I'm trying to speed up compilation by using ClCache together with Incredibuild.
I've configured ClCache by replacing the cl.exe with the ClCache.exe.
However, when using incredibuild it tries to execute tasks on a helper, but it never uses its output.
I see CL.exe (the renamed clcached.exe) calling Python.exe callin CL_original.exe (the original cl.exe) via procesexplorer on the helper.
Is it possible to view the output of the cl-command executed on an Incredibuild-helper? (This would allow me to further debug the situation)
Did anyone succeed in configuring Clcache to work together with incredibuild?
PS: I also tried to use /MsBuild with a /p:CLToolExe pointing to ClCache, also no success.
Related
See below for the following code, and below that, the error that follows.
std::string source = "C:\\Users\\cambarchian\\Documents\\tested";
std::string destination = "C:\\Users\\cambarchian\\Documents\\tester";
std::filesystem::path sourcepath = source;
std::filesystem::path destpath = destination;
std::filesystem::copy_options::update_existing;
std::filesystem::copy(sourcepath, destpath);
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::filesystem::__cxx11::filesystem_error'
what(): filesystem error: cannot copy: File exists [C:\Users\cambarchian\Documents\tested] [C:\Users\cambarchian\Documents\tester]
Tried to use filesystem::copy, along with trying different paths. No luck with anything. Not too much I can write here as the problem is listed above, could be a simple formatting issue. That being said, it worked on my home computer using visual studio 2022, however using VS Code with gcc 11.2 gives me this issue.
Using:
filesystem::copy_file(oldPath, newPath, filesystem::copy_options::overwrite_existing);
The overloads of std::filesystem::copy are documented. You're using the first overload, but want the second:
void copy(from, to) which is equivalent to [overload 2, below] using copy_options::none
void copy(from, to, options)
Writing the statement std::filesystem::copy_options::update_existing; before calling copy doesn't achieve anything at all, whereas passing the option to the correct overload like
std::filesystem::copy(sourcepath, destpath,
std::filesystem::copy_options::update_existing);
should do what you want.
... it worked on my home computer using visual studio 2022 ...
you don't say whether the destination file existed in that case, which is the first thing you should check.
I put the copy_options within the copy function but it didn't work so I started moving it around, I probably should have mentioned that.
Randomly permuting your code isn't a good way of generating clean examples for others to help with.
In the rare event that hacking away at something does fix it, I strongly recommend pausing to figure out why. When you've hacked away at something and it still doesn't work, by all means leave comments to remind yourself what you tried, but the code itself should still be in a good state.
Still doesn't work when I write std::filesystem::copy(sourcepath, destpath, std::filesystem::copy_options::recursive)
Well, that's a different option, isn't it? Were you randomly permuting which copy_options you selected as well?
Trying recursive and update_existing yields the same issue.
The documentation says
The behavior is undefined if there is more than one option in any of the copy_options option group present in options (even in the copy_file group).
so you shouldn't be setting both anyway. There's no benefit to recursively copying a single file, but there may be a benefit to updating or overwriting one. If the destination already exists. Which, according to your error, it does.
Since you do have an error explicitly saying "File exists", you should certainly look at the "options controlling copy_file() when the file already exists" section of the table here.
Visual Studio 2022 fixed the problem
So I am having a problem when calling the command:
file( COPY ${src_dir} DESTINATION ${dest_dir} )
Half the time it works, and then half the time I get an error:
file COPY cannot set permissions on "${dest_dir}/subdir"
My issue is I have changed no permissions or touched these files in between execution. I would prefer to use this method to copy our files, as the other methods with add_custom_command/target does not seem to work on our side. I need to copy these files before our executable target is ultimately declared.
I would even be open to use a bash shell to do this copy command, but it has to be done at this specific point of cmake execution.
I have been wondering if file (COPY...) throws a return value, and if there is a way to possibly rerun the copy command if I get a return. Does anybody know if that is possible?
Can anybody give any help if they have run into this problem?
Thank you!
Edit:
I have already tried using different FILE_PERMISSIONS to see if it would function.
