Xcode 11 Beta 4 deprecated .relativeSize as well as .relativeWidth and .relativeHeight (see this related post).
So what is the alternative?
I want to create an overlay that has a width relative to it's parent.
Let's say I have the following main view
struct MainView: View {
var body: some View {
ZStack(alignment: .topLeading) {
BackgroundView()
SideBarView()
.frame(idealWidth: 200)
.fixedSize(horizontal: true, vertical: false)
}
}
}
With a simple BackgroundView and SideBarView as well those work as expected.
struct SideBarView: View {
var body: some View {
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.green)
}
}
struct BackgroundView: View {
var body: some View {
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.red)
}
}
This was suggested in the release notes and this answer.
How can I avoid to hardcode those values as I could before by using .relativeWidth(0.3) instead of .frame(idealWidth:)?1
1Note: Using .relativeWidth never actually worked, e.g. using 0.3 as a relative value never resulted in a view that was 30 % of the width of the parent, but you could get close to your desired result through trial-and-error.
There are multiple ways to achieve it, one way is using .overlay instead of ZStack. The view you use in the overlay, will get the size of the BackgroundView offered by the parent. Then you simply use GeometryReader to get the width and multiply it by 0.7:
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
BackgroundView().overlay(SideBarView())
}
}
struct SideBarView: View {
var body: some View {
GeometryReader { proxy in
HStack {
Spacer()
Rectangle()
.frame(width: proxy.size.width * 0.7)
.fixedSize(horizontal: true, vertical: false)
.foregroundColor(.green)
}
}
}
}
struct BackgroundView: View {
var body: some View {
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.red)
}
}
Related
I am trying to create a full bleed SwiftUI 'header' view in my scene. This header will sit within a List or a scrollable VStack.
In order to do this, I'd like to have my text in the header positioned below the safe area, but the full view should extend from the top of the screen (and thus, overlap the safe area). Here is visual representation:
V:[(safe-area-spacing)-(padding)-(text)]
here is my attempt:
struct HeaderView: View {
#State var spacing: CGFloat = 100
var body: some View {
HStack {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Rectangle()
.frame(height: spacing)
.opacity(0.5)
Text("this!").font(.largeTitle)
Text("this!").font(.headline)
Text("that!").font(.subheadline)
}
Spacer()
}
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity)
.background(Color.red)
.background(
GeometryReader { proxy in
Color.clear
.preference(
key: SafeAreaSpacingKey.self,
value: proxy.safeAreaInsets.top
)
}
)
.onPreferenceChange(SafeAreaSpacingKey.self) { value in
self.spacing = value
}
}
}
This however, does not seem to correctly size 'Rectangle'. How can I size a view according to the safe area?
Is this what you're looking for? I try to avoid using GeometryReader unless you really need it... I created a MainView, which has a background and a foreground layer. The background layer will ignore the safe areas (full bleed) but the foreground will stay within the safe area by default.
struct HeaderView: View {
var body: some View {
HStack {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Text("this!").font(.largeTitle)
Text("this!").font(.headline)
Text("that!").font(.subheadline)
}
Spacer(minLength: 0)
}
}
}
struct MainView: View {
var body: some View {
ZStack {
// Background
ZStack {
}
.frame(maxWidth:. infinity, maxHeight: .infinity)
.background(Color.red)
.edgesIgnoringSafeArea(.all)
// Foreground
VStack {
HeaderView()
Spacer()
}
}
}
}
add an state to store desired height
#State desiredHeight : CGFloat = 0
then on views body :
.onAppear(perform: {
if let window = UIApplication.shared.windows.first{
let phoneSafeAreaTopnInset = window.safeAreaInsets.top
desiredHeight = phoneSafeAreaTopnInset + x
}
})
set the desiredHeight for your view .
.frame(height : desiredHeight)
I'm making a WatchOS app that displays a bunch of real-time arrival times. I want to place a view, a real-time indicator I designed, on the trailing end of each cell of a List that will be continuously animated.
The real-time indicator view just has two image whose opacity I'm continuously animating. This View by itself seems to work fine:
animated view by itself
However, when embedded inside a List then inside an HStack the animation seems to be affecting the position of my animated view not only its opacity.
animated view inside a cell
The distance this view travels seems to only be affected by the height of the HStack.
