I am using ember 2.17.
I added this property to a controller:
export default Controller.extend({
newAttachments: new Array()
...
})
I add elements in it through this controller action:
setAttachment(file) {
console.log('trying');
this.get('newAttachments').push(file);
}
When I use the action, the message is displayed in the console, and in Ember inspector I can see the array is no longer empty :
However, the following code in the view has no output :
{{#each newAttachments as |file|}}
<p>in loop</p>
{{/each}}
Why is it not displaying anything? In a component it would work, why not here ?
Ember can't observe native arrays. Therefor the framework doesn't know that a value is pushed into the array. You should use ember's own Ember.NativeArray and it's pushObject method instead. That one ensures that the framework is informed if an entry is added to or removed from array. Changed code would look like this:
import { A } from '#ember/array';
export default Controller.extend({
newAttachments: A(),
setAttachment(file){
this.get('newAttachments').pushObject(file)
}
})
You shouldn't add the array as a property of an EmberObject as this might introduce a leak between instances. That's not a production issue in that case cause controllers are singletons in ember.js. But you might see strange behavior in tests. Refactoring for native classes will resolve that issues as class fields are not leaked between instances. For old EmberObject based classes initializing the value in init hook or using a computed property are common ways to deal with that issue:
// computed property
import { computed } from '#ember/object';
import { A } from '#ember/array';
export default Controller.extend({
newAttachments: computed(() => A()),
});
// init hook
import { A } from '#ember/array';
export default Controller.extend({
init() {
this._super(...arguments);
this.set('newAttachments', A());
}
});
Please note that you don't need to use get() if running Ember >= 3.1.
Related
Having a hard time figuring out why controller properties added in init() are added as 'undefined' rather than with default values. I guess you're supposed to define in init() to avoid "leaking state"? I think I am missing something fundamental here.
When a controller property like an empty array is specified right on the controller it's added as 'Array[0]', which then allows you to pushObject stuff into it. When added in init() they are added as 'undefined' so pushObject fails.
See demo on this twiddle and/or the code below:
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Controller.extend({
queryParams: ['q','sort_method','search_type','filter1','filter2'],
init(){
this._super(...arguments);
Ember.set(this, 'q', null);
Ember.set(this, 'sort_method', 'relevance'); // <-- sets default value to 'undefined'
Ember.set(this, 'filter1', []); // <-- sets default value to 'undefined'
},
filter2: [], // <-- sets default values properly but will it cause state issues?
search_type: 'bar'
});
Basically, I'm wanting to figure out how to declare my list of query params in ONE place (like in config file), rather than 3 places (route, controller queryParams array, and to the controller itself)
I created a twiddle to illustrate what I mean.
why controller properties added in init() are added as 'undefined'
If you dig deep into ember sources, you will find a lot of code in Ember.Route that "prepare" query parameters to work (for example, you may try to analyze this code). I guess that answer to this question is somewhere in route's code (probably route initialize properties before/after controller's init is called or something like that).
Basically, I'm wanting to figure out how to declare my list of query params in ONE place (like in config file), rather than 3 places (route, controller queryParams array, and to the controller itself)
You can declare parameters in environment.js. Then, in controller import it and pass to Ember.Controller.extend
import ENV from 'project-name/config/environment';
export default Ember.Controller.extend(Ember.$.extend({}, ENV.myDefaults.controller, {
actions: {
addFilter: function(key, value) {
alert(`adding "${value.toString()}" to controller property '${key}'`);
console.log("DUMP OF EMBER 'this':", this);
this[key].pushObject(value.toString());
}
}
}));
See twiddle for details
I am having some trouble accessing properties passed to my Ember component, which is as follows:
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Component.extend({
isRowEditorActive: function() {
return this.get('items').length > 0;
}.property('items'),
actions: {
// My actions here
}
});
The items (list of strings) that I pass in, can be accessed without problems within the template {{line-items-table items=['asd', 'asd']}}
However trying to get them within the component just returns undefined. Any suggestions?
As #kristjan says, you'll need to define your items for the line-item-table in the parent.
This is due to that the current version of handlebars don't support inline arrays, https://github.com/wycats/handlebars.js/issues/1058
How can I access a variable declared in /component/sales-order.js from /routes/sales-order.js
Is it possible?
Assuming you mean a property of the component, then basically you can't, and shouldn't. Why do you want to?
A route manages the route; it doesn't know about the details of what is eventually being rendered. A route might, for example, instantiate the same component twice. Then which once would you want to retrieve the value from?
The fact you feel the need to do this indicates some kind of problem with the way your app is structured.
Looking at this as a more general problem of how to communicate between component and route, there are various approaches, but the most basic one is to have the component send an action upward:
// thing/route.js
// Define the ultimate action to be invoked.
export default Ember.Route.extend({
actions: {
hiccup() { console.log("Hiccup!"); }
}
});
// thing/template.hbs
// Invoke the component, and tie the action to something specific
{{component action='hiccup'}}
// component/component.js
// Define the component with an action.
export default Ember.Component.extend({
actions: {
go() { this.sendAction(); }
}
});
//component/template.hbs
// Provide a button
<button {{action 'go'}}>Go!</button>
you first export it and then import it
exporting in /component/sales-order.js
export const MY_VARIABLE = 2;
importing in /routes/sales-order.js
import { MY_VARIABLE } from '../components/sales-order'
console.log(MY_VARIABLE) // 2
How can transitionToRoute be called cleanly from within an Ember component?
It works with injecting a controller into the component and calling the controller's transitionToRoute function, however I'd like something a little more elegant if possible.
