I want a #Published variable to be persisted, so that it's the same every time when I relaunch my app.
I want to use both the #UserDefault and #Published property wrappers on one variable. For example I need a '#PublishedUserDefault var isLogedIn'.
I have the following propertyWrapper
import Foundation
#propertyWrapper
struct UserDefault<T> {
let key: String
let defaultValue: T
init(_ key: String, defaultValue: T) {
self.key = key
self.defaultValue = defaultValue
}
var wrappedValue: T {
get {
return UserDefaults.standard.object(forKey: key) as? T ?? defaultValue
}
set {
UserDefaults.standard.set(newValue, forKey: key)
}
}
}
This is my Settings class
import SwiftUI
import Combine
class Settings: ObservableObject {
#Published var isLogedIn : Bool = false
func doLogin(params:[String:String]) {
Webservice().login(params: params) { response in
if let myresponse = response {
self.login = myresponse.login
}
}
}
}
My View class
struct HomeView : View {
#EnvironmentObject var settings: Settings
var body: some View {
VStack {
if settings.isLogedIn {
Text("Loged in")
} else{
Text("Not Loged in")
}
}
}
}
Is there a way to make a single property wrapper that covers both the persisting and the publishing?
import SwiftUI
import Combine
fileprivate var cancellables = [String : AnyCancellable] ()
public extension Published {
init(wrappedValue defaultValue: Value, key: String) {
let value = UserDefaults.standard.object(forKey: key) as? Value ?? defaultValue
self.init(initialValue: value)
cancellables[key] = projectedValue.sink { val in
UserDefaults.standard.set(val, forKey: key)
}
}
}
class Settings: ObservableObject {
#Published(key: "isLogedIn") var isLogedIn = false
...
}
Sample: https://youtu.be/TXdAg_YvBNE
Version for all Codable types check out here
To persist your data you could use the #AppStorage property wrapper.
However, without using #Published your ObservableObject will no longer put out the news about the changed data. To fix this, simply call objectWillChange.send() from the property's willSet observer.
import SwiftUI
class Settings: ObservableObject {
#AppStorage("Example") var example: Bool = false {
willSet {
// Call objectWillChange manually since #AppStorage is not published
objectWillChange.send()
}
}
}
It should be possible to compose a new property wrapper:
Composition was left out of the first revision of this proposal,
because one can manually compose property wrapper types. For example,
the composition #A #B could be implemented as an AB wrapper:
#propertyWrapper
struct AB<Value> {
private var storage: A<B<Value>>
var wrappedValue: Value {
get { storage.wrappedValue.wrappedValue }
set { storage.wrappedValue.wrappedValue = newValue }
}
}
The main benefit of this approach is its predictability: the author of
AB decides how to best achieve the composition of A and B, names it
appropriately, and provides the right API and documentation of its
semantics. On the other hand, having to manually write out each of the
compositions is a lot of boilerplate, particularly for a feature whose
main selling point is the elimination of boilerplate. It is also
unfortunate to have to invent names for each composition---when I try
the compose A and B via #A #B, how do I know to go look for the
manually-composed property wrapper type AB? Or maybe that should be
BA?
Ref: Property WrappersProposal: SE-0258
You currently can't wrap #UserDefault around #Published since that is not currently allowed.
The way to implement #PublishedUserDefault is to pass an objectWillChange into the wrapper and call it before setting the variable.
struct HomeView : View {
#StateObject var auth = Auth()
#AppStorage("username") var username: String = "Anonymous"
var body: some View {
VStack {
if username != "Anonymous" {
Text("Logged in")
} else{
Text("Not Logged in")
}
}
.onAppear(){
auth.login()
}
}
}
import SwiftUI
import Combine
class Auth: ObservableObject {
func login(params:[String:String]) {
Webservice().login(params: params) { response in
if let myresponse = response {
UserDefaults.standard.set(myresponse.login, forKey: "username")`
}
}
}
}
Related
See my code below. My problem is if i change accessToken via UserService.shared.currentStore.accessToken = xxx, SwiftUI doesn't publish, and there's no update on StoreBanner at all.
//SceneDelegate
let contentView = ContentView()
.environmentObject(UserService.shared)
//Define
class UserService: ObservableObject {
#Published var currentStore = Store.defaultValues()
static let shared = UserService()
}
struct Store: Codable, Hashable {
var storeName: String = ""
var accessToken: String = ""
}
//Use it
struct StoreBanner: View {
var body: some View {
Group {
if UserService.shared.currentStore.accessToken.isNotEmpty {
ShopifyLinkedBanner()
} else {
ShopifyLinkBanner()
}
}
}
}
You're trying to use UserService inside StoreBanner without using a property wrapper to tell the view to respond to updates. Without the #ObservedObject property wrapper, the View doesn't have a mechanism to know that any of the #Published properties have been updated.
