I have known, '&' as bitwise and as an operator to get memory address of a variable.
What happens in this case of the code?
res = res & (a[i]<[a[i+1]]);
If it is bitwise and , as far as I know the second condition is also checked,
but what if I used logical and instead of it , wouldn't it still be the same?
As first part is (say) false , second parts get checked comes true, but still res remains false.
Would it be same (for this case) to use logical and for this? or it has some other use (& operator) for this case?
int a[] {1,3,4,2};
int pos = 3;
bool res = true;
for(int i = 0; i < pos; i++)
res &= (a[i] < a[i + 1]);
(Sorry for bad english)
If it is bitwise and , as far as I know the second condition is also checked, but what if I used logical and instead of it , wouldn't it still be the same?
No. Boolean and (written as && or and) has short circuit evaluation - if left part is false right part is not evaluated at all. This allows to write code like this:
if( pointer != nullptr && pointer->value > 100 ) ...
if not short circuit evaluation this code would have UB. For example this code:
if( pointer != nullptr & pointer->value > 100 ) ...
has Undefined Behaviour when pointer is equal to nullptr
Would it be same (for this case) to use logical and for this? or it has some other use (& operator) for this case?
You cannot, as there is no &&= operator in C++. You can write:
res = res && (a[i] < a[i + 1]);
and that would have short circuit as well and compiler may even be smart enough to stop the loop, though I doubt and it should be expressed explicitly anyway:
bool res = true;
for(int i = 0; res && i < pos; i++)
res = a[i] < a[i + 1];
which does the same, but cleaner and more efficient.
Anyway when you need logical or boolean and you should use one to make your intention clear and avoid unexpected surprises.
Besides the short circuiting issue, If res == 2 then:
res & 1 will return 0 which will be interpreted as false.
res && 1 will return true.
Your question is not clear.
Okay, let's dive into your code.
Your given code is very clear. You are performing bitwise and for pos(3) times. For every loop you are comparing a[i] with a[i+1]. Please note that for the last loop, I mean when variable i becomes 3, then i+1 will be 4. And your array a[] doesn't have a[4]. It only has the last element having index 3.
So for bitwise and operation the value of res isn't predictable as a[4] isn't defined.
Now let's think about logical AND operation. For logical and your expression inside the for loop will once generate a false boolean value for a[i] < a[i+1] as your array a[] = {1,3,4,2}. Here 4>2 not 4<2. Hence it will generate false boolean value and your entire response will be false 'cause you know logical AND will be eventually 0 if one of the operands is false.
I think you have got this.
Related
I've written a while loop to increment a pointer until the content is a null byte or the difference between adjacent elements is greater than 1, and this has worked fine:
while (i[1] && *i + 1 == i[1]) i++;
Then I tried to rewrite it as:
while (i[1] && *(i++) + 1 == *i);
But in this way, it got stuck in an infinite loop, as if i was not being incremented. Why is this so?
Edit:
I must apologize for being misleading but I discovered now that it does not get stuck inside the while loop I showed you, rather it simply exits that while loop and instead gets stuck in its parent loop, let me just share with you the whole code:
char accepted[strlen(literal)+1];
strcpy(accepted, literal);
std::sort(accepted, accepted + strlen(accepted));
char *i = accepted-1;
while (*++i){
uint8_t rmin = *i;
//while (i[1] && *i + 1 == i[1]) i++;
while (i[1] && *(i++) + 1 == *i);
uint8_t rmax = *i;
ranges.push_back(Range{rmin, rmax});
if (!i[1]) break;//is this necessary?
}
My question is no longer valid.
And yes, "clever" unreadable code is a bad idea.
There are two problems in your code:
while (i[1] && *(i++) + 1 == *i);
The && operator uses short circuit evaluation, that is if the left part (i[1]) is 0, then the right part (*(i++) + 1 == *i) is never evaluated. That's the reason why your code loops indefinitely.
the expression *(i++) + 1 == *i yields undefined behaviour because the order of evaluation of the sub expressions left and right of the == is not specified.
