How can I stub certain methods (getters, in particular) from Vue single file components for unit testing with mocha/expect?
The problem I was facing was the following:
I have a component with a get method someData
<script lang="ts">
import { Vue, Component } from 'vue-property-decorator'
import SomeService from '#/services/some.service'
#Component()
export default class MyApp extends Vue {
...
mounted () {
...
}
get someData () {
return this.$route.path.split('/')[1] || 'main'
}
get getLocation () {
return this.someService.getBaseURL()
}
initSomeStringProperty (): string {
return 'some string'
}
}
</script>
My tests always fail with:
[Vue warn]: Error in render: "TypeError: Cannot read property 'path' of undefined"
When I try to stub the method using sinon, like following:
describe('MyApp.vue', () => {
if('returns main', () => {
const dataStub = sinon.stub(MyApp, 'someData')
listStub.yields(undefined, 'main')
const wrapper = shallowMount(AppNavBar)
expect(wrapper.text()).to.include('Some Content')
})
})
However, I get the following error:
TypeError: Cannot stub non-existent own property someData
In addition, I get the same error for every other method, I want to stub analogously, e.g., initSomeStringProperty().
In the code above someData is computed property that is defined with property accessor through vue-property-decorator.
It can be stubbed at two points, either on class prototype:
sinon.stub(MyApp.prototype, 'someData').get(() => 'foo');
Or component options:
sinon.stub(MyApp.options.computed.someData, 'get').value('foo');
You could set the component's computed props and methods upon mounting, as shown below. Update: As of 1.x, setting methods has been deprecated in favor of stubbing (see #EstusFlask's answer on how to properly stub with Sinon).
const wrapper = shallowMount(MyApp, {
computed: {
someData: () => 'foo'
},
methods: {
initSomeStringProperty: () => 'bar'
}
})
expect(wrapper.vm.someData).to.equal('foo')
expect(wrapper.vm.initSomeStringProperty()).to.equal('bar')
If you were just trying to avoid the error about $route being undefined, you could mock $route upon mounting:
const wrapper = shallowMount(MyApp, {
mocks: {
$route: { path: '/home' }
}
})
expect(wrapper.vm.someData).to.equal('home')
Related
My component calls
this.axios.get()
when being mounted and passes a vuex-store variable to the api. The api returns an array as the response and the component displays some of the returned data after exchanging a loading-element with the real content.
In my unit test I want to simulate the result of the axios-request, wait for the transition between the loading- and the content-element and then finally check the validity of the content. However, the test fails and outputs:
Cannot read property 'get' of undefined
and highlights the get on this.axios.
Here is what I'm expecting to work (based on this guide):
... some imports etc. ...
const mockAxios = { whatIExpectToGet };
jest.mock("axios", () => ({
get: jest.fn(() => mockAxios)
}));
it("description of the test", async () => {
const wrapper = mount(MyComponent);
... code continues ...
Of course I'm accesssing axios via this and not directly like they do in the guide. But, since I can't find any mention of anything related to that, I assume that's irrelevant?
I also tried to mock axios myself like so:
... imports etc. ...
const axios = {
get: Promise.resolve({ whatIExpectToGet })
};
it("description of the test", async () => {
const wrapper = mount(MyComponent, {
global: {
mocks: [ axios ]
}
});
... code continues ...
Apparently people with similar problems used localVue.use() to inject stuff, but that's no longer supported.
Could someone be so kind and smart as to point me into the right direction, please?
Thank you.
-------------------> SOLUTION <-------------------
Thanks to tony 19 this question is already solved.
I ended up using an async function to mock axios because Promise.resolve() wasn't working for me:
import { shallowMount, flushPromises } from "#vue/test-utils";
import MyComponent from "#/components/MyComponent.vue";
describe("MyComponent.vue", () => {
const axios = {
get: async () => ({
data: { expectedData }
})
};
it("test description", async () => {
const wrapper = shallowMount(MyComponent, {
global: {
mocks: {
axios: axios
}
}
} as any);
expect(wrapper.html()).toContain("some_string_i_display_while_loading");
await flushPromises();
expect(wrapper.html()).toContain("some_string_i_display_after_getting_the_response");
});
});
Using global.mocks to mock axios is the right approach, but your attempt incorrectly used an array when it should've been an object:
const wrapper = mount(MyComponent, {
global: {
// mocks: [ axios ] ❌
mocks: { axios } ✅
}
})
Note axios.get() resolves to an axios.Response object, which stores the response data in its data property, so your mock should do the same.
