Can you include additional header files in an active gdb session? - c++

I am debugging something and would like to use typeid in the typeinfo header file. I am coming from a beginner Python background using pdb where you could import a library and test things while in the session.
Is it possible to include extra header files in a running gdb session [specifically those in the std library] or is including the headers [say typeinfo] before compilation the only way?

typeid is not a header file, it is an operator, referring to an object of the polymorphic type const std::type_info or of some type derived from it. See documentation.
You can call it during debug session and see it's return value without any additional steps like importing a library. See example debug session for a test program:
#include <iostream>
int main() {
int a = 1;
double b = 2;
std::cout << a << std::endl;
std::cout << b << std::endl;
return 0;
}
$ gdb -q ./a.out
Reading symbols from ./a.out...
(gdb) start
Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x40118e: file t1.cpp, line 4.
Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at t1.cpp:4
4 int a = 1;
(gdb) n
5 double b = 2;
(gdb)
7 std::cout << a << std::endl;
(gdb) p typeid(a)
$1 = {_vptr.type_info = 0x7ffff7f81340 <vtable for __cxxabiv1::__fundamental_type_info+16>, __name = 0x7ffff7f2f654 <typeinfo name for int> "i"}
(gdb) p typeid(b)
$2 = {_vptr.type_info = 0x7ffff7f81340 <vtable for __cxxabiv1::__fundamental_type_info+16>, __name = 0x7ffff7f2f693 <typeinfo name for double> "d"}

Related

How to step into a set of chained methods with gdb? [duplicate]

I am debugging C++ in gdb 7.1 on Linux.
I have a function a() that is called in many places in the code. I want to set a breakpoint in it, but only if it was called from b(). Is there any way to do it?
Is there any way to do it only if b() was called from c(), and so on ad infinitum?
Update: There is now a better answer to this question: use GDB _is_caller convenience function.
The need you describe comes up quite often, usually in the context of some_utility_fn being called a lot, but you only are interested in the call which comes from some_other_fn.
You could probably script this entire interaction using the new embedded Python support in GDB from CVS trunk.
Without Python, you are limited in what you can do, but the usual technique is to have a disabled breakpoint on a(), and enable it from a command, attached to a breakpoint on b().
Here is an example:
int a(int x)
{
return x + 1;
}
int b()
{
return a(1);
}
int call_a_lots()
{
int i, sum = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
sum += a(i);
}
int main()
{
call_a_lots();
return b();
}
gcc -g t.c
gdb -q ./a.out
Reading symbols from /tmp/a.out...done.
(gdb) break a
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004cb: file t.c, line 3.
(gdb) disable 1
(gdb) break b
Breakpoint 2 at 0x4004d7: file t.c, line 8.
(gdb) command 2
>silent
>enable 1
>continue
>end
(gdb) run
Breakpoint 1, a (x=1) at t.c:3
3 return x + 1;
(gdb) bt
#0 a (x=1) at t.c:3
#1 0x00000000004004e1 in b () at t.c:8
#2 0x000000000040052c in main () at t.c:21
(gdb) q
Voila: we've stopped on a() called from b(), ignoring previous 100 calls to a().
gdb can handle this directly now without any need for Python. Just do this:
b a if $_caller_is("b")
I have tested this on gdb 7.6 that is already available but it does not work on gdb 7.2 and probably on gdb 7.1:
So this is main.cpp:
int a()
{
int p = 0;
p = p +1;
return p;
}
int b()
{
return a();
}
int c()
{
return a();
}
int main()
{
c();
b();
a();
return 0;
}
Then g++ -g main.cpp
This is my_check.py:
class MyBreakpoint (gdb.Breakpoint):
def stop (self):
if gdb.selected_frame().older().name()=="b":
gdb.execute("bt")
return True
else:
return False
MyBreakpoint("a")
And this is how it works:
4>gdb -q -x my_check.py ./a.out
Reading symbols from /home/a.out...done.
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400540: file main.cpp, line 3.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/a.out
#0 a () at main.cpp:3
#1 0x0000000000400559 in b () at main.cpp:10
#2 0x0000000000400574 in main () at main.cpp:21
Breakpoint 1, a () at main.cpp:3
3 int p = 0;
(gdb) c
Continuing.
[Inferior 1 (process 16739) exited normally]
(gdb) quit
A simpler solution than Python scripting is using a temporary breakpoint.
It looks like this:
b ParentFunction
command 1
tb FunctionImInterestedIn
c
end
Every time you break in ParentFunction, you'll set a one-time breakpoint on the function you're actually interested in, then continue running (presumably until you hit that breakpoint).
Since you'll break exactly once on FunctionImInterestedIn, this won't work if FunctionImInterestedIn is called multiple times in the context of ParentFunction and you want to break on each invocation.
not sure how to do it by gdb.
But you can declare global variable like:
bool call_a = false;
and when b calling a
call_a = true;
a();
and set call_a to false when other function call a() or after your breakpoint
then use condition break-point
break [line-number] if call_a == true
An easy one for arm is:
Set the breakpoint in the function you are interested.
break a
Attach an gdb command to that breakpoint.
command 1
up 1
if $lr == 0x12345678
echo match \n
down 1
else
echo no match \n
echo $lr \n
down 1
cont
end
end
When ever you arrive in the function a(), the command temporarily pops up one stack frame thus updating the link register. The callers link register value can then be used continue when the caller is not the execution
path you need.
Enjoy.

