So I have a set of results in Postman from a runner on a collection using some data file for iterations - I have the stored data from the runner in the Postman app on Linux, but I want to know how I can get hold of the data. There seems to be a database hidden away in the ~/.config directory (/Desktop/file__0.indexeddb.leveldb) - that looks like it has the data from the results there.
Is there anyway that I can get hold of the raw data - I want to be able to save the results from the database and not faff around with running newman or hacking a server to post the results and then save, I already have 20000 results in a collection. I want to be able to get the responseData from each post and save it to a file - I will not execute the posts again, I need to just work out a way
I've tried KeyLord, FastNoSQL (this crashes), levelDBViewer(Jar), but not having any luck here.
Any suggestions?
inline 25024 of runner.js a simple yet hack for small numbers of results I can do the following
RunnerResultsRequestListItem = __WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2_pure_render_decorator___default()(_class = class RunnerResultsRequestListItem extends __WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0_react__["Component"] {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
var text = props.request.response.body,
blob = new Blob([text], { type: 'text/plain' }),
anchor = document.createElement('a');
anchor.download = props.request.ref + ".txt";
anchor.href = (window.webkitURL || window.URL).createObjectURL(blob);
anchor.dataset.downloadurl = ['text/plain', anchor.download, anchor.href].join(':');
anchor.click();
it allows me to save but obviously I have to click save for now, anyone know how to automate the saving part - please add something here!
Related
I created a Google Form with a linked Google Spreadsheet. I would like that everytime someone submits the form, the spreadsheet is copied to an s3 bucket in AWS. To do so, I just got started with Google Scripts. I managed to get the trigger part working on form submit but I am struggling to understand the readme of this GitHub project to upload to s3.
function setUpTrigger() {
ScriptApp.newTrigger('copyDataS3')
.forForm('1SK-2Ow63vs_TaoF54UjSgn35FL7F8_ANHDTOOiTabMM')
.onFormSubmit()
.create();
}
function copyDataS3() {
// https://github.com/viuinsight/google-apps-script-for-aws
// I do not understand where should I place aws.js and util.js.
// Should I do File -> New -> Script file and copy paste the contents? Should the file be .js or .gs?
S3.init("MY_ACCESS_KEY", "MY_SECRET_KEY");
// if I wanwt to copy an spreadsheet with the following id, what should go into "object" below?
var ssID = "SPREADSHEET_ID";
S3.putObject(bucketName, objectName, object, region)
}
I believe your goal as follows.
You want to send Google Spreadsheet to s3 bucket as a CSV data using Google Apps Script.
Modification points:
When I saw google-apps-script-for-aws of the library you are using, I noticed that the data is requested as the string. I thought that in this case, your CSV data might be able to be directly sent. But for example, when you want to sent a binary data, it will occur an error. So in this answer, I would like to propose the modified script of 2 patterns.
I thought that the situation might similar to this thread. But I noticed that you are using the different library from the thread. So I post this answer.
Pattern 1:
In this pattern, it supposes that only the text data is sent. It's like the CSV data in your replying. In this case, I think that it is not required to modify the library.
Modified script:
S3.init("MY_ACCESS_KEY", "MY_SECRET_KEY"); // Please set this.
var spreadsheetId = "###"; // Please set the Spreadsheet ID.
var sheetName = "Sheet1"; // Please set the sheet name.
var region = "###"; // Please set this.
var csv = SpreadsheetApp
.openById(spreadsheetId)
.getSheetByName(sheetName)
.getDataRange()
.getValues() // or .getDisplayValues()
.map(r => r.join(","))
.join("\n");
var blob = Utilities.newBlob(csv, MimeType.CSV, sheetName + ".csv");
S3.putObject("bucketName", "test.csv", blob, region);
Pattern 2:
In this pattern, it supposes that both the text data and binary data are sent. In this case, it is required to also modify the library side.
For google-apps-script-for-aws
Please modify the line 110 in s3.js as follows.
From:
var content = object.getDataAsString();
To:
var content = object.getBytes();
And, please modify the line 146 in s3.js as follows.
From:
Utilities.DigestAlgorithm.MD5, content, Utilities.Charset.UTF_8));
To:
Utilities.DigestAlgorithm.MD5, content));
For Google Apps Script:
In this case, please give the blob to S3.putObject as follows.
