I am looking to extract all the attributes name of a Json string. I came out with an expression but it doesn't work for some specific scenario,
The expression I build is the following
"([a-zA-Z0-9-]*)"(?::\s(?:"[a-zA-Z0-9-\s:]*")|(?:\s^null$)|(?:\s[0-9]+,))
And it works fine for attribute like these :
{"dataAreaId": "cel", "CustomerAccount": "C101112", "AddressBrazilianCNPJOrCPF": "", "PartyType": "Organization"}
But it doest retrieve/match the attribute for these :
{ "DeliveryAddressLongitude": 0,"AddressTimeZone": null,"FullPrimaryAddress": "7800 Avenue Aurtweuil Suite 28841\nBrossard QC J2Z 3P1\nCanada"}
I will really appreciate having any guideline about it as I am struggling.
Cheers
VIncent
With generated json you'd only have to match the word preceding a colon, right, while accounting for quotes? For example:
/("?)(\b\w+\b)\1:/gm
Edit:
/.../gm: g and m are flags that modify the behaviour of the expression, where g (global) means try to find all matches in the string and m (multiline) means make every line in the string anchorable by ^ and $; you actually don't need the m flag here, that was an oversight on my part.
Depending on regex flavour you'll use flags as seen above - after the second expression delimiter, as parameters for match functions or as in-expression modifiers like (?g). I just find /.../flags a good shortcut to show an expression with flags.
\b is a word boundary that anchors a sequence of word characters by making sure there can't be a word character on both sides of it; if there is, the expression won't match. In this expression I just use it to make the engine fail bad strings a little bit quicker while accounting for the optional ". They aren't strictly needed for this expression when you use it only on well-formed JSON.
Related
I want to select some string combination (with dots(.)) from a very long string (sql). The full string could be a single line or multiple line with new line separator, and this combination could be in start (at first line) or a next line (new line) or at both place.
I need help in writing a regex for it.
Examples:
String s = I am testing something like test.test.test in sentence.
Expected output: test.test.test
Example2 (real usecase):
UPDATE test.table
SET access = 01
WHERE access IN (
SELECT name FROM project.dataset.tablename WHERE name = 'test' GROUP BY 1 )
Expected output: test.table and project.dataset.tablename
, can I also add some prefix or suffix words or space which should be present where ever this logic gets checked. In above case if its update regex should pick test.table, but if the statement is like select test.table regex should not pick it up this combinations and same applies for suffix.
Example3: This is to illustrate the above theory.
INS INTO test.table
SEL 'abcscsc', wu_id.Item_Nbr ,1
FROM test.table as_t
WHERE as_t.old <> 0 AND as_t.date = 11
AND (as_t.numb IN ('11') )
Expected Output: test.table, test.table (Key words are INTO and FROM)
Things Not Needed in selection:as_t.numb, as_t.old, as_t.date
If I get the regex I can use in program to extract this word.
Note: Before and after string words to the combination could be anything like update, select { or(, so we have to find the occurrence of words which are joined together with .(dot) and all the number of such occurrence.
I tried something like this:
(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?) -: This only selected the word between two .dot and not all.
.(?<=.)(.?)(?=.)(.?). - This everything before and after.
To solve your initial problem, we can just use some negation. Here's the pattern I came up with:
[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
[^ ... ] Means to make a character class including everything except for what's between the brackets. In this case, I put \s in there, which matches any whitespace. So [^\s] matches anything that isn't whitespace.
+ Is a quantifier. It means to find as many of the preceding construct as you can without breaking the match. This would happily match everything that's not whitespace, but I follow it with a \., which matches a literal .. The \ is necessary because . means to match any character in regex, so we need to escape it so it only has its literal meaning. This means there has to be a . in this group of non-whitespace characters.
I end the pattern with another [^\s]+, which matches everything after the . until the next whitespace.