does gdb has something similar to struct command of crash utility

I want to dump the internal data structures of ovs-vswitchd.
(gdb) print/x all_dpif_backers
$11 = {
map = {
buckets = 0x7e0e28,
one = 0x23467f0,
mask = 0x0,
n = 0x1
}
}
Now I know 0x23467f0 is the address of struct hmap_node. If using crash
utility, I can dump the value like this:
crash> struct hmap_node 0x23467f0
How can we do this using gdb?
How can we do this using gdb?
(gdb) print *(struct hmap_node*) 0x23467f0
Or
(gdb) print (struct hmap_node*) 0x23467f0
$1 = ...
(gdb) print *$1
See also GDB pretty printing.

What is clang++ option so that inside GDB I can use std::cout as function parameter

I first asked the question here. Now I encounter the same problem when using clang, hence ask again.
I tried both clang++ 3.8 and 3.9, the command options are "-g -O0".
The gdb version is 7.11.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.
Here is the code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class D
{
int n;
public:
D(int _n):n(_n){}
void dump(ostream &os);
};
void
D::dump(ostream &os)
{
os << "n=" << n << std::endl;
}
int main() {
D d(200);
std::cout << "hello" << std::endl;
return 0;
}
When it runs to "return 0", call command fails:
(gdb) call d.dump(std::cout)
A syntax error in expression, near `)'.
The same code and same gdb command work fine when compiled with g++ with same option.
Is there a workaround?
It might be because of a verison problem . The program is working fine. I executed it
~/c++practise> g++ stackoverflow1.cpp
~/c++practise> ./a.out
hello
~/c++practise> gdb --version
GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.2-90.el6)
g++ (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-17)
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n
(gdb) b std::cout
"std::cout" is not a function
(gdb) b D::dump(ostream &os)
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400865: file stackoverflow1.cpp, line 15.
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 2 at 0x4008a2: file stackoverflow1.cpp, line 19.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/e1211797/c++practise/outputtrail
Breakpoint 2, main () at stackoverflow1.cpp:19
19 D d(200);
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-1.192.el6.x86_64 libgcc-4.4.7-17.el6.x86_64 libstdc++-4.4.7-17.el6.x86_64
(gdb) s
D::D (this=0x7fffffffe0a0, _n=200) at stackoverflow1.cpp:8
8 D(int _n):n(_n){}
(gdb) s
main () at stackoverflow1.cpp:21
21 std::cout << "hello" << std::endl;
(gdb) s
hello
22 return 0;
(gdb) s
23 }
(gdb) s
0x0000003788c1ed1d in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) s
Single stepping until exit from function __libc_start_main,
which has no line number information.
Program exited normally.
(gdb)

Can we define a new data type in a GDB session

Is there a way to define a new data type (C structure or union) in gdb. The idea is to define a structure and then make gdb print data from an address interpreted as the newly defined structure.
For example, lets say we have a sample structure.
struct sample {
int i;
struct sample *less;
struct sample *more;
}
And if 0x804b320 is the address of an array of struct sample. The binary doesn't have debugging information so that gdb understands struct sample. Is there any way to define struct sample in a gdb session? So that we can print p *(struct sample *)0x804b320
Yes, here is how to make this work:
// sample.h
struct sample {
int i;
struct sample *less;
struct sample *more;
};
// main.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include "sample.h"
int main()
{
struct sample sm;
sm.i = 42;
sm.less = sm.more = &sm;
printf("&sm = %p\n", &sm);
assert(sm.i == 0); // will fail
}
gcc main.c # Note: no '-g' flag
gdb -q ./a.out
(gdb) run
&sm = 0x7fffffffd6b0
a.out: main.c:11: main: Assertion `sm.i == 0' failed.
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00007ffff7a8da75 in raise ()
(gdb) fr 3
#3 0x00000000004005cc in main ()
No local variables, no type struct sample:
(gdb) p sm
No symbol "sm" in current context.
(gdb) p (struct sample *)0x7fffffffd6b0
No struct type named sample.
So we get to work:
// sample.c
#include "sample.h"
struct sample foo;
gcc -g -c sample.c
(gdb) add-symbol-file sample.o 0
add symbol table from file "sample.o" at
.text_addr = 0x0
(gdb) p (struct sample *)0x7fffffffd6b0
$1 = (struct sample *) 0x7fffffffd6b0
(gdb) p *$1
$2 = {i = 42, less = 0x7fffffffd6b0, more = 0x7fffffffd6b0}
VoilĂ !