It's usually not advised to write "clever" code. Write readable code and let the compiler take care of optimizations.
I am currently learning from an SDL2/OpenGL2 example code, for ImGui. Then, I ran into a line (and a few more alike) as shown below. I believe this part binds SDL mouse events to IMGUI API. However, I do not quite understand how it works.
io.MouseDown[0] = g_MousePressed[0] || (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT)) != 0
where,
ImGuiIO& io = ImGui::GetIO();
bool mouseDown[5]; // a member of ImGuiIO struct
static bool g_MousePressed[3] = { false, false, false };
Uint32 mouseMask = SDL_GetMouseState(&mx, &my);
(I hope above is enough information...)
What makes me the most confused is the the last part, not equal to 0. I could understand it, if it was a simple assignment of the result of an And and an Or operations. However, there is not equal to zero following at the end and I have not seen this before. I would like to get some help to understand this code please.
expression != 0
is a boolean expression and thus evaluates to either true or false which can be converted to integer values of 0 or 1.
#include <iostream>
int main() {
constexpr size_t SDL_BUTTON = 5;
for (size_t mouseMask = 0; mouseMask < 16; ++mouseMask) {
std::cout << mouseMask << ' '
<< (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON) << ' '
<< ((mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON) != 0) << '\n';
}
}
Live demo: http://ideone.com/jcmosg
Since || is the logical or operator, we are performing a logical comparison that tests whether io.MouseDown != 0 or (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT)) != 0 and yields a boolean value (true or false) promoted to whatever type io.mouseDown[0] is.
The code could actually have been written as:
io.MouseDown[0] = g_MousePressed[0] || (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT))
or
const bool wasPressed = g_mousePressed[0];
const bool newPress = mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT);
const either = (wasPressed == true) || (newPress == true);
io.MouseDown[0] = either;
or
if (g_mousePressed[0])
io.MouseDown[0] = 1;
else if (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT))
io.MouseDown[0] = 1;
else
io.MouseDown[0] = 0;
See http://ideone.com/TAadn2
If you are intending to learn, find yourself a good sandbox (an empty project file or an online ide like ideone.com etc) and teach yourself to experiment with pieces of code you don't immediately understand.
An expression a = b || c!=0 means a = (b!=0) || (c!=0). In boolean logic, b and b!=0 are equivalent. That's what I think the most confusing part. Once this is understood, there should be no problem.
Note that this expression should not be confused with a=b|c!=0, where | is a binary operation called "bit-wise or", as opposed to the logical operation ||, which is the logical "or". When doing b|c!=0, c!=0 is calculated first to yield a logical value 0 or 1, then b|0 or b|1 is calculated to do nothing (first case) or reset the last bit of the binary code of b to 1 (second case). Finally, that result is assigned to a. In this case, b and b!=0 are not equivalent, because the bit-wise or | is used instead of the logical or ||.
Similarly, & is the "bit-wise and" operator, while && is the logical "and". These two should not be confused either.
Notice that != has a higher precedence than ||, so the whole expression is indeed a simple assignment of the result of an OR.
The !=0 part is a way to turn the result of applying a bitmask into bool, as #AlekDepler said. Funny thing is its pretty much redundant (if mouseMask is of built-in integral type) as implicit conversion from say int to bool works exactly like !=0.
I am reading this code in C++
http://ajmarin.alwaysdata.net/codes/problems/952/ and I don't understand what this &= in the code does:
int k = 5;
int ts = 5;
bool possible = true;
And it have this line:
if(!(possible &= k == ts))
break;
I want to know what is the meaning of "&=" I am new in C++ language and I've never seen something like this for example in java, or at least I don't know the meaning.
The right hand of the statement returns "1" due to the fact that ( k == ts ) that is ( 5 == 5) but the left hand ( possible &= k ) don't know the meaning..
Thank you
It's equivalent to:
possible &= (k == ts);
if (! possible)
and is further equivalent to
possible = possible & (k == ts);
if (! possible)
Here, & is the bitwise AND. num & 0 will always gives you 0 while num & 1 will give you 1 if the least significant bit of num is 1 or 0 otherwise.
