreambuf_iterator<char>());
// -----------
// print output about read data
// -----------
std::cout << "Length of filecontent-string: " << filecontent.size() << std::endl;
std::cout << "Content of File begin" << std::endl;
std::cout << "----------" << std::endl;
std::cout << filecontent << std::endl;
std::cout << "----------" << std::endl;
// -----------
// Apply changes on read in data depending on given input
// -----------
if (add_1_del_2 == 2) {
std::cout << "Runmode: Del" << std::endl;
std::string string_to_delete = input_from_user_string+"\n";
std::string::size_type pos_of_found_substring = filecontent.find(string_to_delete);
if (pos_of_found_substring != std::string::npos) {
filecontent.erase(pos_of_found_substring, string_to_delete.length());
}
else {
}
}
if (add_1_del_2 == 1) {
std::cout << "Runmode: Append" << std::endl;
filecontent.append(input_from_user_string);
}
std::cout << "Content of String after change" << std::endl;
std::cout << "----------" << std::endl;
std::cout << filecontent << std::endl;
std::cout << "----------" << std::endl;
// -----------
// write out to file, truncate before to length of new string
// -----------
std::cout << "Now starting the write out..." << std::endl;
myfilein.seekg(0);
ftruncate(fd,filecontent.length());
myfileout.seekp(0);
myfileout << filecontent;
myfileout.flush();
myfileout.clear();
// -----------
// read from file for a second time and printout content
// -----------
std::cout << "Reading from file again... " << std::endl;
myfilein.seekg(0, std::ios::end);
size_t size_after = myfilein.tellg();
myfilein.seekg(0);
std::string filecontent_after{""};
filecontent_after.reserve(size_after);
std::cout << "Length of file is now: " << size_after << std::endl;
// read full content of file in string "filecontent"
filecontent_after.assign((std::istreambuf_iterator<char>(myfilein)),
std::istreambuf_iterator<char>());
std::cout << "Length of filecontent_after-string: " << filecontent_after.size() << std::endl;
std::cout << "Content of File end" << std::endl;
std::cout << "----------" << std::endl;
std::cout << filecontent_after << std::endl;
std::cout << "----------" << std::endl;
// -----------
// unlocking file and close file
// -----------
printf("Unlocking...\n");
fl.l_type = F_UNLCK;
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETLK, &fl) == -1) {
perror("fcntl");
abort();
}
close(fd);
// -----------
// done
// -----------
std::cout << "done" << std::endl;
exit(0);
}
I ask for your comments on this or perhaps how to improve.
Alexander Bruns

Substring to divide text line by number of elements in the loop in C++ Producer Consumer pattern

