What I am trying to do is to get environmental variable value and use it in code itself.
What I am trying to do is (with variable set as export UTMZONE="33T"):
char UTMZone[4] = getenv("UTMZONE");
With that I receive following error:
error: array must be initialized with a brace-enclosed initializer
I presume issue is with mixing types, but I have no idea what kind of conversion do I have to make.
getenv returns a char*. There isn't a way to initialize a char[N] from a char*. What you would need to do is capture the pointer and then copy the string to the array like
char UTMZone[4];
char* ret = getenv("UTMZONE");
if (ret)
strncpy(UTMZone, ret, 4);
else
// abort
That said, if you can use a std::string, that is constructable from a char*. Using
char* ret = getenv("UTMZONE");
if (ret)
std::string UTMZone = ret;
else
// abort
gives you a string populated with the environment variable. If you need to pass it to a something that needs a char* or const char* then you can use the data() or c_str() member functions respectively. That would look like
function_that_needs_char_star(UTMZone.data());
function_that_needs_const_char_star(UTMZone.c_str());
If you really want to use a char array and know for sure that you only need the first three chars of UTMZONE you could use this:
char* envptr = std::getenv("UTMZONE");
if(envptr){ // check the pointer isn't null
char UTMZone[4];
// set null terminator
UTMZone[4] = '\0';
// copy 3 chars as the null terminator is already there
std::strncpy(UTMZone, 3, envptr);
}
you should really use strings instead of char[] though as those are much safer.
edit: Nathan was both quicker and more eloquent :(
edit: adjusted for use of strncpy instead of strcpy and added NULL check
Related
I have a const char
const char example[] = "\x4D\x5A\xE8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x5B\x52\x45\x55\x89\xE5\x81\xC3";
and
DWORD* example2 = "\xAA\xBB\xCC\xDD";
and i want to change the last 4 bytes of example1 with those on example2
what can I do in C++?
i have tried memcpy , strcpy and strcpy_s with no luck
You should not modify a constant array!
Modifying a inherently constant object/variable leads to Undefined Behavior.
Just don't do it. Make a copy of it and modify that copy or if you want to modify the same array simply don't declare it as const.
Donot modify a constant string.
const char example[] = "\x4D\x5A\xE8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x5B\x52\x45\x55\x89\xE5\x81\xC3"; here, your string has a few NULL string terminator. This will NOT work with functions in <string.h> (such as strlen() and others)
Instead use memcpy, memset functions to append ONLY after knowing the length of the binary string.
Store your result in a character array, but don't assume it will work as a regular string because of your data.
your example[] char array is defined as const so you can not modify it.
1) You should get an eror in the compilation if you change your const char array in this way
example[2] ='R';
2) You should get a warning if you modify your const char array via memcpy or via strcpy
Change it to
char example[] = "\x4D\x5A\xE8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x5B\x52\x45\x55\x89\xE5\x81\xC3";
And you can not use strcpy because your character array contains x00 in the middle so this will affect the strcpy function. Because strcpy stop when it find x00 in the char array
example[] char array contains x00 in the middle, so to find the length of example[] with strlen will not work properly. For this case I suggest to use sizeof(example) instead.
Here after how you can make your copy:
char example[] = "\x4D\x5A\xE8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x5B\x52\x45\x55\x89\xE5\x81\xC3";
DWORD* example2 = "\xAA\xBB\xCC\xDD";
if (sizeof(example)>=sizeof(example2))
memcpy(example+sizeof(example)-sizeof(example2), example2, sizeof(example2));
Const variables can't be changed. This is by design. In the case of a c string, you can have the contents of the string const or the pointer to the string const.
Since you are defining it as a const character array, the pointer is implicitely const and the contents are explicitly const.
const char * const mystring = "hello"
In this case the first "const" tries to apply left (there is nothing), so it applies right (to the char type). So the string content may not change. The second const tries to apply left, so it makes the pointer itself const. That means that the mystring pointer must always point to where the "h" from "hello" in memory is.
So afterwards if I try:
mystring[0] = "y"
or
mystring = "gooodbye!"
They would not work. If you removed the first or second const respectively, they could be made to work.