To read on, check out
Bitwise AND Assignment Operator (&=)
C++ Operator Precedence
It is a bitwise-AND-assignment, which is a Compound Assignment Operator. It is equivalent to the following statement:
possible = possible & (k == ts);
if(!possible)
....
Note that your original code-style is considered by many to be an anti-pattern, and you should in general avoid assignments in if statements (e.g. here and here).
&= is Bitwise AND assigning the result to the lhs( a&=b => a=a&b). (like +=)
It will perform a logical AND and assign the result to possible.
Due to Operator precedence the expression will be like: possible &= (k == ts).
Which means that it will evaulate (k == ts) resulting in a boolean, make a logical and with possible, store it in possible and return it as a result.
while ( (i=t-i%10 ? i/10 : !printf("%d\n",j)) || (i=++j<0?-j:j)<101 );
I came across this on codegolf
Please explain the usage of ? and : and why is there no statement following the while loop? As in why is there a ; after the parenthesis.
There is a boolean operation going on inside the parentheses of the while loop:
while (boolean);
Since the ternary operator is a boolean operator, it's perfectly legal.
So what's this doing? Looks like modular arithmetic, printing going on over a range up to 101.
I'll agree that it's cryptic and obscure. It looks more like a code obfuscation runner up. But it appears to be compilable and runnable. Did you try it? What did it do?
The ?: is a ternary operator.
An expression of form <A> ? <B> : <C> evaluates to:
If <A> is true, then it evaluates to <B>
If <A> is false, then it evaluates to <C>
The ; after the while loop indicates an empty instruction. It is equivalent to writing
while (<condition>) {}
The code you posted seems like being obfuscated.
Please explain the usage of ? and :
That's the conditional operator. a ? b : c evaluates a and converts it to a boolean value. Then it evaluates b if its true, or c if its false, and the overall value of the expression is the result of evaluating b or c.
So the first sub-expression:
assigns t-i%10 to i. The result of that expression is the new value of i.
if i is not zero, the result of the expression is i/10
otherwise, print j, and the result of the expression is zero (since printf returns a non-zero count of characters printed, which ! converts to zero).
Then the second sub-expression, after ||, is only evaluated if the result of the first expression was zero. I'll leave you to figure out what that does.
why is there no statement following the while loop?
There's an empty statement, ;, so the loop body does nothing. All the action happens in the side effects of the conditional expression. This is a common technique when the purpose of the code is to baffle the reader; but please don't do this sort of thing when writing code that anyone you care about might need to maintain.
This is the Conditional Operator (also called ternary operator).
It is a one-line syntax to do the same as if (?) condition doA else (:) doB;
In your example:
(i=t-i%10 ? i/10 : !printf("%d\n",j)
Is equivalent to
if (i=t-i%10)
i/10;
else
!printf("%d\n",j);
?: is the short hand notation for if then else
(i=t-i%10 ? i/10 : !printf("%d\n",j)<br>
equals to
if( i= t-i%10 )
then { i/10 }
else { !printf("%d\n",j) }
Your while loop will run when the statement before the || is true OR the statement after the || is true.
notice that your code does not make any sense.
while ( (i=t-i%10 ? i/10 : !printf("%d\n",j)) || (i=++j<0?-j:j)<101 );
in the most human-readable i can do it for u, it's equivalent to:
while (i < 101)
{
i = (t - i) % 10;
if (i > 0)
{
i = i / 10;
}
else
{
printf("%d\n",j);
}
i = ++j;
if (i < 0)
{
i = i - j;
}
else
{
i = j;
}
}
Greetings.
I am the proud perpetrator of that code. Here goes the full version:
main()
{
int t=getchar()-48,i=100,j=-i;
while ((i=t-i%10?i/10:!printf("%d\n",j)) || (i=++j<0?-j:j)<101 );
}
It is my submission to a programming challenge or "code golf" where you are asked to create the tinniest program that would accept a digit as a parameter and print all the numbers in the range -100 to 100 that include the given digit. Using strings or regular expressions is forbidden.
