I'm using django-easy-pdf in a project to provide an output report. Works great. I'm just adding Hebrew to the languages available and I cannot get the output in RTL.
I've tried a number of approaches to force RTL formatting including hard-coding
html, body, p, table, tr, td, span {
direction: rtl;
}
within the tags in base.html.
Does django-easy-pdf support RTL and if so, how do I implement it?
solution: use django-weasyprint instead
Related
Based on the answer to this question, I was able to get 2-column papaja with listings wrapping (rather than overflowing column width). But the listings package turns off various features that help code listings and R output stand out relative to the main text.
A simple solution would be if I could globally change the font faces and/or sizes selectively for code and R output. Is there a way to do that in papaja? I haven't been able to figure this out from papaja or Rmarkdown documentation. Thank you!
When you use the listings package in a papaja (or bookdown) document, what is technically happening is that all code is wrapped into an lstlisting LaTeX environment that comes with its own capabilities of customizing code appearance. Hence, you don't see the syntax highlighting that you would otherwise see if you would not use the listings package. The documentation of the listings package with instructions how to style your code can be found here.
To make use of this, you can extend the YAML header of your papaja document like this:
documentclass : "apa6"
classoption : "jou"
output :
papaja::apa6_pdf:
pandoc_args: --listings
header-includes:
- \lstset{breaklines=true,language=R,basicstyle=\tiny\ttfamily,frame=trB,commentstyle=\color{darkgray}\textit}
Here, I first specify the code's language, and use a tiny monospace font. With frame, I add a frame around the code block, and with commentstyle I set comments in italic and gray.
i´m developing a theme and for some reason i need to move the default position for breadcrubms (also for many other things) over woocommerce themes. Then i realised to do something like this on my functions.php:
function woocommerce_remove_breadcrumb(){
remove_action( 'woocommerce_before_main_content', 'woocommerce_breadcrumb', 20);
}
add_action('woocommerce_before_main_content', 'woocommerce_remove_breadcrumb');
function woocommerce_custom_breadcrumb(){
woocommerce_breadcrumb();
}
add_action( 'woo_custom_breadcrumb', 'woocommerce_custom_breadcrumb' );
And then on any template file, output the breadcrumb just with:
<? do_action('woo_custom_breadcrumb'); ?>
And works. My question is more than that. Is this the correct approach for something like this? I mean for anything over woocommerce, not just breadcrumb, for any pice, ratings, titles, buttons, sidebar, and so on.
What i´m thinking on is why woocommerce templates don´t come with more deep code. I mean, why there´s no such a single-content-loop.php template where you can just change the order of things, title, category, content, images, etc. in an easy way rather that hooking into functions?
I think that is an acceptable way to call the breadcrumbs explicitly. Sometimes it is easier to call a specific function than remove everything around it!
As for changing the order of things and getting into advanced customization; there isn't a single file, but a number of files working together. Create a folder in your themes root called 'woocommerce' and copy the following files for a safe override:
woocommerce/woocommerce-hooks.php:
Here are your hooks, including the ones you are overriding in your themes functions.php. Here is where you can experiment with removing and repositioning certain elements on your product page. Search for 'Sidebar' and you will see where the 'woocommerce_sidebar' action is added with the function it references in...
woocommerce/woocommerce-template.php:
Here are the functions used in template files to output content based on conditional statements. For instance, search for the 'Single Product' series and you can see which template files are used for which functions. For instance 'woocommerce_template_single_title' uses 'single-product/title.php' - if you copy over this folder and file you can make very specific edits to just the title section
Between these two files and their accompanying references (like title.php) I believe you can do the things you described. Let me know how it works out! I'm new to woocommerce too!
Is it possible to make a graph like this one with ocamlgraph? HTML labels have to be delimited with <> instead of "" and I don't see any mention of this functionality in the documentation.
They can parse this kind of dot nodes: the documentation for the Dot_ast module of OCamlgraph has a Html of string case of the id type for this. It seems like they cannot print this kind of dot files, as the `Label node of the Dot attributes only handles direct strings.
If you need this feature, you could consider implementing it yourself (just change the files graphviz.ml and graphviz.mli), I'm sure the authors would be glad to have some contribution.
I have a page template in Tridion 2011 with Razor code that prints information based on RenderComponentPresentation() as the first thing in the page. No other markup comes before it, because the component, not the page, contains the initial markup. Unless I put at least one character before the first RenderComponentPresentation in the published output, the template refuses to render any presentations.
So, for example, if this is all that is in the layout TBB this works (in my real code the tcms are real of course):
<
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:mytcm","tcm:myothertcm")
but this does not
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:mytcm","tcm:myothertcm")
The first prints the contents of the component preceded by the "<", whereas the second does nothing at all. I don't want to have ANY markup directly at the start of the page template, I want the first thing to be the component. Is it possible?
I've just done a quick test in Template Builder using the latest version of the Razor Mediator (1.2) and couldn't replicate your issue.
Maybe you could try:
<text></text>
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:mytcm","tcm"myothertcm")
It won't render any additional markup but may trick the mediator into doing what you want (though like I said, I can't replicate your problem so can't verify whether it does).
Normally with Razor you iterate over any and all Component Presentations on the page, and right now I'm working with
#foreach(var cp in ComponentPresentations){
#cp.RenderComponentPresentation()
}
This will render every component on the page, regardless of predefined schema's or templates. Your issue however suggest a problem elsewhere. What kind of output does your page template generate (do mind its the page template using a compound template which in turn includes the Razor TBB you describe here). Is it .aspx, HTML or other? And what is the Component templates' output? is it an HTML fragment, or anything else?
As far as you syntax goes, that should be just fine other than the template invocation:
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:x-xxx-xx", "tcm:xx-xxx-xx")
I have a feeling this code only works when used within HTML tags, though, but that's just a hunch.
Bit of a hack but have you tried:
<text>#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:x-xxx-xx", "tcm:xx-xxx-xx")</text>
or
#Html.Raw(RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:x-xxx-xx", "tcm:xx-xxx-xx"))
Disclaimer: not really used Razor mediator. Just Razor.
I'm using HTML_Template for templating in my C++-based web app (don't ask). I chose that because it was very simple and it turns out to be a good solution.
The only problem right now is that I would like to be able to include translatable strings in the HTML templates (HTML_Template does not really support that).
Ultimately, what I would like is to have a single file that contains all the strings to be translated. It can then be given to a translator and plugged back in to the app and used depending on which language the user chose in settings.
I've been going back and forth on some options and was wondering what others felt was the best choice (or if there's a better choice that isn't listed)
Extend HTML_Template to include a tag for holding the literal string to translate. So, for example, in the HTML I would put something like
<TMPL_TRANS "this is the text to translate"/>
Use a completely separate scheme for translation and preprocess the HTML files to generate the final template files (without the special translation lingo). For example, in the pre-processed file, translatable text would look like this:
{{this is the text to translate}}
and the final would look like:
this is the text to translate
Don't do anything and let the translators find the string to translate in the html and js files themselves.
You may want to consider arrays, if not already.
A popular implementation for translating strings is to use tables and indices. One index is for the language and the second index is for the string. Create a function that returns strings based on these two indices:
const std::string& Get_String(unsigned int language_index, unsigned int string_index);
Each language would have a table of strings (or const char *). There would be a table of pointers to language tables, one for each supported language.
The biggest pain is to convert existing code to use this system.
Hope this helps.