When configuring redirections, it's common to run into multiple pages that include some of the same path strings. We've ran into this instance multiple times where we need to redirect:
https://example.com/x...
But not:
https://example.com/y/x...
To match the /x... we use PCRE regex of:
/x.*
We've been struggling to get the exclude to match correctly; we apologize in advance as our regex is a bit weak, here's our pseudo code:
Match all /x... except /y/x...
Here is what we thought that looked like:
^\/(?!y\/).x.*
In our mind that reads:
Any query starting with /x..., except starting with /y/x...
Thank you in advance, and please feel free to suggest better formatting, we are not stack overflow pros.
Your regex matches from the start of the string a forward slash and then uses a negative lookahead to check what follows is not y/. If that is true, then match any character followed by x and 0+ character. That will match for example //x///
Without taking matching the url part into account, one way could be to use a negative lookahead (?! to check if what is on the right side does not contain /y/x and then match any character:
^(?!.*/y/x).+
Regex demo
You may use a negative lookbehind assertion:
~(?<!/y)/x~
RegEx Demo
(?<!/y) is a negative lookbehind assertnion that will fail the match if /y appears before matching /x.
Related
I want to select words ending in with a regular expression, but I want exclude words that end in thing. For example:
everything
running
catching
nothing
Of these words, running and catching should be selected, everything and nothing should be excluded.
I've tried the following:
.+ing$
But that selects everything. I'm thinking look aheads/look arounds could be the solution, but I haven't been able to get one that works.
Solutions that work in Python or R would be helpful.
In python you can use negative lookbehind assertion as this:
^.*(?<!th)ing$
RegEx Demo
(?<!th) is negative lookbehind expression that will fail the match if th comes before ing at the end of string.
Note that if you are matching words that are not on separate lines then instead of anchors use word boundaries as:
\w+(?<!th)ing\b
Something like \b\w+(?<!th)ing\b maybe.
You might also use a negative lookahead (?! to assert that what is on the right is not 0+ times a word character followed by thing and a word boundary:
\b(?!\w*thing\b)\w*ing\b
Regex demo | Python demo
I have 15 titles as follows:
fruits-and-flowers-themeA
fruits-and-flowers-themeB
fruits-and-flowers-just-test-themeA
themeAfruitsandflowers
nice-fruits-and-flowers-themeA
botanical-names-themeA
I want a regex to help me get only those titles with "themeA" in them, but it should not include "nice" and not include "just-test" or "just-tests".
I tried
^(?!.*just-test|*just-tests|nice).*?(?:themeA).*,
but I still get fruits-and-flowers-just-test-themeA in the output.
How to fix this?
Thanks
You can use this regex with negative lookahead:
^(?!.*?(?:just-tests?|nice)).*?themeA.*$
Working Demo
Option 1
You can use a single regex with lookaheads (see online demo):
^(?!.*nice?)(?!.*just-tests?).*themeA.*
The ^ asserts that the match starts at the beginning of the string (so we don't match a subset of the string
The (?!.*nice?) is a negative lookahead that asserts that at this position in the string, we cannot find any characters followed by nice
The (?!.*just-tests?) is a negative lookahead that asserts that at this position in the string, we cannot find any characters followed by just-test and an optional s
As a further tweak, you can compress the lookaheads into one using an | alternation as in anubhava's answer.
Option 2 without lookaheads (Perl, PHP/PCRE)
^(?:.*(?:nice|just-tests?).*)(*SKIP)(?!)|.*themeA.*
This one doesn't use lookaheads but just skips the unwanted titles. See demo.
Use two different regular expressions for clarity and simplicity.
Match your string against one regex that matches themeA:
/themeA/
and then check that the string does NOT match the one you don't want:
/nice|just-tests?/
Doing it in two different regexes makes it far easier to understand and maintain.
Given the following 3 example paths representing server paths i am trying to create a skiplist for my FTP client via PCRE regular expressions but can't seem to get the wished result.
/subdir-level-1/subdir-level-2/.../Author1_-_Title1-(1234)-Publisher1
/subdir-level-1/subdir-level-2/.../Author2_-_Title2_(5678)-PUBLiSHER2
/subdir-level-1/subdir-level-2/.../Author3_-_Title3-4951-publisher3
I want to skip all folders (not paths) that do not end with
-Publisher1
I am trying to create a working pattern with the help of this online help and and this regex tester but don't get any further than to this negative lookahead pattern
.*-(?!Publisher1)
But with this pattern all lines match because with all of them the substrings up to the pattern do all not contain the pattern.
/subdir/subdir/.../Author1_-_Title1-(1234) -Publisher1
/subdir/subdir/.../Author2_-_Title2_(5678) -PUBLiSHER2
/subdir/subdir/.../Author3_-_Title3-4951 -publisher3
What is my mistake and how would the correct pattern be just to match only the second and third line as line to be skipped but keep the first line?
EDIT to make it clearer what to highlight and what not.
Everything from the beginning of the path to the last slash must be ignored (allowed).
Everything after the last slash that matches the defined regex must be skipped.
EDIT to present an advanced pattern matching only the red part
[^/]*(?<!-Publisher2)$
Debuggex Demo
The regex which you have used is:
.*-(?!Publisher1)
I will tell you whats the fault in it.
According to this regex it will match those lines which dont have a - followed by Publisher1. Okay, do you notice the - there in between on yur text, yes. between author and title or after title. So all the strings satisfy this condition. Instead if you search with a negative lookahead in such a way that hiphen is with Publisher1 then your match should work.
