So for my assignment I have to create a calculator that works with big integers up to 256 characters in length. The current part of the assignment I'm up to is getting it work with multiplication of larger numbers. DIGITS is the limit of digits per Bigint class, currently set to 20 for debug sake, but will go up to 256
When doing a calculation like 25 * 137, I get the answer 3285 when it should be 3425. When I look through the couts that I put in place for debug, the first iteration of the i loop works perfectly and adds 685 to sum which is 5 * 137, so that works perfect. However when it gets to the bit where it's having to do the second iteration of the i loop where it is 20 * 137, it's getting the answer wrong and I cannot work out why. I have an inkling that it's something to do with the carry being two digits (14), but I still can't really work out how I can fix it.
The main implementation that obviously has something wrong with it is in the * operator of the bigint class. I know it's not to do with the << or >> operators as they work perfectly for addition and subtraction.
Full code of the bigint class is below:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include "Bigint.h"
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
Bigint::Bigint()
{
for (int i = DIGITS-1; i >= 0; --i) {
digits_[i] = 0;
}
}
ostream& operator<< (ostream& out, const Bigint& n)
{
string s = "";
bool found = false;
for (int i = DIGITS - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
if(n.digits_[i] > 0) {
found = true;
}
if(n.digits_[i] != 0 || found == true) {
s += char(n.digits_[i] + '0');
}
}
if (s == "") {
s = "0";
}
return out << s;
}
istream& operator>> (istream& in, Bigint& n)
{
// Extracts full-length number (does not work for any other length).
// All characters are assumed to be valid digits.
//
string s;
if (in >> s) {
for (int i = 0; i < DIGITS; ++i) {
n.digits_[i] = i < s.length() ? s[s.length() - 1 - i] - '0' : 0;
}
}
return in;
}
Bigint operator+ (const Bigint& n1, const Bigint& n2)
{
Bigint ret;
int cur_carry = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < DIGITS; ++i) {
int n1_digit = n1.get(i);
int n2_digit = n2.get(i);
if(n1_digit < 0 || n1_digit > 9) {
n1_digit = 0;
}
if(n2_digit < 0 || n2_digit > 9) {
n2_digit = 0;
}
//printf("n1 : %d\n", n1_digit);
//printf("n2 : %d\n", n2_digit);
int sum = n1_digit + n2_digit + cur_carry;
//cout << "sum : " << sum << endl;
cur_carry = Bigint::getCarry(sum);
//cout << "new carry : " << cur_carry << endl;
ret.set(i, Bigint::getDigitValue(sum));
//cout << "Set : " << i << "," << Bigint::getDigitValue(sum) << endl;
}
return ret;
}
Bigint operator* (const Bigint& n1, const Bigint& n2)
{
Bigint ret;
//int borrowed = 0;
Bigint sum;
for(int i = 0; i < DIGITS ; i++){
int n1_digit = n1.get(i);
//cout << "n2: " << n2_digit << endl;
Bigint temp;
if(n1_digit < 0 || n1_digit > 9) {
n1_digit = 0;
}
int carry = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < DIGITS ; j++){
int val = n1_digit * (pow(10, i)) * n2.get(j);
cout << "n1: " << n1_digit << endl;
cout << "n2: " << n2.get(j) << endl;
if(carry != 0){
temp.set(j, (Bigint::getDigitValue(val)) + carry);
cout << "Carry was " << carry << ", now set 0" << endl;
cout << "value to set: " << (Bigint::getDigitValue(val)) + carry << endl;
carry = 0;
}
else if(carry == 0){
temp.set(j, Bigint::getDigitValue(val));
cout << "value to set: " << (Bigint::getDigitValue(val))<< endl;
}
carry = (Bigint::getCarry(val) + carry);
cout << "carry: " << carry << endl;
}
cout << "Sum before adding temp: " << sum << endl;
sum = sum + temp;
cout << "Sum after adding temp: " << sum << endl;
}
ret = sum;
return ret; // Only correct when n2 equals 1.