Animated view code:
struct RTIndicator: View {
#State var isAnimating = true
private var repeatingAnimation: Animation {
Animation
.spring()
.repeatForever()
}
private var delayedRepeatingAnimation: Animation {
Animation
.spring()
.repeatForever()
.delay(0.2)
}
var body: some View {
ZStack {
Image("rt-inner")
.opacity(isAnimating ? 0.2 : 1)
.animation(repeatingAnimation)
Image("rt-outer")
.opacity(isAnimating ? 0.2 : 1)
.animation(delayedRepeatingAnimation)
}
.frame(width: 16, height: 16, alignment: .center)
.colorMultiply(.red)
.padding(.top, -6)
.padding(.trailing, -12)
.onAppear {
self.isAnimating.toggle()
}
}
}
All code:
struct SwiftUIView: View {
var body: some View {
List {
HStack {
Text("Cell")
.frame(height: 100)
Spacer()
RTIndicator()
}.padding(8)
}
}
}
Here is found workaround. Tested with Xcode 12.
var body: some View {
List {
HStack {
Text("Cell")
.frame(height: 100)
Spacer()
}
.overlay(RTIndicator(), alignment: .trailing) // << here !!
.padding(8)
}
}
Although it's pretty hacky I have found a temporary solution to this problem. It's based on the answer from Asperi.
I have create a separate View called ClearView which has an animation but does not render anything visual and used it as a second overall in the same HStack.
struct ClearView: View {
#State var isAnimating = false
var body: some View {
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.clear)
.onAppear {
withAnimation(Animation.linear(duration: 0)) {
self.isAnimating = true
}
}
}
}
var body: some View {
List {
HStack {
Text("Cell")
.frame(height: 100)
Spacer()
}
.overlay(RTIndicator(), alignment: .trailing)
.overlay(ClearView(), alignment: .trailing)
.padding(8)
}
}
I created this popover:
import SwiftUI
struct Popover : View {
#State var showingPopover = false
var body: some View {
Button(action: {
self.showingPopover = true
}) {
Image(systemName: "square.stack.3d.up")
}
.popover(isPresented: $showingPopover){
Rectangle()
.frame(width: 500, height: 500)
}
}
}
struct Popover_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
Popover()
.colorScheme(.dark)
.previewDevice("iPad Pro (12.9-inch) (3rd generation)")
}
}
Default behaviour is that is dismisses, once tapped outside.
Question:
How can I set the popover to:
- Persist (not be dismissed when tapped outside)?
- Not block screen when active?
My solution to this problem doesn't involve spinning your own popover lookalike. Simply apply the .interactiveDismissDisabled() modifier to the parent content of the popover, as illustrated in the example below:
import SwiftUI
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var presentingPopover = false
#State private var count = 0
var body: some View {
VStack {
Button {
presentingPopover.toggle()
} label: {
Text("This view pops!")
}.popover(isPresented: $presentingPopover) {
Text("Surprise!")
.padding()
.interactiveDismissDisabled()
}.buttonStyle(.borderedProminent)
Text("Count: \(count)")
Button {
count += 1
} label: {
Text("Doesn't block other buttons too!")
}.buttonStyle(.borderedProminent)
}
.padding()
}
}
Tested on iPadOS 16 (Xcode 14.1), demo video included below:
Note: Although it looks like the buttons have lost focus, they are still interact-able, and might be a bug as such behaviour doesn't exist when running on macOS.
I tried to play with .popover and .sheet but didn't found even close solution. .sheet can present you modal view, but it blocks parent view. So I can offer you to use ZStack and make similar behavior (for user):
import SwiftUI
struct Popover: View {
#State var showingPopover = false
var body: some View {
ZStack {
// rectangles only for color control
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.gray)
Rectangle()
.foregroundColor(.white)
.opacity(showingPopover ? 0.75 : 1)
Button(action: {
withAnimation {
self.showingPopover.toggle()
}
}) {
Image(systemName: "square.stack.3d.up")
}
ModalView()
.opacity(showingPopover ? 1: 0)
.offset(y: self.showingPopover ? 0 : 3000)
}
}
}
// it can be whatever you need, but for arrow you should use Path() and draw it, for example
struct ModalView: View {
var body: some View {
VStack {
Spacer()
ZStack {
Rectangle()
.frame(width: 520, height: 520)
.foregroundColor(.white)
.cornerRadius(10)
Rectangle()
.frame(width: 500, height: 500)
.foregroundColor(.black)
}
}
}
}
struct Popover_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
Popover()
.colorScheme(.dark)
.previewDevice("iPad Pro (12.9-inch) (3rd generation)")
}
}
here ModalView pops up from below and the background makes a little darker. but you still can touch everything on your "parent" view
update: forget to show the result:
P.S.: from here you can go further. For example you can put everything into GeometryReader for counting ModalView position, add for the last .gesture(DragGesture()...) to offset the view under the bottom again and so on.