The purpose of const allows you to say ahead of time "this variable cannot be modified". That means that if it is modified then there is a problem. Generally you should always use const with any variable that you do not want to be modified after instantiation.
You should never modify a constant including a constant array. If you want to change what you have above, create a copy of it and change the copy. As pointed out by RasmusKaj strcpy will not help you here as the source strings contains zero chars so maybe use memcpy for the creation of the copy.
I am new to C++, and haven't quite grasped all the concepts yet, so i am perplexed at why this function does not work. I am currently not at home, so i cannot post the compiler error just yet, i will do it as soon as i get home.
Here is the function.
const char * ConvertToChar(std::string input1, std::string input2) {
// Create a string that you want converted
std::stringstream ss;
// Streams the two strings together
ss << input1 << input2;
// outputs it into a string
std::string msg = ss.str();
//Creating the character the string will go in; be sure it is large enough so you don't overflow the array
cont char * cstr[80];
//Copies the string into the char array. Thus allowing it to be used elsewhere.
strcpy(cstr, msg.c_str());
return * cstr;
}
It is made to concatenate and convert two strings together to return a const char *. That is because the function i want to use it with requires a const char pointer to be passed through.
The code returns a pointer to a local (stack) variable. When the caller gets this pointer that local variable doesn't exist any more. This is often called dangling reference.
If you want to convert std::string to a c-style string use std::string::c_str().
So, to concatenate two strings and get a c-style string do:
std::string input1 = ...;
std::string input2 = ...;
// concatenate
std::string s = input1 + input2;
// get a c-style string
char const* cstr = s.c_str();
// cstr becomes invalid when s is changed or destroyed
Without knowing what the error is, it's hard to say, but this
line:
const char* cstr[80];
seems wrong: it creates an array of 80 pointers; when it
implicitly converts to a pointer, the type will be char
const**, which should give an error when it is passed as an
argument to strcpy, and the dereference in the return
statement is the same as if you wrote cstr[0], and returns the
first pointer in the array—since the contents of the array
have never been initialized, this is undefined behavior.
Before you go any further, you have to define what the function
should return—not only its type, but where the pointed to
memory will reside. There are three possible solutions to this:
Use a local static for the buffer:
This solution was
frequently used in early C, and is still present in a number of
functions in the C library. It has two major defects: 1)
successive calls will overwrite the results, so the client code
must make its own copy before calling the function again, and 2)
it isn't thread safe. (The second issue can be avoided by using
thread local storage.) In cases like yours, it also has the
problem that the buffer must be big enough for the data, which
probably requires dynamic allocation, which adds to the
complexity.
Return a pointer to dynamically allocated memory:
This works well in theory, but requires the client code to free
the memory. This must be rigorously documented, and is
extremely error prone.
Require the client code to provide the buffer:
This is probably the best solution in modern code, but it does
mean that you need extra parameters for the address and the
length of the buffer.
In addition to this: there's no need to use std::ostringstream
if all you're doing is concatenating; just add the two strings.
Whatever solution you use, verify that the results will fit.
I have been working with C++ strings and trying to load char * strings into std::string by using C functions such as strcpy(). Since strcpy() takes char * as a parameter, I have to cast it which goes something like this:
std::string destination;
unsigned char *source;
strcpy((char*)destination.c_str(), (char*)source);
The code works fine and when I run the program in a debugger, the value of *source is stored in destination, but for some odd reason it won't print out with the statement
std::cout << destination;
I noticed that if I use
std::cout << destination.c_str();
The value prints out correctly and all is well. Why does this happen? Is there a better method of copying an unsigned char* or char* into a std::string (stringstreams?) This seems to only happen when I specify the string as foo.c_str() in a copying operation.
Edit: To answer the question "why would you do this?", I am using strcpy() as a plain example. There are other times that it's more complex than assignment. For example, having to copy only X amount of string A into string B using strncpy() or passing a std::string to a function from a C library that takes a char * as a parameter for a buffer.
Here's what you want
std::string destination = source;
What you're doing is wrong on so many levels... you're writing over the inner representation of a std::string... I mean... not cool man... it's much more complex than that, arrays being resized, read-only memory... the works.