Script:
S3.init("MY_ACCESS_KEY", "MY_SECRET_KEY"); // Please set this.
var fileId = "###"; // Please set the file ID.
var region = "###"; // Please set this.
var blob = DriveApp.getFileById(fileId).getBlob();
S3.putObject("bucketName", blob.getName(), blob, region);
References:
viuinsight/google-apps-script-for-aws
Class UrlFetchApp
computeDigest(algorithm, value)
PutObject
I am using a REST API with a POST request. I have created a CSV file to load in various inputs and using the Collection Runner to submit my requests and run the associated JavaScript Tests iteratively. I am trying to figure out how I can also have an entry in each row of the CSV to reference for my JavaScript Test in order to make the JavaScript dynamic. I've searched the Postman documentation and forums, as well as Google and Stack Overflow, but I haven't found anything that works. Here is a basic example of what I'm trying to accomplish.
Let's say I have a basic adding API. Here is my Request:
{
"Numbers": {
"Value_1": {{val1}},
"Value_2": {{val2}},
}
}
The CSV file is as follows:
val1,val2,sum
1,1,2
2,2,4
3,3,6
For this example, lets assume that the API returns a response that includes the sum of val1 and val2; something like this:
{
"Numbers": {{sum}},
}
I am able to load val1 and val2 into my request and iterate through the request for each row, but I am having trouble incorporating the sum values (from the same CSV) into the JavaScript Test.
I am trying to do something like the test below where I can reference the sum value from my spreadsheet, but Postman doesn't like my syntax.
pm.test("Adding machine", function () {
var jsonData = pm.response.json();
pm.expect(jsonData.Numbers === {{sum}});
});
Does anyone have any suggestions? Is this even possible to do?
You could use the pm.iterationData().get('var_name') function and create a check like this?
pm.test("Sums are correctly calculated", () => {
pm.expect(pm.response.json().Numbers).to.equal(pm.iterationData.get('sum'))
})
I'm trying to use a pre-request script to build out a request object based on data pulled from a CSV file. The problem is that the request seems to be set in stone prior to the pre-request script being run. That would seem to make this a mid-request script almost rather than a pre-request.
My code is as follows:
if(ipList === undefined) ipList = "1.2.3.4,2.3.4.5,123.234.345.465";
let ips = ipList.split(',');
let queryArray = [];
for( i=0; i<ips.length; i++){
queryArray.push({ "key": "ip", "value": ips[i] });
}
console.log(queryArray);
pm.request.url.query = queryArray;
console.log(pm.request);
When I hardcode a url query variable in the request to equal 4.3.2.1, the pm.response.url object like this:
pm.request.url.query[0] = {key:"ip", value:"4.3.2.1"}
Note that the url.query[0] part of the object matches the parameter in the actual get request.
When I change the value of pm.request.url.query to equal the new query array, however as you can see here, the query array is set correctly, but the parameters are not appended to the request URL.
So unless I'm doing something wrong, it appears that the request is immutable even to the pre-request scripts.
So my question is this:
Is there a way to modify the url params of a request prior to making the request?
BTW: I know that is might seem odd to have multiple params with the same key in a query, but that's the way this API works and hard coding multiple ip addresses in the query works just fine.
You could just assign a new value to pm.request.url.
Here I had some query params already in the URL, which I had to edit:
const urlSplit = request.url.split('?');
const paramsString = urlSplit[1]; // the second part actually represents the query string we need to modify
const eachParamArray = paramsString.split('&');
let params = {};
eachParamArray.forEach((param) => {
const key = param.split('=')[0];
const value = param.split('=')[1];
Object.assign(params, {[key]: value});
});
params.bla = params.bla + 'foobar';
newQueryString = Object.keys(params).map(key => key + '=' + params[key]).join('&');
pm.request.url = urlSplit[0] + '?' + newQueryString;
In the end, I just constructed a new URL, using the first part of the previous one & the query string with the edited bla parameter.
This seemed to work for me--it didn't change what the UI shows the query string is, but it changed what the actual request was (looking at the console log)
pm.request.url.addQueryParams(["a=1", "b=2"])
pm.request.url.query.remove("b")
I have some parameters called "script_loginAs" etc... named such that people on my team know the parameter is evaluated and not sent.
I'm trying to pull a list of connected users in Firebase to simply populate a select dropdown. My problem is that I can't seem to access the child objects properly.
Using connectedUsers.userName (see below code) works but only for my own user data, it doesn't pull anything else.
It seemed to me like changing "myUserRef.on" to "userListRef.on" and using something like "snapshot.child('userName').val()" should work but it just throws undefined. The same goes for "connectedUsers.child.userName", I'm sure I'm missing something simple here.
