I've got following models:
// venue.js
export default Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string')
});
// web.js
export default Model.extend({
webname: DS.attr('string'),
venue: DS.belongsTo('venue', {async: false})
});
and I use the RESTAdapter. I defined my Mirage configuration as following:
// serializers/application.js
import { RestSerializer } from 'ember-cli-mirage';
export default RestSerializer.extend({
});
// config.js
export default function() {
this.get('/webs', schema => {
let venue = schema.venues.create({name: 'venue name'});
let web = schema.webs.create({
webname: 'web name',
venue: venue
});
return {
web: web,
venue: venue
}
})
}
This model sideloading is a part of our application, so I have to use it. Anyways as you can see the response is fine here, i.e. it correctly identifies the foreign keys etc:
But when I receive the response I can't access the venue from the web - it's null. The ember inspector confirms that:
Does anyone have any idea of how I can preserve the relationship when I obtain the data?
Glad you found include! The idea there is that whether associations are included or not can depend on the request. For example, with JSON:API a lot of apps will use query param includes to specify inclusion from the client-side. Other apps will have their servers send over default server-side includes, and that's what the include key is used for.
Also note that include can be a function, if you want more dynamic behavior. You can check out the docs for some examples.
Last point – your get handlers really should be returning what's already in Mirage's database, rather than creating new resources then returning them. This way your app will behave more similar to how it will in production.
So instead of
this.get('/webs', schema => {
let venue = schema.venues.create({name: 'venue name', id: 100});
let web = schema.webs.create({
webname: 'web name',
venueId: 100
});
return web;
})
try
this.get('/webs', schema => {
return schema.webs.all().models[0]
})
to return the first model (or schema.webs.all() if the endpoint should return a collection). Then, to seed Mirage with your starting data, put your data creation logic in scenarios/default.js using server.create:
// scenarios/default.js
export default function(server) {
let venue = server.create('venue', {name: 'venue name', id: 100});
server.create('web', {
venue,
webname: 'web name'
});
}
Ok, I did it a bit wrong apparently. Here is how one should do the sideloading correctly.
Since my web requires a venue to be sideloaded, I created a new model-specific serializer by calling ember g mirage-serializer web. Then I can specify the relationships which should be loaded alongside with the main entity via the include field:
// serializers/web.js
import ApplicationSerializer from './application';
export default ApplicationSerializer.extend({
include: ['venue'],
});
Then the config.js can be changed to
// config.js
this.get('/webs', schema => {
let venue = schema.venues.create({name: 'venue name', id: 100});
let web = schema.webs.create({
webname: 'web name',
venueId: 100
});
return web;
})
// OR
this.get('/webs', schema => {
let venue = schema.venues.create({name: 'venue name', id: 100});
let web = schema.webs.create({
webname: 'web name',
venue: venue
});
return web;
})
or one can use fixture files etc.
Related
I have three models, syndicates, users and activities. Each syndicate has many activities, and each activity has one user. My models look like this:
App.Syndicate = DS.Model.extend
activities: DS.hasMany('activity', async: true)
name: DS.attr 'string'
App.Activity = DS.Model.extend
syndicate: DS.belongsTo('syndicate')
user: DS.belongsTo('user', async: true)
App.User = DS.Model.extend
activities: DS.hasMany('activity', async: true)
I display the activities using
article#lead
h1= model.name
each activity in model.activities
p
= activity.id
p
= activity.user.name
Looking at syndicate/1, I get a list of the activities for that syndicate, with a user name for each activity, but each user is triggering a separate request to the api - very slow and expensive. I want to know if I cant request the users in a single query.
My reading suggested I could simply set 'coalesceFindRequests' to true, but this didn't work for me
DS.RESTAdapter.reopen
namespace: 'api/v1'
coalesceFindRequests: true
App.Store = DS.Store.extend(
serializer: DS.RESTSerializer.extend
primaryKey: (type) ->
'_id';
)
App.ApplicationAdapter = DS.ActiveModelAdapter.extend()
My route
App.SyndicateRoute = Ember.Route.extend
model: (params) ->
console.log params.syndicate_id
#store.find 'syndicate', params.syndicate_id
Any pointers on what I'm doing wrong?. I'm very new to ember.
Thanks :)
You can, side load the related data for the aggregate.
http://emberjs.com/guides/models/the-rest-adapter/
I have a Consultation model
export default DS.Model.extend({
records: DS.hasMany('record', { async: true }),
currentUser: DS.belongsTo('user'),
remoteUser: DS.belongsTo('user'),
created_time: DS.attr('number'),
freeMsgCount: function () {
return (this.get('remoteUser.msg_block')-this.get('user_msg_cnt'));
}.property('user_msg_cnt'),
.....
});
And User model
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
.....
});
And I try to update User model. I get json data via WebSocket
socket.on('message', function (jsonObj) {
if (jsonObj.action && jsonObj.action == 'userReload') {
self.store.push('user',jsonObj.userData );
return;
}
}
But Consultation model doesn't know about this update, because I have property freeMsgCount in Consultation model which is using data from User model this.get('remoteUser.msg_block'). User data was updated I saw it in Ember inspector. How can I tell Consultation model to update relation remoteUser?