}
int Bigint::get(int pos) const {
//Return address of digit for reading
int ret = digits_[pos];
return ret;
}
void Bigint::set(int pos, int val) {
this->digits_[pos] = val;
}
int Bigint::getCarry(int val) {
//Integer division, always floors
return val/10;
}
int Bigint::getDigitValue(int val) {
return val % 10;
}
Header file:
#ifndef BIGINT_H_
#define BIGINT_H_
#define DIGITS 20
class Bigint
{
public:
/**
* Creates a Bigint initialised to 0.
*/
Bigint();
/**
* Inserts n into stream or extracts n from stream.
*/
friend std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream &out, const Bigint& n);
friend std::istream& operator>> (std::istream &in, Bigint& n);
/**
* Returns the sum, difference, product, or quotient of n1 and n2.
*/
friend Bigint operator* (const Bigint& n1, const Bigint& n2);
friend Bigint operator+ (const Bigint& n1, const Bigint& n2);
int get(int pos) const;
void set(int pos, int val);
static int getCarry(int val);
static int getDigitValue(int val);
private:
int digits_[DIGITS];
};
#endif // BIGINT_H_
Main:
#include <iostream>
#include "Bigint.h"
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
Bigint n1, n2;
char op;
while (cin >> n1 >> op >> n2) {
switch (op) {
case '+' :
cout << n1 + n2 << endl;
break;
case '*' :
cout << n1 * n2 << endl;
break;
}
}
return 0;
}
}
you should not use this lineint val = n1_digit * (pow(10, i)) * n2.get(j);
because it will give integer overflow since you are working with bigintger
instead use the digits in the multiplier and add zeros behind the result.
the number of zeros to add will depend on the position of the multiplier digit which you can find the variable i from this loop for(int i = 0; i < DIGITS ; i++) in the overloaded * function
There are a few potential problems
for (int j = 0; j < DIGITS ; j++){
int val = n1_digit * (pow(10, i)) * n2.get(j); // val % 10 == 0 for i > 0
// You should also be adding the carry to val
cout << "n1: " << n1_digit << endl;
cout << "n2: " << n2.get(j) << endl;
if(carry != 0){
temp.set(j, (Bigint::getDigitValue(val)) + carry);
// This can set temp[j] to values above 9 depending on the carry
cout << "Carry was " << carry << ", now set 0" << endl;
cout << "value to set: " << (Bigint::getDigitValue(val)) + carry << endl;
carry = 0;
}
else if(carry == 0){
temp.set(j, Bigint::getDigitValue(val));
cout << "value to set: " << (Bigint::getDigitValue(val))<< endl;
}
carry = (Bigint::getCarry(val) + carry);
cout << "carry: " << carry << endl;
}
Because you multiply by a power of 10, getDigitValue and getCarry aren't acting the way you expect them to. It might be better to shift the index for temp.set up by i instead of multiplying by pow(10, i).
I would also recommend cleaning up the cases. Both the if and the else if are actually doing the same work in this case, and resetting the carry doesn't do anything. So this would have the exact same behavior:
for (int j = 0; j < DIGITS ; j++){
int val = n1_digit * (pow(10, i)) * n2.get(j);
temp.set(j, (Bigint::getDigitValue(val)) + carry);
// If the carry is 0, the addition doesn't do anything
// You don't need to reset the carry to 0, since it's assigned here anyway
carry = (Bigint::getCarry(val) + carry);
}
Without the cases and without the print statements, it's much easier to read, but here the use of methods (getCarry and getDigitValue) still makes it hard to see the problem by moving the relevant operations to the bottom of the class. Making the changes gives:
for (int j = 0; j < DIGITS ; j++){
int val = n1_digit * n2.get(j) + carry;
temp.set(i + j, Bigint::getDigitValue(val));
carry = Bigint::getCarry(val);
// The carry just gets added to the value at the beginning
// Everything else just works that way
}
You also need to change the get and set functions so that they don't work out of bounds:
int Bigint::get(int pos) const {
//Return address of digit for reading
if (pos >= DIGITS)
return 0;
int ret = digits_[pos];
return ret;
}
void Bigint::set(int pos, int val) {
if (pos >= DIGITS)
return ;
this->digits_[pos] = val;
}
With this code, I get 3425 for 25 * 137.
