I have a dot-net project build with VISUAL STUDIO 2015 4.6.1 framework and I have two independent program folders in the source code which has some build errors. There are no references to these programs from the main program.
When I push the whole source code onto VSTS I get build errors. So now I need a way to exclude those two folders from the manual build for now but may need them later after they are debugged so I don't want to delete them from VSTS too.
Can someone suggest?
Use an MS Build project file. Create an MSBuild project file from scratch
And the at the build solution step in VSTS, select or type the project file path instead of the solution file.
You will have to remove it down the road though. The maintenance tasks tend to be hard and counter-intuitive whenever the code base grows quickly. Visual Studio will not warn you if you have build errors (like obsolete path) in the MS Build project file.
Related
I have a solution that contains both C++ and C# projects that is built in a nightly CI build on a remote machine. The build script checks out a clean copy of the source and builds both debug and release configurations of the solution using MSBuild and runs the test suite on each configuration.
About every other build, the release configuration fails to build properly. An analysis of the build log reveals that C++ Project Q, which depends on C++ Project D, tries to link before Project D is done. This error only happens for the release configuration on this particular build machine - the debug configuration builds without error. I have a separate nightly build process that runs on a separate machine where the release configuration is built with a similar script that uses MSBuild (it just does not run the test suite), and it builds the same source revision without issue. Multiple team members build the solution without issue either from update or clean checkout with one or both configurations, always from the Visual Studio 2019 IDE, on various operating systems.
Project Q is configured with Project D as a project reference and Project D is also listed as a hard-dependency for Project Q. As I mentioned, the build script is using MSBuild.
An additional item of interest from analysis of the release and debug build logs: The build of Project D is initiated differently between the two configuration builds. It is started by its own metaproject in the release configuration (as item 60, for instance), but started earlier (as item 44, for instance), by a different project in the debug configuration. Not sure why the dependency algorithm would run with such different results in the two cases since the solution and working source being built are the same.
Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated.
Update: Inspection of differences between the release and debug build logs reveals some interesting facts. In the failure case I did a search for ") is building" in each log - should be an indication of how many projects were built, including metaproj entries. For the failure case, debug had 282 occurrences, whereas release had 175. For the success case, debug had 280 occurrences and release had a whopping 559! A similar search for "Done Building Project" yields similar results, only off by 1 or 2. That might partly explain the differences in build order between the solutions. I also need to check for conditional build entries.
Visual Studio 2019 Reference Project Not Built Before Dependent
Project Tries To Link in Release Configuration using MSBuild
It seems that project buid order was broken and Project D built later than Project Q which need the output content of Project D, so the whole build failed.
Not sure that if you use Project Dependency(Right-click on project-->Build Dependencies-->Project Dependencies), if so, only VS IDE Build Will recognize their build order while MSBuild command line will lose the relationship about them.
Besides, I wonder if your main project under Release mode references a dependency project under Release mode. If you did these, the build will definitely go wrong.
All of these above is that I think you made some changes to your project.
You could follow these steps:
1) I suggest you could try to use Project Reference and it will add these xml node in ProjectQ.csproj file to strongly specify build relationship:
<ItemGroup>
<ProjectReference Include="..\ProjectD\ProjectD.csproj">
<Project>{26c26cdd-a5e0-40c7-b0c9-4563f969424f}</Project>
<Name>ProjectD</Name>
</ProjectReference>
</ItemGroup>
Also, check if there are any conditions that distinguish between Debug or Release mode when referring to a project like this:
<ProjectReference Include="..\ProjectD\ProjectD.csproj" Condition="'$(Configuration)'=='Debug'">
If so, please remove that condition Condition="'$(Configuration)'=='Debug'" to make sure it is the same between Debug and Release mode.
2) close VS Instance, delete .vs hidden folder under solution folder.
3) check your CI Build and cloud build server and ensure that cloud parameters are consistent with other servers. And examine any of your xxx.csproj files to check if you have any other operations which causes this bahavior.
In addition, if necessary, you can share your xxx.csproj file and the build script with us to troubleshoot it.
I am new to Visual Studio, and I am trying to figure out the best way to organize my projects.
I am writing an application using the sfml library, and I have various resources (images/sounds) that I am using. I dropped these into the project folder, and everything works fine when I launch my application from Visual Studio.
I am wondering though, how does this translate to when a program is deployed? If I go into my solution's debug folder, and try launching the exe, it is unable to locate any of the resource files. Am I suppose to tell Visual Studio to copy files to an appropriate directory, and if so how?
Thanks for any advice or links.
For slightly more complicated "deployment" scenario, you can use post-build scripts to copy the correct files into the output directory and even package it into a zip file, for example.
If you find yourself writing more than one page of batch you may want to consider the options below, because batch is a PITA to debug.
Recent MSVS project files are actually MSBuild files (just open the .vcxproj file in Notepad or Vim). For instance you can use the Copy task, invoke arbitrary programs using the Exec task, etc. It can be a bit more sophisticated than the batch script in post-build scripts. MSBuild 4 can use Property Functions making it quite expressive. Useful reference if you do this
For a "full blown" project, you'll want to roll a dedicated build system using a dedicated MSBuild file, NAnt or even higher level wrappers like Rake.
As a less popular alternative, in a previous project I built a small dedicated "builder" .exe project in the solution and have other projects depend on it. Then in the post-build scripts of the other projects I just invoke the builder projects with arguments to make it perform certain tasks. The advantage is that you can write C# (or F# or VB.NET) and not have to fight the build system (as much) and I think it works quite well for small-mid sized projects.
for my project, I direct everything into one directory.