I am writing the code which counts the lines in the document and split it into equal pats if the line more than 100. To split I am using string.substr(i, i+adding+ addCount). If i have to slit in three parts: First and third split part is OK, Second part has not only its part but also third part words in it. It looks something like this:
linesize: 331
divider3
0 Output I 110
1 EXPRESSION: Mrs. Bennet and her daughters then departed, and Elizabeth returned instantly to Jane, leaving her own and her
0 I
110I 110 0
was here OST
110 Output I 220
2 (error) EXPRESSION: relations’ behaviour to the remarks of the two ladies and Mr. Darcy; the latter of whom, however, could not be prevailed on to join in their censure of her, in spite of all Miss Bingley’s witticisms on fine eyes
110 I
220I 110 0
was here OST
220 Output I 416
3 EXPRESSION: be prevailed on to join in their censure of her, in spite of all Miss Bingley’s witticisms on fine eyes.
220 I
416I 110 86
was here OST
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
#include <mutex>
#include <thread>
#include <condition_variable>
#include <future>
#include <map>
#include <fstream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
atomic<bool> isReady{false};
mutex mtx;
condition_variable condvar;
map<string, int> mapper;
string line;
vector<string> block;
size_t line_index = 0;
int block_size = 100;
int limit_chars = 100;
int c = 0;
deque<vector<string>> dq;
void Producer() {
std::cout << " Producer " << std::endl;
fstream fl("/home/ostap/CLionProjects/WordsCount2/file.txt"); //full path to the file
if (!fl.is_open()) {
cout << "error reading from file" << endl;
}
else {
cout << "SUCCESS!!!" << endl;
while (getline(fl, line) && line_index < block_size) {
if (line.find_first_not_of(' ') != string::npos) { // Checks whether it is a non-space.
// There's a non-space.
cout<< "linesize: " << line.length() << endl;
if (line.length() / limit_chars > 1.4) {
int divider = (int) (line.length() / limit_chars);
int adding = (int) line.length()/divider;
//попробуй поміняти на while все через addCount
int addCount = 0;
int i = 0;
cout <<"divider" << divider<<endl;
while ( i < line.length()){
while (line[i + adding + addCount] != ' ') {addCount+=1;}
cout << i << " Output I " << i + adding + addCount << endl;
cout << "EXPRESSION: " << line.substr(i, i + adding + addCount) << endl; //to del
block.push_back(line.substr(i, i + adding + addCount));
cout << i << " I" << endl;
i = i + adding + addCount;
cout << i << "I" <<" " <<adding <<" "<< addCount <<endl;
++line_index;
addCount = 0;
cout << "was here OST" << endl;
}
}
else {
++line_index;;
block.push_back(line);
cout << "Line: " << line << endl;
}
if (line_index >= block_size) {
c++;
cout << c << endl;
{
lock_guard<mutex> guard(mtx);
//cout << "Producing message: " << x << " th" << endl;
dq.push_back(block);
}
line_index = 0;
block.clear();
}
condvar.notify_one();
}
cout << "Producer completed" << endl;
isReady = true;
// for (unsigned i = 0; i < block.size(); ++i) cout << ' ' << block[i];
// cout << '\n';
//this_thread::sleep_for(chrono::seconds(1));
}
}
}
void Consumer() {
while (true) {
unique_lock<mutex> lk(mtx);
if (!dq.empty()) {
vector<string> & i = dq.front();
dq.pop_front();
lk.unlock();
cout << "Consuming: " << i.data() << " th" << endl;
} else {
if(isReady){
break;
}
else {
condvar.wait(lk);
cout << "There are no messages remained from producer" << endl;
}
}
cout << "\nConsumer is done" << endl;
}
}
int main() {
//cout << "Hello, World!" << endl;
auto t1 = async(launch::async, Producer);
auto t2 = async(launch::async, Consumer);
//auto t3 = async(launch::async, Consumer);
t1.get();
t2.get();
//t3.get();
return -1;

Cannot reopen FIFO when the same process uses both ends of the FIFO

When using a FIFO on a single process, it looks like after both ends have been opened and one is then closed, it is not possible to reuse the FIFO. Any attempt to reopen the closed end fails or the returned file descriptor is useless.
Is it possible to work around this behavior, or do we have to keep both ends of the FIFO open until we are absolutely sure we don't need it anymore?
Here is some test code that shows and attempt to reopen a closed write end of a FIFO:
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdio>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, const char **argv)
{
cout << "Creating an instance of a named pipe..." << endl;
mode_t prevMask = umask(0);
if (mknod("my_pipe", S_IFIFO | 0666, 0))
return -1;
umask(prevMask);
cout << "Opening Read end..." << endl;
int fdM = open("my_pipe", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fdM == -1)
return -1;
cout << "Opening Write end..." << endl;
int fdS = open("my_pipe", O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fdS == -1)
return -1;
cout << "Sending data to pipe..." << endl;
const char *data = "Hello my friend!";
ssize_t NbOfBytesWritten = write(fdS, data, strlen(data));
if (NbOfBytesWritten < 0)
return -1;
cout << "Number of bytes sent: " << NbOfBytesWritten << endl;
cout << "Closing Write end..." << endl;
if (close(fdS))
return -1;
cout << "Reopening Write end..." << endl;
fdS = open("my_pipe", O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fdS == -1)
{
cout << "open() - failed("<< errno << "): " << strerror(errno) << '.';
remove("my_pipe");
return -1;
}
cout << "Sending some more data to pipe..." << endl;
data = "What's up?";
NbOfBytesWritten = write(fdS, data, strlen(data));
if (NbOfBytesWritten < 0)
return -1;
cout << "Number of bytes sent: " << NbOfBytesWritten << endl;
cout << "Reading data from pipe..." << endl;
char buff[128];
ssize_t numBytesRead = read(fdM, buff, 127);
if (NbOfBytesWritten < 0)
return -1;
buff[numBytesRead] = '\0'; // null terminate the string
cout << "Number of bytes read: " << numBytesRead << endl;
cout << "Message: " << buff << endl;
cout << "Closing Write end..." << endl;
if (close(fdS))
return -1;
cout << "Closing Read end..." << endl;
if (close(fdM))
return -1;
cout << "Deleting pipe..." << endl;
if (remove("my_pipe"))
return -1;
return 0;
}
Here is the output:
Creating an instance of a named pipe...
Opening Read end...
Opening Write end...
Sending data to pipe...
Number of bytes sent: 16
Closing Write end...
Reopening Write end...
open() - failed(6): No such device or address.
I also tested similar code trying to reopen a closed read end (While the write end was kept open). In that case the open() function succeed, but the read() function using the file descriptor returned by open() fails with:
Communication error on send. (70)
EDIT:
I'm using CYGWIN.
You code works fine on Linux. I think the issue you are running into is that named pipes on CYGWIN don't work very well and fail to follow POSIX semantics. See FIFO (named pipe) is broken on Cygwin. Likely the same problem you have.

