I was trying to solve this question
but codechef.com says the answer is wrong.
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int t, n, diff, mindiff;
cin >> t;
cin >> n;
int val[n];
while(t--)
{
mindiff = 1000000000;
for(int i = 0; i<n; i++)
{
cin >> val[i];
}
int a = 0;
for(a = 0; a<n ; a++)
{
for(int b=a+1; b<n ; b++)
{
diff = abs(val[a] - val[b]);
if(diff <= mindiff)
{
mindiff = diff;
}
}
}
cout << mindiff << endl;
}
return 0;
}
The results are as expected (for at least the tests I did) buts the website says its wrong.
There are a few things in your code that you should change:
Use std::vector<int> and not variable-length arrays (VLA's):
Reasons:
Variable length arrays are not standard C++. A std::vector is standard C++.
Variable length arrays may exhaust stack memory if the number of entries is large. A std::vector gets its memory from the heap, not the stack.
Variable length arrays suffer from the same problem as regular arrays -- going beyond the bounds of the array leads to undefined
behavior. A std::array has an at() function that can check boundary access when desired.
Use the maximum int to get the maximum integer value.
Instead of
mindif = 1000000000;
it should be:
#include <climits>
//...
int mindiff = std::numeric_limits<int>::max();
As to the solution you chose, the comments in the main section about the nested loop should be addressed.
Instead of a nested for loop, you should sort the data first. Thus finding the minimum value between two values is much easier and with less time complexity.
The program can look something like this (using the data provided at the link):
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <climits>
#include <algorithm>
int main()
{
int n = 5;
std::vector<int> val = {4, 9, 1, 32, 13};
int mindiff = std::numeric_limits<int>::max();
std::sort(val.begin(), val.end());
for(int a = 0; a < n-1 ; a++)
mindiff = std::min(val[a+1] - val[a], mindiff);
std::cout << mindiff;
}
Output:
3
To do this you can use a simple for():
// you already have an array called "arr" which contains some numbers.
int biggestNumber = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.size(); i++) {
if (arr[i] > biggestNumber) {
biggestNumber = arr[i];
}
}
arr.size will get the array's length so that you can check every value from the position 0 to the last one which is arr.size() - 1 (because arrays are 0 based in c++).
Hope this helps.
Related
I'm having trouble with a C6385 warning in my code. I'm trying to see if two arrays will equal each other. The warning I keep getting is on the line where if(p[i] == inputGuess[j]). I have tried redoing these line but I keep getting the same warning. Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong. This is also my first time programming in C++.
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include "Game.h"
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;
int* generateNumbers(int n, int m) {
// Intialize random number
srand(static_cast<unsigned int>(time(NULL)));
// Declare array size to generate random numbers based on what is between 1 to (m)
int* numbers = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
numbers[i] = (rand() % m) +1;
cout << numbers[i]<< " " << endl;
}
return numbers;
}
void Game::guessingGame(int n, int m) {
int* p;
int sum = 0;
// Call the generateNumber function
generateNumbers(n, m);
// Declare array based on user guesses
inputGuess = new int[n];
p = generateNumbers(n,m);
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin >> inputGuess[i];
}
// See if the user guesses and computers answers match up
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; i < n; j++) {
if (p[i] == inputGuess[j]){ //Where I keep getting the C6385 Warning
sum++;
break;
}
}
}
}
The C6385 warning documentation states:
The readable extent of the buffer might be smaller than the index used
to read from it. Attempts to read data outside the valid range leads
to buffer overrun.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/code-quality/c6385?view=msvc-160
Your second if statement compares i < n instead of j < n and since i is never modified inside it will run forever. This causes the warning since you’ll access memory out of bounds. Fix the comparison.
I have tried to do some practice with vector, and I made a simple for loop to calculate the sum of the elements within the vector. The program did not behave in the way I expect, so I try to run a debugger, and to my surprise, somehow, the compiler skips the for loop altogether, and I have not come up with a reasonable explanation.
//all code is written in cpp
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int simplefunction(vector<int>vect)
{
int size = vect.size();
int sum = 0;
for (int count = 0; count == 4; count++) //<<--this for loop is being skipped when I count==4
{
sum = sum + vect[count];
}
return sum; //<<---the return sum is 0
}
int main()
{
vector<int>myvector(10);
for (int i = 0; i == 10; i++)
{
myvector.push_back(i);
}
int sum = simplefunction(myvector);
cout << "the result of the sum is " << sum;
return 0;
}
I have done some research, and usually the ill-defined for loop shows up when the final condition cannot be met (Ex: when setting count-- instead of count++)
Your loop's conditions are wrong, as they are always false!