Go to ur project configuration, change General->Output directory, General->intermediate directory, and Debugging->Working directory to one directory. The reason you cannot locate the resource files is because the debug directory is not the same as the output directory.
I'm a fairly experienced C# dev, but have very little C++ knowledge. I have set my self a project to get a custom Firefox build running, and be able to control it from C# code.
I have got so far as getting and building the Firefox source, and creating a Visual Studio solution for the exe. This means I can now run via F5 in Visual studio. If I open a source file, I can set break points and have them hit.
What I'm not sure how to do, is load the entire source, as if I were working with a C# .NET solution. As I understand it, there are no project files with the Firefox source, as it is not windows specific source. I have followed an online example that suggests creating using 'project from existing code' option in VS, which resulted in VS grinding to a halt as there were so many files.
What are the steps to getting the code into an environment (preferably Visual Studio) that makes it simple(ish) to edit, debug and navigate the source code.
Note: Instructions I have been working through so far are here: https://cs.senecac.on.ca/~david.humphrey/writing/debugging-firefox.html
From you question, I beleive you are almost there. You have a working build ? That means you have :
A Solution File (*.sln)
A Project file (*.vcxproj or *.vcproj depending on yoru visual studio version)
With that in hand, what works best for me is this layout (adapted to your needs) :
Starting from a root folder of you liking, say MyProject
Create a new Empty solution there
Move the folder with your working build in a subdirectory, like MyProject\MyCustomFirefox
In Visual Studio "Add an existing project" and find your vcxproj file
In the same solution, create a C# project like you always do, in a directory at the same level as your FF build, like MyProject\MyFirefoxController
In short the solution file is pretty much alone in the root directory, and each project is in its own directory.
You will also need to adjust build options so that the output files (a DLL or an EXE) is seen by your C# project. While your are at it, make the C# project dependent on your Firefox build : it will instruct the msbuild to rebuild one if you change the other.
This will not work with the Express edition, I beleive. They are single language.
If you have a command line build path, which is creating a VS-debuggable executable, you could try adding all the source files to the project, but marking them 'exclude from build'. Then add a 'post-build step' to call the command line tools.
You may have to do a little more tweaking in the project properties to get the command line output recognized as the output to debug, but theoretically this could work.
What is done when we import an existing project(maybe a visual studio project)?
Which files are used for configuration?
Try this one, you may get some information.
Migrate Visual Studio C and C++ projects to Eclipse CDT
Eclipse manages files completely differently than Visual Studio, files are managed by Eclipse and placed into the project workspace. Adding existing files has the aggravating effect of copying the files from their location into the workspace. There are workarounds for this (adding a link to existing file, makefile-only projects) but the default is to copy files around.
This is great if your project is managed by Eclipse alone, not great if you want a VS project AND an Eclipse project for the same codebase.
I'm don't think you can import a VS project into Eclipse CDT, at least not the way you're thinking.
The files used for configuration are stored in (path to workspace)/.metadata, there are a LOT of files that change constantly and can contain absolute paths. Caveat emptor.
There is no explicit wizard for importing visual studio project files. What you import is a directory tree full of source code files. Basic information about this is worked out and stored in a file called .project, which contains the settings from Project/properties.
If, when you create or import the project, 'use default location' is specified, the tree is copied into a workspace directory. If not, it is left where it is.
If the project type is 'makefile project', the only real assumption is that there is some external command to be run to build the software. Project properties/C++ build can be used to specify this command - by default, it is 'make'.
DevStudio can export a makefile for one of it's projects - from the Project menu, select 'Export Makefile'. Or you can just write one by hand, or use some other build tool such as ant.
If all else fails, set the build command to 'cat' (e.g. from cygwin) and the build argument to the name of a file that contains the output log from however the software was built.
Eclipse itself has two kinds of projects - those with makefiles, and those that it manages itself.
Makefile projects have a separate make file that you generally write on your own.
Eclipse managed projects have a .project file that is used by the IDE to create make files on the fly, when you build your project.
Are you asking specifically for visual studio projects, or is that just an example?
I have a source code for a project with their make files. I want to create a Visual Studio (2005) solution from it. Is there any direct way to do this? can anyone help me please. I spent hours for searching, but couldn't find a way to do this.
Thanks.
Unfortunately, Microsoft removed this capability after VC++ 6.
If all you're looking to do is to build a Visual Studio project from a command line or script, you can use the devenv command to build using the settings in a project.
Something like:
devenv /build debug /project myproj myapp.sln
Ans starting with VS2010, C++ projects will use the MSBuild system, so you can drive builds using that technology.
If you really want a makefile, you'll need to write it up by hand (or maybe there's some 3rd party tool out there that I'm unaware of).
I'm not sure whether this solution can help you. Which I tried and it worked well in my previous projects. It need manually add the files.
Create a blank VS solution/project. Add the source files into that project.
Mark all source files as "Excluded from building". You can right click the files in project explorer and find the setting. So now nothing will happen when you build your project.
In project setting, find something like "Custom build step". Add the commands that invoke your original build command. (You may write different build command for debug/release ). You can also set the post-build actions such to copy your result to some folder....
Now you can edit and build source files.
For my experience, I can even debug it after setting the executable.
Hope this can help you.
If this is a one-off then it is easier to just create the VS project manually in visual studio.
If you are going to need to do this often look at ceating the project in something like cmake or Qt's .pro whcihc an generate makefiles and VS build files from the same defintion.
Do you want to use the makefile to build? You can create a project from existing source in VS 2005 and setup the project to use make to build (and the wizard will take you through all of this).
I am using VS2010.In order to build you can create a project from existing code. In VS2010 you can create project from existing code File->New->Project from Existing code. You can specify the other parameters and then ready with the solution. I did not go with make file but followed this approach which is working great.