Many time we access data via serializer directory according to relationship defined in models in Django(1.11.10). How can i set a filter like fetch-only is_active=1.
class DaasJobsSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = DaasJobs
fields = '__all__'
class DaasScheduleSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
jobs = DaasJobsSerializer(read_only=True,many=True)
class Meta:
model = DaasSchedule
fields = '__all__'
Here i just want to set a filter to fetch only those Jobs which db field is_active=1 in this line like that DaasJobsSerializer(read_only=True,many=True, filter={"is_active":1}) how to do something like this ??
Currently it is giving me all the data without checking is_active,
and i dont want to create serializerMethodField for that.. because all methods written earlier.. i am just setting a is_active field later in the tables in db.
If you want to do it via serializers you can try overriding the ListSerializer and passing it as a custom list_serializer_class.
class IsActiveListSerializer(serializers.ListSerializer):
def to_representation(self, data):
data = data.filter(is_active=1)
return super().to_representation(data)
In your serializer:
class DaasJobsSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = DaasJobs
fields = '__all__'
list_serializer_class = IsActiveListSerializer # import it here
Of course this is a specific use-case, you could make a more generalized version of the ListSerializer to:
class FilteredListSerializer(serializers.ListSerializer):
filter_kwargs = {}
def to_representation(self, data):
if not self.filter_kwargs or not isinstance(self.filter_kwargs, dict):
raise TypeError(_('Invalid Attribute Type: `filter_kwargs` must be a of type `dict`.'))
data = data.filter(**self.filter_kwargs)
return super().to_representation(data)
And then you could sub-class that to make other specific ListSerializers such as:
class IsActiveListSerializer(FilteredListSerializer):
filter_kwargs = {'is_active': 1}
and many others...
Related
I have two models, one contains the other in a foreignKey relationship, I wanted to make an API that would return the combine of these two models, so I attempted to use nested Serializers to add the related model as well, but the data are not all on the same level, the related models is a object inside the first.
Here are the Models
class ModelOne(models.Model):
last_counter = models.IntegerField()
class ModelTwo(models.Model):
model_one = models.ForeignKey(ModelOne, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
category = models.CharField(max_length=64)
counter_type = models.CharField(max_length=32)
Here are the serializers
class ModelOneSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = ModelOne
fields = "__all__"
class ModelTwoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
model_one= ModelOneSerializer(read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = ModelTwo
fields = "__all__"
This would return from the API in the form of
{
"category" : ...,
"counter_type" : ...,
"model_one" : {
"last_counter" : ...
}
}
But I don't want the response to be like that, I want it more like this
{
"category" : ...,
"counter_type" : ...,
"last_counter" : ...,
}
Is there a way to achieve this through serializers?
Use SerializerMethodField
from rest_framework.fields import SerializerMethodField
class ModelTwoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
last_counter = SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = ModelTwo
fields = "__all__"
def get_last_counter(self, obj):
return ModelOneSerializer(obj.model_one).data['last_counter']
When creating custom fields(field_one for example) with SerializerMethodField, you have to create a method called get_field_one, for this method to be automatically detected by the serializer.
You can achieve what you want to do using SerializerMethodField from drf fields:
SerializerMethodField is a read-only field that computes its value at request processing time, by calling a method on the serializer class it is attached to. For example for your case it will look like this. Notice that the computed last_counter is added on the serialized model fields.
from rest_framework.fields import SerializerMethodField
class ModelTwoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
last_counter = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = ModelTwo
fields = ["category", "counter_type", "last_counter"]
def get_last_counter(self, obj):
return int(obj.model_one.last_counter)
SerializerMethodField accepts method_name, but it’s usually more convenient to use the default pattern for naming those methods, which is get_. Just make sure you‘re not overburdening your method fields with any heavy-lifting operations.
You can read more on the official documentation:enter link description here
I have a DRF ModelSerializer, and I'm trying to override the validation, to no avail.
The reason to override the validation is that the corresponding model field is a postgresql HStoreField, so effectively a python dict. However, the incoming data is an array, and I build the corresponding dict during the create function.
Model Part:
class Report(models.Model):
report = HStoreField()
Serializer:
class ReportSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Report
fields = "__all__"
def create(self, validated_data):
codes = validated_data.pop("report")
report = {code: translate_code(code) for code in codes}
return Report(**validated_data, report=report)
def validate_report(self, value):
print("called")
return type(value) == type([]) # I know this is hacky
So the idea is to translate all of the codes to their respective translations, and save that as a key value pair. This is because I will always need the code and its translation together, and from a performance standpoint it makes more sense to do this once and save it in the db, rather than doing the translation on read.
tl;dr: Model field expects dict, data is actually list, I'm trying to override the validation of this field on the serializer to accept this.
Unfortunately, the validate_report function never seems to be called, and I'm not sure why.
