I've been beating my head against this one for awhile. In the deconstructor of my class, I have a for loop that is supposed to iterate through an array of objects and delete them. When I try though, I get a read access violation. The attached code is supposed to read info from two documents and use that to create Country objects.
#include "pch.h"
#include "CountryCatalogue.h"
#include "Country.h"
#include <iterator>
#include <map>
//imports for reading the files
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
CountryCatalogue::CountryCatalogue()
{
_maxSize = 10;
_curSize = 0;
_catalogue = new Country*[_maxSize];
}
CountryCatalogue::CountryCatalogue(std::string continentFileName, std::string countryFileName)
{
//block that opens the files and checks to make sure they can be read
//open up the files
std::ifstream inFile1;
std::ifstream inFile2;
//opening both text files and ensuring that the file is readable to the program
inFile1.open(continentFileName);
if (!inFile1) {
std::cout << "Unable to open file";
exit(1); // terminate with error
}
inFile2.open(countryFileName);
if (!inFile2) {
std::cout << "Unable to open file";
exit(1); // terminate with error
}
// read the continet file
// while there is still stuff to read in the file
std::string str;
while (!inFile1.eof())
{
std::string Country, Cont;
//reading lines from file and assigning to variables
std::getline(inFile1, Country);
std::getline(inFile1, Cont);
//mapping to variables read from file
_countryContinent.insert(std::pair<std::string, std::string>(Country, Cont));
_curSize++;
}
//closing file after use
inFile1.close();
//creating array
_catalogue = new Country*[_curSize+2];
//resetting size to zero for later itteration
_curSize = 0;
// read the country file
// while there is still stuff to read in the file
while (!inFile2.eof())
{
std::string name, POP, AREA;
int pop;
double area = 0.0;
std::getline(inFile2, name);
std::getline(inFile2, POP);
std::getline(inFile2, AREA);
if (!POP.empty() && POP[POP.length() - 1] == '\n') {
POP.erase(POP.length() - 1);
}
if (!AREA.empty() && AREA[AREA.length() - 1] == '\n') {
AREA.erase(AREA.length() - 1);
}
pop = std::stoi(POP);
area = std::stod(AREA);
//creating iterator to search through mapped values
std::map<std::string, std::string>::iterator it;
it = _countryContinent.find(name);
//creating empty string variable to store continent
std::string cont;
//using value found by iterator to make continent string
//ensuring value isn't the end valueof the map
if (it != _countryContinent.end()){
cont = it->second;
}
//std::cout << name << pop << area << cont << std::endl;
// add the country to the catalogue
addCountry(name, pop, area, cont);
}
}
CountryCatalogue::~CountryCatalogue() {
/*for (int i = 0; i < _curSize; i++){
delete _catalogue[i];
std::cout << "deleted" << i << std::endl;
}*/
delete[] _catalogue;
}
void CountryCatalogue::addCountry(std::string name, int pop, double area, std::string cont) {
//std::cout << name << pop << area << cont << std::endl;
//std::cout << _curSize << std::endl;
Country* toAdd = new Country(name, pop, area, cont);
if (_curSize == _maxSize) {
expandCapacity();
}
//adding country object to array
_catalogue[_curSize] = toAdd;
//adding to _curSize for next iteration
_curSize++;
}
void CountryCatalogue::printCountryCatalogue() {
std::string s;
/*for (int i = 0; i < _curSize; i++) {
s += _catalogue[i]->to_string() + "\n";
}*/
std::cout << _curSize << std::endl;
}
void CountryCatalogue::expandCapacity() {
//doubling array size
_maxSize = _maxSize * 2;
//creating pointer to new array of new size
Country** newCatalogue = new Country*[_maxSize];
//copying old array into new
for (int i = 0; i < _curSize; i++) {
newCatalogue[i] = _catalogue[i];
}
//deleting old array
delete[] _catalogue;
//making _catalogue point to newCatalogue
_catalogue = newCatalogue;
}
UPDATE:
What my code is supposed to do is get information from text files and create objects using that data. I am required to use an array instead of a vector. The code runs fine and I can create the country object. The issue is that I cannot add the created object to the _catalogue array, as I cannot delete it afterwards. When I attempt to iterate through the array, I receive a message saying Heap Corruption was detected.
