I am using regex to find few keywords after colon(:) and the best I have reached so far is:
sample test case
test {
test1 {
sadffd(test: "aff", aaa: "aa1") {}
}
}
Now I have to find a keyword inside () brackets and its working for 'aaa' but when I add test it fails, it matches entire words in string.
my regex so far
\btest(.*\w") (failed case) expected "aff" returned "aff", aaa: "aa1"
\baaa(.*\w") (pass case) returned "aa1"
please let me know if more information is needed
You may try
:\s*"(.*?)"
And the data you need is in the first capturing group.
Explanation
:\s*"(.*?)"
: colon
\s* followed by optionally any number of spaces
" followed by quote
( ) capturing group, containing...
.*? any number of character, matching as few as possible
" followed by quote
Demo:
https://regex101.com/r/WnvzdG/1
Update:
If you want to match ONLY after specific keywords, followed by colon, you can do something like:
(KEYWORD1|KEYWORD2|KEYWORD3)\s*:\s*"(.*?)"
First capture group will be the keyword matched, second capture group will be the value.
One more approach (executed in Python)
items = ['test{test1 {sadffd(test: "aff", aaa: "aa1") {}}}']
for item in items:
print(re.findall(r'"(\w+)"',item))
print(re.findall(r'(?<=: )"(\w+)"',item))
Output
['aff', 'aa1']
['aff', 'aa1']
I believe a simple regex would work to get everything inside the double quotes in your case:
("\w+")
Note that your question above says you want to capture "aff" and not just aff so I've included the surrounding quotes within the capturing group.
Example from regex101:
It's pretty crude but this should be OK for the input you've presented. (It wouldn't handle things like an escaped double quote in the string, for example).
Related
I'm trying to capture a group from a string with ~, ~~ and ~~~ symbols. I was successful with extracting single symbols but it doesn't ignore the other occurrences in the string.
This is my code I tried experimenting with:
String f = '~the calculator is on and working~I entered 50 into the calculator'+
'~~I press add button~~holding equal button ~~~The result should be 50';
List<String>givens = f.split(RegExp(r'~+'));
List<String>whens = f.split(RegExp(r'~~+'));
List<String>thens = f.split(RegExp(r'~~~+'));
for(String ss in givens){
print(ss);
}
print('xxxxxxxxxxxx');
for(String ss in whens){
print(ss);
}
print('xxxxxxxxxxxx');
for(String ss in thens){
print(ss);
}
Which will result with:
The givens capture group also captured the ones with ~~ and ~~~ which is not intended.
The whens capture group also captured the ones single ~ which made it very confusing.
Lastly, the thens capture group also captured the others which is also not intended.
I only need to capture the strings starting with the specific pattern but will stop when they see a different one.
Example: givens should only capture 'the calculator is on and working' and 'I entered 50 into the calculator' only.
Any hints or help is greatly appreciated!
I think the problem is that you started off by splitting the string into pieces. But it might be easier to search for the elements with a pattern that will look for some text preceeded with either one, two or three ~ chars.
This can be done with regex positive lookbehind patterns.
Typically, if you want to find a string preceeded by one tild then you have to avoid that it matches if we have other tilds before it.
Find givens
(?<=(?:[^~]|^)~)[^~]+ would be the pattern to find only givens.
Test it here: https://regex101.com/r/9WLbM3/2
Explanation
[^~] means search for any character which is not a ~. This is because [abc] means any char which is in the list, so a, b or c. If you add the ^ char at the beginning of the list then it means "not these chars".
[^~]+ means search for one or multiple times a character which is not ~. This will capture phrases between the tilds.
A positive lookbehind is done with (?<=something present). We want to search for a tild so we would put (?<=~) as positive lookbehind. But the problem is that it will also match the ones with several tilds in front. To avoid that we can say that the tild should either be prefixed by ^ (meaning the beginning of a string) or by [^~] (meaning not a tild). To say "either this or that", we use the syntax (this|that|or even that). But using parenthesis will capture the content and we don't need that. To disable group capturing we can add ?: at the beginning of the group, leading finally to (?:[^~]|^) meaning either a non-tild char or the beginning of the string, without capturing it.
Find whens and thens
The regular expression is almost the same. It's just that we replace ~ by ~{2} or ~{3}.
Pattern for whens: (?<=(?:[^~]|^)~{2})[^~]+
Pattern for thens: (?<=(?:[^~]|^)~{3})[^~]+
Looking for some regex which will create a capture group for words occurring within parentheses, ignoring the parentheses themselves. The regex must be either PCRE or ICU.
Input: ( lakshd asd___ asa1123 Name : _____)
Desired Output: Name
What I've tried:
\\((Name|name|NAME)\\)
(?<=\\()name|Name|NAME(?=\\))
\\(name|Name|NAME\\)
What I've tried:
\\((Name|name|NAME)\\)
(?<=\\()name|Name|NAME(?=\\))
\\(name|Name|NAME\\)
All these patterns look for name or Name or NAME that has a ( immediately before and ) right after, with difference being what is captured or returned as a match. To match some word inside parentheses, you need to use \([^()]* before the value you need to get, and [^()]*\) after it.
Also, there is no point in extracting something you already know.
So, if you plan to extract the last word from the parentheses, you may use
> library(stringr)
> s = "( lakshd asd___ asa1123 Name : _____)"
> res <- str_match(s, "(?i)\\([^()]*\\b([a-z]\\w*)\\b[^()]*\\)")
> res[,2]
[1] "Name"
Note that str_match allows accessing captured values.
The (?i)\\([^()]*\\b([a-z]\\w*)\\b[^()]*\\) pattern matches parentheses and the last whole word from it.
