I have setup a DPDK 17 version testpmd setup. I have two high end servers which have two NIC mapped using a physical direct connection. The issue is that when i try and send traffic from one server to another using testpmd, it either does not send traffic or sends very small number of packets. I have checked multiple documentations and nothing seems to work. My configuration also seems correct.
What am i doing wrong? Please help.
For anyone who faces similar issues, it is important that both servers have testpmd running and correct NICs bound to DPDK.
Related
what may cause rx_crc_erros in DPDK ports?
is it a software thing ? or a hardware thing related to the port or the traffic coming from the other end ?
DPDK Version: 19.02
PMD: I40E
This Port is running on customer Network, worth mentioning that this is the only port (out of 4) having this behaviour, so this may be a router/traffic thing but I couldnt verify that
used dpdk-proc-info to get this data
could not do any additional activity as this is running on customer site
DPDK I40E PMD has only option to enable or disable CRC on the port. Hence the assumption of DPDK I40E PMD is causing CRC error on 1 port out of 4 can be ruled out fully.
The `RX packets are validated by ASIC per port for CRC and then DMA to mbuf for packet buffer. The PMD copies the descirptor states to mbuf struct (one among them is CRC). The packet descriptor indicates the CRC result of the packet buffer to the driver (Kernel/DPDK-PMD). So the CRC error on a given port can arise due to the following reasons as
the port connected to ASIC is faulty (very rare case)
the SFP+ is not properly connected (possible).
the SFP+ is not the recommended one (possible).
the traffic coming from the other end is sending CRC packets as faulty.
One needs to isolate the issue by
binding the port to Linux Driver i40e and checking the statistics via ethtool -S [port].
Check SFP+ for compatibility on the faulty port by swapping with a working one.
re-seat the SFP+ again.
swap the data cables between working and faulty port. Then check if the error is present or not.
If all the above 4 cases the error only comes on the fault port, then indeed the NIC card has only 3 working ports among 4. The NIC card needs replacements or one should ignore the faulty port altogether. Hence this is not a DPDK PMD or library issue.
I am trying to run the l2fwd DPDK application and I get the below output. I am not exactly sure what is happening here. For me all the values are 0, is it because I am not injecting any packets ? I see 16 ports and I dunno how these many ports come. I have only used 2 Ethernet ports.
L2 forwarding image
l2fwd app works like a basic repeater, i.e. forwards all the frames from one port to another. So in order to get values other than zero, it is required to run an external packet generator.
Have a look at the l2fwd user guide for more details and some images with the required setup:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/l2_forward_real_virtual.html
I need to write a win32 c/c++ application which will be able to determine whether the PC it's running on is connected to one of 2 networks. The first network is the company LAN (which has no internet connection) and the second network is a standalone switch with a single PC connected to it (the PC that the program is running on).
I'm pretty new to network programming but so far I have tried testing to see if a network drive which is held on our LAN can be mapped. This works fine if the PC is connected to the LAN, the drive mapping succeeds so so LAN detection is successful. However, if the PC is connected to the switch, this results in a VERY long timeout which is not a suitable as it will delay the program so much as to make it unusable.
Does anyone have any alternative suggestions?
I'm using c/c++ in VS 6.0
[Update]
Whilst trying a few different ideas and looking at some of the suggestions below I thought I should update with some additional information as many (if not all) of the suggestions I don't think will work.
(1) The aforementioned LAN has no external connections at all, it is completely isolated so no resolving of external DNS or pinging websites is possible.
(2) Hostname, MAC address, IP, Default Gateway, Subnet etc etc (basically everything you see in ipconfig -all) are all manually configured (not dynamic from the router) so checking any of these settings will return the same whether connected to the LAN or the switch.
(3) Due to point (2), any attempts to communicate with the switch seem to be unsuccessful, in fact almost all networking commands (ping, arp etc) seem to fail - I think due to the machine trying to connect to the LAN when it isn't there :-(
One thing I have found which works is pinging the default gateway IP which times out when connected to the switch. This is sort of ok as I can reduce the timeout of ping so it doesn't just hang for ages but it feels like a bit of a hack and I would certainly appreciate any better solutions.
Thanks
As far as TCP/IP is concerned there is no such thing as a LAN on WAN. There are a set of non-internet routable addresses like 192.168.x.x and 10.x.x.x but these are sometimes used by ISP short of IP addresses.
You best bet is to use Asynchronous APIs when making TCP/IP connections. WIN32 defines a whole buch of OVERLAPPED APIs for this purpose. This will prevent your application from grinding to a halt while waiting for a remote connection.