Your problem is due to this line
_catalogue = new Country*[_curSize+2];
in the second constructor. You have forgotten to update _maxSize so you have a mismatch between _maxSize and the real allocated amount of memory.
Try:
_maxSize = _curSize+2;
_catalogue = new Country*[_maxSize];
You created _catalogue as a dynamic array.
To release the memory allocated for arrays of elements using new TYPE[SIZE] the syntax is:
delete[] _catalogue;
Loop is Needed for deleting memory allocated for Matrix elements. For example
int matrix = new int[rows][cols];
for (int i = 0; i < rows; ++i)
delete [] matrix[i];
The array is deleted row by row.
Related
I have working C++ code that writes HDF5 data with the column names stored in an attribute. I can successfully read and process the data in Matlab, but am trying to create a C++ reader. It reads the data ok, but when I attempt the read the header, I only get the first column name.
A snippet of the attribute creation process looks like:
// Snip of working code during the creation/recording of a DataSet named mpcDset:
std::vector<std::string> lcFieldnames;
lcFieldnames.clear();
lcFieldnames.push_back("Field1");
lcFieldnames.push_back("Field2");
lcFieldnames.push_back("Field3");
uint lnMaxStringLen = 10;
uint lnNumFields = lcFieldnames.size();
char* lpnBuffer = new char[lnNumFields*lnMaxStringLen];
memset((void*)lpnBuffer,0,lnNumFields*lnMaxStringLen);
int lnCount = 0;
for (auto& lnIndex : lcFieldnames)
{
lnIndex.copy(lpnBuffer + (lnCount *
lnMaxStringLen), lnMaxStringLen -1);
lnCount++;
}
hsize_t lpnHwriteDims[] = { lnNumFields, lnMaxStringLen };
H5::DataSpace lcAdspace(2, lpnHwriteDims, NULL);
H5::Attribute lcAttr = mpcDset->createAttribute(
std::string("header"),
H5::PredType::NATIVE_CHAR, lcAdspace);
lcAdspace.close();
lcAttr.write(H5::PredType::NATIVE_CHAR, lpnBuffer);
lcAttr.close();
delete [] lpnBuffer;
The code in question looks like:
// In another program, given an opened DataSet named mpcDset:
H5::Attribute lcAttr = mpcDset.openAttribute("header");
H5::DataType lcType = lcAttr.getDataType();
hsize_t lnSize = lcAttr.getStorageSize();
char* lpnBuffer = new char[lnSize];
lcAttr.read(lcType, lpnBuffer);
for (uint i=0;i<lnSize; i++)
{
std::cout<<lpnBuffer[i];
}
std::cout<<std::endl;
delete [] lpnBuffer;
lcAttr.close();
lnSize is large enough for all three fields (through inspection), but only "Field1" is output. Any suggestions as to what I am doing wrong?
Personally, to create an attribute that it is a list of strings in C++ I do as follows (something similar):
This code will write an attribute that it is 3 strings, then it will read each of them.
#include "H5Cpp.h"
#ifndef H5_NO_NAMESPACE
using namespace H5;
#endif
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using std::string;
using std::vector;
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
//WRITE ATTRIBUTE
{
try
{
//Example:
//Suppose that in the HDF5 file: 'myH5file_forExample.h5' there is a dataset named 'channel001'
//In that dataset we will create an attribute named 'Column_Names_Attribute'
//That attribute is a list of strings, each string is of variable length.
//The data of the attribute.
vector<string> att_vector;
att_vector.push_back("ColName1");
att_vector.push_back("ColName2 more characters");
att_vector.push_back("ColName3");
//HDF5 FILE
H5::H5File m_h5File;
m_h5File = H5File("myH5file_forExample.h5", H5F_ACC_RDWR); //Open file for read and write
DataSet theDataSet = m_h5File.openDataSet("/channel001"); //Open dataset
H5Object * myObject = &theDataSet;
//DATASPACE
StrType str_type(PredType::C_S1, H5T_VARIABLE);
const int RANK = 1;
hsize_t dims[RANK];
dims[0] = att_vector.size(); //The attribute will have 3 strings
DataSpace att_datspc(RANK, dims);
//ATTRIBUTE
Attribute att(myObject->createAttribute("Column_Names_Attribute" , str_type, att_datspc));
//Convert the vector into a C string array.