If nested levels of parentheses are not likely to happen then looking if current position is going to be followed by a closing parenthesis at the end while an opening parenthesis is supposed to be opened already will do the trick (works with both ICU and PCRE):
(Name|name|NAME)(?=[^()]*\))
PCRE live demo
this is my first post on StackOverflow, and regex is new to me, please bear with me.
I am attempting to capture fields within a powershell command event log.
I have text in the following format:
(Get-AdUser): name="Identity"; value="Username"
I want to capture the string inside the parenthesis Get-ADUser and also capture the value field of "username"
If possible a final output of
Get-AdUser Username
would be perfect.
The gotcha is that I want to capture any value inside the parenthesis except for the word "Out-Default". Out-Default is the output of a command, rather than the command itself.
So far I have:
\((?!Out-Default)([^)]+)\)
which is matching anything inside the parenthesis except "Out-Default".
I'm not sure how to approach it from here. Any advice is appreciated.
Update - is it possible to use only 1 capture group to capture:
(Get-AdUser): name="Identity"; value="Username"
and have the result look like
Get-AdUser name=Identity value=Username
?
Hope this work
\((?!Out-Default)([^)]+)\).*?value="([^"]+)"
Regex demo
Explanation:
\: Escapes a special character sample
( … ): Capturing group sample
(?!…): Negative lookahead sample
[^x]: One character that is not x sample
+: One or more sample
.: Any character except line break sample
*: Zero or more times sample
?: Once or none sample
I have to parse a lot of content with a regular expression.
The content might, for example, be:
14-08-2015 14:18 : Example : Hello =) How are you?
What are you doing?
14-08-2015 14:19: Example2 : I'm fine thanks!
I have this regular expression that will of course return 2 matches, and the groups that I need - data, hour, name, multi line message:
(\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})\s?(\d{2}:\d{2})\s?:([^:]+):([^\d]+)
The problem is that if a number is written inside the message this will not be OK, because the regex will stop getting more characters.
For example in this case this will not work:
14-08-2015 14:18 : Example : Hello =) How are you?
What are you 2 doing?
14-08-2015 14:19: Example2 : I'm fine thanks!
How do I get all the characters until a new date/hour is found?
The problem is with your final capturing group ([^\d]+).
Instead you can use ((?:(?!\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})[\s\S])+)
The outer parenthesis: ((?:(?!\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})[\s\S])+) indicate a capturing group
The next set of parenthesis: ((?:(?!\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})[\s\S])+) indicate a non-capturing group that we want to match 1 to infinite amount of times.
Inside we have a negative look ahead: ((?:(?!\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})[\s\S])+). This says that whatever we are matching cannot include a date.
What we actually capture: ((?:(?!\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})[\s\S])+) means we capture every character including a new line.
The entire regex that works looks like this:
(\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})\s?(\d{2}:\d{2})\s?:([^:]+):((?:(?!\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})[\s\S])+)
https://regex101.com/r/wH5xR2/2
Use a lookahead for dates and get everything up to that.
/^(\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4})\s?(\d{2}:\d{2})\s?:([^:]+):\s?((?:(?!^\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}\s?\d{2}:\d{2}).)*)/sm
I've edited you regex in two ways:
Added ^to the front, ensuring you only start from timestamps on their own line, which should filter out most issues with people posting timestamps
Replaced the last capturing group with ((?:(?!^\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}\s?\d{2}:\d{2}).)*)
(?!^\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}\s?\d{2}:\d{2}) is a negative lookahead, with date
(?:(lookahead).)* Looks for any amount of characters that aren't followed by a date anchored to the start of a line.
((?:(lookahead).)*) Just captures the group for you.
It's not that efficient, but it works. Note the s flag for dotall (dot matches newlines) and m flag that lets ^ match at the start of line. ^ is necessary in the lookahead so that you don't stop the match in case someone posts a timestamp, and in the start to make sure you only match dates from the start of a line.
DEMO: https://regex101.com/r/rX8eH0/3
DEMO with flags in regex: https://regex101.com/r/rX8eH0/4
I'm having trouble to compute 2 regex in one (used to deal with .ini files)
I've got this one (I suggest you to use rubular with theses examples to understand)
^(?<key>[^=;\r\n]+)=((?<value>\"*.*;*.*\"[^;\r\n]*);?(?<comment>.*)[^\r\n]*)
to match :
This="isnot;acomment"
This="isa";comment
This="isa;special";case
And I've got this one :
^(?<key>[^=;\r\n]+)=(?<value>[^;\r\n]*);?(?<comment>[^\r\n]*)
to match
This=isasimplecase
This=isasimple;comment
And I'm trying to merge the 2 regex, sadly I do not manage to say "If my value group is not starting with \" use the second one if not use the first one".
Right now i've got this :
^(?<key>[^=;\r\n]+)=(((?<value>\"*.*;*.*\"[^;\r\n]*);?(?<comment>.*)[^\r\n]*)|(?<value>[^;\r\n]*);?(?<comment>[^\r\n]*))
But it's creating 2 more sections unnamed for the simple case without quoted. I was thinking that maybe by adding "the first item of the value group for the simple case must not start with \". But I didn't manage to do it.
PS : I suggest you to use rubular to understand better my problem. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough
How about this?
^(?<key>[^=;\r\n]+)=(?<value>"[^"]*"|[^;\n\r]*);?(?<comment>.*)
DEMO
(?<key>[^=;\r\n]+) Matches the part before the = symbol.
"[^"]*" Matches the string within the double quotes , ex strings like "foobar". If there is no " then the regex engine move on to the next pattern that is [^;\n\r]* and it matches upto the first ; or newline or \r character. These matched characters are stored into a named group called value.
;? Optional semicolon.
(?<comment>.*) Remaining characters are stored into the comment group.