Look at to the loops there
for (int i = 0; i == 10; i++)
// ^^^^^^^-----> condition : is it `true` when i is 0 (NO!!)
and
for (int count=0; count==4; count++)
// ^^^^^^^^^-----> condition : is it `true` when i is 0 (NO!!)
you are checking i is equal to 10 and 4 respectively, before incrementing it. That is always false. Hence it has not executed further. They should be
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) and for (int count=0; count<4; count++)
Secondly, vector<int> myvector(10); allocates a vector of integers and initialized with 0 s. Meaning, the loop afterwards this line (i.e. in the main())
for (int i = 0; i == 10; i++) {
myvector.push_back(i);
}
will insert 10 more elements (i.e. i s) to it, and you will end up with myvector with 20 elements. You probably meant to do
std::vector<int> myvector;
myvector.reserve(10) // reserve memory to avoid unwanted reallocations
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
myvector.push_back(i);
}
or simpler using std::iota from <numeric> header.
#include <numeric> // std::iota
std::vector<int> myvector(10);
std::iota(myvector.begin(), myvector.end(), 0);
As a side note, avoid practising with using namespace std;
I have looked and looked and am still lost on how to copy or get elements from an array and put them into new arrays ( divide and conquer is the goal).
I have an array that generates 100 random numbers. I need to split the random numbers into 4 smaller arrays obviously containing 25 elements and not have any duplicates. I have read about using pointers, but honestly I don't understand why even use a pointer. Why do I care about another variables address?
I don't know how to do this. Here is my code so far:
#include <iostream>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
// Seed the random number generator
srand(time(NULL));
//create an array to store our random numbers in
int Orignumbers[100] = {};
// Arrays for the divide and conquer method
int NumbersA [25] = {};
int NumbersB [25] = {};
int NumbersC [25] = {};
int NumbersD [25] = {};
//Generate the random numbers
for(int i =0; i < 100; i++)
{
int SomeRandomNumber = rand() % 100 + 1;
// Throw random number into the array
Orignumbers[i] = SomeRandomNumber;
}
// for(int i = 0; i < ) started the for loop for the other arrays, this is where I am stuck!!
// Print out the random numbers
for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
cout << Orignumbers[i] << " , ";
}
}
"divide and conquer" is rather easy; when copying into NumbersA and so forth, you just have to access your Originnumbers with a proper offset, i.e. 0, 25, 50, and 75:
for(int i = 0; i < 25; i++) {
NumbersA[i] = Orignumbers[i];
NumbersB[i] = Orignumbers[i+25];
NumbersC[i] = Orignumbers[i+50];
NumbersD[i] = Orignumbers[i+75];
}
The thing about "no duplicates" is a little bit more tricky. Generating a random sequence of unique numbers is usually solved through "shuffling". Standard library provides functions for that:
#include <random>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 g(rd());
int Orignumbers[100];
//Generate the random numbers without duplicates
for(int i =0; i < 100; i++) {
Orignumbers[i] = i+1;
}
std::shuffle(Orignumbers, Orignumbers+100, g);
// Arrays for the divide and conquer method
int NumbersA [25] = {};
int NumbersB [25] = {};
int NumbersC [25] = {};
int NumbersD [25] = {};
for(int i = 0; i < 25; i++) {
NumbersA[i] = Orignumbers[i];
NumbersB[i] = Orignumbers[i+25];
NumbersC[i] = Orignumbers[i+50];
NumbersD[i] = Orignumbers[i+75];
}
// Print out the random numbers
for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
cout << Orignumbers[i] << " , ";
}
}
Problem:
The program can't be guaranteed to have no duplicate value as the rand() function can generate any random sequence and that may include the decimal value of 99 for 99 times though probability is very low but chances are.
Example:
for(loop=0; loop<9; loop++)
printf("%d", Rand()%10);
If looped for 10 times, it may result some values like:
Output: 6,1,1,1,2,9,1,3,6,9
Compiled Successfully:
Hence, no certainity that values won't repeat
Possibly Solution:
There could be a solution where you can place the values in OriginalArray and compare the rand() generate values against the OriginalArray values.