Here's a full example:
// MyComponent.vue
export default {
mounted() {
this.axios.get('foo').then(resp => this.foo = resp.data)
}
}
// MyComponent.spec.js
it('gets foo', () => {
const wrapper = mount(MyComponent, {
global: {
mocks: {
axios: {
get: Promise.resolve({ data: { foo: true }})
// OR use an async function, which internally returns a Promise
get: async () => ({ data: { foo: true }})
}
}
}
}
})
I am using Vue 2 to enhance a Ruby on Rails engine, using inline-template attributes in the existing Haml views as templates for my Vue components.
Is it possible to test the methods of a component defined like this? All the testing examples I can find assume the use of single-file .vue components.
These tests (using Mocha and Chai) fail with [Vue warn]: Failed to mount component: template or render function not defined.
Example Component:
//main-nav.js
import Vue from 'vue'
const MainNav = {
data: function() {
return {open: true}
},
methods: {
toggleOpen: function(item) {
item.open = !item.open
}
}
}
export default MainNav
Example Test:
//main-nav.test.js
import MainNav from '../../admin/main-nav'
describe('MainNav', () => {
let Constructor
let vm
beforeEach(() => {
Constructor = Vue.extend(MainNav)
vm = new Constructor().$mount()
})
afterEach(() => {
vm.$destroy()
})
describe('toggleOpen', () => {
it('has a toggleOpen function', () => {
expect(vm.MainNav.toggleOpen).to.be.a('function')
})
it('toggles open from true to false', () => {
const result = MainNav.toggleOpen({'open': true})
expect(result).to.include({open: false})
})
})
})
It turns out you can still specify a template in the component file, and any inline-template templates will be used in favour of that.
Recently I am learning to test React with jest and enzyme, It seems hard to understand what a unit test is it, my code
import React from "react";
class App extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {
value: ""
};
this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this);
}
handleChange(e) {
const value = e.target.value;
this.setState({
value
});
}
render() {
return <Nest value={this.state.value} handleChange={this.handleChange} />;
}
}
export const Nest = props => {
return <input value={props.value} onChange={props.handleChange} />;
};
export default App;
and my test
import React from "react";
import App, { Nest } from "./nest";
import { shallow, mount } from "enzyme";
it("should be goood", () => {
const handleChange = jest.fn();
const wrapper = mount(<App />);
wrapper.find("input").simulate("change", { target: { value: "test" } });
expect(handleChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});
IMO, the mocked handleClick will intercept the handleClick on App,
if this is totally wrong, what's the right way to use mock fn and test the handleClick be called.
Another: I search a lot, read the similar situations, seem like this iscontra-Unit Test,
Probably I should test the two component separately, I can test both components,
test the
<Nest value={value} handleChange={handleChange} />
by pass the props manually, and then handleChangeinvoked by simulate change
it passed test.
but how can I test the connection between the two?
I read
some work is React Team's Work
...
I don't know which parts I have to test in this case, and Which parts react already tested and don't need me to test. That's confusing.
You should take the path of testing the Nest component in isolation first, passing your mocked handleChange as a prop, to verify that input changes are being propagated.
If you want to test the state part, then you can get the instance of your App class from enzyme and call that method directly:
it("should update the Nest value prop when change is received", () => {
const wrapper = mount(<App />);
const instance = wrapper.instance()
instance.handleChange( { target: { value: "test" } })
const nestComponent = wrapper.find("Nest").first()
expect(nestComponent).prop('value').toEqual('test');
});
This a very very basic, almost not needed to test piece of code, but it will get your test coverage up if that's what you're after.
Doc for instance: http://airbnb.io/enzyme/docs/api/ReactWrapper/instance.html
If you want to test for the connection. From what I see, the nest component is a child component inside the App component. You could test that <App /> contains `.
describe('<App />', () => {
it('should contain a nest component', () => {
const wrapper = mount(<App />);
expect(wrapper.find(<Nest />)).toHaveLength(1);
});
});
Secondly, since the onChange event on the nest component updates the state in the App component, you can also test for state changes since its a behavior you expect.
it('should update state', () => {
//find input and simulate change with say {value: 'new value'} and then
expect(wrapper.state().value).toBe('newValue');
});
I hope this helps.