You just use .constant(showingPopover) instead of $showingPopover. When you use $ it uses binding and updates your #State variable when you press outside the popover and closes your popover. If you use .constant(), it will just read the value from you #State variable, and will not close the popover.
Your code should look like this:
struct Popover : View {
#State var showingPopover = false
var body: some View {
Button(action: {
self.showingPopover = true
}) {
Image(systemName: "square.stack.3d.up")
}
.popover(isPresented: .constant(showingPopover)) {
Rectangle()
.frame(width: 500, height: 500)
}
}
}
I'm trying to achieve a layout like this:
For this simple example the base would be something like this:
HStack {
VStack {
Text("Foo")
Text("W")
Text("X")
}
VStack {
Text("Bar")
Text("Y")
Text("Z")
}
}
Now that relativeSize(...) is deprecated, the only remaining option I see is GeometryReader, but the issue with it is that once it's itself nested in another stack, it will attempt to fill all available space, in other terms it cannot determine the size it's containing stack would have had if it wasn't present in it and I end up with an overly sized stack.
I wonder if I'm missing something or if this is just how stacks work, or maybe a beta bug?
Thank you for your help
EDIT:
I did this:
VStack {
GeometryReader { /* #kontiki code */ }
Text("Other")
Spacer().layoutPriority(1)
}
But unfortunately this is the result I get, do you think this is a SwiftUI bug?
Second Attempt
I think this does exactly what you need. It uses Preferences. If you need to learn more about how to use SwiftUI preferences, check this post I wrote. They are fully explained there, but it is too long of a subject to post it here.
import SwiftUI
struct MyPref: PreferenceKey {
typealias Value = CGFloat
static var defaultValue: CGFloat = 0
static func reduce(value: inout CGFloat, nextValue: () -> CGFloat) {
value = nextValue()
}
}
struct SetWidthPreference: View {
var body: some View {
GeometryReader { proxy in
Rectangle().fill(Color.clear).preference(key: MyPref.self, value: proxy.size.width)
}
}
}
struct ContentView : View {
#State private var width: CGFloat = 0
var body: some View {
VStack {
ScrollView {
HStack(spacing: 0) {
VStack {
Text("Foo")
Text("Bar")
}.frame(width: width * 0.7, alignment: .leading).fixedSize().border(Color.red)
VStack {
Text("W")
Text("Y")
}.frame(width: width * 0.15).fixedSize().border(Color.red)
VStack {
Text("X")
Text("Z")
}.frame(width: width * 0.15).fixedSize().border(Color.red)
}
Text("Text below table")
}
.border(Color.green, width: 3)
HStack { Spacer() }.background(SetWidthPreference())
}
.onPreferenceChange(MyPref.self) { w in
print("\(w)")
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.width = w
}
}
}
}
Previous Attempt (I keep it here, so comments make sense)
This example will draw 3 columns with 0.7, 0.15 and 0.15 of the parent's width. It's a starting point that you can fine tune. Note that the borders are there so that you can see what you are doing, of course you can remove them.
If GeometryReader is expanding too much, explain exactly what is that you want to accomplish, providing more context on the surroundings of the table (i.e., GeometryReader).
struct ContentView : View {
var body: some View {
GeometryReader { proxy in
HStack(spacing: 0) {
VStack {
Text("Foo")
Text("Bar")
}.frame(width: proxy.size.width * 0.7, alignment: .leading).fixedSize().border(Color.red)
VStack {
Text("W")
Text("Y")
}.frame(width: proxy.size.width * 0.15).fixedSize().border(Color.red)
VStack {
Text("X")
Text("Z")
}.frame(width: proxy.size.width * 0.15).fixedSize().border(Color.red)
}
}.padding(20)
}
}
I'm trying to achieve a following layout using Swift UI…
struct ContentView : View {
var body: some View {
List(1...5) { index in
HStack {
HStack {
Text("Item number \(index)")
Spacer()
}.padding([.leading, .top, .bottom])
.background(Color.blue)
Text("i")
.font(.title)
.italic()
.padding()
.aspectRatio(1, contentMode: .fill)
.background(Color.pink)
}.background(Color.yellow)
}
}
}
I'd like the Text("i") to be square, but setting the .aspectRatio(1, contentMode: .fill) doesn't seem to do anything…
I could set the frame width and height of the text so it's square, but it seems that setting the aspect ratio should achieve what I want in a more dynamic way.
What am I missing?