Related
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
class Term;
class Polynomial;
class Term {
public:
friend class Polynomial;
void set_term(string s);
int get_pow();
int get_coefficient();
private:
int coefficient;
int pow;
};
class Polynomial {
public:
friend class Term;
Polynomial(int s, Term t[]);
int get_size();
Term *myterm;
private:
int P_size;
};
void Term::set_term(string s) {
coefficient = stoi(s.substr(1, 1));
pow = stoi(s.substr(4, 1));
if (s[0] == '-') {
coefficient = -coefficient;
}
}
int Term::get_coefficient() { return coefficient; }
int Term::get_pow() { return pow; }
Polynomial::Polynomial(int s, Term t[]) {
P_size = s;
myterm = new Term[s];
for (int i = 0; i < s; i++) {
myterm[i].coefficient = t[i].coefficient;
cout << i << " Term " << t[i].coefficient << endl;
cout << i << " Polynomial " << myterm[i].coefficient << endl;
myterm[i].pow = t[i].pow;
}
}
Polynomial::get_size() { return P_size; }
int main() {
string x1;
cin >> x1;
int size_x1 = x1.size();
Term term1[size_x1];
for (int i = 0; i < size_x1; i += 5) {
term1[i].set_term(x1.substr(i, 5));
}
Polynomial p1(size_x1 / 5, term1);
for (int i = 0; i < size_x1; i += 5) {
cout << term1[i].get_coefficient() << "x^";
cout << term1[i].get_pow() << endl;
}
cout << "------------------" << endl;
for (int i = 0; i < p1.get_size(); i++) {
if (p1.myterm[i].get_coefficient() > 0)
cout << "+";
cout << p1.myterm[i].get_coefficient();
cout << "x^";
cout << p1.myterm[i].get_pow() << endl;
}
return 0;
}
term1 in main is working right but when I pass it to p1(Polynomial) just t[0] and, myterm[0]
is true I mean I pass term1 to p1 as t so t[0] = term1[0] and myterm[0] = t[0]
Polynomial::Polynomial(int s, Term t[]) {
P_size = s;
myterm = new Term[s];
for (int i = 0; i < s; i++) {
myterm[i].coefficient = t[i].coefficient;
cout << i << " Term " << t[i].coefficient << endl;
cout << i << " Polynomial " << myterm[i].coefficient << endl;
myterm[i].pow = t[i].pow;
}
}
in Polynomial constructor both t[1].coeffient and, myterm[1].coefficient are 4941660(for instance)
however, t is term1 and in term1 term1[1] is the 4(for instance)
if term1[1] is 4 so t[1] should be 4 but it's not so myterm[1], is not 4 too.
There's a lot of confusion over sizes here
string x1;
cin >> x1;
int size_x1 = x1.size();
Term term1[size_x1];
for (int i = 0; i < size_x1; i += 5) {
term1[i].set_term(x1.substr(i, 5));
}
Polynomial p1(size_x1 / 5, term1);
You didn't say what your input is, but suppose it is "1234567890" then size_x1 equals 10, so term1 will also have size 10. Then your for loop will execute twice, with i equal to 0 and i equal to 5, so you will assign 12345 to term1[0] and 67890 to term1[5]. That makes no sense to me. term1 has size 10 but the only elements assigned to are zero and five.
Then you create p1 with size size_x1/5 which equals 2. So the constructor for p1 will look at term1[0] and term1[1], but in the for loop you assigned to term1[0] and term1[5].
