I have a table of number of visual:
visual_1000x123
0
1
I would like to use a dropdown list to let people select 0 or 1.
If 1 is selected, the calculate result will be xxx(let's say 55k).
If 0 is selected, the calculate will be 0.
Maybe I should mention that there is a time filter, which works well.
The result varies according to the selected period.
This measure keeps giving me 0:
measure = IF(MAX('Simulateur'[visual_1000x123])=0, 0,
CALCULATE(SUM('Prévision Leaderboard'[Budget_impressions/1000x123_et_1000x167])) +
CALCULATE(SUM('Prévision Middleboard'[Budget_impressions/1000x123_et_1000x167])))
This measure keeps return 55k:
measure = IF(MAX('Simulateur'[visual_1000x123])=1, 0,
CALCULATE(SUM('Prévision Leaderboard'[Budget_impressions/1000x123_et_1000x167]))+CALCULATE(SUM('Prévision Middleboard'[Budget_impressions/1000x123_et_1000x167])))
I also tried to multiply the number of visual, but it didn't return anything:
measure =
(CALCULATE(SUM('Prévision Leaderboard'[Budget_impressions/1000x123_et_1000x167])) +
CALCULATE(SUM('Prévision Middleboard'[Budget_impressions/1000x123_et_1000x167])))*MAX('Simulateur'[1000x123])
If I am understanding your question correctly, you just want to multiply a number in a column by a factor (which is in a slicer, or visual).
If that is the case you can do it simply as follows:
column1 * factor result = AVERAGE('Table'[Column1]) * AVERAGE('Table (2)'[factor])
Posting this answer myself.
It's due to my data structure. All the data was in one table and I should have them seperated into different tables.
I have a matrix in Power BI which shows counts by Category and by Country (please see table 1 below for example).
I want to create a measure to 'suppress' any counts in that matrix (by replacing the count with "...") that are lower than 3 IF the value of another column in the same source table = 1. IF the value is not equal to 1, I want to suppress any counts in that same matrix that are lower than 10.
To clarify, countries 1 to 5 have either a value of 1 or 2 for the column on which the suppression depends, and within the table it would look like this:
With this measure in the values field, this would produce a matrix that looks like this:
I have been able to achieve the first part (suppressing counts less than 3) using the following DAX syntax to create the measure:
Less than 3 = IF([COUNT]<3),"...",[FORMCOUNT]
But I have struggled to incorporate the second condition. I imagined it would look something like this:
Less than 3 or 10 = IF('Table'[conditional column] = 1
,(IF(AND([COUNT]>0,[COUNT]<3),"...",[COUNT]))
,(IF(AND([COUNT]>0,[COUNT]<10),"...",[COUNT])))
But that doesn't work. I have tried various variations of this syntax using functions such as FILTER that allow you to specify the column and condition but no luck.
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
This may not be the perfect answer but the below appears to do what is required:
Two measures are required:
Measure1 = SELECTEDVALUE('Dataset'[Suppression category],"NA")
Measure2 = IF('Dataset'[Measure1] = 1,IF([COUNT]<3,"...",[COUNT]),IF([COUNT]<10,"...",[COUNT]))
Unfortunately can't currently explain why or how the first measure works, other than that I think it serves to select/distinguish between suppression categories 1 and 2.
The second measure uses the first measure as a condition in a nested IF statement, such that if the suppression category = 1, suppress the count if it is less than 3, otherwise do not suppress the count. IF the suppression is not 1, then suppress the count if it is less than 10. Otherwise, do not suppress the count.
We are trying to implement a dashboard that displays various tables, metrics and a map where the dataset is a list of customers. The primary filter condition is the disjunction of two numeric fields. We want to the user to be able to select a threshold for [field 1] and a separate threshold for [field 2] and then impose the condition [field 1] >= <threshold> OR [field 2] >= <threshold>.
After that, we want to also allow various other interactive slicers so the user can restrict the data further, e.g. by country or account manager.
Power BI naturally imposes AND between all filters and doesn't have a neat way to specify OR. Can you suggest a way to define a calculation using the two numeric fields that is then applied as a filter within the same interactive dashboard screen? Alternatively, is there a way to first prompt the user for the two threshold values before the dashboard is displayed -- so when they click Submit on that parameter-setting screen they are then taken to the main dashboard screen with the disjunction already applied?
Added in response to a comment:
The data can be quite simple: no complexity there. The complexity is in getting the user interface to enable a disjunction.
Suppose the data was a list of customers with customer id, country, gender, total value of transactions in the last 12 months, and number of purchases in last 12 months. I want the end-user (with no technical skills) to specify a minimum threshold for total value (e.g. $1,000) and number of purchases (e.g. 10) and then restrict the data set to those where total value of transactions in the last 12 months > $1,000 OR number of purchases in last 12 months > 10.
After doing that, I want to allow the user to see the data set on a dashboard (e.g. with a table and a graph) and from there select other filters (e.g. gender=male, country=Australia).
The key here is to create separate parameter tables and combine conditions using a measure.
Suppose we have the following Sales table:
Customer Value Number
-----------------------
A 568 2
B 2451 12
C 1352 9
D 876 6
E 993 11
F 2208 20
G 1612 4
Then we'll create two new tables to use as parameters. You could do a calculated table like
Number = VALUES(Sales[Number])
Or something more complex like
Value = GENERATESERIES(0, ROUNDUP(MAX(Sales[Value]),-2), ROUNDUP(MAX(Sales[Value]),-2)/10)
Or define the table manually using Enter Data or some other way.