Now, to solve your secondary problem, you want to make this match only work if it is preceded by a given keyword. Luckily, regex has a construct almost specifically for this case. It's called a lookbehind. The syntax is (?<= ... ) where the ... is the pattern you want to look for. Using your example, this will only match after the keywords INTO and FROM:
(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
Here (?:INTO|FROM) means to match either the text INTO or the text FROM. I then specify that it should be followed by a whitespace character with \s. One possible problem here is that it will only match if the keywords are written in all upper case. You can change this behavior by specifying the case insensitive flag i to your regex parser. If your regex parser doesn't have a way to specify flags, you can usually still specify it inline by putting (?i) in front of the pattern, like so:
(?i)(?<=(?:INTO|FROM)\s)[^\s]+\.[^\s]+
If you are new to regex, I highly recommend using the www.regex101.com website to generate regex and learn how it works. Don't forget to check out the code generator part for getting the regex code based on the programming language you are using, that's a cool feature.
For your question, you need a regex that understands any word character \w that matches between 0 and unlimited times, followed by a dot, followed by another series of word character that repeats between 0 and unlimited times.
So here is my solution to your question:
Your regex in JavaScript:
const regex = /([\w][.][\w])+/gm;
in Java:
final String regex = "([\w][.][\w])+";
in Python:
regex = r"([\w][.][\w])+"
in PHP:
$re = '/([\w][.][\w])+/m';
Note that: this solution is written for your use case (to be used for SQL strings), because now if you have something like '.word' or 'word..word', it will still catch it which I assume you don't have a string like that.
See this screenshot for more details
I'm trying to make a Regex that matches this string {Date HH:MM:ss}, but here's the trick: HH, MM and ss are optional, but it needs to be "HH", not just "H" (the same thing applies to MM and ss). If a single "H" shows up, the string shouldn't be matched.
I know I can use H{2} to match HH, but I can't seem to use that functionality plus the ? to match zero or one time (zero because it's optional, and one time max).
So far I'm doing this (which is obviously not working):
Regex dateRegex = new Regex(#"\{Date H{2}?:M{2}?:s{2}?\}");
Next question. Now that I have the match on the first string, I want to take only the HH:MM:ss part and put it in another string (that will be the format for a TimeStamp object).
I used the same approach, like this:
Regex dateFormatRegex = new Regex(#"(HH)?:?(MM)?:?(ss)?");
But when I try that on "{Date HH:MM}" I don't get any matches. Why?
If I add a space like this Regex dateFormatRegex = new Regex(#" (HH)?:?(MM)?:?(ss)?");, I have the result, but I don't want the space...
I thought that the first parenthesis needed to be escaped, but \( won't work in this case. I guess because it's not a parenthesis that is part of the string to match, but a key-character.
(H{2})? matches zero or two H characters.
However, in your case, writing it twice would be more readable:
Regex dateRegex = new Regex(#"\{Date (HH)?:(MM)?:(ss)?\}");
Besides that, make sure there are no functions available for whatever you are trying to do. Parsing dates is pretty common and most programming languages have functions in their standard library - I'd almost bet 1k of my reputation that .NET has such functions, too.
In your edit you mention an unwanted leading space in the result… to check a leading or trailing condition together with your regex without including this to the result you can use lookaround feature of regex.
new Regex(#"(?<=Date )(HH)?:?(MM)?:?(ss)?")
(?<=...) is a lookbehind pattern.
Regex test site with this example.
For input Date HH:MM:ss, it will match both regexes (with or without lookbehind).
But input FooBar HH:MM:ss will still match a simple regex, but the lookbehind will fail here. Lookaround doesn't change the content of the result, but it prevents false matches (e.g., this second input that is not a Date).
Find more information on regex and lookaround here.
I am trying to write a regex that matches only strings like this:
89-72
10-123
109-12
122-311(a)
22-311(a)(1)(d)(4)
These strings are embedded in sentences and sometimes there are 2 potential matches in the sentence like this:
In section 10-123 which references section 122-311(a) there is a phone number 456-234-2222
I do not want to match the phone. Here is my current working regex
\d{2,3}\-\d{2,3}(\([a-zA-Z0-9]\))*
see DEMO
I've been looking on Stack and have not found anything yet. Any help would be appreciated. Will be using this in a google sheet and potentially postgres.
Based on regex, suggested by #Wiktor Stribiżew:
=REGEXEXTRACT(A1,REPT("\b(\d{2,3}-\d{2,3}\b(?:\([A-Za-z0-9]\))*)(?:[^-]|$)(?:.*)",LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,"\b(\d{2,3}-\d{2,3}\b(?:\([A-Za-z0-9]\))*)(?:[^-]|$)", char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]",""))))
The formula will return all matches.