//Because the input function ::write requires that.
vector<const char *> cStrArray;
for(int index = 0; index < att_vector.size(); ++index)
{
cStrArray.push_back(att_vector[index].c_str());
}
//WRITE DATA
//att_vector must not change during this operation
att.write(str_type, (void*)&cStrArray[0]);
}
catch(H5::Exception &e)
{
std::cout << "Error in the H5 file: " << e.getDetailMsg() << endl;
}
}
//READ ATTRIBUTE
{
try
{
//HDF5 FILE
H5::H5File m_h5File;
m_h5File = H5File("myH5file_forExample.h5", H5F_ACC_RDONLY); //Open file for read
DataSet theDataSet = m_h5File.openDataSet("/channel001"); //Open dataset
H5Object * myObject = &theDataSet;
//ATTRIBUTE
Attribute att(myObject->openAttribute("Column_Names_Attribute"));
// READ ATTRIBUTE
// Read Attribute DataType
DataType attDataType = att.getDataType();
// Read the Attribute DataSpace
DataSpace attDataSpace = att.getSpace();
// Read size of DataSpace
// Dimensions of the array. Since we are working with 1-D, this is just one number.
hsize_t dim = 0;
attDataSpace.getSimpleExtentDims(&dim); //The number of strings.
// Read the Attribute Data. Depends on the kind of data
switch(attDataType.getClass())
{
case H5T_STRING:
{
char **rdata = new char*[dim];
try
{
StrType str_type(PredType::C_S1, H5T_VARIABLE);
att.read(str_type,(void*)rdata);
for(int iStr=0; iStr<dim; ++iStr)
{
cout << rdata[iStr] << endl;
delete[] rdata[iStr];
}
delete[] rdata;
break;
}
catch(...)
{
for(int iStr=0; iStr<dim; ++iStr)
{
delete[] rdata[iStr];
}
delete[] rdata;
throw std::runtime_error("Error while reading attribute.");
}
throw std::runtime_error("Not valid rank.");
break;
}
case H5T_INTEGER:
{
break;
}
case H5T_FLOAT:
{
break;
}
default:
{
throw std::runtime_error("Not a valid datatype class.");
}
}
}
catch(H5::Exception &e)
{
std::cout << "Error in the H5 file: " << e.getDetailMsg() << endl;
}
catch(std::runtime_error &e)
{
std::cout << "Error in the execution: " << e.what() << endl;
}
}
return 0;
}
Result of the write operation, seen in the HDFview program:
I want to create an array whose size I will only know at runtime, and then further increase that size during execution of the program.
This is from an /r/dailyprogrammer challenge which can be found here https://www.reddit.com/r/dailyprogrammer/comments/3twuwf/20151123_challenge_242_easy_funny_plant/
MSVisual gives me the error std::badd_array_new_length which means that it's having trouble instantiating the array?
I'm so tired with oftentimes copying code letter for letter from websites where it works and I constantly get errors. Is Visual a bad platform for learning C++? Should I try QT?
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
void main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
int currentPlants = std::stoi(argv[2]), targetPeople = std::stoi(argv[1]), currentProduce = 0, week = 0;
int * plants;
plants = new int[currentPlants];
for (int i = 0; i < currentPlants; i++) {
plants[i] = 0;
}
if (plants == nullptr) EXIT_FAILURE;
while (currentProduce < targetPeople) {
currentProduce = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < currentPlants; i++) {
currentProduce += plants[i];
plants[i]++;
}
if (currentProduce >= targetPeople) break;
else {
plants = new int[currentProduce];
for (; currentPlants < currentProduce; currentPlants++) {
plants[currentPlants] = 0;
}
}
week++;
}
std::cout << week;
}
You should use an std::vector.
As a summary :
// Create an array of size 10
std::vector<int> my_vector(10);
// Add '3' to my_vector
my_vector.push_back(3);
// Remove the last element
my_vector.pop_back();
Explanation and example here : www.cplusplus.com/reference/vector/vector/
Edit : you don't need to specify the array size when you construct your object.
// Create an array
std::vector<int> my_vector;
You can't increase the size of an array at runtime. You can create a new bigger array, and copy the contents of the old array to the new array.
The problem with your code is that on the first pass through plants all of your plants[x] are zero. You add all of these together and get zero => currentProduce == 0. You then try to new plants[currentProduce aka 0] which is illegal.
