I need to redirect multiple pages based on a single section of the URL, so these pages:
site/type1
site/type1/page1
site/type1/page2
site/type1/page3
need to redirect to:
site/type2
site/type2/page1
site/type2/page2
site/type2/page3
In reality there is more than 4 pages involved.
I think i can use the trigger:
(.*)/type2(.*)
but I'm stumped on how to set the destination so it dynamically populates the rest of the URL with what was there on the previous page.
Any ideas welcome.
Thanks.
you can simply look for site\/type1 and replace it with site\/type2
I tested it with vim and it worked fine for me :%s/site\/type1/site\/type2/g
Hope it'll help you
Your language probably supports replacing with regex.
This is the regex you should use:
(.*\/)type1(\/.*|$)
This is a bit different from the one you proposed. Your regex will match type2 instead of type1, but you want to redirect from type1 to type2, right? Another thing I changed is group 2. If you don't want things like site/type1b to turn into site/type2b, then you should write the second group as \/.*|$.
For the replacement, you should use $1type2$2, which means "the stuff captured in group 1, followed by type2, followed by the stuff captured in group 2".
Here is an online demo of the above regex and replacement. You can use the "code generator" feature to generate the code that performs this replacement in your language, if you are not sure how to replace with regex.
Related
I want to get the thread-id of an url via regex.
The Url can have these states:
https://mypage.com/threads/an-example-thread/
https://mypage.com/threads/an-example-thread/page-1
https://mypage.com/threads/an-example-thread
My pattern .+/threads/(.+)/.+ covers the first two options. Now I need a pattern, that also covers option 3. .+/threads/(.+)(/.+|$) works. But I use the first group to get the tread-id/name. So how is is possible to create an or-pattern without grouping?
As mentioned in the comments, try to use /threads/([^\/]*), that will match all 3.
I am currently learning regex and I am trying to filter all links (eg: http://www.link.com/folder/file.html) from a document with notepad++. Actually I want to delete everything else so that in the end only the http links are listed.
So far I tried this : http\:\/\/www\.[a-zA-Z0-9\.\/\-]+
This gives me all links which is find, but how do I delete the remaining stuff so that in the end I have a neat list of all links?
If I try to replace it with nothing followed by \1, obviously the link will be deleted, but I want the exact opposite to have everything else deleted.
So it should be something like:
- find a string of numbers, letters and special signs until "http"
- delete what you found
- and keep searching for more numbers, letters ans special signs after "html"
- and delete that again
Any ideas? Thanks so much.
In Notepad++, in the Replace menu (CTRL+H) you can do the following:
Find: .*?(http\:\/\/www\.[a-zA-Z0-9\.\/\-]+)
Replace: $1\n
Options: check the Regular expression and the . matches newline
This will return you with a list of all your links. There are two issues though:
The regex you provided for matching URLs is far from being generic enough to match any URL. If it is working in your case, that's fine, else check this question.
It will leave the text after the last matched URL intact. You have to delete it manually.
The answer made previously by #psxls was a great help for me when I have wanted to perform a similar process.
However, this regex rule was written six years ago now: accordingly, I had to adjust / complete / update it in order it can properly work with the some recent links, because:
a lot of URL are now using HTTPS instead of HTTP protocol
many websites less use www as main subdomain
some links adds punctuation mark (which have to be preserved)
I finally reshuffle the search rule to .*?(https?\:\/\/[a-zA-Z0-9[:punct:]]+) and it worked correctly with the file I had.
Unfortunately, this seemingly simple task is going to be almost impossible to do in notepad++. The regex you would have to construct would be...horrible. It might not even be possible, but if it is, it's not worth it. I pretty much guarantee that.
However, all is not lost. There are other tools more suitable to this problem.
Really what you want is a tool that can search through an input file and print out a list of regex matches. The UNIX utility "grep" will do just that. Don't be scared off because it's a UNIX utility: you can get it for Windows:
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/grep.htm
The grep command line you'll want to use is this:
grep -o 'http:\/\/www.[a-zA-Z0-9./-]\+\?' <filename(s)>
(Where <filename(s)> are the name(s) of the files you want to search for URLs in.)
You might want to shake up your regex a little bit, too. The problems I see with that regex are that it doesn't handle URLs without the 'www' subdomain, and it won't handle secure links (which start with https). Maybe that's what you want, but if not, I would modify it thusly:
grep -o 'https\?:\/\/[a-zA-Z0-9./-]\+\?' <filename(s)>
Here are some things to note about these expressions:
Inside a character group, there's no need to quote metacharacters except for [ and (sometimes) -. I say sometimes because if you put the dash at the end, as I have above, it's no longer interpreted as a range operator.
The grep utility's syntax, annoyingly, is different than most regex implementations in that most of the metacharacters we're familiar with (?, +, etc.) must be escaped to be used, not the other way around. Which is why you see backslashes before the ? and + characters above.
Lastly, the repetition metacharacter in this expression (+) is greedy by default, which could cause problems. I made it lazy by appending a ? to it. The way you have your URL match formulated, it probably wouldn't have caused problems, but if you change your match to, say [^ ] instead of [a-zA-Z0-9./-], you would see URLs on the same line getting combined together.
I did this a different way.
Find everything up to the first/next (https or http) (then everything that comes next) up to (html or htm), then output just the '(https or http)(everything next) then (html or htm)' with a line feed/ carriage return after each.
So:
Find: .*?(https:|http:)(.*?)(html|htm)
Replace with: \1\2\3\r\n
Saves looking for all possible (incl non-generic) url matches.
You will need to manually remove any text after the last matched URL.