It seems that you're not watching remoteUser changes in your computed property, so it won't be triggered if remoteUser property's changed. Please add remoteUser.msg_block to computed property declaration:
export default DS.Model.extend({
# ...
freeMsgCount: function () {
return (this.get('remoteUser.msg_block')-this.get('user_msg_cnt'));
}.property('user_msg_cnt', 'remoteUser.msg_block'),
I got two models set up like this:
App.Conversation = DS.Model.extend({
header : DS.attr('string'),
created_at : DS.attr('date'),
entry : DS.hasMany('Entry')
});
App.Entry = DS.Model.extend({
body : DS.attr('string'),
conversation: DS.belongsTo('Conversation'),
created_at : DS.attr('date'),
});
And routes like this:
App.ConversationsRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('conversation');
}
});
App.ConversationRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(params) {
return this.store.find('conversation', params.id);
}
})
And a Conversation controller like this:
App.ConversationController = Em.ObjectController.extend({
actions: {
loadMore: function() {
}
},
entries: function() {
return this.get('entry');
}.property('model.entry')
});
Now, what I would like to do is only to supply 10 entries sideloaded with each Conversation. That works with no problems and I am able to retrieve all conversations with their hasMany relationship to Entry.
However I would like to lazyload more related entries at a later point by some functionality in my loadMore action, if the user clicks a button in my app.
How can this be achieved? I really can't wrap my head around how to load more entries and sync them to the Conversation model.
Thank you for your help.
Manually fetch the 10 records via find by query, then push them into the entry collection using pushObjects.
var entryCol = this.get('entry');
store.find('entry', {skip:10}).then(function (col){
entryCol.pushObjects(col);
});
Something like this (sorry phone)
is there any way to do some filtering based on the related ID? imagine I have 2 models one is a song model and the other is an album model so obviously the song has album with an id, the json will return the model with
{album: 1}
so if I wanna filter it seems that I can't compare the album id with something like
song.get('album.id') === 1
is there any way to do it so simply?
Thanks
Edit: models
App.Album = DS.Model.extend({
irrelevantstuff: DS.attr(),
songs: DS.hasMany('Song')
})
App.Song = DS.Model.extend({
irrelevantstuff: DS.attr(),
album: DS.belongsTo('Album')
})
I tried both with {async:true} and without, still same problem.
however I noticed that if I run it the first time it gives me undefined to all of the album.id but if I run it the second time I get the ids, now I have everything on the store, so it's not doing an AJAX request either the first or second time.
{"songs": [{"irrelevantstuff":"foo", "album": 1}, {"irrelevantstuff":"bar", "album": 1}]}
{"albums": [{"irrelevantstuff":"album", "songs": [1,2]}]
Relationships should be camelCase
App.Album = DS.Model.extend({
irrelevantstuff: DS.attr(),
songs: DS.hasMany('song', {async: true})
})
App.Song = DS.Model.extend({
irrelevantstuff: DS.attr(),
album: DS.belongsTo('album', {async: true})
})
Since your data for the relationship isn't coming down in the request for the song/album it would be considered async. As such if you want to access it you'll need to use it asynchronous methods, promises.
var songPromise = this.store.find('song', 1);
songPromise.then(function(song){
var albumPromise = song.get('album');
albumPromise.then(function(album){
// the album is available for usage....
if(album.get('id') == 1){
alert('woo hoo');
}
});
});
I am struggling with a strange problem. I have a model called Activity with a property defined like this:
owner: DS.belongsTo('App.User', embedded: true)
The User is also a defined model when I'm getting the JSON response like this:
some single properties and
user: { id: etc. }
My all properties map well but the user embedded object from JSON doesn't map to the owner property. However, when I change
owner
to
user
It maps well. But I want to leave the owner because it's a better representation of what I mean. I tried this action:
owner: DS.belongsTo('App.User', key: 'user', embedded: true)
but it didn't help.
First, I recommend using the latest Ember / EmberData, but you will need to handle embedded records manually by enhancing extractSingle in a custom serializer (see example below). Also, you should define relationships like this:
App.Activity = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
owner: DS.belongsTo('user')
});
App.User = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
activities: DS.hasMany('activity')
});
Next, I recommend using the ActiveModelAdapter if you are using underscores when communicating with the server (i.e. like in EmberData 0.13):
App.ApplicationAdapter = DS.ActiveModelAdapter;
Finally, to use owner for a User, override typeForRoot in a custom serializer.
For example:
App.ApplicationSerializer = DS.ActiveModelSerializer.extend({
typeForRoot: function(root) {
if (root == 'owner' || root == 'owners') { root = 'user'; }
return this._super(root);
},
// based on: https://github.com/emberjs/data/blob/master/TRANSITION.md#embedded-records
extractSingle: function(store, type, payload, id, requestType) {
var owner = payload.activity.owner,
ownerId = owner.id;
payload.owners = [owner];
payload.activity.owner_id = ownerId;
return this._super.apply(this, arguments);
}
});
Example JSBin