What it currently looks like inside the component's javascript:
// this.controller is injected in an initializer
this.controller.transitionToRoute("some.target.route.name");
What would be nicer in the component's javascript:
transitionToRoute("some.target.route.name");
One goal is do this without using sendAction as this particular component has a single purpose and should always transition to the same route. There's no need for any other Ember artifacts to be aware of the route this component always transitions to, there's no need for the associated indirection. The responsibility for the target route is owned by this component.
UPDATE Please see the other more recent answers for how to achieve this with less code in newer Ember versions, and vote those up if they work for you - Thanks!
Inject the router into the components and call this.get('router').transitionTo('some.target.route.name').
To inject the router into all components, write an initializer at app/initializers/component-router-injector.js with the following contents:
// app/initializers/component-router-injector.js
export function initialize(application) {
// Injects all Ember components with a router object:
application.inject('component', 'router', 'router:main');
}
export default {
name: 'component-router-injector',
initialize: initialize
};
Sample usage in a component:
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Component.extend({
actions: {
submit: function() {
this.get('router').transitionTo('some.target.route.name');
}
}
});
Jan 22, 2018 update
As of Ember 2.15, phase 1 of the public router service is implemented.
Transition to a route from inside a component:
import { inject as service } from '#ember/service';
export default Ember.Component.extend({
router: service(),
actions: {
someAction() {
this.get('router').transitionTo('index');
}
}
});
Use
router: service()
instead of
router: service('-routing')
import Component from '#ember/component';
import {inject as service} from '#ember/service';
export default Component.extend({
router: service(),
actions: {
onClick(params) {
let route = this.getMyRoute(params);
this.get('router').transitionTo(route);
}
}
});
If you want to use the router only in a specific component or service or controller, you may try this:
Initialize an attribute with the private service -routing. The - because it's not a public API yet.
router: service('-routing'),
And then inside any action method or other function inside the service or component:
this.get('router').transitionTo(routeName, optionalParams);
Note: It'll be transitionToRoute in a controller.
You can use container to get access to any needed part of application. To get application controller :
this.container.lookup('controller:application')
But what about structure of application - components should generate events - so my opinion it's better to use sendAction. Cause in future you can get situation, when you need to filter such behavior ( for example ) or other application-specific logic before transition
https://github.com/emberjs/ember.js/blob/5fd2d035b30aa9ebfe73de824b3b283ec8e589cc/packages/ember-runtime/lib/system/service.js#L31
In the line I reference above the ember-core team imports this createInjectionHelper and uses it to add a clean/simple api for injecting services like so
App.ApplicationRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
authManager: Ember.inject.service('auth'),
model: function() {
return this.get('authManager').findCurrentUser();
}
});
How can I create something like this myself for a non service?
Your example usage will change slightly from what you have above. We will cover what the injectRepositories does in a little bit.
import injectRepositories from 'app/utils/inject';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
repository: injectRepositories('person'),
model: function() {
var repository = this.get('repository');
return repository.find();
}
});
The initializer can be improved with the following changes:
import registerWithContainer from "ember-cli-auto-register/register";
export function initialize(_, application) {
registerWithContainer("repositories", application);
application.inject("repositories", "store", "store:main");
}
export default {
name: "repositories",
after: "store",
initialize: initialize
};
Let's break down what is happening in each line.
registerWithContainer("repositories", application);
In the line above, we are deferring to the ember-addon ember-cli-auto-register. This addon will take a directory, in this situation, the repositories directory and register each object into the Ember container to able to be accessed via a lookup. They will be inserted as if doing the following:
application.register("repositories:person", PersonRepository);
Then we add a function to do the injection using the ember-addon ember-cli-injection:
// app/utils/inject.js
import inject from "ember-cli-injection/inject";
var injectRepositories = inject("repositories");
export default injectRepositories;
This then allows us the opportunity to use the newly created function above to access these objects with the code below:
import injectRepositories from 'app/utils/inject';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
repository: injectRepositories('person'),
model: function() {
var repository = this.get('repository');
return repository.find();
}
});
Since each object is now in the container, we can look it up and inject at runtime instead of during the initialization of the application. We register the repositories key in the function and this then returns a computed property (see code below from ember-cli-injection). We do this as a computed property to allow lazy loading. The object is not fetched from the container until the property is accessed.
import Ember from 'ember';
var injection = function(key) {
return function(name) {
return Ember.computed(function(propertyName) {
var objectName = name || propertyName;
return this.container.lookup(key + ':' + objectName);
});
};
};
export default injection;
We also allow for a name to passed to the repositories function, for example repository: injectRepositories('person'). This allows you to name your object whatever you would like when injecting it.
If you would like to just name the object the same as the name of the repository injected into the container you can alternatively do person: injectRepositories(). This will pass the person key to the computed property as the propertyName and since the name was left null when injecting, the objectName will instead be person. This matches the API produces similar results but is not the same as that of the Ember.inject.service and Ember.inject.controller API that is available as of Ember 1.10.
I don't think it's their intention for you to use it this way. The standard way is to use App.inject() if you're using plain ember, or do this in an initializer if you're using ember-cli.
In your case:
// Register the service
App.register('service:auth', {
findCurrentUser: function() {
// Do your magic
}
}, { instantiate: false });
App.inject('route', 'auth', 'service:auth');
Then in your model hook you can use this.auth.findCurrentUser();. You can also inject this into controllers and components if you need. Also note, to keep it clean, that you might want to include a separate module instead of defining your auth module in the service registration.
More info here:
http://emberjs.com/guides/understanding-ember/dependency-injection-and-service-lookup/#toc_dependency-injection-with-code-register-inject-code
NOTE
A service is also not a "special" thing. You can inject anything you want into pretty much anything you want using this method.