Can a Postman Pro share collections to Free Postman users? - postman

Can a Postman Pro share unlimited request to multiple Free Postman users?
I'm thinking of setting up a Pro account that will act as a central request collection store, then Free Postman users will just clone/read from it.
Is this possible?

Yes it can be done with the same process as sharing a collection within the team, but the free users will not be able to use the pro features like API design within Postman, generate machine-readable documentation, common schemas, servers to simulate, monitoring API performance, API uptime and custom domains

Related

Use token from Google Cloud Platform without verification and warnings

we have some authorization issues while access sensitive scopes with private Google user data using tokens from Google Cloud Platform credential service.
Verification
Our applications is a self-developed web-service which provides data-gathering functionality for our accounts. After data collection all data is placed in the aggregated form into our database for future analysis. All accounts which will be used with this application are inner accounts of our advertising agency or delegated to us by our clients. No external user accounts will use our developed app.
In order to pass the verification process we have to provide Youtube link with the demonstration of how our web-service works with user data, however data gathering web-service does not have visual interface.
What will you recommend to with this case? Maybe there is no need to pass full verification in case of using only own accounts?

Query (HTTP GET) data in Power Apps Portal from Web API with JavaScript

I have a "Starter Portal" Power App Portal. I would like to utilize JavaScript and the Web API for querying data. Documentation states
You can use the Web API to perform create, update, and delete operations across all Microsoft Dataverse tables from your portal pages.
Further documentation only lists the CREATE, UPDATE, DELETE operations, and this API being accessible as
[Portal URI]/_api
And I have found how to successfully authenticate using a helper method to get a token for the header:
shell.getTokenDeferred().done(function (token) { ...}
This allows authentication as the user logged into the portal so I believe all relevant Table Permissions, etc. are applied.
But, I would like to retrieve data (HTTP GET). I know this is possible from the Dataverse Web API.. This api is exposed as
[Organization URI]/api/data/v9.1/
Are these really the same API, just exposed a different way for the portal? Is it possible to use the GET endpoints or the second API altogether, authenticated as a Portal Contact user like the previous operations?
It's the same API but permissions are different, you will need to enable the tables you want to access inside the _api endpoint.
You can read more info at this page: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/maker/portals/read-operations, there is also an XrmToolBox tool to assist you in this operation (but I didn't try it) https://www.xrmtoolbox.com/plugins/PowerPortalWebAPIHelper/
Regarding the Web API calls, I released a new tool to create them (similar to CRM REST Builder) I also added a "Portals" syntax (is in preview) but the generated urls are the same. Link: https://github.com/GuidoPreite/DRB

using Google APIs account to handle multiple users in my app

I have a web app in which I need to use the google translation and language detection API. Following the docs I can consume the API using my service account. However, I have different clients (users) who use my service and each one should be billed separately, so I need a way to calculate the pricing for each user separately.
I read on other SO questions that making a service account per client is a bad idea. Also, I need a way to allow each user to enable/disable the translation feature programatically (my web app is a service on the cloud, so for example if the solution was to create a service acc/user, then I need a programmatic way to do that). Any ideas about the best available way to handle this?

How to handle development for multiple customers of ours using the Postmates API

We would like to develop an app which can be used by multiple customers (of ours). Each app will be customized to each customer of ours.
What we are unsure about is how to handle authentication keys and API keys? Do we create one set of these for each of our customers or do we just have one account and all our customers use the one set of API keys. The latter approach makes me nervous because if one customer is banned (for what ever reason) then all my customers will suffer since they all share the same API key.
Any guidance from Postmates development team would be appreciated.
Currently, we do not support provisioning multiple API keys for a single account.
I recommend having each client create an API key. This also would allow your customers to use their own payment method, versus a single payment method for every customer.
Hope this helps, let me know if you have any more questions!

Limitations of web service in Moodle

I'm going to integrate a Moodle-based application into my website wherein all data/activities being posted in this Moodle-based application can be retrieved by my website and vice versa.
So, is the Moodle web service enough to access all the data in that Moodle application?
Yes, you should be able to use web services. No, not all data is accessible out-of-the-box.
Things you can do with the webservices:
Retrieve a list of users, courses, assignments
Upload files
Create notes
Send messages
Enrol to courses, groups, cohorts
Check grades
On your Moodle site turn on web services and go to /admin/webservice/documentation.php to get a full list of existing functions you can call.
You can see some examples of this implemented in the Moodle Mobile App:
User: http://docs.moodle.org/26/en/Mobile_app
Dev: http://docs.moodle.org/dev/Moodle_Mobile
If these satisfy your requirements then yes web services should be sufficient as they are.
If they do not then you can extend the web services as a local plugin to provide richer functionality, which would be limited by your development capacity rather than the system itself. To port all of the features of some modules to web services would be a significant undertaking, but there are some low-hanging fruit to get activity lists, forum discussions/posts, choice polls, etc.
Web services is a better approach than exposing the database to an external system as it allows you to utilise the core APIs to improve integrity.