I have successfully deployed efs-provisioner following the steps outlined in efs-provisioner.
But the PVC is hanging in Pending State displaying the same message:
waiting for a volume to be created, either by external provisioner "example.com/aws-efs" or manually created by system administrator.
What could be a reason why PVC is not created properly?
The solution was described by ParaSwarm posted here
"...The quick fix is to give the cluster-admin role to the default service account. Of course, depending on your environment and
security, you may need a more elaborate fix. If you elect to go the
easy way, you can simply apply this:"
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: default-admin-rbac (or whatever)
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: default
namespace: default
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: cluster-admin
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
Related
I want to run a statefulSet in AWS EKS Fargate and attach a EFS volume with it, but I am getting errors in mounting a volume with pod.
These are the error I am getting from describe pod.
QoS Class: BestEffort
Node-Selectors: <none>
Tolerations: node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal LoggingEnabled 114s fargate-scheduler Successfully enabled logging for pod
Normal Scheduled 75s fargate-scheduler Successfully assigned default/app1 to fargate-10.0.2.123
Warning FailedMount 43s (x7 over 75s) kubelet MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "efs-pv" : rpc error: code = Internal desc = Could not mount "fs-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/" at "/var/lib/kubelet/pods/b799a6d6-fe9e-4f80-ac2d-8ccf8834d7c4/volumes/kubernetes.io~csi/efs-pv/mount": mount failed: exit status 1
Mounting command: mount
Mounting arguments: -t efs -o tls fs-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/ /var/lib/kubelet/pods/b799a6d6-fe9e-4f80-ac2d-8ccf8834d7c4/volumes/kubernetes.io~csi/efs-pv/mount
Output: Failed to resolve "fs-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com" - check that your file system ID is correct, and ensure that the VPC has an EFS mount target for this file system ID.
See https://docs.aws.amazon.com/console/efs/mount-dns-name for more detail.
Attempting to lookup mount target ip address using botocore. Failed to import necessary dependency botocore, please install botocore first.
Warning: config file does not have fall_back_to_mount_target_ip_address_enabled item in section mount.. You should be able to find a new config file in the same folder as current config file /etc/amazon/efs/efs-utils.conf. Consider update the new config file to latest config file. Use the default value [fall_back_to_mount_target_ip_address_enabled = True].
If anyone has setup efs volume with eks fargate cluster please have a look at it. I am really stucked in from long time.
What I have setup
Created a EFS Volume
CSIDriver Object
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1beta1
kind: CSIDriver
metadata:
name: efs.csi.aws.com
spec:
attachRequired: false
Storage Class
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: efs-sc
provisioner: efs.csi.aws.com
PersistentVolume
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolume
metadata:
name: efs-pv
spec:
capacity:
storage: 5Gi
volumeMode: Filesystem
accessModes:
- ReadWriteMany
persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain
storageClassName: efs-sc
csi:
driver: efs.csi.aws.com
volumeHandle: <EFS filesystem ID>
PersistentVolumeClaim
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
metadata:
name: efs-claim
spec:
accessModes:
- ReadWriteMany
storageClassName: efs-sc
resources:
requests:
storage: 5Gi
Pod Configuration
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: app1
spec:
containers:
- name: app1
image: busybox
command: ["/bin/sh"]
args: ["-c", "while true; do echo $(date -u) >> /data/out1.txt; sleep 5; done"]
volumeMounts:
- name: persistent-storage
mountPath: /data
volumes:
- name: persistent-storage
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: efs-claim
I had the same question as you literally a day after and have been working on the error nonstop since then! Did you check to make sure your VPC had DNS hostnames enabled? That is what fixed it for me.
Just an FYI, if you are using fargate and you want to change this--I had to go as far as deleting the entire cluster after changing the DNS hostnames flag in order for the change to propagate. I'm unsure if you're familiar with the DHCP options of a normal ec2 instance, but usually it takes something like renewing the ipconfig in order to force the flag to propagate, but since fargate is a managed system, I was unable to find a way to do so from the node itself. I have created another post here attempting to answer that question.
Another quick FYI: if your pod execution role doesn't have access to EFS, you will need to add a policy that allows access (I just used the default AmazonElasticFileSystemFullAccess Role for the time being in order to try to get things working). Once again, you will have to relaunch your whole cluster in order to get this role change to propagate if you haven't already done so!
I tried to create a managed certificate for my ingress with this yaml:
---
apiVersion: "networking.gke.io/v1beta1"
kind: "ManagedCertificate"
metadata:
name: "example-cert-webapi"
spec:
domains:
- "foobar.domain.com"
It was successfully created but when I try to describe the said managed certificate using this command:
kubectl describe managedcertificate example-cert-api
It does not show the status. I was expecting that it will be in provisioning status but it the output of the describe command does not show the status. Below is the describe output:
Name: example-cert-webapi
Namespace: default
Labels: <none>
Annotations: <none>
API Version: networking.gke.io/v1
Kind: ManagedCertificate
Metadata:
Creation Timestamp: 2020-09-27T08:31:12Z
Generation: 1
Resource Version: foobarResourceVersion
Self Link: fooBarSelfLink
UID: fooBarUID
Spec:
Domains:
foobar.domain.com
Events: <none>
I have replaced with foobar the entries which are think are sensitive data.
