I have a method with input param as Array. When I generate stub out of it creates List type.
But I want to know how to create a wrapper class around array type e.g. for class Apple it should create ArrayOfApple.
Is there any change needs to be done in class or any specific plugin need to be used?
Note: I am using JAXWS with Apache CXF implementation
Below is the sample code:
EmployeeService.java:
#WebService(endpointInterface="com.test.EmployeeService")
#SOAPBinding(style=Style.DOCUMENT)
public class EmployeeService {
public String updateEmpRoles(#WebParam(name="EmpRoles")EmpRole[] empRoles) {
return "SUCCESS";
}
}
EmpRole.java :
#XmlType(name="EmpRole")
public class EmpRole {
private String empRole;
public String getEmpRole() {
return empRole;
}
public void setEmpRole(String empRole) {
this.empRole = empRole;
}
}
After publishing, wsdl is getting generated as below -
But what I expect is WSDL should create ArrayOfEmpRole and it should wrap List<EmpRole>.
Kindly help
In short - I want something that Björn doesn't want in below link. (In his case, it's automatically creating ArrayOfXXX, this is what I need) - Arrays in SOAP method Parameters generated via JAX-WS?
I would switch from Code first to a Contract first approach which means start with the WSDL and generate a stub using wsdl2java from it. This way you can ensure that the WSDL looks like the way you want.
If you want to stick to the current approach, the easiest way to achieve a wrapper is probably to introduce another class.
Related
Currently I'm using json to pass messages between 2 different languages (C++ and Dart) but I quickly realized json isn't perfect for this. I'm looking into protobuf.
I just finished reading https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3 but I couldn't find anything that matches my use case: inheritance.
For example, I want to serialize an instance of Profile:
class Profile{
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<VPN>> vpns;
}
class VPN {
//...
}
class OpenVPN: public VPN {
//...
}
class WireguardVPN: public VPN {
//...
}
class CiscoVPN: public VPN {
//...
}
But profile.vpns can hold all types of VPNs: OpenVPN, WireguardVPN, CiscoVPN. How can I translate this behavior to protobuf?
This is how I was doing in json:
class VPN {
enum Type {
OPENVPN,WIREGUARDVPN, CISCOVPN
};
Type type;
}
then when parsing the json, I first looked into the type field, and according to it, I called the json parser for each child.
However protobuf generates the parsers automatically on the 2 languages (which is great). So I'd like to know how this can be made automatically
I'm new to unreal engine and c++. I have a class in which I define a delegate with one parameter and a return type:
DECLARE_DELEGATE_RetVal_OneParam(bool, FInteractionValidatorDelegate, APlayerController*)
I've added a property containing this delegate:
FInteractionValidatorDelegate Validator;
And in another class I bind the delegate:
SomeComponent->Validator.BindUObject(this, &AInteractable::IsValid)
This all works fine but I don't want to expose the delegate publicly thus I want to encapsulate it by adding a BindValidator() method to my component. What is the best method of doing this ?
you could write a function like this :
void yourComponent::BindValidator(UObject * obj, void(*func)(bool))
{
Validator.BindUObject(obj, func);
}
but I recommend against doing this, first because passing functions' pointers will make errors coming from this hard to find (delegates are already enough obfuscation, with lots of macros and generated functions), also you will not be able to expose this to blueprints.
In UE4's way of doing things you could just pass a delegate as a FName
like so :
void yourComponent::BindValidator(UObject * obj, FName functionName)
{
Validator.BindUFunction(obj, functionName);
}
Here it's the UE4 doing the functions' declaration matching.
Hope this helps!
It is possible to automatically generate Sitecore templates just coding models? I'm using Sitecore 8.0 and I saw Glass Mapper Code First approach but I cant find more information about that.
Not sure why there isn't much info about it, but you can definitely model/code first!. I do it alot using the attribute configuration approach like so:
[SitecoreType(true, "{generated guid}")]
public class ExampleModel
{
[SitecoreField("{generated guid}", SitecoreFieldType.SingleLineText)]
public virtual string Title { get; set; }
}
Now how this works. The SitecoreType 'true' value for the first parameter indicates it may be used for codefirst. There is a GlassCodeFirstDataprovider which has an Initialize method, executed in Sitecore's Initialize pipeline. This method will collect all configurations marked for codefirst and create it in the sql dataprovider. The sections and fields are stored in memory. It also takes inheritance into account (base templates).
I think you first need to uncomment some code in the GlassMapperScCustom class you get when you install the project via Nuget. The PostLoad method contains the few lines that execute the Initialize method of each CodeFirstDataprovider.
var dbs = global::Sitecore.Configuration.Factory.GetDatabases();
foreach (var db in dbs)
{
var provider = db.GetDataProviders().FirstOrDefault(x => x is GlassDataProvider) as GlassDataProvider;
if (provider != null)
{
using (new SecurityDisabler())
{
provider.Initialise(db);
}
}
}
Furthermore I would advise to use code first on development only. You can create packages or serialize the templates as usual and deploy them to other environment so you dont need the dataprovider (and potential risks) there.