You have to think carefully about what the code you are writing is actually doing. The compiler will do exactly what you tell it to. It's not like talking to a person who can understand what you really meant. So you have to be very careful. This is I think you really meant (but I could be wrong)
string x1;
cin >> x1;
int size_x1 = x1.size();
int size_term1 = size_x1/5;
Term term1[size_term1];
for (int i = 0; i < size_term1 ; ++i) {
term1[i].set_term(x1.substr(5*i, 5));
}
Polynomial p1(size_term1, term1);
I created a new variable size_term1 with the size of the term array, which is now the sizeof the input divided by 5. And I changed the for loop so that it assigns to term1[0] and term1[1].
So your problem has nothing to do with passing an array to a class, which you did perfectly correctly. It was not thinking clearly about the code you were writing, and making mistakes in the logic.
So far I have this code. I'm trying to print prime factorization with exponents. For example, if my input is 20, the output should be 2^2, 5
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
void get_divisors (int n);
bool prime( int n);
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
int n = 0 ;
cout << "Enter a number and press Enter: ";
cin >>n;
cout << " Number n is " << n << endl;
get_divisors(n);
cout << endl;
return 0;
}
void get_divisors(int n){
double sqrt_of_n = sqrt(n);
for (int i =2; i <= sqrt_of_n; ++i){
if (prime (i)){
if (n % i == 0){
cout << i << ", ";
get_divisors(n / i);
return;
}
}
}
cout << n;
}
bool prime (int n){
double sqrt_of_n = sqrt (n);
for (int i = 2; i <= sqrt_of_n; ++i){
if ( n % i == 0) return 0;
}
return 1;
}
I hope someone can help me with this.
You can use an std::unordered_map<int, int> to store two numbers (x and n for x^n). Basically, factorize the number normally by looping through prime numbers smaller than the number itself, dividing the number by the each prime as many times as possible, and recording each prime you divide by. Each time you divide by a prime number p, increment the counter at map[p].
I've put together a sample implementation, from some old code I had. It asks for a number and factorizes it, displaying everything in x^n.
#include <iostream>
#include <unordered_map>
#include <cmath>
bool isPrime(const int& x) {
if (x < 3 || x % 2 == 0) {
return x == 2;
} else {
for (int i = 3; i < (int) (std::pow(x, 0.5) + 2); i += 2) {
if (x % i == 0) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
}
std::unordered_map<int, int> prime_factorize(const int &x) {
int currentX = abs(x);
if (isPrime(currentX) || currentX < 4) {
return {{currentX, 1}};
}
std::unordered_map<int, int> primeFactors = {};
while (currentX % 2 == 0) {
if (primeFactors.find(2) != primeFactors.end()) {
primeFactors[2]++;
} else {
primeFactors[2] = 1;
}
currentX /= 2;
}
for (int i = 3; i <= currentX; i += 2) {
if (isPrime(i)) {
while (currentX % i == 0) {
if (primeFactors.find(i) != primeFactors.end()) {
primeFactors[i]++;
} else {
primeFactors[i] = 1;
}
currentX /= i;
}
}
}
return primeFactors;
}
int main() {
int x;
std::cout << "Enter a number: ";
std::cin >> x;
auto factors = prime_factorize(x);
std::cout << x << " = ";
for (auto p : factors) {
std::cout << "(" << p.first << " ^ " << p.second << ")";
}
}
Sample output:
Enter a number: 1238
1238 = (619 ^ 1)(2 ^ 1)
To begin with, avoid using namespace std at the top of your program. Second, don't use function declarations when you can put your definitions before the use of those functions (but this may be a matter of preference).
When finding primes, I'd divide the number by 2, then by 3, and so on. I can also try with 4, but I'll never be able to divide by 4 if 2 was a divisor, so non primes are automatically skipped.
