For each number read from the standard input the program should print YES if it is a Tribonacci number and NO otherwise. What am I doing wrong in my program, it prints YES, but it wont print NO when the number is not a tribonacci number. For example when number is 45, it should print no.
Tribonacci number formula
T0=0
T1=1
T2=2
Tn=Tn-1 + Tn-2 + Tn-3 (for n>2)
using namespace std;
bool isTrib(int n) {
if(n==0 || n == 1 || n == 2) {
return true;
}
if(n > 2) {
int trib = isTrib(n-1)+isTrib(n-2)+isTrib(n-3);
if(trib == n) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
int main()
{
int n;
while(cin>>n) {
bool result = isTrib(n);
cout << result;
result == 1 ? cout << "YES" << endl : cout << "NO" << endl;
}
return 0;
}
you're mixing two things: actual tribonacci numbers and "true"/"false" answer to question "whether N is tribonacci", for example variable trib in your code can be either 0, 1, 2 or 3, it cannot take any other values, but you're trying to compare it with real number, which is apples to oranges
here is fixed version:
bool isTrib(int n) {
if(n==0 || n == 1 || n == 2) {
return true;
}
int n1 = 0;
int n2 = 1;
int n3 = 2;
int trib = n1 + n2 + n3;
while (trib <= n) {
if (trib == n) return true;
n1 = n2;
n2 = n3;
n3 = trib;
trib = n1 + n2 + n3;
}
return false;
}
int main()
{
int n;
while(cin>>n) {
bool result = isTrib(n);
cout << (result ? "YES" : "NO") << endl;
}
return 0;
}
Given an array of integers and a number k, write a function that returns true if given array can be divided into pairs such that sum of every pair is divisible by k.
This code is producing correct results for all test cases except one I cannot find the glitch in it.
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
int main() {
int t;
cin >> t;
while (t--) {
int n;
cin >> n;
int arr[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin >> arr[i];
}
int k;
cin >> k;
int flag[n] = {0};
int p = 0;
int q = 0;
if (n % 2 != 0) {
cout << "False" << endl;
} else {
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = i + 1; j < n; j++) {
if ((arr[i] + arr[j]) % k == 0 && flag[j] == 0) {
p = 1;
flag[j] = 1;
}
}
if (p == 0) {
q = 1;
cout << "False" << endl;
break;
}
}
if (q == 0) {
cout << "True" << endl;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
One of the big sources of bugs in code is messy code. So how do we clean up code? We modularize it. This means breaking up the code so that each portion of the code does one job well. Let's see what that looks like.
Function to check if something is divisible by k:
bool isDivisible(int number, int divisor) {
return number % divisor == 0;
}
Function to check all pairs:
The logic is as follows:
Take the first number in the list; call in n0.
For every remaining number n1, check if that plus the first number is divisible by k
When we find n1 such that n0 + n1 is divisible by k,
a. If the remaining numbers left over can also be split into divisible pairs, return true
b. Otherwise, continue searching
4.If we've searched through all the numbers, return false.
bool pairsDivisible(int* nums, int count, int k) {
if(count == 0) return true;
if(count % 2 != 0) return false; // count must be even
// 1.
int n0 = nums[0];
// 2.
for(int i = 1; i < count; i++) {
int n1 = nums[i];
// 3.
if(isDivisible(n0 + n1, k)) {
// Move the ith number so it's now nums[1]
std::swap(nums[1], nums[i]);
if(pairsDivisible(nums + 2, count - 2, k)) {
return true; // 3.a
} else {
// Reset the array
std::swap(nums[1], nums[i]);
}
}
}
return false;
}
I have a task to find the count of all prime numbers in random generated sequence.
The input is:
25 10
where 25 is the number s which should be < 10^3 and is used for srand(s) and the number 10 is N(the length of the sequence) which should be < 10^9. The numbers in the sequence are generated with rand()%1000. There are no more than 100 total examples. So here is my code:
#include <iostream>
#include <stdlib.h>
using namespace std;
bool isPrime(int n)
{
if (n == 0 || n == 1) return false;
for (int i = 2; i < n; i++)
{
if (n % i == 0) return false;
}
return true;
}
void Solve(int s, int N)
{
if (s >= 1000 || s <= 0 || N > 1000000000 || N <= 0)
{
cout << "s or N out of bounds!" << endl;
return;
}
int number,
count = 0,
i;
srand(s);
for (i = 1; i <= N; i++)
{
number = rand() % 1000;
if (isPrime(number))
{
count++;
}
}
cout << count << endl;
}
int main()
{
int s, N;
int counter = 0;
while (cin >> s >> N)
{
if (++counter == 100)
{
cout << "You have reached the maximum examples(100)!" << endl;
break;
}
Solve(s, N);
}
return 0;
}
And when I input 25 10 the answer should be 3 but I got 1. Where is my problem? Any help will be appreciated.