You can. But it's not going to be Glass related.
Code first is exactly what Sitecore.PathFinder is looking to achieve. There's not a lot of info publicly available on this yet however.
Get started here: https://github.com/JakobChristensen/Sitecore.Pathfinder
I'm new to the site (and to c++) so please forgive me if this is a basic question - I've googled and looked through this site without success so far, so any help anyone can provide would be hugely appreciated.
I'd like to add some functionality to an app, that allows a user to fully define the structure and contents of an object. For example, user would be presented with a configuration screen that allows them to list each property of the object - given my limited knowledge I've assumed this might be achieved by using a class:
Class Name: CustomClassName
Class Property 1: property1Name property1DataType property1DefaultValue
...
Class Property n: propertynName propertynDataType propertynDefaultValue
The user would then be able to hit a button to save their custom configuration, and the program could then reference that configuration as a Class:
class CustomClassName
{
property1DataType property1Name = property1DefaultValue;
...
propertynDataType propertynName = propertynDefaultValue;
}
I'm not even sure this is possible using Classes, so if there's another mechanism that facilitates this I'm open to suggestions!
You can't create classes in runtime, but since dynamic typing is in essence a subset of static typing, you can fake it.
Start with the Property type1:
using Property = variant<int, float, string>;
A simple "dynamic" class could look like this:
class DynamicClass {
std::map<std::string, Property> properties;
public:
Property const& operator[](std::string const&) const
Property operator[](std::string const&);
};
Use:
DynamicClass d;
d["myInt"] = 5;
1 Example implementation. Internals of variant should be tailored for your specific purpose. If you need an open variant, where you don't know all of the possible types beforehand, this gets more complicated, calling for something like any.
Hi all: I'm an experienced c# programmer trying to do some work in c++, and I'm not sure about the right way to do this:
I am authoring a class that needs to notify a consuming class that something has happened.
If I were writing this in c#, I would define an event on my class.
No events in c++, so I am trying to figure out what is the correct way to do this. I have thought about callback functions, but how do I handle a case where I want to execute a member function (not a static function).
More specifically, what I really need to do is to handle the event, but have access to member state within the object instance that is handling the event.
I have been looking at std::tr1:function, but I am having trouble getting it to work.
I don't suppose that anyone would want to translate the following example c# example into an example of the correct/best practice c++ (I need ANSI c++)?
(please bear in mind that I have almost no c++ experience -- don't assume that I know any long-established c++ conventions -- I don't ;);
A simple c# console app (works on my machine):
using System;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
public class EventSource
{
public event EventHandler<EchoEventArgs> EchoEvent;
public void RaiseEvent(int echoId)
{
var echoEvent = this.EchoEvent;
if (echoEvent != null)
echoEvent(this, new EchoEventArgs() {EchoId = echoId});
}
}
public class EchoEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public int EchoId { get; set; }
}
public class EventConsumer
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public EventConsumer(EventSource source)
{
source.EchoEvent += OnEcho;
}
private void OnEcho(object sender, EchoEventArgs args)
{
// handle the echo, and use this.Id to prove that the correct instance data is present.
Console.WriteLine("Echo! My Id: {0} Echo Id: {1}", this.Id, args.EchoId);
}
}
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
var source = new EventSource();
var consumer1 = new EventConsumer(source) { Id = 1 };
var consumer2 = new EventConsumer(source) { Id = 2 };
source.RaiseEvent(1);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
The basic idea is to take function objects, e.g., something like std::function<Signature> as the callbacks. These aren't function pointers but can be called. The standard C++ library (for C++ 2011) contains a number of class and functions, e.g., std::mem_fn() and std::bind() which allow using functions, including member functions, to be used as function objects.
The part what is missing is something supporting multiple events be registered: std::function<Signature> represents one function. However, it is easy to put them, e.g., into a std::vector<std::function<Signature>>. What becomes more interesting (and requires variadic templates to be done easily) is creating an event class which encapsulates the abstraction of multiple events begin registered, potentially unregistered, and called.
C++ has a concept of functor: a callable object. You need to read about them.
Think about an object that has overwritten operator(). You pass an instance of such an object. After that you can call it like a regular function. And it can maintain a state.
There's also Signals2 library in Boost, which provides an API very close to real C# events, at least in idiomatic sense.
Qt has something that might help you called Signals and Slots: http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/signalsandslots.html
It lets you specify what the signals (the events that you want to listen to) and the slots (the receiving side) an object has, and then you can connect them. More than one object can listen to a signal like you mention you needed.
Qt is a large app framework, so I'm not sure how to use only the signals & slots part of it. But if you're building an entire GUI application the rest of the Qt might benefit you too (a lot of the ui event stuff is based on signals and slots).