I have also a Cloud DNS setup which corresponds to the domains which I used in the certificate.
Has anyone experienced the same situation? When my ingress deployment finished, the SSL certificate did not take effect.
Thanks in advance!
We noticed the same issue since yesterday. I can confirm that downgrading to 1.16 solved the problem.
Edit: the issue is created at Google: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/169595857
I'm creating a new EKS Kubernetes Cluster on AWS.
When I deploy my workloads (migrating from an existing cluster) Kubelet stopps posting node status and all worker nodes become "NotReady" within a minute.
I was assuming that a misconfiguration within my cluster should not make the nodes crash - but apperently it does.
Can a misconfiguration within my cluster really make the AWS EKS Worker Nodes "NotReady"? Are there some rules of thumb under what circumstances this can happen? CPU Load to high? Pods in kube-system crashing?
This is a community wiki answer based on the solution from comments and posted for better visibility. Feel free to expand it.
As suggested by #gusto2 the problem was with the kubelet pod that was unable to call the API server. #stackoverflowjakob late confirmed that the connection between worker and master node was broken due to VPC misconfiguration and it was discovered by checking AWS Console -> EKS status.
Did you change the default PSP (pod security policy)? In my case, I added new eks.restricted psp, and new nodes will be NotReady status. My solution is to restore eks.privileged psp.
---
apiVersion: policy/v1beta1
kind: PodSecurityPolicy
metadata:
name: eks.privileged
annotations:
kubernetes.io/description: 'privileged allows full unrestricted access to
pod features, as if the PodSecurityPolicy controller was not enabled.'
seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/allowedProfileNames: '*'
labels:
kubernetes.io/cluster-service: "true"
eks.amazonaws.com/component: pod-security-policy
spec:
privileged: true
allowPrivilegeEscalation: true
allowedCapabilities:
- '*'
volumes:
- '*'
hostNetwork: true
hostPorts:
- min: 0
max: 65535
hostIPC: true
hostPID: true
runAsUser:
rule: 'RunAsAny'
seLinux:
rule: 'RunAsAny'
supplementalGroups:
rule: 'RunAsAny'
fsGroup:
rule: 'RunAsAny'
readOnlyRootFilesystem: false
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: eks:podsecuritypolicy:privileged
labels:
kubernetes.io/cluster-service: "true"
eks.amazonaws.com/component: pod-security-policy
rules:
- apiGroups:
- policy
resourceNames:
- eks.privileged
resources:
- podsecuritypolicies
verbs:
- use
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: eks:podsecuritypolicy:authenticated
annotations:
kubernetes.io/description: 'Allow all authenticated users to create privileged pods.'
labels:
kubernetes.io/cluster-service: "true"
eks.amazonaws.com/component: pod-security-policy
roleRef:
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
kind: ClusterRole
name: eks:podsecuritypolicy:privileged
subjects:
- kind: Group
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
name: system:authenticated
You can try kubectl describe node $BAD_NODE or ssh into node and try sudo dmesg -T and
try restating the kubelet on the node /etc/init.d/kubelet restart
Or
systemctl restart kubelet
Or delete node (drain first)
kubectl drain <node-name>
kubectl delete node <node-name>
Am new to kubernetes and trying out Jenkins kubernetes plugin. I have created a K8s cluster and namespace called jenkins-pl in AWS. Below are my Jenkins deployment and service yaml files:
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: jenkins
spec:
replicas: 1
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: jenkins
spec:
containers:
- name: jenkins
image: contactsai123/my-jenkins-image:1.0
env:
- name: JAVA_OPTS
value: -Djenkins.install.runSetupWizard=false
ports:
- name: http-port
containerPort: 8080
- name: jnlp-port
containerPort: 50000
volumeMounts:
- name: jenkins-home
mountPath: /var/jenkins_home
volumes:
- name: jenkins-home
emptyDir: {}
Here is my jenkins-service.yaml file
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: jenkins
spec:
type: LoadBalancer
ports:
- port: 8080
targetPort: 8080
selector:
app: jenkins
Am able to launch Jenkins successfully, am unsure on what should I provide in kubernetes URL.
I gave "https://kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.local" and get the error message:
Error testing connection https://kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.local: Failure executing: GET at: https://kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.local/api/v1/namespaces/jenkins-pl/pods. Message: Forbidden!Configured service account doesn't have access. Service account may have been revoked. pods is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:jenkins-pl:default" cannot list pods in the namespace "jenkins-pl".
