So, I need to make a function that is going to return the chromatic number of a graph. The graph is given through an adjecency matrix that the function finds using a file name. I have a function that should in theory work and which the compiler is throwing no issues for, yet when I run it, it simply prints out an empty line and ends the program.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <fstream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int Find_Chromatic_Number (vector <vector <int>> matg, int matc[], int n) {
if (n == 0) {
return 0;
}
int result, i, j;
result = 0;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (j = i; j < n; j++) {
if (matg[i][j] == 1) {
if (matc[i] == matc[j]) {
matc[j]++;
}
}
}
}
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (result < matc[i]) {
result = matc[i];
}
}
return result;
}
int main() {
string file;
int n, i, j, m;
cout << "unesite ime datoteke: " << endl;
cin >> file;
ifstream reader;
reader.open(file.c_str());
reader >> n;
vector<vector<int>> matg(n, vector<int>(0));
int matc[n];
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < n; j++) {
reader >> matg[i][j];
}
matc[i] = 1;
}
int result = Find_Chromatic_Number(matg, matc, n);
cout << result << endl;
return 0;
}
The program is supposed to use an freader to convert the file into a 2D vector which represents the adjecency matrix (matg). I also made an array (matc) which represents the value of each vertice, with different numbers corresponding to different colors.
The function should go through the vector and every time there is an edge between two vertices it should check if their color value in matc is the same. If it is, it ups the second vale (j) by one. After the function has passed through the vector, the matc array should contain n different number with the highest number being the chromatic number I am looking for.
I hope I have explained enough of what I am trying to accomplish, if not just ask and I will add any further explanations.
Try to make it like that.
Don't choose a size for your vector
vector<vector<int> > matg;
And instead of using reader >> matg[i][j];
use:
int tmp;
reader >> tmp;
matg[i].push_back(tmp);
Related
Description
In statistics, there is a measure of the distribution called the mode. The mode is the data that appears the most in a data set. A data set may have more than one mode, that is, when there is more than one data with the same number of occurrences.
Mr. Dengklek gives you N integers. Find the greatest mode of the numbers.
Input Format
The first line contains an integer N. The next line contains N integers.
Output Format
A row contains an integer which is the largest mode.
Input Example
6
1 3 2 4 1 4
Example Output
4
Limits
1 ≤ N ≤100,000
1≤(every integer on the second line)≤1000
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
#define ll long long
int main() {
unsigned int N;
while(true){
cin >> N;
if(N > 0 && N <= 1000){
break;
}
}
int arr[N];
int input;
for (int k = 0; k < N; k++)
{
cin >> input;
if(input > 0 && input <=1000){
arr[k] = input;
}
else{
k -= 1;
}
}
int number;
int mode;
int position;
int count = 0;
int countMode = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
number = arr[i];
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++)
{
if(arr[j] == number){
++count;
}
}
if(count > countMode){
countMode = count;
mode = arr[i];
position = i;
}
else if(count == countMode){
if(arr[i] > arr[position]){
mode = arr[i];
position = i;
}
}
count = 0;
}
cout << mode << endl;
return 0;
}
I got a "RTE" (run time error) and 70 pts.
Here is the code which I got 80 pts but got "TLE" (time limit exceeded):
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
#define ll long long
int main() {
unsigned int N;
while(true){
cin >> N;
if(N > 0 && N <= 100000){
break;
}
}
int arr[N];
int input;
for (int k = 0; k < N; k++)
{
cin >> input;
if(input > 0 && input <=1000){
arr[k] = input;
}
else{
k -= 1;
}
}
int number;
vector<int> mode;
int count = 0;
int countMode = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
number = arr[i];
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++)
{
if(arr[j] == number){
++count;
}
}
if(count > countMode){
countMode = count;
mode.clear();
mode.push_back(arr[i]);
}
else if(count == countMode){
mode.push_back(arr[i]);
}
count = 0;
}
sort(mode.begin(), mode.end(), greater<int>());
cout << mode.front() << endl;
return 0;
}
How can I accelerate the program?
As already noted, the algorithm implemented in both of the posted snippets has O(N2) time complexity, while there exists an O(N) alternative.
You can also take advantage of some of the algorithms in the Standard Library, like std::max_element, which returns an
iterator to the greatest element in the range [first, last). If several elements in the range are equivalent to the greatest element, returns the iterator to the first such element.