Jest provides a way to mock functions as described in their docs
apiGetMethod = jest.fn().mockImplementation(
new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const userID = parseInt(url.substr('/users/'.length), 10);
process.nextTick(
() => users[userID] ? resolve(users[userID]) : reject({
error: 'User with ' + userID + ' not found.',
});
);
});
);
However these mocks only seem to work when the function is called directly in a test.
describe('example test', () => {
it('uses the mocked function', () => {
apiGetMethod().then(...);
});
});
If I have a React Component defined as such how can I mock it?
import { apiGetMethod } from './api';
class Foo extends React.Component {
state = {
data: []
}
makeRequest = () => {
apiGetMethod().then(result => {
this.setState({data: result});
});
};
componentDidMount() {
this.makeRequest();
}
render() {
return (
<ul>
{ this.state.data.map((data) => <li>{data}</li>) }
</ul>
)
}
}
I have no idea how to make it so Foo component calls my mocked apiGetMethod() implementation so that I can test that it renders properly with data.
(this is a simplified, contrived example for the sake of understanding how to mock functions called inside react components)
edit: api.js file for clarity
// api.js
import 'whatwg-fetch';
export function apiGetMethod() {
return fetch(url, {...});
}
You have to mock the ./api module like this and import it so you can set the implemenation of the mock
import { apiGetMethod } from './api'
jest.mock('./api', () => ({ apiGetMethod: jest.fn() }))
in your test can set how the mock should work using mockImplementation:
apiGetMethod.mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve('test1234'))
In case the jest.mock method from #Andreas's answer did not work for you. you could try the following in your test file.
const api = require('./api');
api.apiGetMethod = jest.fn(/* Add custom implementation here.*/);
This should execute your mocked version of the apiGetMethod inside you Foo component.
Here is an updated solution for anyone struggling with this in '21. This solution uses Typescript, so be aware of that. For regular JS just take out the type calls wherever you see them.
You import the function inside your test at the top
import functionToMock from '../api'
Then you indeed mock the call to the folder outside of the tests, to indicate that anything being called from this folder should and will be mocked
[imports are up here]
jest.mock('../api');
[tests are down here]
Next we mock the actual function we're importing. Personally I did this inside the test, but I assume it works just as well outside the test or inside a beforeEach
(functionToMock as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(data_that_is_returned);
Now here's the kicker and where everyone seems to get stuck. So far this is correct, but we are missing one important bit when mocking functions inside a component: act. You can read more on it here but essentially we want to wrap our render inside this act. React testing library has it's own version of act. It is also asynchronous, so you have to make sure your test is async and also define the destructured variables from render outside of it.
In the end your test file should look something like this:
import { render, act } from '#testing-library/react';
import UserGrid from '../components/Users/UserGrid';
import { data2 } from '../__fixtures__/data';
import functionToMock from '../api';
jest.mock('../api');
describe("Test Suite", () => {
it('Renders', async () => {
(functionToMock as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(data2);
let getAllByTestId: any;
let getByTestId: any;
await act(async () => {
({ getByTestId, getAllByTestId } = render(<UserGrid />));
});
const container = getByTestId('grid-container');
const userBoxes = getAllByTestId('user-box');
});
});
Another solution to mock this would be:
window['getData'] = jest.fn();
I have some legacy code I want to start unit-testing. It's a class like this:
export class Controller {
private something: any;
constructor() { this.something = true; }
public getSomething(): any { return this.something; }
}
Trying to unit-test it with Mocha like this:
import Controller from '../../src/Controller';
describe('Controller', () => {
let subject: any;
beforeEach( () => {
subject = new Controller(); // compiler complains here
});
describe('getOptions()', () => {
it('should get something', () => {
let result: any = subject.getOptions();
if (typeof result !== 'object') {
throw new Error('Expected object but got ' + result);
}
});
});
});
Compiler complains:
[ts] Cannot use 'new' with an expression whose type lacks a call or
construct signature.
How do I get an instance of the Controller class to run tests against?
It doesn't work because you are trying to import the Controller as a default export while it isn't.
Try:
import {Controller} from '../../src/Controller';
or:
export default class Controller {
You can read more about imports in general on the MDN page here.