Try this:
struct StoreBanner: View {
#ObservedObject private var userService = UserService.shared
var body: some View {
Group {
if userService.currentStore.accessToken.isNotEmpty {
ShopifyLinkedBanner()
} else {
ShopifyLinkBanner()
}
}
}
}
This should work assuming you set accessToken somewhere in your code on the same instance of UserService.
I think I'm going about this SwiftUI thing all wrong. It's clear that we're just defining the layout as a structs and there can be limited conventional programming embroiled in the layout. I'm having difficulties thinking like this. What is the best way of doing this?
Take the example below. Project is an NSManagedObject. All I want to do is pass in example record so the SwiftUI will render. Nothing I try works.
struct ProjectView: View
{
#State var project: Project //NSManagedObject
var body: some View
{
TextField("", text: Binding<String>($project.projectName)!)
}
}
struct ProjectView_Previews: PreviewProvider
{
static var previews: some View
{
var p:Project
p = getFirstProject() //returns a Project
return ProjectView(project: p)
}
}
If I try returning the struct it says it cannot preview in the file.
If I don't return the struct I get a Function declares an opaque return type, but has no return statements in its body from which to infer an underlying type error.
UPDATE:
var app = UIApplication.shared.delegate as! AppDelegate
#UIApplicationMain
class AppDelegate: UIResponder, UIApplicationDelegate {
lazy var persistentContainer: NSPersistentCloudKitContainer = {
fatalError("Unresolved error \(error), \(error.userInfo)")
}
})
return container
}()
lazy var managedObjectContext: NSManagedObjectContext =
{
return persistentContainer.viewContext
}()
}
And the rest of the code:
func allRecords<T: NSManagedObject>(_ type : T.Type, sort: NSSortDescriptor? = nil) -> [T]
{
let context = app.managedObjectContext
let request = T.fetchRequest()
if let sortDescriptor = sort
{
request.sortDescriptors = [sortDescriptor]
}
do
{
let results = try context.fetch(request)
return results as! [T]
}
catch
{
print("Error with request: \(error)")
return []
}
}
func getCount() -> String
{
let r = allRecords(Project.self)
return String(r.count)
}
struct ProjectView: View
{
// #ObservedObject var project: Project
var body: some View
{
Text(getCount())
// TextField("", text: Binding<String>($project.projectName)!)
}
}
struct ProjectView_Previews: PreviewProvider
{
static var previews: some View
{
ProjectView()
}
}
r.count is returning 0, but in the main application thread it is returning 8. Has app.managedObjectContext not been defined properly? I think this has just got too complicated too quickly.
Assuming getFirstProject works correctly the following should work
struct ProjectView_Previews: PreviewProvider
{
static var previews: some View
{
ProjectView(project: getFirstProject())
}
}
However there are concerns about the following...
struct ProjectView: View
{
#State var project: Project //NSManagedObject
because #State is designed to be internal view state-only thing, but Project in your case is a model, so the recommended scenario for this is to use ObservableObject view model either by conforming Project or as standalone clue class holding Project instance(s).
I have the following view model:
struct RegistrationViewModel {
var firstname: String?
}
I want to bind the firstname property in the TextField as shown below:
TextField("First name", text: $registrationVM.firstname)
.textFieldStyle(RoundedBorderTextFieldStyle())
I keep getting an error that Binding is not allowed.
To bind objects your variable needs to conform to one of the new wrappers #State, #Binding, #ObservableObject, etc.
Because your RegistrationViewModel doesn't conform to View the only way to do it is to have your RegistrationViewModel conform to ObservableObject.
class RegistrationViewModel: ObservableObject {
#Published var firstname: String?
}
Once that is done you can call it View using
#ObservedObject var resgistrationVM: RegistrationViewModel = RegistrationViewModel()
or as an #EnvironmentObject
https://developer.apple.com/tutorials/swiftui/handling-user-input
Also, SwiftUI does not work well with optionals but an extension can handle that very easily.