#include <algorithm>
#include <array>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
constexpr long max_N{ 100'000L };
long N;
if ( !(std::cin >> N) or N < 1 or N > max_N )
{
std::cerr << "Error: Unable to read a valid N.\n";
return 1;
}
constexpr long max_value{ 1'000L };
std::array<long, max_value> counts{};
for (long k = 0; k < N; ++k)
{
long value;
if ( !(std::cin >> value) or value < 1 or value > max_value )
{
std::cerr << "Error: Unable to read value " << k + 1 << ".\n";
return 1;
}
++counts[value - 1];
}
auto const it_max_mode{ std::max_element(counts.crbegin(), counts.crend()) };
// If we start from the last... ^^ ^^
std::cout << std::distance(it_max_mode, counts.crend()) << '\n';
// The first is also the greatest.
return 0;
}
Compiler Explorer demo
I got a "RTE" (run time error)
Consider this fragment of the first snippet:
int number;
int mode;
int position; // <--- Note that it's uninitialized
int count = 0;
int countMode = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
number = arr[i];
// [...] Evaluate count.
if(count > countMode){
countMode = count;
mode = arr[i];
position = i; // <--- Here it's assigned a value, but...
}
else if(count == countMode){ // If this happens first...
if(arr[i] > arr[position]){
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Position may be indeterminate, here
mode = arr[i];
position = i;
}
}
count = 0;
}
Finally, some resources worth reading:
Why is “using namespace std;” considered bad practice?
Why should I not #include <bits/stdc++.h>?
Using preprocessing directive #define for long long
Why aren't variable-length arrays part of the C++ standard?
You're overcomplicating things. Competitive programming is a weird beast were solutions assume limited resources, whaky amount of input data. Often those tasks are balanced that way that they require use of constant time alternate algorithms, summ on set dynamic programming. Size of code is often taken in consideration. So it's combination of math science and dirty programming tricks. It's a game for experts, "brain porn" if you allow me to call it so: it's wrong, it's enjoyable and you're using your brain. It has little in common with production software developing.
You know that there can be only 1000 different values, but there are huge number or repeated instances. All that you need is to find the largest one. What's the worst case of finding maximum value in array of 1000? O(1000) and you check one at the time. And you already have to have a loop on N to input those values.
Here is an example of dirty competitive code (no input sanitation at all) to solve this problem:
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
using in = unsigned short;
array<int, 1001> modes;
in biggest;
int big_m;
int N;
int main()
{
cin >> N;
in val;
while(N --> 0){
cin >> val;
if(val < 1001) {
modes[val]++;
}
else
continue;
if( modes[val] == big_m) {
if( val > biggest )
biggest = val;
}
else
if( modes[val] > big_m) {
biggest = val;
big_m = modes[val];
}
}
cout << biggest;
return 0;
}
No for loops if you don't need them, minimalistic ids, minimalistic data to store. Avoid dynamic creation and minimize automatic creation of objects if possible, those add execution time. Static objects are created during compilation and are materialized when your executable is loaded.
modes is an array of our counters, biggest stores largest value of int for given maximum mode, big_m is current maximum value in modes. As they are global variables, they are initialized statically.
PS. NB. The provided example is an instance of stereotype and I don't guarantee it's 100% fit for that particular judge or closed test cases it uses. Some judges use tainted input and some other things that complicate life of challengers, there is always a factor of unknown. E.g. this example would faithfully output "0" if judge would offer that among input values even if value isn't in range.
I input p and n (int type) numbers from my keyboard, I want to generate the first p*n square numbers into the array pp[99]. Here's my code:
#include <iostream>
#include <math.h>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int i, j, n, p, pp[19];
cout<<"n="; cin>>n;
cout<<"p="; cin>>p;
i=n*p;
j=-1;
while(i!=0)
{
if(sqrt(i)==(float)sqrt(i))
{
j++;
pp[j]=i;
}
i--;
}
for(i=0; i<n*p; i++)
cout<<pp[i]<<" ";
return 0;
}
But I am encountering the following problem: If I for example I enter p=3 and n=3, it will only show me the first 3 square numbers instead of 9, the rest 6 being zeros. Now I know why this happens, just not sure how to fix it (it's checking the first n * p natural numbers and seeing which are squares, not the first n*p squares).