I executed the command:
$ kubectl cluster-info | grep master
and got the following output:
https://api-selegrid-k8s-loca-m23tbb-1891259367.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com
I provided the above in Kubernetes URL, for which I get the similar error as before.
Not sure how to move forward?
Your cluster has RBAC enabled. You have to give your deployment necessary RBAC permission to list pods.
Consider your deployment as a user who need to perform some task in your cluster. So, you have to provide it necessary permission.
At first you have to create a role. It could be ClusterRole or Role.
This role define what can be done under this role. A ClusterRole give permission to do some task in cluster scope where Role give permission only in a particular namespace.
Then, you have to create a Service Account. Consider service account as a user. It is for application instead of a person.
Finally, you have to bind Role or ClusterRole to the service account through RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding. This actually tell that which user/service can access permissions defined under which roles.
Check this nice post to understand RBAC: Configuring permissions in Kubernetes with RBAC
Also this video might help you to understand the basics: Role Based Access Control (RBAC) with Kubernetes
I want to deploy kafka on kubernetes.
Because I will be streaming with high bandwidth from the internet to kafka I want to use the hostport and advertise the hosts "dnsName:hostPort" to zookeeper so that all traffic goes directly to the kafka broker (as opposed to using nodeport and a loadbalancer where traffic hits some random node which redirects it creating unnecessary traffic).
I have setup my kubernetes cluster on amazon. With kubectl describe node ${nodeId} I get the internalIp, externalIp, internal and external Dns name of the node.
I want to pass the externalDns name to the kafka broker so that it can use it as advertise host.
How can I pass that information to the container? Ideally I could do this from the deployment yaml but I'm also open to other solutions.
How can I pass that information to the container? Ideally I could do this from the deployment yaml but I'm also open to other solutions.
The first thing I would try is envFrom: fieldRef: and see if it will let you reach into the PodSpec's status: field to grab the nodeName. I deeply appreciate that isn't the ExternalDnsName you asked about, but if fieldRef works, it could be a lot less typing and thus could be a good tradeoff.
But, with "I'm also open to other solutions" in mind: don't forget that -- unless instructed otherwise -- each Pod is able to interact with the kubernetes API, and with the correct RBAC permissions it can request the very information you're seeking. You can do that either as a command: override, to do setup work before launching the kafka broker, or you can do that work in an init container, write the external address into a shared bit of filesystem (with volume: emptyDir: {} or similar), and then any glue code for slurping that value into your kafka broker.
I am 100% certain that the envFrom: fieldRef: construct that I mentioned earlier can acquire the metadata.name and metadata.namespace of the Pod, at which point the Pod can ask the kubernetes API for its own PodSpec, extract the nodeName from the aforementioned status: field, then ask the kubernetes API for the Node info, and voilĂ , you have all the information kubernetes knows about that Node.
Matthew L Daniels answer describes the valid approach of querying the kubernetes api using the nodename which is obtained by an env var. The difficulty lies in giving the pod the proper rbac access and setting up an init Container.
Here the kubernetes yml that implements this with an init container using the python kubernetes client:
### This serviceAccount gives the kafka sidecar the permission to query the kubernetes API for node information so that it can find out the advertise host (node public dns name) for the kafka which uses hostPort to be as efficient as possible.
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
name: node-reader-service-account
namespace: default
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: node-reader-cluster-role
rules:
- apiGroups: [""] # The API group "" indicates the core API Group.
resources: ["nodes"]
verbs: ["get", "list", "watch"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: read-nodes-rolebinding
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount # May be "User", "Group" or "ServiceAccount"
name: node-reader-service-account
namespace: default
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: node-reader-cluster-role
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
---
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
annotations:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
io.kompose.service: kafka
name: kafka
spec:
replicas: 1
strategy:
type: Recreate
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
io.kompose.service: kafka
spec:
serviceAccountName: node-reader-service-account
containers:
- name: kafka
image: someImage
resources: {}
command: ["/bin/sh"]
args: ["-c", "export KAFKA_ADVERTISED_LISTENERS=$(cat '/etc/sidecar-data/dnsName') && env | grep KAFKA_ADVERTISED_LISTENERS && /start-kafka.sh"]
volumeMounts:
- name: sidecar-data
mountPath: /etc/sidecar-data/
initContainers:
- name: kafka-sidecar
image: sidecarImage
command: ["python"]
args: ["/script/getHostDnsName.py", "$(KUBE_NODE_NAME)", "/etc/sidecar-data/dnsName"]
env:
- name: KUBE_NODE_NAME
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: spec.nodeName
volumeMounts:
- name: sidecar-data
mountPath: /etc/sidecar-data/
volumes:
- name: sidecar-data
emptyDir: {}
restartPolicy: Always
status: {}