This is a possible solution:
#include <iostream>
int main(void)
{
int n = 3 * 5 * 5 * 262417;
bool first = true;
int i = 2;
int count = 0;
while (i > 1) {
if (n % i == 0) {
n /= i;
++count;
}
else {
if (count > 0) {
if (!first)
std::cout << ", ";
std::cout << i;
if (count > 1)
std::cout << "^" << count;
first = false;
count = 0;
}
i++;
if (i * i > n)
i = n;
}
}
std::cout << "\n";
return 0;
}
Note the i * i > n which is an alternative to the sqrt() you are using.
I have to write a functioncalled moveAndSortInt() that will receive an array of integers as an argument, and move all the even values down to the second half of the array and sort them from largest to smallest, while all the odd values will be sorted from smallest to largest. How can I improve my code?
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void moveAndSortInt(int[], int);
void displayName();
int main() {
int ary1[] = { -19, 270, 76, -61, 54 };
int size = 5;
int i;
int ary2[] = {9, 8, -103, -73, 74, 53};
int size2 = 6;
int j;
displayName();
cout << endl;
cout << "Original ary1[]" << endl;
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
cout << " " << ary1[i] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
cout << "\nCallingMoveAndSortInt() --\n " << endl;
moveAndSortInt(ary1, size);
cout << "Updated ary1[]" << endl;
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
cout << " " << ary1[i] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
cout << "\nOriginal ary2[]" << endl;
for (j = 0; j < size2; j++) {
cout << " " << ary2[j] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
cout << "\nCallingMoveAndSortInt() --\n" << endl;
moveAndSortInt(ary2, size2);
cout << "Updated ary2[]" << endl;
for (j = 0; j < size2; j++) {
cout << " " << ary2[j] << " ";
}
}
void moveAndSortInt(int ary[], int size) {
int i, j;
int temp;
for (i = 0; i < 1 + size / 2; i++) {
if (ary[i] % 2 == 0) {
for (j = size - 1; j > size / 2; j--) {
if (ary[j] % 2 != 0) {
temp = ary[i];
ary[i] = ary[j];
ary[j] = temp;
j = 0;
}
}
}
}
return;
I would suggest using std::sort, the standard algorithm for sorting, which is often implemented with a Quicksort. It is very fast, and also supports custom comparison. Here's some code to get you started:
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
int main()
{
std::vector<int> data = { 2, 213, 2, 2, 3 ,123, 4, 213, 2132, 123 };
std::sort(data.begin(), data.end(), [](int lhs, int rhs)
{
if (lhs % 2) // if lhs is odd
if (rhs % 2) // and rhs is odd then just use comparision
return lhs < rhs;
else // and if rhs is even then rhs is "bigger"
return false;
else // if lhs is even
if (rhs % 2)
return true; // and rhs is odd then lhs is "bigger"
else // and if they are both even just use comparision.
return lhs < rhs;
});
}
I'm sorry if that code is a little hard to read, but it does the trick.
This of course would work with C-style arrays too, just replace data.begin() with data and data.end() with data + size.
Alright, so I looked at it a bit. Let's start with conventions.
int i;
for (i = 1; i < 10; i++)
Can be shortened to:
for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++)
Which looks better and is more readable. It would also be nice to have a few more comments, but that's something everyone needs to get better at, no matter how good they are.
So it seems that your code does correctly sort the array into even and odd halves. That's all you need to do yourself as long as you know where they end because sorting them largest to smallest is something that std::sort can do for you.
Edit: It was pointed out to me that my previous example is not exactly the same, as with the second one i can only be used in the loop. For your purposes, they work the same.