If I take the i-- and add it in the if{ } statement then the algorithm will never end, once it reaches a non-square number (which will be instant unless the first one it checks is a perfect square) the algorithm will stop succeeding in iteration and will be blocked checking the same number an infinite amount of times.
Any way to fix this?
Instead of searching for them, generate them.
int square(int x)
{
return x * x;
}
int main()
{
int n = 0;
int p = 0;
std::cin >> n >> p;
int limit = n * p;
int squares[99] = {};
for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++)
{
squares[i] = square(i+1);
}
for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++)
{
std::cout << squares[i] << ' ';
}
}
Hello I am trying to split an array any time there is a negative value (excluding the negative value) and am a bit stuck at the moment. I tried an approach as seen in my code but I am not getting the desired output.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <fstream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
string line;
string filename;
int n,length;
std::vector<int>arr1;
fstream file("t1.txt");
if(file.is_open())
{
while(file >> n)
arr1.push_back(n);
for(int i =0; i < (int)arr1.size(); i++)
cout << arr1.at(i);
}
cout << endl;
int* arr2 = &arr1[0];
int arr3[arr1.size()/2];
int arr4[arr1.size()/2];
for(int i = 0; i < arr1.size(); i++)
{
cout << arr2[i];
}
for (int i =0; i < arr1.size(); i++)
{
if(i == -1)
break;
else
arr3[i] = arr2[i];
}
return 0;
}
The main problem is here:
int arr3[arr1.size()/2];
int arr4[arr1.size()/2];
This doesn't compile, and can be replaced with
std::vector<int> arr3; arr3.reserve(arr1.size() / 2);
std::vector<int> arr4; arr4.reserve(arr1.size() / 2);
I've added the "reserve" function so that the program doesn't have to allocate memory over and over in the loop.
Next, you are checking i in your loop, and your i loops from 0 to arr1.size() (which is unsigned so can't be negative) therefore i will never be negative.
What you really wanna check is what is in the arr1 vector at "i" position, and you can do so with the [] operator like
for (int i =0; i < arr1.size(); i++)
{
if (arr1[i] >= 0) //if the value is positive, we push it inside our arr3 vector
arr3.push_back(arr1[i]);
else
{
i++; //skip negative value
//
while (i < arr1.size())
{
if (arr1[i] > 0)
arr4.push_back(arr1[i]);
i++;
}
//
//or
//insert all the elemenents we haven't processed yet in the arr4 vector
//this code assumes those elements are positive values
//arr4.insert(arr4.begin(), arr1.begin() + i, arr1.end());
//break;
}
}
Of course this could be done in a different way, like instead of creating 2 vectors, you could just use the one you have generated already.
Hope this helps.
There are several problems in your code
you should not access the vector's data this way unless you really need to
you prepare arrays with predefined size without knowing where to expect the negative values
you do not assign anything to your array 4
you check the index for being negative, not the value
according to your text there could be several negative values leading to multiple result-arrays. You seem to be prepared for only two.