SwiftUI Optional TextField
extension Optional where Wrapped == String {
var _bound: String? {
get {
return self
}
set {
self = newValue
}
}
public var bound: String {
get {
return _bound ?? ""
}
set {
_bound = newValue.isEmpty ? nil : newValue
}
}
}
I have multiple classes that I want to use with a budget picker view. They all have this budgetable protocol defined.
import SwiftUI
struct BudgetPickerView: View {
#EnvironmentObject var userData: UserData
#State var budgetable: Budgetable
...
}
import Foundation
protocol Budgetable
{
var budgetId: String { get set }
}
For example this Allocation class
import Foundation
import Combine
class Allocation: ObservableObject, Identifiable, Budgetable {
let objectWillChange = ObservableObjectPublisher()
let id: String?
var amount: String { willSet { self.objectWillChange.send() } }
var budgetId: String { willSet { self.objectWillChange.send() } }
init(id: String? = nil, amount: String, budgetId: String) {
self.id = id
self.amount = amount.removePrefix("-")
self.budgetId = budgetId
}
}
However, when I try to pass an allocation into my budget picker view I get an error
NavigationLink(destination: BudgetPickerView(budgetable: allocation))...
Cannot convert return expression of type 'NavigationLink>, BudgetPickerView>' to return type 'some View'
Expression type 'BudgetPickerView' is ambiguous without more context
Change as bellow code
struct BudgetPickerView: View {
#EnvironmentObject var userData: UserData
var budgetable: Budgetable
var body: some View {
...
}
}
and
NavigationLink(destination: BudgetPickerView(budgetable: allocation).EnvironmentObject(UserData()))
By SwiftUI concept you are not allowed to work with #State outside of View, but the following works well (having other your parts unchanged)
struct BudgetPickerView: View {
#State private var budgetable: Budgetable
init(budgetable: Budgetable) {
_budgetable = State<Budgetable>(initialValue: budgetable)
}
var body: some View {
Text("Hello, World!")
}
}
struct TestBudgetPickerView: View {
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
NavigationLink(destination:
BudgetPickerView(budgetable: Allocation(amount: "10", budgetId: "1")))
{ Text("Item") }
}
}
}
BTW, just incase, again by design #State is intended to hold temporary-view-state-only data, not a model. For model is more preferable to use ObservableObject. In your case Budgetable looks like a model.
I have a dictionary that contains various values I want to "filter" by. So I'm doing something like this
struct ExampleView : View {
#EnvironmentObject var externalData : ExternalData
var body: some View {
VStack {
ForEach(externalData.filters) { (v : (String, Bool)) in
Toggle(isOn: $externalData.filters[v.0], label: {
Text("\(v.0)")
})
}
}
}
}
final class ExternalData : BindableObject {
let didChange = PassthroughSubject<ExternalData, Never>()
init() {
filters["Juniper"] = true
filters["Beans"] = false
}
var filters : Dictionary<String, Bool> = [:] {
didSet {
didChange.send(self)
}
}
}
This question seems related, but putting dynamic didn't seem to help and I wasn't able to figure out how to do that NSObject inheritance thing in this case. Right now, this code as is gives me this error:
Cannot subscript a value of type 'Binding<[String : Bool]>' with an argument of type 'String'
But trying to move the $ around or use paren in various ways doesn't seem to help. How can I bind the toggles to the values in my dictionary? I could just make manual toggles for each value, but that makes fragile code since (among other reasons) the potential filter values are based on a dataset that might have new values at some point.
I'm aware that I should really sort the keys (in some way) before iterating over them so the ordering is consistent, but that clutters this example so I left that code out.
I managed to make is work by using a custom binding for each filter.
final class ExternalData: BindableObject {
let didChange = PassthroughSubject<Void, Never>()
var filters: Dictionary<String, Bool> = [:] {
didSet {
didChange.send(())
}
}
init() {
filters["Juniper"] = true
filters["Beans"] = false
}
var keys: [String] {
return Array(filters.keys)
}
func binding(for key: String) -> Binding<Bool> {
return Binding(getValue: {
return self.filters[key] ?? false
}, setValue: {
self.filters[key] = $0
})
}
}
The keys property list the filters keys as String so that it can be displayed (using ForEach(externalData.keys))
The binding(for:) method, create a custom Binding for the given key. This binding is given to the Toggle to read/write the current value in the wrapped dictionary.
The view code:
struct ExampleView : View {
#EnvironmentObject var externalData : ExternalData
var body: some View {
VStack {
ForEach(externalData.keys) { key in
Toggle(isOn: self.externalData.binding(for: key)) {
Text(key)
}
}
}
}
}