I am trying to make a code pipeline which will build my branch when I make a pull request to the master branch in AWS. I have many developers working in my organisation and all the developers work on their own branch. I am not very familiar with ccreating lambda function. Hoping for a solution
You can dynamically create pipelines everytime a new pull-request has been created. Look for the CodeCommit Triggers (in the old CodePipeline UI), you need lambda for this.
Basically it works like this: Copy existing pipeline and update the the source branch.
It is not the best, but afaik the only way to do what you want.
I was there and would not recommend it for the following reasons:
I hit this limit of 20 in my region: "Maximum number of pipelines with change detection set to periodically checking for source changes" - but, you definitely want this feature ( https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codepipeline/latest/userguide/limits.html )
The branch-deleted trigger does not work correctly, so you can not delete the created pipeline, when the branch has been merged into master.
I would recommend you to use Github.com if you need a workflow as you described. Sorry for this.
I have recently implemented an approach that uses CodeBuild GitHub webhook support to run initial unit tests and build, and then publish the source repository and built artefacts as a zipped archive to S3.
You can then use the S3 archive as a source in CodePipeline, where you can then transition your PR artefacts and code through Integration testing, Staging deployments etc...
This is quite a powerful pattern, although one trap here is that if you have a lot of pull requests being created at a single time, you can get CodePipeline executions being superseded given only one execution can proceed through a given stage at a time (this is actually a really important property, especially if your integration tests run against shared resources and you don't want multiple instances of your application running data setup/teardown tasks at the same time). To overcome this, I publish an S3 notification to an SQS FIFO queue when CodeBuild publishes the S3 artifact, and then poll the queue, copying each artifact to a different S3 location that triggers CodePipeline, but only if there are are currently no executions waiting to execute after the first CodePipeline source stage.
We can very well have dynamic branching support with the following approach.
One of the limitations in AWS code-pipeline is that we have to specify branch names while creating the pipeline. We can however overcome this issue using the architecture shown below.
flow diagram
Create a Lambda function which takes the GitHub web-hook data as input, using boto3 integrate it with AWS pipeline(pull the pipeline and update), have an API gateway to make the call to the Lambda function as a rest call and at last create a web-hook to the GitHub repository.
External links:
https://aws.amazon.com/quickstart/architecture/git-to-s3-using-webhooks/
https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/reference/services/codepipeline.html
Related thread: Dynamically change branches on AWS CodePipeline
Related
I have a number of services in a single GitHub repository, each service has its own CodePipeline on AWS managed through Terraform. Instead of triggering all of the pipelines on commit, I'd like to know how I can trigger each service's pipeline if its directory had any changes on commit, without having to split the services each into its own repository.
I don't think that there's a conditional source stage support per folder at code pipeline as we speak. Just finished checking this documentation about sources in CodePipeline. It does not seem to contain a folder-level filtering.
You could try this CDK-based template solution which showcases a mono-repository, which is composed of multiple services, have different CI/CD pipelines for each service. The solution detects which top level directory the modification happened and triggers the AWS CodePipeline configured to that directory.
This is sad but they might add it in the future. I've also wanted Quality gates, images from readme files in code-commit but these features seem too hard to implement haha.
It ended up being simpler than I had anticipated, there are github actions that do exactly what I needed.
This action checks whether a path had a change, and this action triggers a specific pipeline.
Background
I want to create the following CI/CD flow in AWS and Github, for a react app using Amplify:
A single main branch, with short-lived feature branches and PRs into main.
Each PR triggers its own test environment in Amplify, with its own temporary subdomain, which gets torn down when the PR is merged, as described here.
Merging into main does not automatically trigger a deploy to production.
Instead, there is a separate mechanism (a web page, or amplify command, or even triggers based on git tags) for manually selecting a commit from main to deploy to production.
Questions
It's not clear to me if...
Support for this flow is already built into Amplify (based on the docs I've read, I think the answer is "no", but I'm not sure).
Support for this flow is already built into AWS CodePipeline, or if it can be configured there.
There is another AWS tool that solves this.
I'm looking for answers to those questions, or specific references in the docs which address them.
The answers for Amplify are Yes, Yes, Yes, Partially.
(1) A single main branch, with short-lived feature branches and PRs into main.
Yes. Feature branch deploys. Can define which branch patterns, such as feature*/, you wish to auto-deploy.
(2) Each PR triggers its own test environment in Amplify, with its own temporary subdomain,
Yes. Web Previews for PRs. "A web preview deploys every pull request made to your GitHub repository to a unique preview URL which is completely different from the URL your main site uses."
(3) Merging into main does not automatically trigger a deploy to production.
Yes. Disable automatic builds on main.
(4) Instead, there is a separate mechanism ... for manually selecting a commit from main to deploy to production.
Partially (HEAD only?). Call the StartJob API to manually trigger a build from, say, Lambda. The job type RELEASE starts a new job with the latest change from the specified branch. I am not sure if jobType: MANUAL with a commitId starts a job from an arbitrary commit hash.