You can just reorder it
#include <algorithm>
#include <climits>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
auto const shuffle = [] (int input)
{
if ( input % 2 )
{
unsigned const dist_from_min = (unsigned)input - INT_MIN;
return dist_from_min >> 1;
}
else
{
unsigned const dist_from_max = INT_MAX - (unsigned)input;
return INT_MIN + (dist_from_max >> 1);
}
};
auto const ordering = [shuffle] (int left, int right)
{ return shuffle (left) < shuffle (right); };
std::vector <int> data =
{ 5, 2, 3, 0, -1, -3, 1, 100
, INT_MIN, INT_MIN + 1, INT_MAX, INT_MAX - 1
, -567, -765, 765, 567, -234, -432, 234, 432
};
std::sort ( data.begin ( ), data.end ( ), ordering );
for ( auto item : data )
std::cout << item << "\n";
}
void CensusData::mergeSort(int type) {
if(type == 0)
MERGE_SORT(type, 0, data.size());
}
void CensusData::MERGE_SORT(int type, int p, int r){
//int q;
//cout << "data size " << data.size() << endl;
std::cout << "MERGE_SORT START ///("<< p << ", " << r << ")" <<std::endl;
if(p < r)
{
int q = (p + r)/2;
MERGE_SORT(type, p, q);
MERGE_SORT(type, q + 1, r);
MERGE(type, p, q ,r);
}
}
void CensusData::MERGE(int type, int p, int q, int r){
if(type == 0)
{
std::cout << "MERGING" << std::endl;
//int n1;
//int n2;
int n1 = q - p + 1;
int n2 = r - q;
int L[n1 + 1];
int R[n2 + 1];
for(int i = 1; i < n1; i++)
{
cout << "filling Left Array" << endl;
L[i] = data[p + i - 1]->population;
}
for(int j = 1; j < n2; j++)
{
cout << "filling Right Array" << endl;
R[j] = data[q + j]->population;
}
int i = 1;
int j = 1;
for(int k = p; p < r; p++)
{
cout << "for loop: " << endl;
if(L[i] <= R[j])
{
cout << "TRUE" << endl;
data[k]->population = L[j];
i = i + 1;
}
/*else if(data[k]->population == R[j])
{
cout << "FALSE" << endl;
j = j + 1;
}*/
else
{
data[k]->population = R[j];
j = j + 1;
}
}
}
}
do not worry about type, it wont effect this program at all. basically i am trying to make a merge sort that will take a vector containing an integer, the vector looks like this:
class Record { // declaration of a Record
public:
std::string* city;
std::string* state;
int population;
Record(std::string&, std::string&, int);
~Record();
};
std::vector<Record*> data;
basically i have been trying to get it to actually sort, but it doesn't seem to work at all, i have even seen garbage in the program.
example input:
237 812826 68642
output:
4484540 812826 68642
Note: all of the rest of the program works fine (tested it with an insertion sort) only this part is not working.
Take a look at lecture 15 of the excellent Stanford Universities course Programming Abstractions. It covers all kinds of sorts including merge:
http://see.stanford.edu/see/lecturelist.aspx?coll=11f4f422-5670-4b4c-889c-008262e09e4e
You can even get the source code from SourceForge:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/progabstrlib/files/
I'm in the process of writing a Polynomial Class and have overloaded the + operator. I asked a question a few days ago regarding the actual overloading process, and received a great answer. However, my question now is in regards to the actual function of my program.
I need to add two user entered polynomials together. When one adds polynomials one must only add like terms, even if the two polynomials differ in size. My program does ok if the first entered polynomial is larger than the second, but reaches an error if the first polynomial is smaller than the second. To be more specific... I've noticed that it seems to leave one term off. On top of that it seems to add two like terms together and then print it with a different exponent. For example :
2x^3 + 3x^3 = 5x^2.
For reference, this is my previous question regarding this program: Overloading + operator with classes containing array pointers (C++)
Some help would be greatly appreciated.