You might set permissions explicitly, with PERMISSIONS <permissions>, FILE_PERMISSIONS <permissions> and DIRECTORY_PERMISSIONS <permissions>, or skip setting-of-permissions through NO_SOURCE_PERMISSIONS.
You could hack in a ls -laR ${dest_dir} command to see if there's anything special going on in the filesystem at the time file(COPY ...) is invoked.
So, what I ended up doing is simply using this copy step in a while loop, because it usually works the 2'nd time, if not the first. Not an elegant way, and may only apply to my case, but please leave other answers if somebody can think of other methods.
The Point Cloud library comes with an executable pcl_hdl_viewer_simple that I can run (./pcl_hdl_viewer_simple) without any extra arguments to get live data from a Velodyne LIDAR HDL32.
The source code for this program is supposed to be hdl_viewer_simple.cpp. A simplified version of the code is given on this page which cannot be compiled readily and requires a tiny bit of tweaking to make it compile.
My problem is that the executable that I build myself for both the versions are not able to run. I always get the smart pointer error "Assertion px!=0" error. I am not sure if I am not executing the program in the correct way or what. The executable is supposed to be executed like
./hdl_viewer_simple -calibrationFile hdl32calib.xml -pcapFile file.pcap
in case of playing from previously recorded PCAP files or just ./hdl_viewer_simple if wanting to get live data from the real sensor. However, I always get the assertion failed error.
Has anyone been able to run the executables? I do not want to use the ROS drivers
"Assertion px!=0" is occurring because your pointer is not initialized.
Now that being said, you could initialize it inside your routines, in case the pointer is NULL, especially for data input.
in here, you can try updating the line 83 like this :
CloudConstPtr cloud(new Cloud); //initializing your pointer
and hopefully, it will work.
Cheers,
I have a C++ program which works well when I compile with no additional options. However, whenever I use cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release there is a very specific part of the code which stops working.
Concretely, I have an interface for a Boost Fibonacci Heap. I am calling this function:
narrow_band_.push(myObject);
And this function does the following:
inline void myHeap::push (myStruct & c) {
handles_[c.getIndex()] = heap_.push(c);
}
where heap_ is:
boost::heap::fibonacci_heap<myStruct, boost::heap::compare<compare_func>> heap_;
For some reason the heap_size is not being modified, therefore the rest of the code does not work because the next step is to extract the minimum from the heap and it is always empty.
In Debug mode it works ok. Thank you for your help.
EDIT - Additional info
I have also found this problem: I have a set of code which do simple math operations. In Release mode the results are incorrect. If I just do cout of a couple of variables to check their values, the result changes, which is still incorrect but quite strange.
I solved the problem. It was funny but in this case it was not initialization/timing issues common in the Release mode. It was that the return statement was missing in a couple of functions. In debug mode the output was perfect but in the release mode that failed. I had warnings deactivated, that is why I did not see it before.
The go test command has support for the -c flag, described as follows:
-c Compile the test binary to pkg.test but do not run it.
(Where pkg is the last element of the package's import path.)
As far as I understand, generating a binary like this is the way to run it interactively using GDB. However, since the test binary is created by combining the source and test files temporarily in some /tmp/ directory, this is what happens when I run list in gdb:
Loading Go Runtime support.
(gdb) list
42 github.com/<username>/<project>/_test/_testmain.go: No such file or directory.
This means I cannot happily inspect the Go source code in GDB like I'm used to. I know it is possible to force the temporary directory to stay by passing the -work flag to the go test command, but then it is still a huge hassle since the binary is not created in that directory and such. I was wondering if anyone found a clean solution to this problem.
Go 1.5 has been released, and there is still no officially sanctioned Go debugger. I haven't had much success using GDB for effectively debugging Go programs or test binaries. However, I have had success using Delve, a non-official debugger that is still undergoing development: https://github.com/derekparker/delve
To run your test code in the debugger, simply install delve:
go get -u github.com/derekparker/delve/cmd/dlv
... and then start the tests in the debugger from within your workspace:
dlv test
From the debugger prompt, you can single-step, set breakpoints, etc.