So you plan on moving the hiphen inside the parenthesis so that it matches and make your regex like this :
^.*(?!-Publisher1)
but this will also not work, because here .* matches everything, so when we do a lookahead, we are not able to find a single character to match . Thus we will use a negative lookbehind. <.
.*(?<!-Publisher1)
what now ? . I have done everything but still I cannot get it to work. why is it so ?
because a negative lookbehind will lookback and tell if it is not followed by -Publisher1.
this is complex, just bear with me :
suppose your string
/subdir/subdir/.../Author1_-_Title1-(1234)-Publisher1
we do a negative lookbehind for -Publisher1. From the postition after 1 . i.e. at the end of the string -Publisher1 is visible when we lookback. BUT our condition is negative lookbehind. So it will move one character left to reach a position where it will no more be able to lookback and say that "Hey I can see -Publisher1 from here" because from here we are able to see "-Publisher" only. Our condtin satisfies but the regex still matches the rest of the string.
So it is essential to bind the lookbehind to the end of the string so that it doesnot move one character to the left to search for its match.
final regex:
.*(?<!-Publisher1)$
demo here : http://regex101.com/r/lE1vW2
This should suit your needs:
^.*(?<!-Publisher1)$
Debuggex Demo
I want to skip all folders that do not end with -Publisher1
You can use this negative lookahead based regex:
^(?!.*?-Publisher1$).+$
Working Demo
You could use the following regex in order to exclude lines containing Publisher1:
^((?!Publisher1).)*$
Online demo: http://regex101.com/r/gD8jK0
Hey guys I've been working with this one for a little while. I can't seem to get it.
Here is what I have so far
(#[^{2,}+)([^(\s\W\d{2}]+)(\b)
http://rubular.com/r/zlx3j00Wjl
Although this is not excepting periods in the match.
I basically need to match this.
#function.name(param)
I just need to match function.name. This does that.
http://rubular.com/r/hWMB72LsWT
I don't want to match this
##function.name(param)
hello##test.com`
Didn't know if anyone has any ideas. Thanks for the help.
You can use a negative lookahead: #(?!#) matches a # not followed by another #.
Here is my go at it (here it is on Rubular):
(?<!#)#(\w+(?:\.\w+)*)\([^)]*\)
Explained:
(?<!#)# # an '#' not preceded by an '#'
(\w+(?:\.\w+)*) # any number of xxx.xxx.xxx, captured into a group
\([^)]*\) # brackets, containing anything that isn't a closing bracket
Since this is Ruby, you might not care about matching parentheses. In that case you can just remove the last section.
Try this:
(?:^|\s)#+([^(]+)
You will have function.match and function.name in the first group, will not match hello##test.com. Rubular:
http://rubular.com/r/b8gy1LcVGz
Try this
(?!.*##)^#([^()\s]+)\b
See it here on Rubular
I removed some brackets from your expression
I removed the Quantifier from the leading #
(?!.*##) is a negative lookahead assertion. It will fail if it finds anywhere in the string two # characters in a row.
I am not sure about your requirements, if there is all the time a set of brackets at the end, then you don't need your word boundary. If there can be similar strings without brackets that you don't want to match, then I would add another lookahead to ensure this assertion:
?!.*##)^#([^()\s]+)(?=\()
See it here on Rubular
I have a regex, for example (ma|(t){1}). It matches ma and t and doesn't match bla.
I want to negate the regex, thus it must match bla and not ma and t, by adding something to this regex. I know I can write bla, the actual regex is however more complex.
Use negative lookaround: (?!pattern)
Positive lookarounds can be used to assert that a pattern matches. Negative lookarounds is the opposite: it's used to assert that a pattern DOES NOT match. Some flavor supports assertions; some puts limitations on lookbehind, etc.
Links to regular-expressions.info
Lookahead and Lookbehind Zero-Width Assertions
Flavor comparison
See also
How do I convert CamelCase into human-readable names in Java?
Regex for all strings not containing a string?
A regex to match a substring that isn’t followed by a certain other substring.
More examples
These are attempts to come up with regex solutions to toy problems as exercises; they should be educational if you're trying to learn the various ways you can use lookarounds (nesting them, using them to capture, etc):
codingBat plusOut using regex
codingBat repeatEnd using regex
codingbat wordEnds using regex
Assuming you only want to disallow strings that match the regex completely (i.e., mmbla is okay, but mm isn't), this is what you want:
^(?!(?:m{2}|t)$).*$
(?!(?:m{2}|t)$) is a negative lookahead; it says "starting from the current position, the next few characters are not mm or t, followed by the end of the string." The start anchor (^) at the beginning ensures that the lookahead is applied at the beginning of the string. If that succeeds, the .* goes ahead and consumes the string.
FYI, if you're using Java's matches() method, you don't really need the the ^ and the final $, but they don't do any harm. The $ inside the lookahead is required, though.
\b(?=\w)(?!(ma|(t){1}))\b(\w*)
this is for the given regex.
the \b is to find word boundary.
the positive look ahead (?=\w) is here to avoid spaces.
the negative look ahead over the original regex is to prevent matches of it.
and finally the (\w*) is to catch all the words that are left.
the group that will hold the words is group 3.
the simple (?!pattern) will not work as any sub-string will match
the simple ^(?!(?:m{2}|t)$).*$ will not work as it's granularity is full lines
This regexp math your condition:
^.*(?<!ma|t)$
Look at how it works:
https://regex101.com/r/Ryg2FX/1
Apply this if you use laravel.
Laravel has a not_regex where field under validation must not match the given regular expression; uses the PHP preg_match function internally.
'email' => 'not_regex:/^.+$/i'