My Code:
#include<iostream>
#include<stdexcept>
using namespace std;
#ifndef POLYNOMIAL_H
#define POLYNOMIAL_H
class Polynomial
{
friend istream& operator>>(istream& in, Polynomial& p);
friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& out, const Polynomial& p);
public:
Polynomial(int = 10);
~Polynomial();
void assignExponent();
Polynomial operator+(const Polynomial& other);
private:
int SIZE;
int *exponents;
int *polyPtr;
};
#endif
//CONSTRUCTOR
Polynomial::Polynomial(int arraySize)
{
if(arraySize > 0)
SIZE = arraySize;
else
{
cout << "Array size must be greater than 0. Program will now "
<< "Terminate..." << endl;
system("pause");
exit(0);
}
polyPtr = new int[SIZE];
exponents = new int[SIZE];
for(int i = 0; i<SIZE; i++)
polyPtr[i] = 0;
assignExponent();
};
//DESTRUCTOR
Polynomial::~Polynomial()
{
delete [] polyPtr;
};
//STREAM INSERTION
istream& operator>>(istream& in, Polynomial& p)
{
for(int i = 0; i<p.SIZE; i++)
{
in >> p.polyPtr[i];
}
return in;
};
//STREAM EXTRACTION
ostream& operator<<(ostream& out, const Polynomial& p)
{
int exponent;
for(int i = 0; i<p.SIZE; i++)
{
exponent = (p.SIZE - 1) - i;
if(p.polyPtr[i] != 1)
{
if(exponent > 0 && exponent != 1)
out << p.polyPtr[i] << "x^" << exponent << " + ";
if(exponent == 1)
out << p.polyPtr[i] << "x" << " + ";
if(exponent == 0)
out << p.polyPtr[i];
}
//In order to not display coefficient if = 1
else
{
if(exponent > 0 && exponent != 1)
out << "x^" << exponent << " + ";
if(exponent == 1)
out << "x" << " + ";
if(exponent == 0)
out << p.polyPtr[i];
}
}
return out;
};
//Assigns a value for exponent
void Polynomial::assignExponent()
{
for(int i = 0; i<SIZE; i++)
{
exponents[i] = (SIZE - 1) - i;
}
};
//OVERLOAD OF + OPERATOR
Polynomial Polynomial::operator+(const Polynomial& other)
{
Polynomial sum(SIZE);
int difference;
//If the first polynomial is larger
if (SIZE > other.SIZE)
{
difference = SIZE - other.SIZE;
for(int i = 0; i<SIZE; i++)
{
if(i - difference < 0)
sum.polyPtr[i] = polyPtr[i];
else
{
sum.polyPtr[i] = polyPtr[i] +
other.polyPtr[i - difference];
}
}
}
//If the second polynomial is larger **PROBLEM***************************************
if(other.SIZE > SIZE)
{
difference = other.SIZE - SIZE;
for(int i = 0; i<other.SIZE; i++)
{
if(i - difference < 0)
sum.polyPtr[i] = other.polyPtr[i];
else
{
sum.polyPtr[i] = other.polyPtr[i] +
polyPtr[i - difference];
}
}
}
//If the polynomials are equal
if(SIZE == other.SIZE)
{
for(int i = SIZE-1; i >= 0; i--)
{
sum.polyPtr[i] = polyPtr[i] + other.polyPtr[i];
}
}
return sum;
};
int main()
{
int polySize;
//User enters a size for the first & second polynomial
cout << "Enter a size for the first polynomial: ";
cin >> polySize;
Polynomial pOne(polySize);
cout << "\nEnter a size for the second polynomial: ";
cin >> polySize;
Polynomial pTwo(polySize);
//User enters in values (Overload of >> operator
cout << "\n\nEnter in values for the first polynomial, "
<< "in the format - (x x x x): " << endl;
cin >> pOne;
cout << "\nEnter in values for the second polynomial, "
<< "in the format - (x x x x): " << endl;
cin >> pTwo;
//Overload << operator for output
cout << "\nPolynomial 1 is: " << pOne << endl
<< "Polynomial 2 is: " << pTwo << endl;
Polynomial pThree = pOne + pTwo;
cout << "\nAfter being added together, the new polynomial is: "
<< pThree << endl;
system("pause");
}
Output Window:
The SIZE of sum should be the maximum of the SIZE of the two polynomials:
Polynomial Polynomial::operator+(const Polynomial& other)
{
Polynomial sum( max(SIZE,other.SIZE) );
Otherwise your new Polynomial is only as large as the polynomial you're doing the operation on, and you will be writing to unallocated memory further down the loop:
for(int i = 0; i<other.SIZE; i++)
{
if(i - difference < 0)
sum.polyPtr[i] = other.polyPtr[i];
else
{
sum.polyPtr[i] = other.polyPtr[i] +
polyPtr[i - difference]; // i may be higher than SIZE, thus sum.polyPtr[i] invokes undefined behaviour.