Your second problem is that each time you new you create a new array discarding the old values; new creates a new array, it doesn't know anything about the old one.
I rewrote your code using std::vector, which fixes the crash but produces an endless loop because on the first pass, currentProduce comes out to zero so the array is truncated.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
int main(int argc, const char* argv_real[])
{
const char* argv[] = { "programname", "5", "25" };
int currentPlants = std::stoi(argv[2]), targetPeople = std::stoi(argv[1]), currentProduce = 0, week = 0;
std::cout << "targetPeople = " << targetPeople
<< ", currentPlants = " << currentPlants
<< "\n";
std::vector<int> plants;
// Option 1:
// plants.resize(currentPlants);
// Option 2:
for (auto i = 0; i < currentPlants; ++i) {
plants.push_back(0);
}
while (currentProduce < targetPeople) {
std::cout << "cp: " << currentProduce
<< ", tp: " << targetPeople
<< "\n";
currentProduce = 0;
// plantCount is a reference to plants[i] for each i
for (auto& plantCount : plants) {
std::cout << plantCount << ", ";
currentProduce += plantCount;
plantCount++;
}
std::cout << " cp: " << currentProduce << "\n";
if (currentProduce >= targetPeople)
break;
// Option 1:
plants.resize(currentProduce);
// Option 2:
// while (currentPlants < currentProduce) {
// plants.push_back(0);
// }
week++;
}
std::cout << week;
}
Live demo: http://ideone.com/xGpoF6
Outside of using std::vector, you would need to allocate a new array on the heap, copy the contents over, and delete the old one. Then point your int* to the newly allocated array.
This wouldn't technically change the array size, but those accessing the object would see it as though it was changing.
This is dangerous:
int * plants;
plants = new int[currentPlants];
for (int i = 0; i < currentPlants; i++) {
plants[i] = 0;
}
if (plants == nullptr) EXIT_FAILURE;
This is what happens (if you are lucky):
the program attempts to create some memory and returns nullptr if it can't
the program then uses the memory in a loop even if nullptr was returned. (If nullptr was returned this will crash the program, silently corrupt the memory so you get the wrong results or otherwise doing something you don't want)
the program then checks to see if nullptr was returned.
If you are unlucky the compiler does time travel and destroys the entire universe. I am not kidding, have a look at:
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20140627-00/?p=633
Undefined behavior causing time travel
I'm building a sparse matrix class that holds two arrays (row and column) of pointers to doubly linked lists (down and right). Sort of like this:
rows
c0123456789
o1
l2
u3
m4 A-->B-->
n5 | |
s6 | V
7 V D-->
8 C-->
9
Both arrays are initialized to have nullptr in every space until something is inserted in that place.
I have a function "readFile" that reads in objects from a text file and inserts them into this sparse matrix. For some reason, before this function returns, all of the data in it is fine, but after I return, I get random memory locations in my arrays. Here is main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <fstream>
#include "sparseMatrix.h"
using namespace std;
class basic
{
private:
int x, y;
string word;
basic *down;
basic *right;
public:
basic(int x, int y, string word)
{
this->x = x;
this->y = y;
this->word = word;
down = nullptr;
right = nullptr;
}
int getX()
{
return x;
}
int getY()
{
return y;
}
basic *getRight()
{
return right;
}
void setRight(basic *newRight)
{
right = newRight;
}
basic *getDown()
{
return down;
}
void setDown(basic *newDown)
{
down = newDown;
}
void print()
{
cout << "X: " << x << ", Y: " << y << ", word: " << word << ".\n";
}
};
sparseMatrix<basic> readFileBROKEN(string pathToFile);
sparseMatrix<basic> *readFile(string pathToFile);
int main()
{
cout << "Working:\n\n";
sparseMatrix<basic> *workingMatrix = readFile("C:/users/jmhjr/desktop/testdata.txt");
cout << "After returning, here are all the locations that are NOT nullptr:\n";
workingMatrix->printyArray();
cin.get();
cout << "Not working:\n\n";
sparseMatrix<basic> brokenMatrix = readFileBROKEN("C:/users/jmhjr/desktop/testdata.txt");