Another workaround for 3+4 is to skip the build for an arbitrary commit. Amplify will skip building if [skip-cd] appears at the end of a commit message.
In my experience, I don't think there is any easy way to meet your requirement.
If you are using Gitlab, you can try Gitlab Review Apps to achieve that (I tried before with some scripts)
Support for this flow is already built into Amplify (based on the docs I've read, I think the answer is "no", but I'm not sure).
Check below links, if this help:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV2WS535nyI
https://dev.to/rajandmr/deploying-react-app-using-aws-amplify-with-ci-cd-pipeline-setup-3lid
Support for this flow is already built into AWS CodePipeline, or if it can be configured there.
For this, you need to create a full your own pipeline. Yes, you can configure your pipeline.
There is another AWS tool that solves this.
If you are okay with Jenkins, then Jenkins will help you to achieve this.
You can deploy Jenkins docker in AWS EC2 and create your pipeline. You can also use the parameterised option for selecting your environment and git branch.
so we have a pipeline that zips code functions for our Lambda, uploads it to S3 and builds
the every lambda we have again with new version of zipped codes.
Now, the problem is, every single Lambda is being Built every pipeline run. even if there are no changes to other lambda code function. ex. (only 1 of 10 lambda has code change)
What would be the best approach or checking that we need to add in our pipeline in order to build the only Lambda that has code change? open for any suggestions even creating new pipeline and breaking this lambdas into pieces
I think the best way is to add a stage before the zipfile to see with files changes in the code in the last merge.
Simply take those names and check which lambda was affected.
Then it will pass the list of lambdas need to redeploy.
What we do at our company is have a single pipeline per lambda / repo. We have a few mono repos that when they deploy they deploy all the lambdas in that repo at once but still through a single pipeline. If you concerned about cost in the pipeline sticking around you could always delete them and then have another job to recreate them when you need to feploy a new change.
We've got everything done through cloud formation scripts so it's all simple scripts running here and there to create pipelines.
Curious what is the reason to have one pipeline deploy all 10 lambdas?
I am not able to find a way to stop the auto triggering of the pipeline whenever I push code to bitbucket.
My assumption is that you want more control over when your pipeline does certain things.
Rather than achieving this through stopping the pipeline from getting triggered, I'd recommend using either stage transitions or manual approvals to achieve this control inside the pipeline.
Stage transitions are better when you want to "turn off" a pipeline and have the latest thing run through when you turn it back on.
Manual approvals are better when you want the version to be locked while waiting for approval so you can run tests without worrying that the version will change.
You mentioned in your comment that you wanted to only run your pipeline at certain times, so a way you could do that is to enable and disable the stage transition after source on a schedule.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codepipeline/latest/userguide/transitions.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codepipeline/latest/userguide/approvals.html
You can disable DetectChanges parameter on your Source action as explained here. Extract with the relevant context:
DetectChanges: Controls automatically starting your pipeline when a new commit is made on the configured repository and branch. If unspecified, the default value is true, and the field does not display by default.
This works on Bitbucket, GitHub, and GitHub Enterprise Server actions. I have a CloudFormation template configured with this option and works. Not sure about the same option on AWS console, because I saw that some configurations are only available from CloudFormation or aws cli. As you can read "this field does not display by default".
My team has been running into issues with our CodePipeline where features were pushed out into production when they shouldn't have been due to our Docker image patching. A little background on our architecture: Our pipeline has two sources, one for the source code and one for the Docker image builder. Docker builds via CodeBuild and is deployed to dev, test, and then prod environments with manual approval steps in between.
Our Docker image receives monthly patching which triggers the pipeline to execute and is what caused the features to be pushed out. We redesigned our git branching strategy so that our master branch will only contain stable releases, but I could still see this issue potentially occurring again if a specific release date is specified. Is there a way to push out the image patching without pushing out the latest commit?
Can CodePipeline Use a Specific Commit
This is an often requested feature but unfortunately CodePipeline will always bring the latest commit from the selected branch in the Source action.
CodePipeline tied to a single git branch is more of a feature of CodePipeline as the design is more inclined towards Trunk based development [0]. Also, as per the designers of this service, CodePipeline is designed for post-merge/release validation. That is, once your change is ready to be released to production and is merged into your master/main branch, CodePipeline takes over and automatically tests and releases the final merged set of changes. CodePipeline has a lot of features like stage locking, superseding versions, etc. which don't work well for the case where you want to test a change in isolation before it's merged (e.g. feature branch testing or pull request testing.) Therefore there currently isn't a recommended way to do this in CodePipeline.
[0] https://trunkbaseddevelopment.com/
Having said that, there is a way to hack this with S3 Source action in pipeline instead of GitHub/CodeCommit source action. Essentially your pipeline's S3 source action is tied to S3 bucket/key. You can then upload a zip of any specific commit to this S3 bucket/key and trigger the pipeline.