i have been thinking about this a lot.
So i wanna create a table which contains a password.
The password should at least be 6 chars long a contain minimum 2 numbers.
My version was:
create table User (
passwort varchar(80) not null check (length(passwort) >= 6 and passwort like '%[0-9]%[0-9]%')
);
The Problem with this approach is that the password has to contain [0-9] twice instead of the actual numbers. Does anyone know how to get rid of that problem ?
Thanks in advance.
How about .*?\d.*?\d.*?
This ensures that between zero or more characters (including digits), there must be 2 digits.
While I still recommend you split the work in 2 as per my comment, ie.
Check the length of the string.
Use the actual expression to check if the string contains 2 numbers.
You can use the following expression: ^(?=.{6,}).*?\d.*?\d.*?$. What is does is that it looks ahead for a minimum of 6 characters and then checks that the string is made up from 2 numbers, which can be separated by 0 or more characters.
An example of the expression is available here.
Related
I want to check if a number is 50 or more using a regular expression. This in itself is no problem but the number field has another regex checking the format of the entered number.
The number will be in the continental format: 123.456,78 (a dot between groups of three digits and always a comma with 2 digits at the end)
Examples:
100.000,00
50.000,00
50,00
34,34
etc.
I want to capture numbers which are 50 or more. So from the four examples above the first three should be matched.
I've come up with this rather complicated one and am wondering if there is an easier way to do this.
^(\d{1,3}[.]|[5-9][0-9]|\d{3}|[.]\d{1,3})*[,]\d{2}$
EDIT
I want to match continental numbers here. The numbers have this format due to internal regulations and specify a price.
Example: 1000 EUR would be written as 1.000,00 EUR
50000 as 50.000,00 and so on.
It's a matter of taste, obviously, but using a negative lookahead gives a simple solution.
^(?!([1-4]?\d),)[1-9](\d{1,2})?(\.\d{3})*,\d{2}\b
In words: starting from a boundary ignore all numbers that start with 1 digit OR 2 digits (the first being a 1,2,3 or 4), followed by a comma.
Check on regex101.com
Try:
EDIT ^(.{3,}|[5-9]\d),\d{2}$
It checks if:
there 3 chars or more before the ,
there are 2 numbers before the , and the first is between 5 and 9
and then a , and 2 numbers
Donno if it answer your question as it'll return true for:
aa50,00
1sdf,54
But this assumes that your original string is a number in the format you expect (as it was not a requirement in your question).
EDIT 3
The regex below tests if the number is valid referring to the continental format and if it's equal or greater than 50. See tests here.
Regex: ^((([1-9]\d{0,2}\.)(\d{3}\.){0,}\d{3})|([1-9]\d{2})|([5-9]\d)),\d{2}$
Explanation (d is a number):
([1-9]\d{0,2}\.): either d., dd. or ddd. one time with the first d between 1 and 9.
(\d{3}\.){0,}: ddd. zero or x time
\d{3}: ddd 3 digit
These 3 parts combined match any numbers equals or greater than 1000 like: 1.000, 22.002 or 100.000.000.
([1-9]\d{2}): any number between 100 and 999.
([5-9]\d)): a number between 5 and 9 followed by a number. Matches anything between 50 and 99.
So it's either the one of the parts above or this one.
Then ,\d{2}$ matches the comma and the two last digits.
I have named all inner groups, for better understanding what part of number is matched by each group. After you understand how it works, change all ?P<..> to ?:.
This one is for any dec number in the continental format.
^(?P<common_int>(?P<int>(?P<int_start>[1-9]\d{1,2}|[1-9]\d|[1-9])(?P<int_end>\.\d{3})*|0)(?!,)|(?P<dec_int_having_frac>(?P<dec_int>(?P<dec_int_start>[1-9]\d{1,2}|[1-9]\d|[1-9])(?P<dec_int_end>\.\d{3})*,)|0,|,)(?=\d))(?P<frac_from_comma>(?<=,)(?P<frac>(?P<frac_start>\d{3}\.)*(?P<frac_end>\d{1,3})))?$
test
This one is for the same with the limit number>=50
^(?P<common_int>(?P<int>(?P<int_start>[1-9]\d{1,2}|[1-9]\d|[1-9])(?P<int_end>\.\d{3})+|(?P<int_short>[1-9]\d{2}|[5-9]\d))(?!,)|(?P<dec_int_having_frac>(?P<dec_int>(?P<dec_int_start>[1-9]\d{1,2}|[1-9]\d|[1-9])(?P<dec_int_end>\.\d{3})+,)|(?P<dec_short_int>[1-9]\d{2}|[5-9]\d),)(?=\d))(?P<frac_from_comma>(?<=,)(?P<frac>(?P<frac_start>\d{3}\.)*(?P<frac_end>\d{1,3})))?$
tests
If you always have the integer part under 999.999 and fractal part always 2 digits, it will be a bit more simple:
^(?P<dec_int_having_frac>(?P<dec_int>(?P<dec_int_start>[1-9]\d{1,2}|[1-9]\d|[1-9])(?P<dec_int_end>\.\d{3})?,)|(?P<dec_short_int>[1-9]\d{2}|[5-9]\d),)(?=\d)(?P<frac_from_comma>(?<=,)(?P<frac>(?P<frac_end>\d{1,2})))?$
test
If you can guarantee that the number is correctly formed -- that is, that the regex isn't expected to detect that 5,0.1 is invalid, then there are a limited number of passing cases:
ends with \d{3}
ends with [5-9]\d
contains \d{3},
contains [5-9]\d,
It's not actually necessary to do anything with \.