cout << "After returning, here are all the locations that are NOT nullptr:\n";
brokenMatrix.printyArray();
cin.get();
delete workingMatrix;
}
sparseMatrix<basic> readFileBROKEN(string pathToFile)
{
ifstream inputFile;
inputFile.open(pathToFile);
if (inputFile.fail())
{
cout << "Couldn't open " << pathToFile << "!\n";
exit(-1);
}
sparseMatrix<basic> matrix(100, 100);
while (!inputFile.eof())
{
int x, y;
string word;
inputFile >> x >> y >> word;
basic data(x, y, word);
matrix.insert(data);
}
cout << "Before returning, here are all the locations that are NOT nullptr:\n";
matrix.printyArray();
cout << "press ENTER to return\n";
cin.get();
return matrix;
}
sparseMatrix<basic> *readFile(string pathToFile)
{
ifstream inputFile;
inputFile.open(pathToFile);
if (inputFile.fail())
{
cout << "Couldn't open " << pathToFile << "!\n";
exit(-1);
}
sparseMatrix<basic> *matrix = new sparseMatrix<basic>(100, 100);
while (!inputFile.eof())
{
int x, y;
string word;
inputFile >> x >> y >> word;
basic data(x, y, word);
matrix->insert(data);
}
cout << "Before returning, here are all the locations that are NOT nullptr:\n";
matrix->printyArray();
cout << "press ENTER to return\n";
cin.get();
return matrix;
}
and here is sparseMatrix.h:
template <class dataType>
class sparseMatrix
{
private:
//The dimensions of the sparse matrix.
int width;
int height;
//Dynamic array of pointers to heads of linked lists.
dataType** xArray;
dataType** yArray;
public:
//Constructor. Sets everything in the two arrays to nullptr.
sparseMatrix(int height, int width)
{
this->width = width;
this->height = height;
xArray = new dataType*[width];
yArray = new dataType*[height];
for (int row = 0; row < height; row++)
{
this->yArray[row] = nullptr;
}
for (int col = 0; col < width; col++)
{
this->xArray[col] = nullptr;
}
}
//Deconstructor. First goes through the matrix and looks for every city it can find, and deletes
//all of those. Then when it's done, it deletes the two dynamic arrays.
~sparseMatrix()
{
dataType *currentdataType;
dataType *next;
for (int row = 0; row < height; row++)
{
currentdataType = yArray[row];
while (currentdataType != nullptr)
{
next = currentdataType->getRight();
delete currentdataType;
currentdataType = next;
}
}
delete [] yArray;
delete [] xArray;
}
//Creates a copy of the data we are passed, then creates links to this copy.
void insert(dataType data)
{
//Make sure the data is valid.
if (data.getX() < 0 || data.getX() >= width || data.getY() < 0 || data.getY() >= height)
{
std::cout << "That dataType doesn't fit into the sparse matrix!\n";
data.print();
std::cin.get();
}
else
{
//Copy the data we were passed.
dataType *newData = new dataType(data);
//Easy case. If nothing is in this row, set yArray[row] to the address of this data.
if (yArray[data.getY()] == nullptr)
{
yArray[data.getY()] = newData;
}
//Not so easy case. Move forward (right) until we find the right location, then set links.
else
{
dataType *current = yArray[data.getY()];
while (current->getRight() != nullptr)
{
current = current->getRight();
}
current->setRight(newData);
}
//Easy case. If nothing is in this col, set xArray[col] to the address of this data.
if (xArray[data.getX()] == nullptr)
{
xArray[data.getX()] = newData;
}
//Not so easy case. Move forward (down) until we find the right location, then set links.
else
{
dataType *current = xArray[data.getX()];
while (current->getDown() != nullptr)
{
current = current->getDown();
}
current->setDown(newData);
}
}
}
void printyArray()
{
for (int r = 0; r < height; r++)
{
if (yArray[r] != nullptr)
{
std::cout << r << ' ';
//yArray[r]->print();
}
}
}
};
readFile reads everything in from a file that looks like this:
0 0 hello
5 2 world
6 8 foo
9 5 bar
...
As expected, before returning, the only locations that are NOT nullptr are the ones that I have inserted into. (0, 2, 8 and 5). However when the function returns, EVERY SINGLE location in the array is not nullptr. I added a second function which returns a pointer to dynamically allocated sparseMatrix object, rather then returning the object itself, and this fixed it. However, I don't understand why. It seems like these two functions should behave identically the same way.