I'm trying to modify this program to their equivalent iterative but it becomes very difficult to me because as yet i'm still a newbie, it comes to an algorithm that decomposes a number into its prime factors, here the code:
#include <iostream>
#include <map>
#include <cmath>
std::map< int, std::pair<int, int> > decompositions;
void descompon_number(int num, int root, int i = 2 )
{
auto iterator = decompositions.find(num);
if (iterator == decompositions.end())
{
if (num > 1 && i <= root)
{
if (num % i == 0)
{
int n = num / i;
decompositions[num] = std::make_pair(i, n);
descompon_number(n, (int) std::sqrt(n));
}
else
descompon_number(num, root, i + 1);
}
else
decompositions[num] = std::make_pair(num, 1);
}
}
void show(int num, int factor, int exponent, int see)
{
auto pair = decompositions[num];
if (num <= 1 || factor != pair.first)
{
if (see)
std::cout << factor;
if (exponent > 1 && see)
std::cout << "^" << exponent;
if (pair.first > 1 && see)
std::cout << " * ";
exponent = 0;
}
if (num > 1)
show(pair.second, pair.first, exponent + 1, see);
}
void descompon(int a, int b, int see)
{
if (a <= b)
{
descompon_number(a, (int) std::sqrt(a));
if (see)
std::cout << a << " = ";
show(a, decompositions[a].first, 0, see);
if (see)
std::cout << std::endl;
descompon(a + 1, b, see);
}
}
int main()
{
descompon(2, 100, 1);
return 0;
}
Someone can help me out with this
Finding prime factors iteratively is not very complicated.
Here's the pseudocode how to do this.
Let P be a list of the first n prime numbers, such that Pn <= sqrt(m).
array findPrimeFactors(m)
answer = new array
for p in P
while m can be divided by p
m = m / p
answer.append(p)
if m == 1
break
return answer
Note: empty array is returned if m is prime.
You can use an erastotenes' sieve to compute prime numbers, and later you can use the algorithm posted by popovitsj.
The following code can be optimized, but its main purpose is to show you how to proceed.
Complete example:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
// Returns a vector containing the first <number> prime numbers
vector<int> erastotenes_sieve(int number)
{
vector<int> result;
int *sieve = new int[number];
for (int i = 0; i < number; i++) sieve[i] = 0;
// Traverse the sieve marking multiples.
for (int i = 2; i < number / 2; i++)
for (int j = i + i; j < number; j += i)
sieve[j] = 1;
// Collect unaffected indexes, those are prime numbers.
for (int i = 2; i < number; i++)
if (!sieve[i])
result.push_back(i);
delete [] sieve;
return result;
}
vector<int> descompon_number(int number)
{
vector<int> result;
if (number == 1 || number == 0)
{
result.push_back(number);
return result;
}
for (int &prime : erastotenes_sieve(number))
{
while (number % prime == 0 && number != 1)
{
number /= prime;
result.push_back(prime);
}
}
return result;
}
int main()
{
for (auto &i : descompon_number(20))
{
cout << i << endl;
}
return 0;
}
According to this post, we can get all divisors of a number through the following codes.
for (int i = 1; i <= num; ++i){
if (num % i == 0)
cout << i << endl;
}
For example, the divisors of number 24 are 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 24.
After searching some related posts, I did not find any good solutions. Is there any efficient way to accomplish this?
My solution:
Find all prime factors of the given number through this solution.
Get all possible combinations of those prime factors.
However, it doesn't seem to be a good one.
Factors are paired. 1 and 24, 2 and 12, 3 and 8, 4 and 6.
An improvement of your algorithm could be to iterate to the square root of num instead of all the way to num, and then calculate the paired factors using num / i.
You should really check till square root of num as sqrt(num) * sqrt(num) = num:
Something on these lines:
int square_root = (int) sqrt(num) + 1;
for (int i = 1; i < square_root; i++) {
if (num % i == 0&&i*i!=num)
cout << i << num/i << endl;
if (num % i == 0&&i*i==num)
cout << i << '\n';
}
There is no efficient way in the sense of algorithmic complexity (an algorithm with polynomial complexity) known in science by now. So iterating until the square root as already suggested is mostly as good as you can be.
Mainly because of this, a large part of the currently used cryptography is based on the assumption that it is very time consuming to compute a prime factorization of any given integer.
