Continue debugging after SegFault in GDB? - gdb

Question

I am debugging a huge program using GDB and there is a SegFault in my program.
Instead of re-running the program, is it possible to switch to a previous stack frame and continue execution from there?

Answer 1

On Unix and Linux systems, at least, you can use gdb's handle command to tell gdb to stop the program when a signal is received (with the stop keyword) and not to pass the signal to the program (with the nopass keyword). When the program stops, you can use the return command to return a value from the current frame, then continue the program.
$ gdb -q segvtest
Reading symbols from segvtest...done.
(gdb) list 1,99999
1 #include <stdio.h>
2
3 int a()
4 {
5 int *p = 0;
6 return *p;
7 }
8
9 int main()
10 {
11 int i = a();
12 printf("a() returned %d\n", i);
13 }
(gdb) handle SIGSEGV stop nopass
Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description
SIGSEGV Yes Yes No Segmentation fault
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/mp/segvtest
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000080006c0 in a () at segvtest.c:6
6 return *p;
(gdb) return 12345
Make a return now? (y or n) y
#0 0x00000000080006d6 in main () at segvtest.c:11
11 int i = a();
(gdb) c
Continuing.
a() returned 12345
[Inferior 1 (process 74) exited normally]
(gdb)

Answer 2

is it possible to switch to a previous stack frame and continue
execution from there?
Yes, you can do it with reverse debugging.
When you get segfault, run reverse-finish to go out of the current frame in reverse direction. You will stop in the previous frame where you are about to call the function that caused a segfault.