Also, the part that is most confusing to me, why does this run perfectly fine in Xcode, but not in Visual Studio?
tomse's answer is correct and gives the why and a fix, but it's an unnecessarily expensive fix for this problem. His suggestion of the copy constructor also solves numerous future problems such as the classics Why did my vector eat my data? and Dude, where's my segfault? Make the copy constructor. Don't use it unless you have to.
I think Andras Fekete got the problem right, but his post is kind of garbled. His solution is bang on, though.
Define your function like this:
bool readFile(string pathToFile, sparseMatrix<basic> & matrix)
Remove the definition of matrix inside the function in favour of the one passed in.
Return false on error so you know the matrix is bad (or use exceptions).
Create the matrix in the calling function and pass it into the revised reader function.
sparseMatrix<basic> matrix(100, 100);
if readFile("C:/users/jmhjr/desktop/testdata.txt", matrix);
That puts you right back where you were with the pointer version, but without the pointer and without having to do the extra work of copying data you didn't need to copy.
Your function:
sparseMatrix<basic> readFileBROKEN(string pathToFile)
returns a copy of the object (which is OK), but sparseMatrix does not define a copy constructor, so the default generated will be used which creates a shallow copy by just copying the adresses inside the returned object.
But the memory where the address points to is deleted when you leave your function (because the destructor of the locally created object is called).
To solve this you have to define your own copy contructor in sparseMatrix which copies all the content of the object.
sparseMatrix(const sparseMatrix& rhs) :
width(rhs.width),
height(rhs.height),
xArray(nullptr),
yArray(nullptr)
{
... and now copy all the content from rhs.xArray to this->xArray,
(same for yArray)
}
The problem is that you're allocating 'matrix' inside both of the readFile functions. Upon returning from the function, both variables are deallocated. However, returning the value (eradFile) the matrix is copied into your variable of the calling function, whereas returning the pointer (readFileBROKEN) is just returning the address where the matrix used to be stored.
To fix this, you should allocate the 'matrix' variable, and pass in a reference to the function. Then the function can return a void while stuffing the matrix properly.
I've been writing a program to simulate a paging system for an assignment. The program almost works but for some reason I'm getting a segfault when I try to delete my dynamically allocated array of frames.
Here's the algorithm code:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
// Initialize page count
PageCount = 0;
// Validate input
ValidateArgs(argc, argv);
// Load programs and trace from list file
Programs = LoadPrograms();
Trace = LoadTrace();
// Load main memory
MainMemory Memory = MainMemory(Programs);
// Run the Algorithm
Run(Memory);
// Print results
Print();
// Print the output to a file
PrintOutput();
return 0;
}
void Run(MainMemory memory)
{
int page, frame;
vector<int> replaceFrame;
for (long i = 0; i < Trace.size(); i++)
{
// Get page and frame
page = Programs[Trace[i].ProgramNum].GetPage(Trace[i].Word);
frame = memory.IsInMemory(page);
if (frame != -1)
{
// Access page
memory.Frames[frame].Access(i);
}
else
{
// Find page to replace
if (Algorithm == "clock")
{
replaceFrame = memory.FindClock();
}
else if (Algorithm == "lru")
{
replaceFrame = memory.FindLRU(i);
}
else
{
replaceFrame = memory.FindOldest(i);
}
// Replace page
memory.Frames[replaceFrame[0]].Replace(page, i);
// Replace with next contiguous page for prepaging
if (HowToPage)
{
memory.Frames[replaceFrame[1]].Replace(
Programs[Trace[i].ProgramNum].GetNextPage(
Trace[i].Word), i);
}
}
}
return;
}
Program and Request are both data types loaded from files. Request is just a data struct and Program has a vector of ints as one of its members.
