My Patch statement is not updating the list item, it is also not giving an error so I am not sure where it is failing.
Patch('Check-In Data', First(Filter('Check-In Data', Title = "nNumberLookUp.text" && 'Active Issue'=true)), {Feedback:Feedback_DataCard4.DataField, Sat:DataCardValue37.Value, 'Active Issue':false}); Navigate(Completed, ScreenTransition.Fade)
it should be looking up the n-number then adding those two fields and turning active issue to false. But nothing happens
Related
I have 2 radio buttons in the UI, one for setting a variable (ng-model) say selected as true (ng-value=true) and other one for setting it as false (ng-value=false). Now, when none of them is selected it results in the variable selected being absent from the outgoing request (as expected).
However, when that is dealt with Django Forms, the self.data dictionary in the clean() method gives False on accessing self.data.get('selected') / self.data['selected'] why is that so? Shouldn't it be None or at least give a key-error when it was not even present in the actual request?
Note that the variable 'selected' is actually a field in a Django Model with default=False, is that thing responsible for this behaviour? How can I circumvent this situation considering that altering the Django Model field isn't an option?
So I dealt with it the other day by checking for the selected key in the raw request.body. Now, since its a string, I had to parse it to a dict and then access the mentioned key using :
json.loads(request.body).get('selected')
In this way, if selected is not present at all when none of the radio buttons are selected, I get None. Similarly, if the radio button for ng-value=true is selected then I get True and vice-versa.
I've encountered the weirdest thing while developing a django-python web app.
I have a field in my database that I want to display on the frontend. The field is a MultiSelectField and the list is populated from a list
models.py
# Other service areas
other_areas = MultiSelectField(choices = SERVICE_AREAS, max_length=360,
default=None, null=True)
My SERVICE_AREAS is created by a function like this:
def get_service_areas():
#SERVICE_AREAS = [('None', '-------------')]
SERVICE_AREAS = []
sas = service_area.objects.all()
for s in sas:
SERVICE_AREAS.append((s.name, s.name))
return SERVICE_AREAS
I have a form from where I select the other "service areas" and everything is submitted to my database correctly (in pgadmin I see the correct values)
proof of ok values in DB
Then on the frontend side in my template i have this code to present the data:
index.html
<div class="email" style="padding-top: 10px;">{{c.service_area}}- {{c.service_area.said}} , Other SAID's: {{c.other_areas}}</div>
The weird part about this is that when the data actually show on my screen it turns up as the word "None" as many times is there are comma seperated values in that field. (If there are 3 service areas it will come up as None, None, None, if 4 service areas: None, None, None, None etc.)
The rest of my data shows up correctly in the template. I'm kinda stumped and any ideas are welcome.
example output for the image I added above:
I have two values in the other_areas field (43006,43001) and it shows up like this
There really isn't much source code here to go off of. But, it is clearly telling you that there is nothing there. You could not be passing the object to the front-end from your views which would make those template tags show None. Since you don't show what your model actually is, what data you are rendering from your views, nobody here can necessarily help you. I would recommend you post code so we can further understand how to help you.
I want to select all of the users who do not have associated posts where the title is, 'test123'. The following syntax is not working:
User.includes(:posts).where.not(posts: { title: 'test123' })
How do I select users whose associated posts do not have a specific title?
UPDATE
Originally, I tried to isolate where exactly I thought I was having the problem, but I want to show the query that most closely reflects what I am doing. The problem is still with the, where.not, clause. It's returning an empty array when I know there are records with posts that have other titles.
User.where("users.created_at >= ? and users.created_at <= ?", 1.month.ago.utc, 1.week.ago.utc)
.where(active: true)
.includes(:comments)
.where('comments.id is not null')
.includes(:posts)
.where.not(posts: { title: 'test123'} )
.references(:posts)
From the API Doc
If you want to add conditions to your included models you’ll have to
explicitly reference them
So the below query will work
User.includes(:posts).where.not(posts: { title: 'test123' }).references(:posts)
I believe the problem was with executing inner vs outer joins with Active Record Query Syntax. The problem with this query:
User.includes(:posts).where.not(posts: { title: 'test123' })
is that it evaluates, where.not(posts: { title: 'test123'}), only after retrieving all the user records with an associated post -- leaving behind all of the other user records who do not have a corresponding post. I wanted a query that would not exclude the Users without posts.