The easiest regex is to code for each of these individually:
(\d{3}$|[5-9]\d$|\d{3},|[5-9]\d)
You could make it more compact and efficient by merging some of the cases:
(\d{3}[$,]|[5-9]\d[$,])
If you need to also validate the format, you will need extra complexity. I would advise against attempting to do both in a single regex.
However unless you have a very good reason for having to do this with a regex, I recommend against it. Parse the string into an integer, and compare it with 50.
I'm using an online tool to create contests. In order to send prizes, there's a form in there asking for user information (first name, last name, address,... etc).
There's an option to use regular expressions to validate the data entered in this form.
I'm struggling with the regular expression to put for the street number (I'm located in Belgium).
A street number can be the following:
1234
1234a
1234a12
begins with a number (max 4 digits)
can have letters as well (max 2 char)
Can have numbers after the letter(s) (max3)
I came up with the following expression:
^([0-9]{1,4})([A-Za-z]{1,2})?([0-9]{1,3})?$
But the problem is that as letters and second part of numbers are optional, it allows to enter numbers with up to 8 digits, which is not optimal.
1234 (first group)(no letters in the second group) 5678 (third group)
If one of you can tip me on how to achieve the expected result, it would be greatly appreciated !
You might use this regex:
^\d{1,4}([a-zA-Z]{1,2}\d{1,3}|[a-zA-Z]{1,2}|)$
where:
\d{1,4} - 1-4 digits
([a-zA-Z]{1,2}\d{1,3}|[a-zA-Z]{1,2}|) - optional group, which can be
[a-zA-Z]{1,2}\d{1,3} - 1-2 letters + 1-3 digits
or
[a-zA-Z]{1,2} - 1-2 letters
or
empty
\d{0,4}[a-zA-Z]{0,2}\d{0,3}
\d{0,4} The first groupe matches a number with 4 digits max
[a-zA-Z]{0,2} The second groupe matches a char with 2 digit in max
\d{0,3} The first groupe matches a number with 3 digits max
You have to keep the last two groups together, not allowing the last one to be present, if the second isn't, e.g.
^\d{1,4}(?:[a-zA-z]{1,2}\d{0,3})?$
or a little less optimized (but showing the approach a bit better)
^\d{1,4}(?:[a-zA-z]{1,2}(?:\d{1,3})?)?$
As you are using this for a validation I assumed that you don't need the capturing groups and replaced them with non-capturing ones.
You might want to change the first number check to [1-9]\d{0,3} to disallow leading zeros.
Thank you so much for your answers ! I tried Sebastian's solution :
^\d{1,4}(?:[a-zA-z]{1,2}\d{0,3})?$
And it works like a charm ! I still don't really understand what the ":" stand for, but I'll try to figure it out next time i have to fiddle with Regex !
Have a nice day,
Stan
The first digit cannot be 0.
There shouldn't be other symbols before and after the number.
So:
^[1-9]\d{0,3}(?:[a-zA-Z]{1,2}\d{0,3})?$
The ?: combination means that the () construction does not create a matching substring.
Here is the regex with tests for it.
I need a regular expression to validate a concatenated string that consists of 7 digit numbers separated by commas.
Furthermore, I must ensure that:
The string is not empty.
The chain doesn't begins or finish with commas.
The numbers do not start with 0.
Example: 1234567,2345678,3456789
My solution so far: ^\d+(,\d+)*?$
The problems I still need to resolve:
Validate that the numbers are exactly 7 digits.
Validate that the numbers do not start with 0.
Thank you.
Something like ^[1-9]\d{6}(,[1-9]\d{6})+$ should work. The [1-9] ensures the number doesn't begin with 0, and \d{6} ensures that there are 6 digits to follow.
Based on Gavin answer, here is what worked for me : ^[1-9]\d{6}(,[1-9]\d{6})*$
The minor difference is the use of the * instead of + at the end of the regular expression. There are some cases where I must validate only one 7 digits number...
Thank you for the help everyone!
I have a string of 8 separated hexadecimal numbers, such as:
3E%12%3%1F%3E%6%1%19
And I need to check if the number 12 is located within the first 4 set of numbers.
I'm guessing this shouldn't be all that complex, but my searches turned up empty. Regular expressions are always a trouble for me, but I don't have access to anything else in this scenario. Any help would be appreciated.
^([^%]+%){0,3}12%
See it in action
The idea is:
^ - from the start
[^%]+% - match multiple non % characters, followed by a % character
{0,3} - between 0 and 3 of those
12% - 12% after that
Here you go
^([^%]*%){4}(?<=.*12.*)
This will match both the following if that is what is intended
1%312%..
1%123%..
Check the solution if %123% is matched or not
If the number 12 should stand on its own then use
^([^%]*%){4}(?<=.*\b12\b.*)
I have this
"^(?!(11111|22222|33333|44444|55555|66666|77777|88888|99999|00000))([0-9]\d{8})"
regular expression in c# code and javascript works fine but in text tag of adobe echosign doesnt works anyone have anotherway to work on texttag of echosign?
By your last comment, you need a regex to validate a string of maximum length 9 containing digits only:
^[0-9]{1,9}$
This will validate any string containing digits, with length at least 1 and not greater than 9.
If you want to avoid strings such as 098 (leading zeroes), use this instead:
^[1-9][0-9]{0,8}$
EDIT: If I understand your question well now, you can use this regex:
^(?!([0-9])\1\1-\1\1)[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{4}$
That is assuming that echosign can handle callbacks, if not, you can use this instead:
^(?!(?:111-11|222-22|333-33|444-44|555-55|666-66|777-77|888-88|999-99|000-00))[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{4}$