Here's my code:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
#define pii pair<int, int>
#define MAX 46656
#define LMT 216
#define LEN 4830
#define RNG 100032
unsigned base[MAX / 64], segment[RNG / 64], primes[LEN];
#define sq(x) ((x)*(x))
#define mset(x,v) memset(x,v,sizeof(x))
#define chkC(x,n) (x[n>>6]&(1<<((n>>1)&31)))
#define setC(x,n) (x[n>>6]|=(1<<((n>>1)&31)))
// http://zobayer.blogspot.com/2009/09/segmented-sieve.html
void sieve()
{
unsigned i, j, k;
for (i = 3; i<LMT; i += 2)
if (!chkC(base, i))
for (j = i*i, k = i << 1; j<MAX; j += k)
setC(base, j);
primes[0] = 2;
for (i = 3, j = 1; i<MAX; i += 2)
if (!chkC(base, i))
primes[j++] = i;
}
//http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/print-all-prime-factors-of-a-given-number/
vector <pii> factors;
void primeFactors(int num)
{
int expo = 0;
for (int i = 0; primes[i] <= sqrt(num); i++)
{
expo = 0;
int prime = primes[i];
while (num % prime == 0){
expo++;
num = num / prime;
}
if (expo>0)
factors.push_back(make_pair(prime, expo));
}
if ( num >= 2)
factors.push_back(make_pair(num, 1));
}
vector <int> divisors;
void setDivisors(int n, int i) {
int j, x, k;
for (j = i; j<factors.size(); j++) {
x = factors[j].first * n;
for (k = 0; k<factors[j].second; k++) {
divisors.push_back(x);
setDivisors(x, j + 1);
x *= factors[j].first;
}
}
}
int main() {
sieve();
int n, x, i;
cin >> n;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cin >> x;
primeFactors(x);
setDivisors(1, 0);
divisors.push_back(1);
sort(divisors.begin(), divisors.end());
cout << divisors.size() << "\n";
for (int j = 0; j < divisors.size(); j++) {
cout << divisors[j] << " ";
}
cout << "\n";
divisors.clear();
factors.clear();
}
}
The first part, sieve() is used to find the prime numbers and put them in primes[] array. Follow the link to find more about that code (bitwise sieve).
The second part primeFactors(x) takes an integer (x) as input and finds out its prime factors and corresponding exponent, and puts them in vector factors[]. For example, primeFactors(12) will populate factors[] in this way:
factors[0].first=2, factors[0].second=2
factors[1].first=3, factors[1].second=1
as 12 = 2^2 * 3^1
The third part setDivisors() recursively calls itself to calculate all the divisors of x, using the vector factors[] and puts them in vector divisors[].
It can calculate divisors of any number which fits in int. Also it is quite fast.
Plenty of good solutions exist for finding all the prime factors of not too large numbers. I just wanted to point out, that once you have them, no computation is required to get all the factors.
if N = p_1^{a}*p_{2}^{b}*p_{3}^{c}.....
Then the number of factors is clearly (a+1)(b+1)(c+1).... since every factor can occur zero up to a times.
e.g. 12 = 2^2*3^1 so it has 3*2 = 6 factors. 1,2,3,4,6,12
======
I originally thought that you just wanted the number of distinct factors. But the same logic applies. You just iterate over the set of numbers corresponding to the possible combinations of exponents.
so int he example above:
00
01
10
11
20
21
gives you the 6 factors.
If you want all divisors to be printed in sorted order
int i;
for(i=1;i*i<n;i++){ /*print all the divisors from 1(inclusive) to
if(n%i==0){ √n (exclusive) */
cout<<i<<" ";
}
}
for( ;i>=1;i--){ /*print all the divisors from √n(inclusive) to
if(n%i==0){ n (inclusive)*/
cout<<(n/i)<<" ";
}
}
If divisors can be printed in any order
for(int j=1;j*j<=n;j++){
if(n%j==0){
cout<<j<<" ";
if(j!=(n/j))
cout<<(n/j)<<" ";
}
}
Both approaches have complexity O(√n)
Here is the Java Implementation of this approach:
public static int countAllFactors(int num)
{
TreeSet<Integer> tree_set = new TreeSet<Integer>();
for (int i = 1; i * i <= num; i+=1)
{
if (num % i == 0)
{
tree_set.add(i);
tree_set.add(num / i);
}
}
System.out.print(tree_set);
return tree_set.size();
}
//Try this,it can find divisors of verrrrrrrrrry big numbers (pretty efficiently :-))
#include<iostream>
#include<cstdio>
#include<cmath>
#include<vector>
#include<conio.h>
using namespace std;
vector<double> D;
void divs(double N);
double mod(double &n1, double &n2);
void push(double N);
void show();
int main()
{
double N;
cout << "\n Enter number: "; cin >> N;