This is not a good idea at all for two reasons:
destination.c_str() is a const pointer and casting away it's const and writing to it is undefined behavior.
You haven't set the size of the string, meaning that it won't even necessealy have a large enough buffer to hold the string which is likely to cause an access violation.
std::string has a constructor which allows it to be constructed from a char* so simply write:
std::string destination = source
Well what you are doing is undefined behavior. Your c_str() returns a const char * and is not meant to be assigned to. Why not use the defined constructor or assignment operator.
std::string defines an implicit conversion from const char* to std::string... so use that.
You decided to cast away an error as c_str() returns a const char*, i.e., it does not allow for writing to its underlying buffer. You did everything you could to get around that and it didn't work (you shouldn't be surprised at this).
c_str() returns a const char* for good reason. You have no idea if this pointer points to the string's underlying buffer. You have no idea if this pointer points to a memory block large enough to hold your new string. The library is using its interface to tell you exactly how the return value of c_str() should be used and you're ignoring that completely.
Do not do what you are doing!!!
I repeat!
DO NOT DO WHAT YOU ARE DOING!!!
That it seems to sort of work when you do some weird things is a consequence of how the string class was implemented. You are almost certainly writing in memory you shouldn't be and a bunch of other bogus stuff.
When you need to interact with a C function that writes to a buffer there's two basic methods:
std::string read_from_sock(int sock) {
char buffer[1024] = "";
int recv = read(sock, buffer, 1024);
if (recv > 0) {
return std::string(buffer, buffer + recv);
}
return std::string();
}
Or you might try the peek method:
std::string read_from_sock(int sock) {
int recv = read(sock, 0, 0, MSG_PEEK);
if (recv > 0) {
std::vector<char> buf(recv);
recv = read(sock, &buf[0], recv, 0);
return std::string(buf.begin(), buf.end());
}
return std::string();
}
Of course, these are not very robust versions...but they illustrate the point.
First you should note that the value returned by c_str is a const char* and must not be modified. Actually it even does not have to point to the internal buffer of string.
In response to your edit:
having to copy only X amount of string A into string B using strncpy()
If string A is a char array, and string B is std::string, and strlen(A) >= X, then you can do this:
B.assign(A, A + X);
passing a std::string to a function from a C library that takes a char
* as a parameter for a buffer
If the parameter is actually const char *, you can use c_str() for that. But if it is just plain char *, and you are using a C++11 compliant compiler, then you can do the following:
c_function(&B[0]);
However, you need to ensure that there is room in the string for the data(same as if you were using a plain c-string), which you can do with a call to the resize() function. If the function writes an unspecified amount of characters to the string as a null-terminated c-string, then you will probably want to truncate the string afterward, like this:
B.resize(B.find('\0'));
The reason you can safely do this in a C++11 compiler and not a C++03 compiler is that in C++03, strings were not guaranteed by the standard to be contiguous, but in C++11, they are. If you want the guarantee in C++03, then you can use std::vector<char> instead.
I have found that the easiest way to build my program argument list is as a vector of strings. However, execv expects an array of chars for the second argument. What's the easiest way to get it to accept of vector of strings?
execv() accepts only an array of string pointers. There is no way to get it to accept anything else. It is a standard interface, callable from every hosted language, not just C++.
I have tested compiling this:
std::vector<string> vector;
const char *programname = "abc";
const char **argv = new const char* [vector.size()+2]; // extra room for program name and sentinel
argv [0] = programname; // by convention, argv[0] is program name
for (int j = 0; j < vector.size()+1; ++j) // copy args
argv [j+1] = vector[j] .c_str();
argv [vector.size()+1] = NULL; // end of arguments sentinel is NULL
execv (programname, (char **)argv);
The prototype for execv is:
int execv(const char *path, char *const argv[]);
That means the argument list is an array of pointers to null-terminated c strings.
You have vector<string>. Find out the size of that vector and make an array of pointers to char. Then loop through the vector and for each string in the vector set the corresponding element of the array to point to it.
I stumbled over the same problem a while ago.