Here is some code that actually splits when encountering negative values:
std::vector<vector<int> > splitted;
for (int i = 0; i < arr1.size(); ++i)
{
if (i ==0 or arr1[i] < 0)
splitted.push_back(std::vector<int>());
if (arr1[i] >= 0)
splitted.back().push_back(arr1[i]);
}
Testing it:
for (int i = 0; i < splitted.size(); ++i)
{
for (int k = 0; k < splitted[i].size(); ++k)
{
std::cout << splitted[i][k];
}
if (splitted[i].empty())
std::cout << "(emtpy)";
std::cout << '\n';
}
Using the following test input
1 2 3 -1 1 -1 -1
You get the following output:
123
1
(emtpy)
(emtpy)
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
class PerformSort
{
public:
const vector<int> * p;
vector<int>& getElements(int);
vector<int>& sortArray(vector<int>&);
void printer(vector<int>&);
}firstSort;
vector<int>& PerformSort::getElements (int num)
{
vector<int> elements(num);
for (int i = 0; i < num; i++)
{
cout << "Enter elements into the array: ";
cin >> elements[i];
}
p = &elements;
return p;
}
vector<int>& PerformSort::sortArray (vector<int>& vector)
{
int holder, min;
for (int i = 0; i < (sizeof(vector) - 1); i++)
{
min = i;
for (int j = (i + 1); j < sizeof(vector); j++)
{
if (vector[j] < vector[min])
{
min = j;
}
}
if (min != i)
{
holder = vector[i];
vector[i] = vector[min];
vector[min] = holder;
}
}
return vector;
}
void PerformSort::printer(vector<int>& vector2)
{
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(vector2); i++)
{
cout << vector2[i] << " ";
}
}
int main ()
{
int numberOfTimes;
cin >> numberOfTimes;
firstSort.printer(firstSort.sortArray(firstSort.getElements(numberOfTimes)));
return 0;
}
This returns the error: "invalid initialization of reference of type from expression of type". My first approach to create a SelectionSort algorithm was to try passing the vector by value (stupidly). After this I started to use pointers instead, after some research. However, this resulted in the aforementioned error. Declaring everything as constant does not seem to resolve the underlying error, despite how, if I understand things correctly, the error lies with temporary references being passed where constant ones are required. Any thoughts on how I might achieve this passing and returning of vectors? (I come from a Java background and am just beginning C++, so forgive me if I have made any obvious errors with regards to the pointers).
Return it by value:
vector<int> PerformSort::getElements (int num)
{
vector<int> elements(num);
for (int i = 0; i < num; i++)
{
cout << "Enter elements into the array: ";
cin >> elements[i];
}
return elements;
}
This will also let you get rid of p, which is a huge can of worms in its own right.
Finally, I notice that you use sizeof(vector) in quite a few places. This won't give you the number of elements in the vector; use vector.size() instead.
Rename the variable vector to something else:
vector<int>& PerformSort::sortArray (vector<int>& wayBetterName)
&
return wayBetterName;
What urged you to name a variable the same as a type?
There's many more other issues with the code.
You don't need pointers, you don't need the references, plus you're better off just using std::sort.
I am trying to write a program that takes an input of of n integers, and finds out the one that occurs the maximum number of times in the given input. I am trying to run the program for t cases.
For this, I have implemented a counting sort like algorithm (perhaps a bit naiive), that counts the number of occurrences of each number in the input. In case there are multiple numbers with the same maximum occurrence, I need to return the smaller among those. For this, I implemented sorting.
The issue I am facing is, that every time I run the program on Visual C++, I am getting an error that tells "vector subscript out of range". Under Netbeans, it is generating a return value of 1 and exiting. Please help me find the problem
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int findmax(vector<int> a, int n)
{
int i,ret;
ret = 0;
for ( i = 0; i <n; i++)
{
if (a[i] > ret) {
ret = a[i];
}
}
return ret;
}
int main() {
int i = 0, j = 0, k = 0, n,m,r1,r2;
vector<int> a;
int t;
vector<int> buff;
cin>>t;
while(t--) {
cin>>n;
a.clear();
buff.clear();
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin>>a[i];
}
sort(a.begin(),a.end());
m = findmax(a,n);
for ( j = 0; j < m+1; j++) {
buff[a[j]] = buff[a[j]] + 1;
}
k = findmax(buff,m+1);
for ( i = 0; i < m+1; i++) {
if (buff[i] == k) {
r1 = i;
r2 = buff[i];
break;
}
}
cout<<r1<<" "<<r2<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
After a.clear() the vector doesn't have any members, and its size is 0.
Add a call to a.resize(n) to make it the proper size. You also need to resize buff to whatever size it needs to be.
this line it's the culprit:
cin>>a[i];
you must use push_back:
cin >> temp;
a.push_back(temp);
or resize(n) before:
cin>>n;
a.resize(n);
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin>>a[i];
}
then you should pass you vector by reference to findmax
int findmax(vector<int> &a, int n)
...
This isn't how you populate an array.
cin>>a[i];
You need to use the push_back() method or pre-allocate the appropriate size.
The problem is that you're illegally using indexes of your vector that don't exist (you never add any items to the vector). Since you know the size, you can resize it after you clear it:
a.clear();
a.resize(n);
buff.clear();
buff.resize(n);
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin>>a[i];
}
will be out of range. The vector, as you construct it, has zero size.