Give it a whirl!
Unfortunately, this appears to be a known issue that's not going to be fixed. See this discussion:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-nuts/nIA09gp3eNU
I've seen two solutions to this problem.
1) create a .gdbinit file with a set substitute-path command to
redirect gdb to the actual location of the source. This file could be
generated by the go tool but you'd risk overwriting someone's custom
.gdbinit file and would tie the go tool to gdb which seems like a bad
idea.
2) Replace the source file paths in the executable (which are pointing
to /tmp/...) with the location they reside on disk. This is
straightforward if the real path is shorter then the /tmp/... path.
This would likely require additional support from the compiler /
linker to make this solution more generic.
It spawned this issue on the Go Google Code issue tracker, to which the decision ended up being:
https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=2881
This is annoying, but it is the least of many annoying possibilities.
As a rule, the go tool should not be scribbling in the source
directories, which might not even be writable, and it shouldn't be
leaving files elsewhere after it exits. There is next to nothing
interesting in _testmain.go. People testing with gdb can break on
testing.Main instead.
Russ
Status: Unfortunate
So, in short, it sucks, and while you can work around it and GDB a test executable, the development team is unlikely to make it as easy as it could be for you.
I'm still new to the golang game but for what it's worth basic debugging seems to work.
The list command you're trying to work can be used so long as you're already at a breakpoint somewhere in your code. For example:
(gdb) b aws.go:54
Breakpoint 1 at 0x61841: file /Users/mat/gocode/src/github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws/aws.go, line 54.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /Users/mat/gocode/src/github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws/aws.test
[snip: some arnings about BinaryCache]
Breakpoint 1, github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws.imageIsNewer (latest=0xc2081fe2d0, ami=0xc2081fe3c0, ~r2=false)
at /Users/mat/gocode/src/github.com/stellar/deliverator/aws/aws.go:54
54 layout := "2006-01-02T15:04:05.000Z"
(gdb) list
49 func imageIsNewer(latest *ec2.Image, ami *ec2.Image) bool {
50 if latest == nil {
51 return true
52 }
53
54 layout := "2006-01-02T15:04:05.000Z"
55
56 amiCreationTime, amiErr := time.Parse(layout, *ami.CreationDate)
57 if amiErr != nil {
58 panic(amiErr)
This is just after running the following in the aws subdir of my project:
go test -c
gdb aws.test
As an additional caveat, it does seem very selective about where breakpoints can be placed. Seems like it has to be an expression but that conclusion is only via experimentation.
If you're willing to use tools besides GDB, check out godebug. To use it, first install with:
go get github.com/mailgun/godebug
Next, insert a breakpoint somewhere by adding the following statement to your code:
_ = "breakpoint"
Now run your tests with the godebug test command.
godebug test
It supports many of the parameters from the go test command.
-test.bench string
regular expression per path component to select benchmarks to run
-test.benchmem
print memory allocations for benchmarks
-test.benchtime duration
approximate run time for each benchmark (default 1s)
-test.blockprofile string
write a goroutine blocking profile to the named file after execution
-test.blockprofilerate int
if >= 0, calls runtime.SetBlockProfileRate() (default 1)
-test.count n
run tests and benchmarks n times (default 1)
-test.coverprofile string
write a coverage profile to the named file after execution
-test.cpu string
comma-separated list of number of CPUs to use for each test
-test.cpuprofile string
write a cpu profile to the named file during execution
-test.memprofile string
write a memory profile to the named file after execution
-test.memprofilerate int
if >=0, sets runtime.MemProfileRate
-test.outputdir string
directory in which to write profiles
-test.parallel int
maximum test parallelism (default 4)
-test.run string
regular expression to select tests and examples to run
-test.short
run smaller test suite to save time
-test.timeout duration
if positive, sets an aggregate time limit for all tests
-test.trace string
write an execution trace to the named file after execution
-test.v
verbose: print additional output