Clicking in ALSA tone generator

I'm learning to use ALSA on a Raspberry Pi 2. I've written a small test program in C++ to generate a 440 Hz test tone. It makes the tone, but there is a clicking sound about twice per second in the tone.
Does anyone have an idea why this might be happening? The code is below.
#include <cmath>
#include <climits>
#include <iostream>
#include <alsa/asoundlib.h>
#include "definitions.hpp"
using namespace std;
int main() {
int ret;
snd_pcm_t* pcm_handle; // device handle
snd_pcm_stream_t stream = SND_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK;
snd_pcm_hw_params_t* hwparams; // hardware information
char* pcm_name = strdup("plughw:0,0"); // on-board audio jack
int rate = 48000;
const uint16 freq = 440;
long unsigned int bufferSize = 8192*4;
const uint32 len = bufferSize*100;
const float32 arg = 2 * 3.141592 * freq / rate;
sint16 vals[len];
for(int i = 0; i < len; i = i + 2) {
vals[i] = SHRT_MAX * cos(arg * i / 2);
}
snd_pcm_hw_params_alloca(&hwparams);
ret = snd_pcm_open(&pcm_handle, pcm_name, stream, 0);
cout << "Opening: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params_any(pcm_handle, hwparams);
cout << "Initializing hwparams structure: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params_set_access(pcm_handle, hwparams,
SND_PCM_ACCESS_RW_INTERLEAVED);
cout << "Setting access: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params_set_format(pcm_handle, hwparams,
SND_PCM_FORMAT_S16_LE);
cout << "Setting format: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params_set_rate(pcm_handle, hwparams,
rate, (int)0);
cout << "Setting rate: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params_set_channels(pcm_handle, hwparams, 2);
cout << "Setting channels: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params_set_periods(pcm_handle, hwparams, 2, 0);
cout << "Setting periods: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params_set_buffer_size_near(pcm_handle, hwparams,
&bufferSize);
cout << "Setting buffer size: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
ret = snd_pcm_hw_params(pcm_handle, hwparams);
cout << "Applying parameters: " << snd_strerror(ret) << endl;
cout << endl << endl;
const void* ptr = (const void*)&vals;
int err;
do {
ptr += bufferSize;
ret = snd_pcm_writei(pcm_handle,
ptr, len);
if(ret < 0) {
err = snd_pcm_prepare(pcm_handle);
cout << "Preparing: " << snd_strerror(err)
<< endl;
}
} while(ret < 0);
cout << "Writing data: " << ret << ", " << snd_strerror(ret)
<< endl;
}
When you run it, you get this terminal output. Of course, there's no write error, just the number of bits written.
pi#raspberrypi:~/radio $ ./bin/alsatest
Opening: Success
Initializing hwparams structure: Success
Setting access: Success
Setting format: Success
Setting rate: Success
Setting channels: Success
Setting periods: Success
Setting buffer size: Success
Applying parameters: Success
Writing data: 344110, Unknown error 344110
UPDATE - NEXT DAY
OK. I've hooked the output up to my handy-dandy oscilloscope and saw the following waveform. There seems to be a discontinuity in the signal every time there's a click. I added a few lines to count how many nearly-zero values were next to each other in my sinusoid array, and there were none. Oddly enough, the ALSA sample program /test/pcm.c makes a perfect wave. Perhaps I need to write in really small chunks? There doesn't seem to be much difference between my code and the example.