Can also be used to create url links:
Find: .*?(https:|http:)(.*?)(html|htm)
Replace: \1\2\3\r\n
or image links (jpg/jpeg/gif):
Find: .*?(https:|http:)(.*?)(jpeg|jpg|gif)
Replace: <img src="\1\2\3">\r\n
I know my answer won't be RegEx related, but here is another efficient way to get lines containing URLs.
This won't remove text around links like Toto mentioned in comments.
At least if there is nice pattern to all links, like https://.
CTRL+F => change tab to Mark
Insert https://
Tick Mark to bookmark.
Mark All.
Find => Bookmarks => Delete all lines without bookmark.
I hope someone who lands here in search of same problem will find my way more user-friendly.
You can still use RegEx to mark lines :)
I like to change two kinds of URLS in my DotNetNuke setup:
/fr-ca/Anything to /fr/Anything
AND
/en-us/Anything to /en/Anything
I went into Host > Settings > Advanced > Friendly URLS and tried this
Match
.*fr-ca/(.*)
Replace with:
.*fr/(.*)
But this isn't working...?
EDIT: Based on the answer below I did...
Match
(.*/fr)-ca(/.*)
Replace:
$1$2
This made the url look the way I want but now it goes to a broken page?
I woudl highly recommend iFinity URLMaster to do what you want. I know it is not free but I hesitated a long time and finally got it. I can say it is worth every penny.
You'll need to use groups. Basically whatever is in () will get put into groups and these can be recalled by using a number i to recall the ith group appearing in the regex.
The exact way to recall groups varies from language to language, but I believe $GroupNumber should work.
So replace:
(.*fr)-ca(/.*)
with:
$1$2
10 websites need to be cached. When caching: photos, css, js, etc are not displayed properly because the base domain isn't attached to the directory. I need a regex to add the base domain to the directory. examples below
base domain: http://www.example.com
the problem occurs when reading cached pages with img src="thumb/123.jpg" or src="/inc/123.js".
they would display correctly if it was img src="http://www.example.com/thumb/123.jpg" or src="http://www.example.com/inc/123.js".
regex something like: if (src=") isn't followed by the base domain then add the base domain
without knowing the language, you can use the (maybe most portable) substitute modifier:
s/^(src=")([^"]+")$/$1www\.example\.com\/$2/
This should do the following:
1. the string 'src="' (and capture it in variable $1)
2. one or more non-double-quote (") character followed by " (and capture it in variable $2)
3. Substitutes 'www.example.com/' in between the two capture groups.
Depending on the language, you can wrap this in a conditional that checks for the existence of the domain and substitutes if it isn't found.
to check for domain: /www\.example\.com/i should do.
EDIT: See comments:
For PHP, I would do this a bit differently. I would probably use simplexml. I don't think that will translate well, though, so here's a regex one...
$html = file_get_contents('/path/to/file.html');
$regex_match = '/(src="|href=")[^(?:www.example.com\/)]([^"]+")/gi';
$regex_substitute = '$1www.example.com/$2';
preg_replace($regex_match, $regex_substitute, $html);
Note: I haven't actually run this to debug it, it's just off the cuff. I would be concerned about 3 things. first, I am unsure how preg_replace will handle the / character. I don't think you're concerned with this, though, unless VB has a similar problem. Second, If there's a chance that line breaks would get in the way, I might change the regex. Third, I added the [^(?:www\.example\.com)] bit. This should change the match to any src or href that doesn't have www.example.com/ there, but this depends on the type of regex being used (POSIX/PCRE).
The rest of the changes should be fine (I added href=" and also made it case-insensitive (\i) and there's a requirement to make it global (\g) otherwise, it will just match once).
I hope that helps.
Matching regular expression:
(?:src|href)="(http://www\.example\.com/)?.+
I'm being lazy tonight and don't want to figure this one out. I need a regex to match 'jeremy.miller' and 'scottgu' from the following inputs:
http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeremy.miller/archive/2009/08/26/talking-about-storyteller-and-executable-requirements-on-elegant-code.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2009/08/25/clean-web-config-files-vs-2010-and-net-4-0-series.aspx
Ideas?
Edit
Chris Lutz did a great job of meeting the requirements above. What if these were the inputs so you couldn't use 'archive' in the regex?
http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeremy.miller/
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/
Would this be what you're looking for?
'/([^/]+)/archive/'
Captures the piece before "archive" in both cases. Depending on regex flavor you'll need to escape the /s for it to work. As an alternative, if you don't want to match the archive part, you could use a lookahead, but I don't like lookaheads, and it's easier to match a lot and just capture the parts you need (in my opinion), so if you prefer to use a lookahead to verify that the next part is archive, you can write one yourself.
EDIT: As you update your question, my idea of what you want is becoming fuzzier. If you want a new regex to match the second cases, you can just pluck the appropriate part off the end, with the same / conditions as before:
'/([^/]+)/$'
If you specifically want either the text jeremy.miller or scottgu, regardless of where they occur in a URL, but only as "words" in the URL (i.e. not scottgu2), try this, once again with the / caveat:
'/(jeremy\.miller|scottgu)/'
As yet a third alternative, if you want the field after the domain name, unless that field is "blogs", it's going to get hairy, especially with the / caveat:
'http://[^/]+/(?:blogs/)?([^/]+)/'
This will match the domain name, an optional blogs field, and then the desired field. The (?:) syntax is a non-capturing group, which means it's just like regular parenthesis, but won't capture the value, so the only value captured is the value you want. (?:) has a risk of varying depending on your particular regex flavor. I don't know what language you're asking for, but I predominantly use Perl, so this regex should pretty much do it if you're using PCRE. If you're using something different, look into non-capturing groups.
Wow. That's a lot of talking about regexes. I need to shut up and post already.
Try this one:
/\/([\w\.]+)\/archive/