}
}
The current first problem is here:
Polynomial sum(SIZE);
Better:
Polynomial sum(std::max(SIZE, other.SIZE));
But I think the real problem is that you need to simplify your design.
The first thing could be to use:
private:
int SIZE;
double *coef;
};
Simple keep the coeficient for ax^n in coef[n]=a. Now is tryvial to find out what elemnt you need to add.
But much simpler could be to use
std::map<int,double> p; to store all. p[n]=a;
Without debugging and optimizing, just an idea:
private:
std::map<int,double> p;
};
And forget about any new, delete and index out of range.
The +() will be like:
Polynomial Polynomial::operator+(const Polynomial& other)
{
Polynomial sum; // No SIZE more.
sum.p= p;
for (auto ax_n : other.p)
sum.p[ax_n.first] += ax_n.second;
return sum;
}
Your problem lies in the construction of sum(SIZE)
Polynomial Polynomial::operator+(const Polynomial& other)
{
Polynomial sum(SIZE);
If you do this, and the first polynomial is only of size 2, later in the method you are copying into memory that isn't yours:
if(other.SIZE > SIZE)
{
difference = other.SIZE - SIZE;
////HERE IS YOUR PROBLEM - your loop uses other.SIZE, which is larger than SIZE...
for(int i = 0; i<other.SIZE; i++)
{
if(i - difference < 0)
sum.polyPtr[i] = other.polyPtr[i];
else
{
sum.polyPtr[i] = other.polyPtr[i] +
polyPtr[i - difference];
}
}
}
The error happens because you use sum.polyPtr[i], which when the SIZE < other.SIZE occurs, doesn't exist.
Your code is way too over-complicated. Something like this does it nicely:
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <iterator>
#include <sstream>
// helper to read the input polynomials into a output-iterator
template<class OutIter>
void read_vector(std::istream& is, OutIter first)
{
// helper type to iterate over the input coefficients
typedef std::istream_iterator<
typename OutIter::container_type::value_type> iter_t;
// buffer to hold the input line
std::string buffer;
// read it
std::getline(is, buffer);
// create a string stream with which we tokenize the input
std::istringstream iss(buffer);
// read coefficients into output container
std::copy(iter_t(iss), iter_t(), first);
}
int main()
{
std::vector<double> p1, p2;
// read input
std::cout << "Enter coefficients of the first polynomial: ";
read_vector(std::cin, std::back_inserter(p1));
std::cout << "Enter coefficients of the second polynomial: ";
read_vector(std::cin, std::back_inserter(p2));
// check for errors
if (p1.empty() || p2.empty())
{
std::cerr << "Error: polynomials must not be empty\n";
return 1;
}
// initialize result polynomial to 0. coefficients
std::vector<double> p3(std::max(p1.size(), p2.size()), 0.);
// copy first polynomial to the result, starting from the back
std::copy(p1.rbegin(), p1.rend(), p3.rbegin());
// add second polynomial, starting from the back
std::transform(p2.rbegin(), p2.rend(), p3.rbegin(), p3.rbegin(),
std::plus<double>());
// print result
std::cout << "Sum: ";
const size_t n = p3.size()-1;
for (size_t i=0; i < n; ++i)
{
std::cout << std::showpos << p3[i] << "x^" << n-i;
}
std::cout << std::showpos << p3[n] << "\n";
}