This is how I did it:
User.where("users.id NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT(user_id) from posts where title = 'test123')")
Rails4 is getting depreciation warning when I am upgrading from rails 3.2 to rails 4.0. I have this query.
Child.find(:all, :include => :children_users, :conditions => "state = 'active' AND owner_id = #{self.id} AND children_users.user_id = #{other_user.id}")
I am getting deprecation warning as follow :-
DEPRECATION WARNING: It looks like you are eager loading table(s) (one of: splits, accounts) that are referenced in a string SQL snippet. For example:
Post.includes(:comments).where("comments.title = 'foo'")
Currently, Active Record recognizes the table in the string, and knows to JOIN the comments table to the query, rather than loading comments in a separate query. However, doing this without writing a full-blown SQL parser is inherently flawed. Since we don't want to write an SQL parser, we are removing this functionality. From now on, you must explicitly tell Active Record when you are referencing a table from a string:
Post.includes(:comments).where("comments.title = 'foo'").references(:comments)
If you don't rely on implicit join references you can disable the feature entirely by setting `config.active_record.disable_implicit_join_references = true`. (called from splits_under_100_percent at /Users/newimac/RailsApp/bank/app/models/user.rb:274)
To solve this problem, I have try like this
Child.includes(:children_users).where(state: active, owner_id: self.id, children_users.user_id = other_user.id).load
or
Child.where{(state: active, owner_id: self.id, children_users.user_id = other_user.id).includes(:children_users)}
But none of them work.
children_users.user_id = other_user.id wrong.
The correct one is: "children_users.user_id" => other_user.id
Thank You for #Zakwan. Finally, this query works.
Child.includes(:children_users).where(state: 'active', owner_id: self.id, "children_users.user_id" => other_user.id).load
In WFFM there is an option so that, when someone abandons the form, any data that was entered in the form itself is recorded and should be accessible via the Dropout Report.
I have a WFFM for which I have turned on Analytics and turned on the dropout feature. Unfortunately I don't see any data being recorded in the DB and the Dropout Report is visible, but empty.
I see from the javascript code included in the WFFM folder that a series of AJAX calls are supposed to save the fields on blur events -- with calls to /sitecore modules/web/Web Forms for Marketers/Tracking.aspx
I tried debugging the Javascript code, but the method supposed to post the info to /sitecore modules/web/Web Forms for Marketers/Tracking.aspx is never being called. Can you think of any reasons for this code not to work? Also, does anyone know which table this information is supposed to be recorded? Is it the fields table in the WFFM DB?
Finally, even though I have turned on analytics on this particular WFFM form and I have associated a campaign and a goal to the submission of the form, none of these is being recorded. I see that the data entered in the form is stored successfully and is displaying in the Data Report, but no info about the Campaign nor the Goal are recorded in the DB.
I even checked manually directly in the DMS DB running:
select top 10
p.DateTime, p.UrlText, cp.CampaignName
,i.Url, vi.VisitId
from pages p
inner join ItemUrls i on p.ItemId = i.ItemId
inner join Visits vi on vi.VisitId = p.VisitId
inner join GeoIps g on vi.Ip = g.Ip
left join Campaigns cp on cp.CampaignId = vi.CampaignId
order by p.DateTime desc
This one shows that the page where the form is rendered is being hit, but no campaign is associated to the visit.
Then I tried the following:
select pe.datetime, ped.Name, pg.UrlText from PageEvents pe
inner join PageEventDefinitions ped on ped.PageEventDefinitionId = pe.PageEventDefinitionId
inner join Pages pg on pg.PageId = pe.PageId
order by pe.DateTime desc
But I don't see any entry for this particular campaign nor for the goal (while I see entries for other campaigns and goals associated to non-WFFM Sitecore items)
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Francesco
EDIT
The sc.webform.js file contains this method:
_create: function () {
var self = this,
options = this.options;
if (options.tracking) {
this.element.find("input[type!='submit'], select, textarea")
.bind('focus', function (e) { self.onFocusField(e, this) })
.bind('blur change', function (e) { self.onBlurField(e, this) });
this.element.find("select")
.change(function () { $scw.webform.controls.updateAnalyticsListValue(this) });
this.element.find("input[type='checkbox'], input[type='radio']")
.click(function () { $scw.webform.controls.updateAnalyticsListValue(this) });
}
this.element.find(".scfDatePickerTextBox").each(function () { $scw.webform.controls.datePicker(this) });
},
This is supposed to be called by the form on sc.webform widget initialization. It should bind the focus and blur change events for all input fields, drop downs and text areas. Unfortunately, when I tried to put a break point inside this method, it never gets called.