EDIT
I also tried this:
class ReportSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Report
fields = "__all__"
validators = []
def create(self, validated_data):
codes = validated_data.pop("report")
report = {code: translate_code(code) for code in codes}
return Report(**validated_data, report=report)
def validate(self, data):
return isinstance(data["report"], "list")
But this validate() is not called either
EDIT: Viewset:
class ReportsViewset(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = ReportSerializer
viewset = Report.objects.all()
I am using the Django REST framework to create an API. I would like to add data from more than one model to the serialised output.
At the moment my serialiser looks like this:
class ItemSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Item
fields = ('url', 'owner', 'item_type')
I would like to add an
item_cost
value from my Costs model to the serialised output (a different cost for each item in the Item model). I would also like to add a unix timestamp value to the serialised output (one value to be placed at the end of all of the other serialised output).
My serialiser is used in a view as follows:
class ItemViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = Item.objects.all().order_by('-date_added')
serializer_class = ItemSerializer
I can't work out how to add the other data items to the serialised output.
You can use a SerializerMethodField from rest_framework.serializers and create a method that returns the value you are looking for, eg:
class ItemSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
cost = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
def get_cost(self, obj):
value = ... # calculate your value
return value
class Meta:
model = Item
fields = ('url', 'owner', 'item_type', 'cost')
Reference in the docs: http://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/fields/#serializermethodfield
I have a question concerning using proxy models with the Django Rest Framework and nested serialization.
My proxy models are as follows:
class MyField(Field):
class Meta:
proxy = True
def field_type_name(self):
# logic that computes the field type name here
return "the result"
class MyForm(Form):
class Meta:
proxy = True
The Field model is defined in another app that I've included in my project. I wanted to add my own method to it without modifying the model so I made a proxy.
These are the serializers for the proxy models:
class MyFieldSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
field_type = serializers.ChoiceField(source='field_type_name',
choices=form_fields.NAMES)
class Meta:
model = MyField
fields = ('url', 'field_type',)
class MyFormSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
fields = MyFieldSerializer(many=True)
class Meta:
model = MyForm
fields = ('url', 'fields')
And the viewsets:
class MyFieldViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = MyField.objects.all()
serializer_class = MyFieldSerializer
class MyFormViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = MyForm.objects.all()
serializer_class = MyFormSerializer
urls.py:
router.register(r'fields', views.MyFieldViewSet)
router.register(r'forms', views.MyFormViewSet)
If I go to /fields/ it works fine. The method I added in the proxy model is executed correctly.
[
{
"url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/fields/1/",
"field_type": "the result",
},
{ ...
But if I go to /forms/ I get the following error:
AttributeError at /forms/
'Field' object has no attribute 'field_type_name'
/Users/..../lib/python2.7/site-packages/rest_framework/fields.py in get_component
"""
Given an object, and an attribute name,
return that attribute on the object.
"""
if isinstance(obj, dict):
val = obj.get(attr_name)
else:
**val = getattr(obj, attr_name)**
if is_simple_callable(val):
return val()
return val
▼ Local vars
Variable Value
attr_name u'field_type_name'
obj <Field: Cools2>
As you can see the obj is Field instead of MyField which is why it's not able to call field_type_name. This only happens on the nested serialization. If anyone has a suggestion on how I can best fix this I'd greatly appreciate it.
EDIT:
Based on Kevin's response I'm editing the proxy models to try to fix this.
Here are the base models for reference:
class Form(AbstractForm):
pass
class Field(AbstractField):
form = models.ForeignKey("Form", related_name="fields")
Here is my attempt to fix the problem (using examples from Django proxy model and ForeignKey):
class MyField(Field):
class Meta:
proxy = True
def field_type_name(self):
# logic that computes the field type name here
return "the result"
# this works
#property
def form(self):
return MyForm.objects.get(id=self.form_id)
class MyForm(Form):
class Meta:
proxy = True
# this does not work
#property
def fields(self):
qs = super(MyForm, self).fields
qs.model = MyField
return qs
Now I can get MyForm from MyField but not MyField from MyForm (the reverse):
>>> MyField.objects.get(pk=1).form
<MyForm: Cool Form>
>>> MyForm.objects.get(pk=1).fields.all()
[]
I
This is because your model Form (or MyForm) isn't configured to return MyField objects when you access the field attribute on the form. It's not configured to substitute your proxied-version.
Try it yourself, open ./manage.py shell and try to read the fields related manager, it will return a collection of Field objects.
>>> form = MyForm.objects.all()[0].fields.all()
(Btw, I have to guess on the actual model structure since the original Field and Form models weren't included in your example).
If it's a read-only field, you could use serializers.SerializerMethodField to add a method to the serializer (your field_type_name(). If you want to be able to edit it, you're better off writing your own field sub-class that handles the conversion.