Is there any way to set a breakpoint in gdb that is conditional on the call stack?

I am debugging C++ in gdb 7.1 on Linux.
I have a function a() that is called in many places in the code. I want to set a breakpoint in it, but only if it was called from b(). Is there any way to do it?
Is there any way to do it only if b() was called from c(), and so on ad infinitum?
Update: There is now a better answer to this question: use GDB _is_caller convenience function.
The need you describe comes up quite often, usually in the context of some_utility_fn being called a lot, but you only are interested in the call which comes from some_other_fn.
You could probably script this entire interaction using the new embedded Python support in GDB from CVS trunk.
Without Python, you are limited in what you can do, but the usual technique is to have a disabled breakpoint on a(), and enable it from a command, attached to a breakpoint on b().
Here is an example:
int a(int x)
{
return x + 1;
}
int b()
{
return a(1);
}
int call_a_lots()
{
int i, sum = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
sum += a(i);
}
int main()
{
call_a_lots();
return b();
}
gcc -g t.c
gdb -q ./a.out
Reading symbols from /tmp/a.out...done.
(gdb) break a
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004cb: file t.c, line 3.
(gdb) disable 1
(gdb) break b
Breakpoint 2 at 0x4004d7: file t.c, line 8.
(gdb) command 2
>silent
>enable 1
>continue
>end
(gdb) run
Breakpoint 1, a (x=1) at t.c:3
3 return x + 1;
(gdb) bt
#0 a (x=1) at t.c:3
#1 0x00000000004004e1 in b () at t.c:8
#2 0x000000000040052c in main () at t.c:21
(gdb) q
Voila: we've stopped on a() called from b(), ignoring previous 100 calls to a().
gdb can handle this directly now without any need for Python. Just do this:
b a if $_caller_is("b")
I have tested this on gdb 7.6 that is already available but it does not work on gdb 7.2 and probably on gdb 7.1:
So this is main.cpp:
int a()
{
int p = 0;
p = p +1;
return p;
}
int b()
{
return a();
}
int c()
{
return a();
}
int main()
{
c();
b();
a();
return 0;
}
Then g++ -g main.cpp
This is my_check.py:
class MyBreakpoint (gdb.Breakpoint):
def stop (self):
if gdb.selected_frame().older().name()=="b":
gdb.execute("bt")
return True
else:
return False
MyBreakpoint("a")
And this is how it works:
4>gdb -q -x my_check.py ./a.out
Reading symbols from /home/a.out...done.
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400540: file main.cpp, line 3.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/a.out
#0 a () at main.cpp:3
#1 0x0000000000400559 in b () at main.cpp:10
#2 0x0000000000400574 in main () at main.cpp:21
Breakpoint 1, a () at main.cpp:3
3 int p = 0;
(gdb) c
Continuing.
[Inferior 1 (process 16739) exited normally]
(gdb) quit
A simpler solution than Python scripting is using a temporary breakpoint.
It looks like this:
b ParentFunction
command 1
tb FunctionImInterestedIn
c
end
Every time you break in ParentFunction, you'll set a one-time breakpoint on the function you're actually interested in, then continue running (presumably until you hit that breakpoint).
Since you'll break exactly once on FunctionImInterestedIn, this won't work if FunctionImInterestedIn is called multiple times in the context of ParentFunction and you want to break on each invocation.
not sure how to do it by gdb.
But you can declare global variable like:
bool call_a = false;
and when b calling a
call_a = true;
a();
and set call_a to false when other function call a() or after your breakpoint
then use condition break-point
break [line-number] if call_a == true
An easy one for arm is:
Set the breakpoint in the function you are interested.
break a
Attach an gdb command to that breakpoint.
command 1
up 1
if $lr == 0x12345678
echo match \n
down 1
else
echo no match \n
echo $lr \n
down 1
cont
end
end
When ever you arrive in the function a(), the command temporarily pops up one stack frame thus updating the link register. The callers link register value can then be used continue when the caller is not the execution
path you need.
Enjoy.