For first iteration of loop, you can directly assign value to OriginalArray then from 2nd iteration of loop you've to compare rand() value against OriginalArray but insertion time consumption may be higher than O(NN) as rand() function may repeat values.
Possibly Solution:
#include <iostream>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int Orignumbers[100] ;
int NumbersA [25] ,
NumbersB [25] ,
NumbersC [25] ,
NumbersD [25] ;
srand(time(NULL));
for(int i =0; i < 100; i++){
Orignumbers[i] = rand() % 100+1;
for(int loop=0; loop<i; loop++) {
if(Orignumber[loop] == Orignumber[i] ) {
i--;
break;
}
}
}
//Placing in four different arrays thats maybe needed.
for(int i = 0; i <25; i++ ) {
NumbersA[i] = Orignumbers[i];
NumbersB[i] = Orignumbers[i+25];
NumbersC[i] = Orignumbers[i+50];
NumbersD[i] = Orignumbers[i+75];
}
for(int i = 0; i < 99; i++)
cout << Orignumbers[i] << " , ";
}
As you tagged your question with C++ then forget about old-fashion arrays, let's do it C++ style.
You want to split your array into 4 arrays and they should not have duplicate numbers, so you can't have a number 5 times in your original array, because then surely one of your 4 arrays will have a duplicate one, So here is the way I propose to do it :
#include <set>
#include <ctime>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::multiset<int> allNums;
std::srand(unsigned(std::time(0)));
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
int SomeRandomNumber = std::rand() % 100 + 1;
if (allNums.count(SomeRandomNumber) < 4) {
allNums.insert(SomeRandomNumber);
}
else {
--i;
}
}
std::vector<int> vOne, vTwo, vThree, vFour;
for (auto iter = allNums.begin(); iter != allNums.end(); ++iter) {
vOne.push_back(*iter);
++iter;
vTwo.push_back(*iter);
++iter;
vThree.push_back(*iter);
++iter;
vFour.push_back(*iter);
}
system("pause");
return 0;
}
EDIT : As you mentioned in the comments, you just want to find a number in an array, so how about this :
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
if (origArray[i] == magicNumber) {
cout << "magicNumber founded in index " << i << "of origArray";
}
}
On some situations, even on C++, the use of arrays might be preferable than vectors, for example, when dealing with multidimensional arrays (2D, 3D, etc) that needs to be continuous and ordered on the memory. (e.g. later access by other applications or faster exporting to file using formats such as HDF5.)
Like Jesper pointed out, you may use Copy and I would add MemCopy to copy the content of an array or memory block into another.
Don't underestimate the importance of pointers, they may solve your problem without the need doing any copy. A bit like Stephan solution but without the need of the index variable "i", just having the pointers initialized at different places on the array. For a very large number of elements, such strategy will save some relevant processing time.
My program have to sort an array in another array.
When I run the program it prints 1 2 3 -858993460 5 -858993460 7.
I can not understand where the mistake is in the code.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
const int N = 7;
int arr[N] = { 3, 17, 2, 9, 1, 5, 7 };
int max = arr[0];
for (int i = 1; i < N; i++)
{
if (max < arr[i])
max = arr[i];
}
int sort_arr[N];
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++)
{
sort_arr[arr[j] - 1] = arr[j];
}
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
cout << sort_arr[i] << " ";
}
return 0;
}
Okay lets face the problems in your code.
The "weird" numbers you see there, came from the uninitialzied array sort_arr. What do I mean by uninitialized? Well sort_arr is a little chunck somewhere in your memory. Since a program usually does not clear its memory and rather claims the memory it used as free, the chunk of sort_arr may contain bits and bytes set by another program. The numbers occure since these bytes are interpreted as an integer value. So the first thing to do would be to initialize the array before using it.
sort_arr[N] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
Now why did these numbers occure? Well you're probably expecting your algorithm to set all values in sort_arr which would result in an sorted array, right? Well but your algorithm isn't working that well. See this line:
sort_arr[arr[j] - 1] = arr[j];
What happens when j is 1? arr[1] is then evaluated to 17 and 17 - 1 equals 16. So sort_arr[arr[1] - 1] is the same as sort_arr[16] which exceeds the bounds of your array.