In the below code by changing to "userListRef.on('child_added', function(snapshot)" I can successfully add and remove user data from Firebase, and log all of the objects to the console and all data looks fine when I drill down the objects. I just need a way to access that data so I can put all connected users into a select dropdown or remove them from it when they disconnect.
var userListRef = new Firebase('https://myaccount.firebaseIO.com/users/');
var myUserRef = userListRef.push();
// ADD USER DATA TO FIREBASE
var userId = $('#myIdInput').val();
var userName = $('#nameInput').val();
myUserRef.push({userId: userId, userName: userName});
// READ USER OBJECTS AND FIRE ADDUSER FUNCTION
myUserRef.on('child_added', function(snapshot) {
var connectedUsers = snapshot.val();
console.log(addUser);
//addUser(connectedUsers.userId, connectedUsers.userName);
});
// ADD USER TO SELECT DROPDOWN
function addUser(userId, userName) {
var modSelect = $('#tsmmodsendto');
modSelect.append($('<option></option>').attr("value", userId).text(userName));
}
// READ USER OBJECTS AND FIRE REMOVEUSER FUNCTION
myUserRef.on('child_removed', function(snapshot) {
var connectedUsers = snapshot.val();
console.log(removeUser);
//removeUser(connectedUsers.userId, connectedUsers.userName);
});
// REMOVE USER TO SELECT DROPDOWN
function removeUser(userId, userName) {
var modSelect = $('#tsmmodsendto');
modSelect.append($('<option></option>').removeAttr("value", userId).text(userName));
}
// ON DISCONNECT REMOVE USER DATA FROM FIREBASE
myUserRef.onDisconnect().remove();
The code you've written won't work properly because each user is writing to:
/users/PUSH_ID/PUSH_ID
And is then listening at:
/users/PUSH_ID
So every client is going to be listening only to its own data and will never see anyone else's data. In order to view other people's data, you need to all be listening / writing to the same path.
In your question you mention you see "undefined" if you change to listening at /users. Could you simplify your code, and use that approach, and perhaps then I can provide a more helpful answer?
Or if I'm not understanding correctly, please simplify and clarify your question.
I have set a cookie that I want to use to populate a form, so that users don't need to keep filling out the same form (it's submitting an inquiry to owners of holiday villas).
I've got it working fine if the cookie is already set, but it errors out if there is no cookie set.
I'm guessing I'll need to use an "if" statement, but don't quite know how to write the code.
Here is the code that sets the cookie...
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"] = Request["BookingReqName"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqEmail"] = Request["BookingReqEmail"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqPhone"] = Request["BookingReqPhone"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumAdults"] = Request["BookingNumAdults"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumChildren"] = Request["BookingNumChildren"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqMessage"] = Request["BookingReqMessage"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"].Expires = DateTime.Now.AddHours(4);
}
Here are the variables that collect info from the cookie...
var reqname = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"];
var reqemail = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqEmail"];
var reqphone = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqPhone"];
var numadults = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumAdults"];
var numchildren = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumChildren"];
var reqmessage = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqMessage"];
and here is a sample input from the form...
<label>Name</label>
<input type="text" name="BookingReqName" id="BookingReqName" placeholder="full name…" value="#reqname">
In WebMatrix C#.net, I think you are looking for something like this:
if(Request["BookingReqName"] != null)
{
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"] = Request["BookingReqName"];
}
else
{
Response.Cookies["BookingReqName"] = ""; //<--Whatever default value you want (I've used an empty string here, so you, at least, won't get a null reference error).
}
Or you can use the same code as a one liner (to not clutter up your code, however this will decrease readability, obv.).
if(Request["BookingReqName"] != null){Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"] = Request["BookingReqName"];}else{Response.Cookies["BookingReqName"] = ""; //<--Whatever default value you want (I've used an empty string here, so you, at least, won't get a null reference error).}
You'll just have to do that for all of your lines requesting cookie values.
The point is, though, that anything can go in the "else" block that helps you handle what to do when the cookie values have been cleared/expired (which you must always expect). You could redirect to a page that requests information from the user to reset any "forgotten" configurations, or, if you want to persist the data no matter what, consider storing these values in a database, instead, as those values won't clear/expire.
One last thing, if this doesn't help:
If you find yourself wondering what value to store in the cookie (the default value you wish to specify), because you need to know, right then and there, what it was supposed to have remembered, then I am afraid it is time to reconsider how you have structured the flow of data.
Sorry, but I have done that, once upon a time, only with Session variables, and it wasn't pretty :)
If you need any help with the best way(s) to transfer data between web pages, check this very helpful, concise link from Mike Brind's website: http://www.mikesdotnetting.com/Article/192/Transferring-Data-Between-ASP.NET-Web-Pages
It should just be the following
if(Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"] == null)
{
return; // <- if BookingEnquiry is null we end this routine
}
// Normal code flow here...
or something similar