I want to serialize a model, but want to include an additional field that requires doing some database lookups on the model instance to be serialized:
class FooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
my_field = ... # result of some database queries on the input Foo object
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = ('id', 'name', 'myfield')
What is the right way to do this? I see that you can pass in extra "context" to the serializer, is the right answer to pass in the additional field in a context dictionary?
With that approach, the logic of getting the field I need would not be self-contained with the serializer definition, which is ideal since every serialized instance will need my_field. Elsewhere in the DRF serializers documentation it says "extra fields can correspond to any property or callable on the model". Are "extra fields" what I'm talking about?
Should I define a function in Foo's model definition that returns my_field value, and in the serializer I hook up my_field to that callable? What does that look like?
Happy to clarify the question if necessary.
I think SerializerMethodField is what you're looking for:
class FooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
my_field = serializers.SerializerMethodField('is_named_bar')
def is_named_bar(self, foo):
return foo.name == "bar"
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = ('id', 'name', 'my_field')
http://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/fields/#serializermethodfield
You can change your model method to property and use it in serializer with this approach.
class Foo(models.Model):
. . .
#property
def my_field(self):
return stuff
. . .
class FooSerializer(ModelSerializer):
my_field = serializers.ReadOnlyField(source='my_field')
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = ('my_field',)
Edit: With recent versions of rest framework (I tried 3.3.3), you don't need to change to property. Model method will just work fine.
With the last version of Django Rest Framework, you need to create a method in your model with the name of the field you want to add. No need for #property and source='field' raise an error.
class Foo(models.Model):
. . .
def foo(self):
return 'stuff'
. . .
class FooSerializer(ModelSerializer):
foo = serializers.ReadOnlyField()
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = ('foo',)
if you want read and write on your extra field, you can use a new custom serializer, that extends serializers.Serializer, and use it like this
class ExtraFieldSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
def to_representation(self, instance):
# this would have the same as body as in a SerializerMethodField
return 'my logic here'
def to_internal_value(self, data):
# This must return a dictionary that will be used to
# update the caller's validation data, i.e. if the result
# produced should just be set back into the field that this
# serializer is set to, return the following:
return {
self.field_name: 'Any python object made with data: %s' % data
}
class MyModelSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
my_extra_field = ExtraFieldSerializer(source='*')
class Meta:
model = MyModel
fields = ['id', 'my_extra_field']
i use this in related nested fields with some custom logic
My response to a similar question (here) might be useful.
If you have a Model Method defined in the following way:
class MyModel(models.Model):
...
def model_method(self):
return "some_calculated_result"
You can add the result of calling said method to your serializer like so:
class MyModelSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
model_method_field = serializers.CharField(source='model_method')
p.s. Since the custom field isn't really a field in your model, you'll usually want to make it read-only, like so:
class Meta:
model = MyModel
read_only_fields = (
'model_method_field',
)
If you want to add field dynamically for each object u can use to_represention.
class FooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = ('id', 'name',)
def to_representation(self, instance):
representation = super().to_representation(instance)
if instance.name!='': #condition
representation['email']=instance.name+"#xyz.com"#adding key and value
representation['currency']=instance.task.profile.currency #adding key and value some other relation field
return representation
return representation
In this way you can add key and value for each obj dynamically
hope u like it
This worked for me.
If we want to just add an additional field in ModelSerializer, we can
do it like below, and also the field can be assigned some val after
some calculations of lookup. Or in some cases, if we want to send the
parameters in API response.
In model.py
class Foo(models.Model):
"""Model Foo"""
name = models.CharField(max_length=30, help_text="Customer Name")
In serializer.py
class FooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
retrieved_time = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
#classmethod
def get_retrieved_time(self, object):
"""getter method to add field retrieved_time"""
return None
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = ('id', 'name', 'retrieved_time ')
Hope this could help someone.
class Demo(models.Model):
...
#property
def property_name(self):
...
If you want to use the same property name:
class DemoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
property_name = serializers.ReadOnlyField()
class Meta:
model = Product
fields = '__all__' # or you can choose your own fields
If you want to use different property name, just change this:
new_property_name = serializers.ReadOnlyField(source='property_name')
As Chemical Programer said in this comment, in latest DRF you can just do it like this:
class FooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
extra_field = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
def get_extra_field(self, foo_instance):
return foo_instance.a + foo_instance.b
class Meta:
model = Foo
fields = ('extra_field', ...)
DRF docs source
Even though, this is not what author has wanted, it still can be considered useful for people here:
If you are using .save() ModelSerializer's method, you can pass **kwargs into it. By this, you can save multiple dynamic values.
i.e. .save(**{'foo':'bar', 'lorem':'ipsum'})
Add the following in serializer class:
def to_representation(self, instance):
representation = super().to_representation(instance)
representation['package_id'] = "custom value"
return representation