At the end of this function, my MainMemory object (the one that contains the dynamically allocated array) calls its destructor which is in my MainMemory struct:
struct MainMemory
{
Frame* Frames;
int Number;
// Initializes an object of the MainMemory class
MainMemory(vector<Program> thePrograms)
{
Number = MemorySize / PageSize;
Frames = new Frame[Number];
int numberProgs = thePrograms.size(), counter = 0;
// Load main memory
for (int i = 0; i < numberProgs; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < thePrograms[i].Pages.size(); j++)
{
int page = thePrograms[i].Pages[j];
Frames[counter] = Frame(page, 0);
if (counter + 1 < Number)
{
counter++;
}
else
{
return;
}
}
}
}
// Initializes an object of the MainMemory class with another object
// of the MainMemory class
MainMemory(const MainMemory& cpy)
{
*this = cpy;
}
// Sets one MainMemory equal to another
MainMemory& operator=(const MainMemory& rhs)
{
Number = rhs.Number;
Frames = new Frame[Number];
for (int i = 0; i < Number; i++)
{
Frames[i] = Frame(rhs.Frames[i].Number,
rhs.Frames[i].TimeStamp, rhs.Frames[i].UseCount,
rhs.Frames[i].UseBit);
}
return *this;
}
// Deletes the MainMemory object
~MainMemory()
{
delete[] Frames;
Frames = NULL;
}
};
After some testing, I know that the Frames object has a memory address coming in to the destructor. Further, the code fails at the line indicated. The Frame struct doesn't have any dynamic elements so I didn't bother creating a destructor for it and instead let C++ do that for me.
struct Frame
{
int Number;
int TimeStamp;
int UseCount;
bool UseBit;
// Initializes an empty object of the Frame class
Frame() { }
// Initializes an object of the Frame class
Frame(int number, int time)
{
Number = number;
TimeStamp = time;
UseCount = time;
UseBit = false;
}
// Initializes an object of the Frame class
Frame(int number, int time, int count, bool use)
{
Number = number;
TimeStamp = time;
UseCount = count;
UseBit = use;
}
// Simulates a replacement of one frame with a page from secondary
void Replace(int page, int time)
{
Number = page;
TimeStamp = time;
UseCount = time;
UseBit = true;
PageFaults++;
return;
}
// Simulates a memory access to the frame
void Access(int time)
{
UseCount = time;
UseBit = true;
return;
}
};
But clearly, something's not working so I'm wondering where I screwed up.
Thanks for your help!
EDIT: I rechecked my constructor to see if it was shallow-copying anything. All elements in the copied element were in different locations from the original.
EDIT: I've been asked to add a SSCCE to this post:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
PageCount = 0;
Programs = LoadPrograms();
Trace = LoadTrace();
MainMemory Memory(Programs);
cout << endl << "Running algorithm" << endl;
cout << endl << "Memory is at location " << &Memory << endl;
Test(Memory);
return 0;
}
void Test(MainMemory memory)
{
cout << endl << "Memory at location " << &memory << endl;
return;
}
This is the output I get:
Running algorithm
Memory is at location 0x7fff910a4eb0
Memory at location 0x7fff910a4ec0
In destructor
Frames in 0x7fff910a4ec0
Frames deleted
Destruction finished
It's copying correctly at least. Further, after changing the copy constructor, to explicitly copy the object (thanks Joachim Pileborg), it almost finishes executing Run(). However, there's still a problem with deallocating the memory. So, I think the issue is with the Run() function itself.
I would do this as a comment but the length of my reply precludes this. I can spot a number of oddities in the program that may or may not be related to the crash you are getting.
This is bad:
MainMemory(const MainMemory& cpy)
{
*this = cpy;
}
You would be creating multiple references to pointers, alloying multiple deletions of the same memory block.
Here, you do not delete Frames before assigning a new value to it.
MainMemory& operator=(const MainMemory& rhs)
{
Number = rhs.Number;
Frames = new Frame[Number];
for (int i = 0; i < Number; i++)
{
Frames[i] = Frame(rhs.Frames[i].Number,
rhs.Frames[i].TimeStamp, rhs.Frames[i].UseCount,
rhs.Frames[i].UseBit);
}
return *this;
}
I expect that this is causing the double deletions:
MainMemory Memory = MainMemory(Programs);
is then causing your problem (combined with the first issue above). Should be:
MainMemory Memory (Programs) ;
I would also question the constructor use for the Frames class.