Here's the link to the challenge.
The point is that it is doing all the work into a single statement that evaluates to a boolean. In fact, this is the result of merging two different while loops into a single one. It is equivalent to the following code:
main()
{
int i,t=getchar()-'0',j=-100;
do
{
i = j<0? -j : j;
do
{
if (t == i%10)
{
printf("%d\n",j);
break;
}
}
while(i/=10);
}
while (j++<100);
}
Now lets dissect that loop a little.
First, the initialisation.
int t=getchar()-48,i=100,j=-i;
A character will be read from the standard input. You are supposed to type a number between 0 and 9. 48 is the value for the zero character ('0'), so t will end up holding an integer between 0 and 9.
i and j will be 100 and -100. j will be run from -100 to 100 (inclusive) and i will always hold the absolute value of j.
Now the loop:
while ((i=t-i%10?i/10:!printf("%d\n",j)) || (i=++j<0?-j:j)<101 );
Let's read it as
while ( A || B ) /* do nothing */ ;
with A equals to (i=t-i%10?i/10:!printf("%d\n",j)) and B equals to (i=++j<0?-j:j)<101
The point is that A is evaluated as a boolean. If true, B won't be evaluated at all and the loop will execute again. If false, B will be evaluated and in turn, if B is true we'll repeat again and once B is false, the loop will be exited.
So A is the inner loop and B the outer loop. Let's dissect them
(i=t-i%10?i/10:!printf("%d\n",j))
It's a ternary operator in the form i = CONDITION? X : Y; It means that first CONDITION will be evaluated. If true, i will be set to the value of X; otherwise i will be set to Y.
Here CONDITION (t-i%10) can be read as t - (i%10). This will evaluate to true if i modulo 10 is different than t, and false if i%10 and t are the same value.
If different, it's equivalent to i = i / 10;
If same, the operation will be i = !printf("%d\n",j)
If you think about it hard enough, you'll see that it's just a loop that checks if any of the decimal digits in the integer in i is equal to t.
The loop will keep going until exhausting all digits of i (i/10 will be zero) or the printf statement is run. Printf returns the number of digits printed, which should always be more than zero, so !printf(...) shall always evaluate to false, also terminating the loop.
Now for the B part (outer loop), it will just increment j until it reaches 101, and set i to the absolute value of j in the way.
Hope I made any sense.
Yes, I found this thread by searching for my code in google because I couldn't find the challenge post.
I´m studing the code of OpenCV, and I came across the next few lines:
The function´s var are:
CvMat* _err;
CvMat* _mask;
int i, count = _err->rows*_err->cols, goodCount = 0;
for( i = 0; i < count; i++ )
goodCount += mask[i] = err[i] <= threshold; // This line is strange for me
return goodCount;
What does the line I indicated actually do? Because, call me strange, I have never seen anything like that.
For your information:
Yes, the code is working :D
The code is part of the CvModelEstimator2::findInliers function.
That line is evil.
Nevertheless, it assigns 1 to mask[i] if err[i] <= threshold and 0 otherwise.
Then it increments goodCount if the condition holds.
mask[i] = (err[i] <= threshold);
goodCount += mask[i];
So you're confused about this line:
goodCount += mask[i] = err[i] <= threshold;
You can use a C operator precedence table to figure out the order of operations here, but it's fairly unambiguous anyway:
Compare err[i] against threshold. This results in a bool (true or false).
Assign the result to mask[i]. I think the bool will be converted to a number here, which will be 1 for true or 0 for false.
Use the new value of mask[i] (which is the result of the = operator) to increment goodCount (basically, goodCount will end up containing the count of "true" values found in step 1).
To me the most subtle part of that line is the fact that assignment returns a reference to the left-hand side (i.e. the target). This is sometimes seen in a less complex expression like this:
if ((mem = malloc(42)) == NULL)
throw ...
goodCount += mask[i] = err[i] <= threshold;
Mixing assignment and comparison in the same statement is generally a bad idea.
The recommended approach is to (1) know what is the precedence of the involved operators, and (2) split the statement into several ones, to enhance readability.