I ended up building the argument list in a std::basic_string<char const*>. Then I called the c_str() method and did a const_cast<char* const*> on the result to obtain the list in a format that execv accepts.
For composed arguments, I newed strings (ordinary strings made of ordinary chars ;) ), took their c_str() and let them leak.
The const_cast is necessary to remove an additional const as the c_str() method of the given string type returns a char const* const* iirc. Typing this, I think I could have used std::basic_string<char*> but I guess I had a reason...
I am well aware that the const-casting and memory leaking looks a bit rude and is indeed bad practise, but since execv replaces the whole process it won't matter anyway.
Yes, it can be done pretty cleanly by taking advantage of the internal array that vectors use. Best to not use C++ strings in the vector, and const_cast string literals and string.c_str()'s to char*.
This will work, since the standard guarantees its elements are stored contiguously (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/2923290/383983)
#include <unistd.h>
#include <vector>
using std::vector;
int main() {
vector<const char*> command;
// do a push_back for the command, then each of the arguments
command.push_back("echo");
command.push_back("testing");
command.push_back("1");
command.push_back("2");
command.push_back("3");
// push NULL to the end of the vector (execvp expects NULL as last element)
command.push_back(NULL);
// pass the vector's internal array to execvp
execvp(command[0], const_cast<char* const*>(command.data()));
return 1;
}
Code adapted from: How to pass a vector to execvp
Do a const_cast to avoid the "deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*'". String literals are implemented as const char* in C++. const_cast is the safest form of cast here, as it only removes the const and does not do any other funny business. execvp() will not edit the values anyway.
If you want to avoid all casts, you have to complicate this code by copying all the values to char* types not really worth it.
Although if the number of arguments you want to pass to execv/execl is known, it's easier to write this in C.
You can't change the how execv works (not easily anyway), but you could overload the function name with one that works the way you want it to:
int execv(const string& path, const vector<string>& argv) {
vector<const char*> av;
for (const string& a : argv) {
av.push_back(a.c_str());
av.push_back(0);
return execv(path.c_str(), &av[0]);
}
Of course, this may cause some confusion. You would be better off giving it a name other than execv().
NB: I just typed this in off the top of my head. It may not work. It may not even compile ;-)
I have done a search in google and been told this is impossible as I can only get a static char * from a string, so I am looking for an alternative.
Here is the situation:
I have a .txt file that contains a list of other .txt files and some numbers, this is done so the program can be added to without recompilation. I use an ifstream to read the filenames into a string.
The function that they are required for is expecting a char * not a string and apparently this conversion is impossible.
I have access to this function but it calls another function with the char * so I think im stuck using a char *.
Does anyone know of a work around or another way of doing this?
In C++, I’d always do the following if a non-const char* is needed:
std::vector<char> buffer(str.length() + 1, '\0');
std::copy(str.begin(), str.end(), buffer.begin());
char* cstr = &buffer[0];
The first line creates a modifiable copy of our string that is guaranteed to reside in a contiguous memory block. The second line gets a pointer to the beginning of this buffer. Notice that the vector is one element bigger than the string to accomodate a null termination.
You can get a const char* to the string using c_str:
std::string str = "foo bar" ;
const char *ptr = str.c_str() ;
If you need just a char* you have to make a copy, e.g. doing:
char *cpy = new char[str.size()+1] ;
strcpy(cpy, str.c_str());
As previous posters have mentioned if the called function does in fact modify the string then you will need to copy it. However for future reference if you are simply dealing with an old c-style function that takes a char* but doesn't actually modfiy the argument, you can const-cast the result of the c_str() call.
void oldFn(char *c) { // doesn't modify c }
std::string tStr("asdf");
oldFn(const_cast< char* >(tStr.c_str());
There is c_str(); if you need a C compatible version of a std::string. See http://www.cppreference.com/wiki/string/basic_string/c_str
It's not static though but const. If your other function requires char* (without const) you can either cast away the constness (WARNING! Make sure the function doesn't modify the string) or create a local copy as codebolt suggested. Don't forget to delete the copy afterwards!
Can't you just pass the string as such to your function that takes a char*:
func(&string[0]);