I'm fairly familiar with a lot of the Amazon Web Services but I'm not trying to get up to speed with a number of Azure Web Services. To help that transition, what AWS services are most similar to these Azure ones:
Cosmos Db - I'm guessing AWS Dynamo Db
Azure Service Bus - I'm guessing AWS SQS
Service fabric
Azure Storage (Blob, queues and tables)
Azure Functions - I'm guessing this is AWS Lambda
App Insights
Cloud Services
Azure Traffic Manager
Azure Load Balancer - I'm guessing AWS Load Balancer
Azure Key vault
Thanks in advance
Microsoft has done a nice work of comparing Azure and AWS Services.
You can find this information here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services.
Related
I have a ASP.NET Core Web API planning to deploy in AWS, I don't have enough background in AWS what is the good package to subscribe in AWS?
My option is Amazon EC2 or Cloud Computing or there is other package for Web API? And my other concern is I also have files to upload by the client need at least of 1 or 2 TB of cloud storage. Can I connect the Cloud Storage services of Amazon to Amazon EC2. I really don't how to start.
You could look at Elastic Beanstalk (EB) as explained in Creating and deploying .NET applications on Elastic Beanstalk. EB is AWS Platform as a Service (Paas) offering which allows you to deploy your code, without managing much or any of EC2 instances, load balancers, security groups and more.
Alternatively, if you can run your app in a docker container, maybe it would be easier to deploy it using ECS Fargate. EB can also be used to deploy dockerized applications.
For storage you can use EFS if you require filesystem-like storage that can be shared across multiple instances, containers or lambda functions.
I have a ASP.NET Core MVC 5 app that I want to deploy in AWS Beanstalk and communicate with some .NET services and SQL database in the on-premise. How can I achieve that? Can I achieve it by creating a VPN connection?
Based on the comments.
One way to enable private connectivity between application running on Elastic Beanstalk (EB) and on-premise database is through VPN. AWS provides managed service for that called AWS Site-to-Site VPN.
The other solution, though much more expensive, is through AWS Direct Connect (DX). Unlike VPN, DX connectivity does not involve internet which generally improves security, bandwidth and latency of the connection.
I'm trying to find out if Spring Cloud Zuul is working on GCP or not. If that's the case, should we use it the same way we do in AWS?
(The Services are deployed as App Engines)
Thanks,
As Zuul is an edge server as a bastion host it should have no problem working on GCP. The dataflow and architecture will depend entirely on the GCP API and service where you will be deploying Spring Cloud, in your case (App Engine API), the management and configurations come from Cloud VPC API features such as Routes and Load Balancer API's that will be working with Zuul.
Here is a guide explaining how to deploy it on GKE as a containerized service where they follow the integration for Zuul with Istio at service layer scope.
We have all of our cloud assets currently inside Azure, which includes a Service Fabric Cluster containing many applications and services which communicate with Azure VM's through Azure Load Balancers. The VM's have both public and private IP's, and the Load Balancers' frontend IP configurations point to the private IP's of the VM's.
What I need to do is move my VM's to AWS. Service Fabric has to stay put on Azure though. I don't know if this is possible or not. The Service Fabric services communicate with the Azure VM's through the Load Balancers using the VM's private IP addresses. So the only way I could see achieving this is either:
Keep the load balancers in Azure and direct the traffic from them to AWS VM's.
Point Azure Service Fabric to AWS load balancers.
I don't know if either of the above are technologically possible.
For #1, if I used Azure's load balancing, I believe the load balancer front-end IP config would have to use the public IP of the AWS VM, right? Is that not less secure? If I set it up to go through a VPN (if even possible) is that as secure as using internal private ip's as in the current load balancer config?
For #2, again, not sure if this is technologically achievable - can we even have Service Fabric Services "talk" to AWS load balancers? If so, what is the most secure way to achieve this?
I'm not new to the cloud engineering game, but very new to the idea of using two cloud services as a hybrid solution. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
As far as I know creating multiregion / multi-datacenter cluster in Service Fabric is possible.
Here are the brief list of requirements to have initial mindset about how this would work and here is a sample not approved by Microsoft with cross region Service Fabric cluster configuration (I know this are different regions in Azure not different cloud provider but this sample can be of use to see how some of the things are configured).
Hope this helps.
Based on the details provided in the comments of you own question:
SF is cloud agnostic, you could deploy your entire cluster without any dependencies on Azure at all.
The cluster you see in your azure portal is just an Azure Resource Screen used to describe the details of your cluster.
Your are better of creating the entire cluster in AWS, than doing the requested approach, because at the end, the only thing left in azure would be this Azure Resource Screen.
Extending the Oleg answer, "creating multiregion / multi-datacenter cluster in Service Fabric is possible." I would add, that is also possible to create an azure agnostic cluster where you can host on AWS, Google Cloud or On Premises.
The only details that is not well clear, is that any other option not hosted in azure requires an extra level of management, because you have to play around with the resources(VM, Load Balancers, AutoScaling, OS Updates, and so on) to keep the cluster updated and running.
Also, multi-region and multi-zone cluster were something left aside for a long time in the SF roadmap because it is something very complex to do and this is why they avoid recommend, but is possible.
If you want to go for AWS approach, I guide you to this tutorial: Create AWS infrastructure to host a Service Fabric cluster
This is the first of a 4 part tutorial with guidance on how you can Setup a SF Cluster on AWS infrastructure.
Regarding the other resources hosted on Azure, You could still access then from AWS without any problems.
Is it possible to connect via an Amazon Java Web Project (AWS EC2) to an Google Cloud SQL?
You can get a public IP address for your Google Cloud SQL instance, and that should allow you to connect from EC2. Although the latency might be unacceptable depending on the distance between the client and the database.