Hi there I need to Build something like a dictionary and each word according to my code can have 100 meanings, but maybe it has only 5 meanings then I will be allocating 95 extra space for nothing or maybe it has more than 100 meanings then the program will crash, I know the vector class is very easy and could be good use of, but the task is almost building my own vector class, to learn how it works. Thus **meanings and some other stuff remain the same and here is my code, Also I know I am causing memory leakage, how can I delete properly? :
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <cstring>
using namespace std;
class Expression {
char *word_with_several_meanings; // like "bank", "class"
char **meanings; // a pointer to a pointer stores all meanings
int meanings_ctr; // meanings counter
//-----------FUNCTIONS------------------------------------------------
public:
void word( char* = NULL );
void add_meaning(char* = NULL);
char* get_word();
int get_total_number_of_meanings();
char* get_meaning(int meanx = 0);
Expression(int mctr = 0); // CTOR
~Expression(); // DTOR
};
Expression::Expression(int mctr ) {
meanings_ctr = mctr; // Setting the counter to 0
meanings = new char * [100]; // Allocate Space for 100 meanings
}
Expression::~Expression() {
delete [] meanings; // Deleting the memory we allocated
delete [] word_with_several_meanings; // Deleting the memory we allocated
}
void Expression::word( char *p2c )
{
word_with_several_meanings = new char[strlen(p2c)+1];
// copy the string, DEEP copy
strcpy(word_with_several_meanings, p2c);
}
void Expression::add_meaning(char *p2c)
{
//meanings = new char * [meanings_ctr+1];
meanings[meanings_ctr] = new char[strlen(p2c)+1];
strcpy(meanings[meanings_ctr++],p2c);
}
char * Expression::get_meaning( int meanx )
{
return *(meanings+meanx);
}
char * Expression::get_word()
{
return word_with_several_meanings;
}
int Expression::get_total_number_of_meanings()
{
return meanings_ctr;
}
int main(void) {
int i;
Expression expr;
expr.word("bank ");
expr.add_meaning("a place to get money from");
expr.add_meaning("b place to sit");
expr.add_meaning("4 letter word");
expr.add_meaning("Test meaning");
cout << expr.get_word() << endl;
for(int i = 0; i<expr.get_total_number_of_meanings(); i++)
cout << " " << expr.get_meaning(i) << endl;
Expression expr2;
expr2.word("class");
expr2.add_meaning("a school class");
expr2.add_meaning("a classification for a hotel");
expr2.add_meaning("Starts with C");
cout << expr2.get_word() << endl;
for( i = 0; i<expr2.get_total_number_of_meanings(); i++)
cout << " " << expr2.get_meaning(i) << endl;
Expression expr3;
expr3.word("A long test ... ");
char str[] = "Meaning_ ";
for (int kx=0;kx<26;kx++)
{
str[8] = (char) ('A'+kx);
expr3.add_meaning(str);
}
cout << expr3.get_word() << endl;
for(i = 0; i < expr3.get_total_number_of_meanings(); i++)
cout << " " << expr3.get_meaning(i) << endl;
return 0;
}
When you are allocating a multi dimensional array with new then you are allocating it with a loop, e.g.
char **x = new char*[size]
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
x[i] = new int[size];
}
So you also have to delete it in this fashion:
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
delete[] x[i];
}
delete[] x;
Thus when you're having arbitrary sizes of your array you'll have to store them somewhere for using them within the destructor.
delete [] meanings; // Deleting the memory we allocated
won't get rid of your memory allocated, only the pointers themselves.
To free up the actual memory, you will need to iterate through your meanings array, and delete [] each element in it.
Something like:
for (int i = 0; i < meanings_ctr; ++i)
{
delete [] meanings[meanings_ctr];
meanings[meanings_ctr] = NULL;
}
delete [] meanings;
--
For the problem of what to do if you get more than 100 meanings (or in general when your collection is full), the standard technique is to allocate a new array that is double the size (which you can do since it is dynamic), copy your existing collection into that one, and then dispose of your existing one.
I'd use a simple linked list (this is simplified, not complete and untested; also there should be proper getters/setters and stuff):
class Meaning {
char text[20];
Meaning *next;
Meaning(const char *text) : next(0) {
strcpy(this->text, text);
}
}
class Word {
char text[20];
Meaning *first;
Meaning *last;
Word(const char *text) : first(0), last(0) {
strcpy(this->text, text);
}
~Word() {
Meaning *m = first, *n;
while(m) {
n = m->next;
delete m;
m = n;
}
}
void AddMeaning(const char *text) {
if (last) {
last = last->next = new Meaning(text);
}
else {
first = last = new Meaning(text);
}
}
void print() {
printf("%s:\n\t", text);
Meaning *m = first;
while (m) {
printf("%s, ", m->text);
m = m->next;
}
}
}