In any case, once you have these tables, name their columns what you want (I used MinNumber and MinValue) and write your filtering measure
Filter = IF(MAX(Sales[Number]) > MIN(Number[MinCount]) ||
MAX(Sales[Value]) > MIN('Value'[MinValue]),
1, 0)
Then put your Filter measure as a visual level filter where Filter is not 0 and use MinCount and MinValues column as slicers.
If you select 10 for MinCount and 1000 for MinValue then your table should look like this:
Notice that E and G only exceed one of the thresholds and tha A and D are excluded.
To my knowledge, there is no such built-in slicer feature in Power BI at the time being. There is however a suggestion in the Power BI forum that requests a functionality like this. If you'd be willing to use the Power Query Editor, it's easy to obtain the values you're looking for, but only for hard-coded values for your limits or thresh-holds.
Let me show you how for a synthetic dataset that should fit the structure of your description:
Dataset:
CustomerID,Country,Gender,TransactionValue12,NPurchases12
51,USA,M,3516,1
58,USA,M,3308,12
57,USA,M,7360,19
54,USA,M,2052,6
51,USA,M,4889,5
57,USA,M,4746,6
50,USA,M,3803,3
58,USA,M,4113,24
57,USA,M,7421,17
58,USA,M,1774,24
50,USA,F,8984,5
52,USA,F,1436,22
52,USA,F,2137,9
58,USA,F,9933,25
50,Canada,F,7050,16
56,Canada,F,7202,5
54,Canada,F,2096,19
59,Canada,F,4639,9
58,Canada,F,5724,25
56,Canada,F,4885,5
57,Canada,F,6212,4
54,Canada,F,5016,16
55,Canada,F,7340,21
60,Canada,F,7883,6
55,Canada,M,5884,12
60,UK,M,2328,12
52,UK,M,7826,1
58,UK,M,2542,11
56,UK,M,9304,3
54,UK,M,3685,16
58,UK,M,6440,16
50,UK,M,2469,13
57,UK,M,7827,6
Desktop table:
Here you see an Input table and a subset table using two Slicers. If the forum suggestion gets implemented, it should hopefully be easy to change a subset like below to an "OR" scenario:
Transaction Value > 1000 OR Number or purchases > 10 using Power Query:
If you use Edit Queries > Advanced filter you can set it up like this:
The last step under Applied Steps will then contain this formula:
= Table.SelectRows(#"Changed Type2", each [NPurchases12] > 10 or [TransactionValue12] > 1000
Now your original Input table will look like this:
Now, if only we were able to replace the hardcoded 10 and 1000 with a dynamic value, for example from a slicer, we would be fine! But no...
I know this is not what you were looking for, but it was the best 'negative answer' I could find. I guess I'm hoping for a better solution just as much as you are!
In Power BI Desktop, I'm trying to order the following column with repeated values by an ID column (contains primary key).
This returns the error: "There can't be more than one value in "Nível2"...."
In this other post it seems the suggestion is to concatenate the values of the column so they don't get duplicate.
But I want them to be repeated so they can aggregate values in visuals.
So, what's the workaround for this situation?
Thanks in advance for helping!
The issue is that your sort column (i.e. your ID column) contains multiple values for each value in the column you are trying to sort (i.e. your Nivel2 column).
You need to ensure that your sort column contains only one distinct value for each value in the column you are trying to sort.
One way to achieve this would be to create a new (calculated) sort column based on your ID column. It could be defined like this:
SortColumn:=CALCULATE(MAX('YourTable'[ID]),ALLEXCEPT('YourTable','YourTable'[Nivel2]))
Here is an example of how the SortColumn would behave:
Id Nivel2 SortColumn
1 Caixa 4
2 Caixa 4
3 Caixa 4
4 Caixa 4
5 Depósitos à ordem 7
6 Depósitos à ordem 7
7 Depósitos à ordem 7
You can now sort Nivel2 by SortColumn.
EDIT - The implementation of the SortColumn should be done in the data source
There seems to be a limitation in PowerBI where it checks the implementation of the sort column rather than the data in the sort column. Therefore the above solution does not work, even though the data in the sort column is perfectly valid. The above solution will throw this error when you attempt to sort [Nivel2] by SortColumn:
This column can't be sorted by a column that is already sorted, directly or indirectly, by this column.
The implementation of the SortColumn should be moved to the data source instead. I.e. if your data source is an Excel sheet, then the SortColumn should be created inside the Excel sheet.
The above answer does explain the issue and the resolvation correctly. The only change is that the SortColumn must be implemented outside of the tabular model (PowerBI) to ensure that PowerBI does not know about the dependency between the SortColumn and the [Nivel2] column.
In my case, I calculate the levels from a parent-child hierarchy
Path = Path([id],[father])
For each level:
Level1 = LOOKUPVALUE([Name],[id], PathItem([Path],1))
Level2 = LOOKUPVALUE([Name],[id], PathItem([Path],2))
.....
Then I created a new column for each level to sort the column Level:
SortL1 = LOOKUPVALUE([nID],[id], PathItem([Path],1))
SortL2 = LOOKUPVALUE([nID],[id], PathItem([Path],2))
.....
id and nID is the same numeric variable but "id" in string format because Path do not support numeric values.