String:
A
In 22-311(a)(1)(d)(4) section 10-123 which ... 122-311(a) ... number 456-234-2222
Output:
B C D
22-311(a)(1)(d)(4) 10-123 122-311(a)
Solution
To extract all matches from a string, use this pattern:
=REGEXEXTRACT(A1,
REPT(basic_regex & "(?:.*)",
LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,basic_regex, char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]",""))))
The tail of a function:
LEN(REGEXREPLACE(REGEXREPLACE(A1,basic_regex, char (9)),"[^"&char(9)&"]","")))
is just for finding number 3 -- how many entries of a pattern in a string.
To not match the phone number you have to indicate that the match must neither be preceded nor followed by \d or -. Google spreadsheet uses RE2 which does not support look around assertion (see the list of supported feature) so as far as I can tell, the only solution is to add a character before and after the match, or the string boundary:
(?:^|[^-\d])\d{2,3}\-\d{2,3}(\([a-zA-Z0-9]\))*(?:$|[^-\d])
(?:^|[^-\d]) means either the start of a line (^) or a character that is not - or \d (you might want to change that, and forbid all letters as well). $ is the end of a line. ^ and $ only do what you want with the /m flag though
As you can see here this finds the correct strings, but with additional spaces around some of the matches.
I thought that by default my Regex would exhibit the greedy behavior that I want, but it is not in the following code:
Regex keywords = new Regex(#"in|int|into|internal|interface");
var targets = keywords.ToString().Split('|');
foreach (string t in targets)
{
Match match = keywords.Match(t);
Console.WriteLine("Matched {0,-9} with {1}", t, match.Value);
}
Output:
Matched in with in
Matched int with in
Matched into with in
Matched internal with in
Matched interface with in
Now I realize that I could get it to work for this small example if I simply sorted the keywords by length descending, but
I want to understand why this
isn't working as expected, and
the actual project I am working on
has many more words in the Regex and
it is important to keep them in
alphabetical order.
So my question is: Why is this being lazy and how do I fix it?
Laziness and greediness applies to quantifiers only (?, *, +, {min,max}). Alternations always match in order and try the first possible match.
It looks like you're trying to word break things. To do that you need the entire expression to be correct, your current one is not. Try this one instead..
new Regex(#"\b(in|int|into|internal|interface)\b");
The "\b" says to match word boundaries, and is a zero-width match. This is locale dependent behavior, but in general this means whitespace and punctuation. Being a zero width match it will not contain the character that caused the regex engine to detect the word boundary.
According to RegularExpressions.info, regular expressions are eager. Therefore, when it goes through your piped expression, it stops on the first solid match.
My recommendation would be to store all of your keywords in an array or list, then generate the sorted, piped expression when you need it. You would only have to do this once too as long as your keyword list doesn't change. Just store the generated expression in a singleton of some sort and return that on regex executions.
I would like to match either any sequence or digits, or the literal: na .
I am using:
"^\d*|na$"
Numbers are being matched, but not na.
Whats my mistake?
More info: im using this in a regular expression validator for a textbox in aspnet c#.
A blank entry is ok.
It's because the expression is being read (assuming PCRE):
"^\d*" OR "na$"
Some parentheses would take care of that in a jiff. Choose from (depending on your needs):
"^(\d+|na)$" // this will capture the number or na
"^(?:\d+|na)$" // this one won't capture
Cheers!
The | operator have a higher precedence than the anchors ^ and $. So the expression ^\d*|na$ means match ^\d* or na$. So try this:
^(\d*|na)$
Or:
^\d*$|^na$
Perhaps ^(?:\d*|na)$ would be better. What language/engine? Also, please show the input and, if possible, the snippet of the code.
Also, it is possible that you aren't matching "na" because there is a new line after it. The digits wouldn't be affected because you did not specify a $ anchor for them.
So, depending on the language and how the input is acquired, there might be new-line between "na" and the end of the string, and $ won't match it unless you turn on multi-line match (or strip the string of the new line).
This may not be the best or most elegant way to fix it, but try this:
"^\d*|[n][a]$"