SECOND EDIT
Interesting. I figured out that the whole thing should start from this line of Javascript code embedded in the page that contains the WFFM form:
<script type="text/javascript">
$scwhead.ready(function() {
$scw('#form_A8BF483419174F97A2830E12CBCF7E4F').webform({formId: "{A8BF4834-1917-4F97-A283-0E12CBCF7E4F}",pageId: "{21C24144-B964-4FBA-8388-D9B90EBBC17C}",eventCountId: "pagecolumns_0_columncontent_0_bottomrow_0_form_A8BF483419174F97A2830E12CBCF7E4F_form_A8BF483419174F97A2830E12CBCF7E4F_eventcount",tracking: true})
});
</script>
Once I put a break point here, I was finally able to trace into the _create method of the jQuery.UI widget defined in sc.webform.js. The code that calls _create is actually inside the jQuery.UI library. Kinda makes sense, right?
Finally, the code inside _create is executed, the blur events are bound to the TrackEvents method, also defined within the widget:
_trackEvents: function(events) {
$scw.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: "/sitecore modules/web/Web Forms for Marketers/Tracking.aspx" + location.search,
data: {track: JSON.stringify(events)},
dataType: 'json'
});
What doesn't make sense is that now, even though I can finally see trackEvents being called whenever I tab from field to field in the WFFM form (why wasn't working before it's a mistery to me), I don't see any data recorded in the WFFM DB. I even tried a quick query in the DB:
select f.Timestamp, f.StorageName, fi.Value, fi.FieldName
from Form f
inner join Field fi on f.Id = fi.FormId
order by f.Timestamp desc, FieldName
Does anybody know where is Tracking.aspx supposed to save the captured field informations?
This may be silly to ask, but did you configure the data source correctly for your WFFM? I mean, obviously, you're using WFFM..but is it set to use SQL or is it using the "file" that WFFM uses by default as it's database.
like this to use SQL:
<!-- MSSQL-->
<formsDataProvider type="Sitecore.Forms.Data.DataProviders.WFMDataProvider,Sitecore.Forms.Core">
<param desc="connection string">Database=Sitecore_WebForms;Data Source=xxx;user id=xxx;password=xxx;Connect Timeout=30</param>
</formsDataProvider>
<!-- SQLite -->
<!--<formsDataProvider type="Sitecore.Forms.Data.DataProviders.SQLite.SQLiteWFMDataProvider,Sitecore.Forms.Core">
<param desc="connection string">Data Source=/data/sitecore_webforms.db;version=3;BinaryGUID=true</param>
</formsDataProvider>-->
If you don't configure that correctly, I'm wondering if somehow data is being recorded in one place but not another? Also, another question I have is to ask if this is a dev environment, are you running webforms in live mode? It just seems to me like this is a configuration issue.
We are experiencing the exact same problem on 6.5 update 6 and WFFM 2.3.3 rev. 111209. We can see the asynchronous calls to the server including the probably well formed json object containing the correct event.
Example:
track:[{"fieldId":"{E0A0BCDD-85E1-4D8D-9E76-5ABD240423C9}","type":"Field Completed","value":"test","formId":"{0F3B57C1-1B6A-43B9-A5A6-2E958C168B31}","pageId":"{025AFF68-62B9-42CE-B49F-0C36311E1976}","ticks":16}]
We don't see any of the dropouts arrive in the database, though...
Have you made sure your campaigns and goals have been deployed? If you have switched databases they may not be. To redeploy do this:
For each Goal in System -> Marketing Center -> Goals
Change the workflow state to draft
Save
Then in the review ribbon click deploy.
This will create an entry in the pageeventdefinition table and allow
you to query.
Don't forget to do the same for campaigns.