I think this is what you're looking for:
List(1..<6) { index in
HStack {
HStack {
Text("Item number \(index)")
Spacer()
}
.padding([.leading, .top, .bottom])
.background(Color.blue)
Text("i")
.font(.title)
.italic()
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity, maxHeight: .infinity)
.aspectRatio(1, contentMode: .fill)
.background(Color.pink)
.fixedSize(horizontal: true, vertical: false)
.padding(.leading, 6)
}
.padding(6)
.background(Color.yellow)
}
The answer being said, i don't recommend giving SwiftUI too much freedom to decide the sizings. one of the biggest SwiftUI problems right now is the way it decides how to fit the views into each other. if something goes not-so-good on SwiftUI's side, it can result in too many calls to the UIKit's sizeToFit method which can slowdown the app, or even crash it.
but, if you tried this solution in a few different situations and it worked, you can assume that in your case, giving SwiftUI the choice of deciding the sizings is not problematic.
The issue is due to used different fonts for left/right sides, so paddings generate different resulting area.
Here is possible solution. The idea is to give right side rect based on default view size of left side text (this gives ability to track dynamic fonts sizes as well, automatically).
Tested with Xcode 12 / iOS 14
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var height = CGFloat.zero
var body: some View {
List(1...5, id: \.self) { index in
HStack(spacing: 8) {
HStack {
Text("Item number \(index)")
Spacer()
}
.padding([.leading, .top, .bottom])
.background(GeometryReader {
Color.blue.preference(key: ViewHeightKey.self, value: $0.frame(in: .local).size.height)
})
Text("i")
.italic()
.font(.title)
.frame(width: height, height: height)
.background(Color.pink)
}
.padding(8)
.background(Color.yellow)
.onPreferenceChange(ViewHeightKey.self) {
self.height = $0
}
}
}
}
struct ViewHeightKey: PreferenceKey {
typealias Value = CGFloat
static var defaultValue = CGFloat.zero
static func reduce(value: inout Value, nextValue: () -> Value) {
value += nextValue()
}
}
I managed to recreate the view in your first screenshot in SwiftUI. I wasn't sure on how much padding you wanted so I defined a private immutable variable for this value
The blue view is the one that will have the text content and could change in size so by using a GeometryReader you can get the size of the blue view and then use the height value from the size to set the width and height of the pink view. This means that whatever the height of the blue view is, the pink view will follow keeping an equal aspect ratio
The SizeGetter view below is used to get any views size using a GeometryReader and then binds that value back to a #State variable in the ContentView. Because the #State and #Binding property wrappers are being used, whenever the blueViewSize is updated SwiftUI will automatically refresh the view.
The SizeGetter view can be used for any view and is implemented using the .background() modifier as shown below
struct SizeGetter: View {
#Binding var size: CGSize;
var body: some View {
// Get the size of the view using a GeometryReader
GeometryReader { geometry in
Group { () -> AnyView in
// Get the size from the geometry
let size = geometry.frame(in: .global).size;
// If the size has changed, update the size on the main thread
// Checking if the size has changed stops an infinite layout loop
if (size != self.size) {
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.size = size;
}
}
// Return an empty view
return AnyView(EmptyView());
}
}
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
private let padding: Length = 10;
#State private var blueViewSize: CGSize = .zero;
var body: some View {
List(1...5) { index in
// The yellow view
HStack(spacing: self.padding) {
// The blue view
HStack(spacing: 0) {
VStack(spacing: 0) {
Text("Item number \(index)")
.padding(self.padding);
}
Spacer();
}
.background(SizeGetter(size: self.$blueViewSize))
.background(Color.blue);
// The pink view
VStack(spacing: 0) {
Text("i")
.font(.title)
.italic();
}
.frame(
width: self.blueViewSize.height,
height: self.blueViewSize.height
)
.background(Color.pink);
}
.padding(self.padding)
.background(Color.yellow);
}
}
}
In my opinion it is better to set the background colour of a VStack or HStack instead of the Text view directly because you can then add more text and other views to the stack and not have to set the background colour for each one
I was searching very similar topic "Square Text in SwiftUI", came across your question and I think I've found quite simple approach to achieve your desired layout, using GeometryProxy to set width and heigh of the square view from offered geometry.size.
Checkout the code below, an example of TableCellView which can be used within List View context:
import SwiftUI
struct TableCellView: View {
var index: Int
var body: some View {
HStack {
HStack {
Text("Item number \(index)")
.padding([.top, .leading, .bottom])
Spacer()
}
.background(Color(.systemBlue))
.layoutPriority(1)
GeometryReader { geometry in
self.squareView(geometry: geometry)
}
.padding(.trailing)
}
.background(Color(.systemYellow))
.padding(.trailing)
}
func squareView(geometry: GeometryProxy) -> some View {
Text("i")
.frame(width: geometry.size.height, height: geometry.size.height)
.background(Color(.systemPink))
}
}