divs(N); // find and push divisors to D
cout << "\n Divisors of "<<N<<": "; show(); // show contents of D (all divisors of N)
_getch(); // used visual studio, if it isn't supported replace it by "getch();"
return(0);
}
void divs(double N)
{
for (double i = 1; i <= sqrt(N); ++i)
{
if (!mod(N, i)) { push(i); if(i*i!=N) push(N / i); }
}
}
double mod(double &n1, double &n2)
{
return(((n1/n2)-floor(n1/n2))*n2);
}
void push(double N)
{
double s = 1, e = D.size(), m = floor((s + e) / 2);
while (s <= e)
{
if (N==D[m-1]) { return; }
else if (N > D[m-1]) { s = m + 1; }
else { e = m - 1; }
m = floor((s + e) / 2);
}
D.insert(D.begin() + m, N);
}
void show()
{
for (double i = 0; i < D.size(); ++i) cout << D[i] << " ";
}
int result_num;
bool flag;
cout << "Number Divisors\n";
for (int number = 1; number <= 35; number++)
{
flag = false;
cout << setw(3) << number << setw(14);
for (int i = 1; i <= number; i++)
{
result_num = number % i;
if (result_num == 0 && flag == true)
{
cout << "," << i;
}
if (result_num == 0 && flag == false)
{
cout << i;
}
flag = true;
}
cout << endl;
}
cout << "Press enter to continue.....";
cin.ignore();
return 0;
}
for (int i = 1; i*i <= num; ++i)
{
if (num % i == 0)
cout << i << endl;
if (num/i!=i)
cout << num/i << endl;
}
for( int i = 1; i * i <= num; i++ )
{
/* upto sqrt is because every divisor after sqrt
is also found when the number is divided by i.
EXAMPLE like if number is 90 when it is divided by 5
then you can also see that 90/5 = 18
where 18 also divides the number.
But when number is a perfect square
then num / i == i therefore only i is the factor
*/
//DIVISORS IN TIME COMPLEXITY sqrt(n)
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
#define ll long long
int main()
{
ll int n;
cin >> n;
for(ll i = 2; i <= sqrt(n); i++)
{
if (n%i==0)
{
if (n/i!=i)
cout << i << endl << n/i<< endl;
else
cout << i << endl;
}
}
}
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
typedef long long int ll;
#define MOD 1000000007
#define fo(i,k,n) for(int i=k;i<=n;++i)
#define endl '\n'
ll etf[1000001];
ll spf[1000001];
void sieve(){
ll i,j;
for(i=0;i<=1000000;i++) {etf[i]=i;spf[i]=i;}
for(i=2;i<=1000000;i++){
if(etf[i]==i){
for(j=i;j<=1000000;j+=i){
etf[j]/=i;
etf[j]*=(i-1);
if(spf[j]==j)spf[j]=i;
}
}
}
}
void primefacto(ll n,vector<pair<ll,ll>>& vec){
ll lastprime = 1,k=0;
while(n>1){
if(lastprime!=spf[n])vec.push_back(make_pair(spf[n],0));
vec[vec.size()-1].second++;
lastprime=spf[n];
n/=spf[n];
}
}
void divisors(vector<pair<ll,ll>>& vec,ll idx,vector<ll>& divs,ll num){
if(idx==vec.size()){
divs.push_back(num);
return;
}
for(ll i=0;i<=vec[idx].second;i++){
divisors(vec,idx+1,divs,num*pow(vec[idx].first,i));
}
}
void solve(){
ll n;
cin>>n;
vector<pair<ll,ll>> vec;
primefacto(n,vec);
vector<ll> divs;
divisors(vec,0,divs,1);
for(auto it=divs.begin();it!=divs.end();it++){
cout<<*it<<endl;
}
}
int main(){
ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
cin.tie(0);cout.tie(0);
sieve();
ll t;cin>>t;
while(t--) solve();
return 0;
}
We can use modified sieve for getting all the factors for all numbers in range [1, N-1].
for (int i = 1; i < N; i++) {
for (int j = i; j < N; j += i) {
ans[j].push_back(i);
}
}
The time complexity is O(N * log(N)) as the sum of harmonic series 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/N can be approximated to log(N).
More info about time complexity : https://math.stackexchange.com/a/3367064
P.S : Usually in programming problems, the task will include several queries where each query represents a different number and hence precalculating the divisors for all numbers in a range at once would be beneficial as the lookup takes O(1) time in that case.
java 8 recursive (works on HackerRank). This method includes option to sum and return the factors as an integer.
static class Calculator implements AdvancedArithmetic {
public int divisorSum(int n) {
if (n == 1)
return 1;
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
return divisorSum( n, set, 1);
}
private int divisorSum(int n, Set<Integer> sum, int start){
if ( start > n/2 )
return 0;
if (n%start == 0)
sum.add(start);
start++;
divisorSum(n, sum, start);
int total = 0;
for(int number: sum)
total+=number;
return total +n;
}
}