Google Firebase Vs Amazon AWS for complex queries [closed] - amazon-web-services

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm currently working on a react-native project similar to Instagram using Firebase Real-time database and Storage. I was considering switching to Amazon AWS as with firebase complex queries are not supported. Does Amazon AWS provide something more or should I just stick with Firebase?

Amazon AWS is much more complex I would say, it also requires more experience. If you don't have huge data on background and Firebase has all features which you are planning to use, stay on Firebase.

Related

Amazon S3 for images/videos or server [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I notice that a lot of people prefer upload the images and videos in storage services like AWS S3. Those images are such a slider, logo, product's images, random images, etc.
What is the big difference to upload those images in the server or in a services like S3?
Prices? Bandwidth? Access? It is more fast? Scalability?
Thanks
Please read it,
https://www.linkeit.com/blog/what-is-amazon-s3-and-its-benefits
in case if you will use your server for static files you will need maintain
Scalability
Security
Backups ( You need do it reliable and durable )
And many other

AWS QuickSight, can I publish some report into my own web application? [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
My team and I are making a web application that needs to have reporting part in it. Can we display QuickSight dashboards in our application and how?
Thank you in advance! :)
Since November 2018, embedding dashboards is supported.
This functionality is now supported. Check the blog article on Embed interactive dashboards in your application with Amazon QuickSight.

Azure or AWS for sitecore [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am currently evaluating where to set up a new Sitecore infrastructure for a client. The client no longer want an on-premise set up. I am looking into both Azure and AWS and was wondering if there is an advantage to using one over the other. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
Sitecore 9 is built with cloud first mindset and it is based (built around) Azure technologies. So, the simple and short Answer is go with Azure, it has many advantages.

why openstack is getting so popular? [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
can anyone tell me why openstack is getting so popular because there are many open source private computing platforms like opennebula,cloudStack,Eucalyptus...so what is the advantage of using Openstack? and why not others?
OpenStack has lots of contributors and is supported by lots of large IT vendors. It is trying to beat AWS and VMware. It is developing its own set of APIs.
The other open source private cloud platforms have their own strengths. Eucalyptus is the only one with AWS compatibility. You can move workloads back and forth. You can use the same scripting. You can use the same tools. For instance, ChaosMonkey that Netflix developed for their internal use on AWS runs on Eucalyptus as well.

What advantages are there having a web site per web service versus per application in IIS? [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
What advantages are there having a web site per web service versus an application per webservice in IIS7?
As far as I can see there is no advantage apart from being able to stop/start a single service when it is a website. It doesn't look like this is achievable with applications.
Web sites can have different bindings and host headers. With applications -- you can still stop/start single services via their Application Pools. You can also take advantage of configuration inheritance if you use applications.