Alternatively put the socket stuff into another thread and then only notify the UI when the operation is done.
I would first try to differentiate between the two using information available locally--that is, from your computer. Does the output of ipconfig /all differ depending on which network you're connected to? If so, exploit that difference if you can.
Is it possible to get the MAC address of the standalone switch? Of the switch that controls the company LAN? That would be a sure way to tell. Unless somebody cloned the MAC address.
If you try using the existence or non-existence of some network service to determine which network you're connected to, you can never be sure. For example, if you failed to map that network drive, all you know is that the network drive isn't available. You can't say for certain that you're not connected to the company LAN. Same is true if you use ping. Lack of response from a particular machine means only that the machine didn't respond.
Various things you can look at for differentiation:
DNS domain name (GetComputerNameEx)
MAC address of gateway (ping it, then GetIpNetTable)
Routing table(do you have a gateway and default route on the company LAN)
WNet discovered network resources (WNetOpenEnum, WNetEnumResource)
Ability to resolve external hostnames (try a 5-10 names like www.google.com, www.microsoft.com and so on, if one resolves you should have internet)
You'll have to decide how many indicators are "enough" to decide you're on one or the other LAN though if tests fail. Then keep retrying until you have a definite result.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366071%28v=VS.85%29.aspx has a lot of network related functions that you can experiment with to create further indicators.
Windows knows when you have removed the network cable from your NIC. Is there a programmatic way to determine this via API in C++?
Note: I am not using .NET and this is for a closed LAN (not connected to Internet ever)
Raymond Chen blogged about something similar recently. Here is the relevant documentation. I think the MIB_IPADDR_DISCONNECTED flag is what you are looking for.
Use the Network List Manager api with the INetwork api.
You can register your app to receive callbacks when networks become connected/not connected.
Or you can get the list of networks and then check each of them to see if the machine is network connected or not
Remember that a windows machine will often have multiple networks set up (Ethernet, wifi, etc)
Remember that just because a network is connected, you may not have access to the internet. Eg you could have DNS or routing problems. Or you could be on a working network that is not connected to the internet.
Due to the above, many diagnostic tools also connect to a "known-good" internet server if they want to really know if they're connected or not. Something like google.com -- they spend a lot of money to make sure that their site is up all the time.
Finally, you can also have a semi-connected situation where packets are getting through but not enough to really enable communications to flow. To test this, don't just ping an internet site since that'd only be a pair of packets. Instead, open a TCP connection or something more than a ping.
Is there an existing Linux/POSIX C/C++ library or example code for how to rebind a socket from one physical interface to another?
For example, I have ping transmitting on a socket that is associated with a physical connection A and I want to rebind that socket to physical connection B and have the ping packets continue being sent and received on connection B (after a short delay during switch-over).
I only need this for session-less protocols.
Thank you
Update:
I am trying to provide failover solution for use with PPP and Ethernet devices.
I have a basic script which can accomplish 90% of the functionality through use of iptables, NAT and routing table.
The problem is when the failover occurs, the pings continue being sent on the secondary connection, however, their source IP is from the old connection.
I've spoken with a couple of people who work on commercial routers and their suggestion is to rebind the socket to the secondary interface.
Update 2:
I apologise for not specifying this earlier. This solution will run on a router. I cannot change the ping program because it will run on the clients computer. I used ping as just an example, any connection that is not session-based should be capable of being switched over. I tested this feature on several commercial routers and it does work. Unfortunately, their software is proprietary, however, from various conversations and testing, I found that they are re-binding the sockets on failover.
As of your updated post, the problem is that changing the routing info is not going to change the source address of your ping, it will just force it out the second interface. This answer contains some relevant info.
You'll need to change the ping program. You can use a socket-per-interface approach and somehow inform the program when to fail over. Or you will have to close the socket and then bind to the second interface.
You can get the interface info required a couple of ways including calling ioctl() with the SIOCGIFCONF option and looping through the returned structures to get the interface address info.
I do't think that's quite a well-defined operation. the physical interfaces have different MAC addresses, so unless you have a routing layer mapping them (NAT or the like) then they're going to have different IP addresses.
Ports are identified by a triple of <IP addr, Port number, protocol> so if your IP address changes the port is going to change.
What are you really trying to do here?
I'm not at all sure what you're trying to accomplish, but I have a guess... Are you trying to do some kind of failover? If so, then there are indeed ways to accomplish that, but why not do it in the OS instead of the application?
On one end you can use CARP, and on the other you can use interface trunking/bonding (terminology varies) in failover mode.