If you want to program a sorting algorithm by your self than I would recommend to start with an simple bubble sort algorithm. Otherwise, if you only need to sort the array have a look at the algorithm header. It is fairly simple to use:
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator> // << include this to use begin() and end()
using namespace std;
int main()
{
const int N = 7;
int arr[N] = { 3, 17, 2, 9, 1, 5, 7 };
int sort_arr[N] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
copy(begin(arr), end(arr), begin(sort_arr));
sort(begin(sort_arr), end(sort_arr));
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
cout << sort_arr[i] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
By the way. You're looking for the biggest value in your array, right? After you have sorted the array sort_arr[N - 1] is the biggest value contained in your array.
If you want to sort a array into another array then one way is you make a copy of the array and then use the sort function in the standard library to sort the second array.
int arr[10];
int b[10];
for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
{
cin>>arr[i];
b[i]=arr[i];
}
sort(b,b+10);
// this sort function will sort the array elements in ascending order and if you want to change the order then just add a comparison function as third arguement to the sort function.
It seems that you think that sort_arr[arr[j] - 1] = arr[j] will sort arr into sort_arr. It won't.
Sorting is already written for you here: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/sort You can use that like this:
copy(cbegin(arr), cend(arr), begin(sort_arr));
sort(begin(sort_arr), end(sort_arr));
Live Example
My guess is this is an attempt to implement a type of counting sort. Note that variable length arrays aren't normally allowed in C++ or some versions of C. You could use _alloca() to allocate off the stack to get the equivalent of a variable length array: int * sort_arr = (int *)_alloca(max * sizeof(int)); .
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
const int N = 7;
// assuming range of values is 1 to ...
int arr[N] = { 3, 17, 2, 9, 1, 5, 7 };
int max = arr[0];
for (int i = 1; i < N; i++)
{
if (max < arr[i])
max = arr[i];
}
int sort_arr[max];
for (int i = 0; i < max; i++)
{
sort_arr[i] = 0;
}
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++)
{
sort_arr[arr[j] - 1]++;
}
for (int i = 0; i < max; i++)
{
while(sort_arr[i])
{
cout << i+1 << " ";
sort_arr[i]--;
}
}
return 0;
}
I am trying to write a program that takes an input of of n integers, and finds out the one that occurs the maximum number of times in the given input. I am trying to run the program for t cases.
For this, I have implemented a counting sort like algorithm (perhaps a bit naiive), that counts the number of occurrences of each number in the input. In case there are multiple numbers with the same maximum occurrence, I need to return the smaller among those. For this, I implemented sorting.
The issue I am facing is, that every time I run the program on Visual C++, I am getting an error that tells "vector subscript out of range". Under Netbeans, it is generating a return value of 1 and exiting. Please help me find the problem
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int findmax(vector<int> a, int n)
{
int i,ret;
ret = 0;
for ( i = 0; i <n; i++)
{
if (a[i] > ret) {
ret = a[i];
}
}
return ret;
}
int main() {
int i = 0, j = 0, k = 0, n,m,r1,r2;
vector<int> a;
int t;
vector<int> buff;
cin>>t;
while(t--) {
cin>>n;
a.clear();
buff.clear();
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin>>a[i];
}
sort(a.begin(),a.end());
m = findmax(a,n);
for ( j = 0; j < m+1; j++) {
buff[a[j]] = buff[a[j]] + 1;
}
k = findmax(buff,m+1);
for ( i = 0; i < m+1; i++) {
if (buff[i] == k) {
r1 = i;
r2 = buff[i];
break;
}
}
cout<<r1<<" "<<r2<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
After a.clear() the vector doesn't have any members, and its size is 0.
Add a call to a.resize(n) to make it the proper size. You also need to resize buff to whatever size it needs to be.
this line it's the culprit:
cin>>a[i];
you must use push_back:
cin >> temp;
a.push_back(temp);
or resize(n) before:
cin>>n;
a.resize(n);
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin>>a[i];
}
then you should pass you vector by reference to findmax
int findmax(vector<int> &a, int n)
...
This isn't how you populate an array.
cin>>a[i];
You need to use the push_back() method or pre-allocate the appropriate size.
The problem is that you're illegally using indexes of your vector that don't exist (you never add any items to the vector). Since you know the size, you can resize it after you clear it:
a.clear();
a.resize(n);
buff.clear();
buff.resize(n);
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin>>a[i];
}
will be out of range. The vector, as you construct it, has zero size.