I have some x and y data, with which I would like to generate a 3D histogram, with a color gradient (bwr or whatever).
I have written a script which plot the interesting values, in between -2 and 2 for both x and y abscesses:
import numpy as np
import numpy.random
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# To generate some test data
x = np.random.randn(500)
y = np.random.randn(500)
XY = np.stack((x,y),axis=-1)
def selection(XY, limitXY=[[-2,+2],[-2,+2]]):
XY_select = []
for elt in XY:
if elt[0] > limitXY[0][0] and elt[0] < limitXY[0][1] and elt[1] > limitXY[1][0] and elt[1] < limitXY[1][1]:
XY_select.append(elt)
return np.array(XY_select)
XY_select = selection(XY, limitXY=[[-2,+2],[-2,+2]])
heatmap, xedges, yedges = np.histogram2d(XY_select[:,0], XY_select[:,1], bins = 7, range = [[-2,2],[-2,2]])
extent = [xedges[0], xedges[-1], yedges[0], yedges[-1]]
plt.figure("Histogram")
#plt.clf()
plt.imshow(heatmap.T, extent=extent, origin='lower')
plt.show()
And give this correct result:
Now, I would like to turn this into a 3D histogram. Unfortunatly I don't success to plot it correctly with bar3d because it takes by default the length of x and y for abscisse.
I am quite sure that there is a very easy way to plot this in 3D with imshow. Like an unknow option...
I finaly succeded in doing it. I am almost sure there is a better way to do it, but at leat it works:
import numpy as np
import numpy.random
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# To generate some test data
x = np.random.randn(500)
y = np.random.randn(500)
XY = np.stack((x,y),axis=-1)
def selection(XY, limitXY=[[-2,+2],[-2,+2]]):
XY_select = []
for elt in XY:
if elt[0] > limitXY[0][0] and elt[0] < limitXY[0][1] and elt[1] > limitXY[1][0] and elt[1] < limitXY[1][1]:
XY_select.append(elt)
return np.array(XY_select)
XY_select = selection(XY, limitXY=[[-2,+2],[-2,+2]])
xAmplitudes = np.array(XY_select)[:,0]#your data here
yAmplitudes = np.array(XY_select)[:,1]#your other data here
fig = plt.figure() #create a canvas, tell matplotlib it's 3d
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
hist, xedges, yedges = np.histogram2d(x, y, bins=(7,7), range = [[-2,+2],[-2,+2]]) # you can change your bins, and the range on which to take data
# hist is a 7X7 matrix, with the populations for each of the subspace parts.
xpos, ypos = np.meshgrid(xedges[:-1]+xedges[1:], yedges[:-1]+yedges[1:]) -(xedges[1]-xedges[0])
xpos = xpos.flatten()*1./2
ypos = ypos.flatten()*1./2
zpos = np.zeros_like (xpos)
dx = xedges [1] - xedges [0]
dy = yedges [1] - yedges [0]
dz = hist.flatten()
cmap = cm.get_cmap('jet') # Get desired colormap - you can change this!
max_height = np.max(dz) # get range of colorbars so we can normalize
min_height = np.min(dz)
# scale each z to [0,1], and get their rgb values
rgba = [cmap((k-min_height)/max_height) for k in dz]
ax.bar3d(xpos, ypos, zpos, dx, dy, dz, color=rgba, zsort='average')
plt.title("X vs. Y Amplitudes for ____ Data")
plt.xlabel("My X data source")
plt.ylabel("My Y data source")
plt.savefig("Your_title_goes_here")
plt.show()
I use this example, but I modified it, because it introduced an offset. The result is this:
You can generate the same result using something as simple as the following:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.linspace(-2, 2, 7)
y = np.linspace(-2, 2, 7)
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(x, y)
z = xx*0+yy*0+ np.random.random(size=[7,7])
plt.imshow(z, interpolation='nearest', cmap=plt.cm.viridis, extent=[-2,2,2,2])
plt.show()
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
ax = Axes3D(plt.figure())
ax.plot_surface(xx, yy, z, cmap=plt.cm.viridis, cstride=1, rstride=1)
plt.show()
The results are given below:
Related
I try to make a fit of my curve. My raw data is in an xlsx file. I extract them using pandas. I want to do two different fit because there is a change in behavior from Ra = 1e6. We know that Ra is proportional to Nu**a. a = 0.25 for Ra <1e6 and if not a = 0.33.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from math import log10
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
import lmfit
data=pd.read_excel('data.xlsx',sheet_name='Sheet2',index=False,dtype={'Ra': float})
print(data)
plt.xscale('log')
plt.yscale('log')
plt.scatter(data['Ra'].values, data['Nu_top'].values, label='Nu_top')
plt.scatter(data['Ra'].values, data['Nu_bottom'].values, label='Nu_bottom')
plt.errorbar(data['Ra'].values, data['Nu_top'].values , yerr=data['Ecart type top'].values, linestyle="None")
plt.errorbar(data['Ra'].values, data['Nu_bottom'].values , yerr=data['Ecart type bot'].values, linestyle="None")
def func(x,a):
return 10**(np.log10(x)/a)
"""maxX = max(data['Ra'].values)
minX = min(data['Ra'].values)
maxY = max(data['Nu_top'].values)
minY = min(data['Nu_top'].values)
maxXY = max(maxX, maxY)
parameterBounds = [-maxXY, maxXY]"""
from lmfit import Model
mod = Model(func)
params = mod.make_params(a=0.25)
ret = mod.fit(data['Nu_top'].head(10).values, params, x=data['Ra'].head(10).values)
print(ret.fit_report())
popt, pcov = curve_fit(func, data['Ra'].head(10).values,
data['Nu_top'].head(10).values, sigma=data['Ecart type top'].head(10).values,
absolute_sigma=True, p0=[0.25])
plt.plot(data['Ra'].head(10).values, func(data['Ra'].head(10).values, *popt),
'r-', label='fit: a=%5.3f' % tuple(popt))
popt, pcov = curve_fit(func, data['Ra'].tail(4).values, data['Nu_top'].tail(4).values,
sigma=data['Ecart type top'].tail(4).values,
absolute_sigma=True, p0=[0.33])
plt.plot(data['Ra'].tail(4).values, func(data['Ra'].tail(4).values, *popt),
'b-', label='fit: a=%5.3f' % tuple(popt))
print(pcov)
plt.grid
plt.title("Nusselt en fonction de Ra")
plt.xlabel('Ra')
plt.ylabel('Nu')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
So I use the log: logRa = a * logNu.
Ra = x axis
Nu = y axis
That's why I defined my function func in this way.
my two fit are not all correct as you can see. I have a covariance equal to [0.00010971]. So I had to do something wrong but I don't see it. I need help please.
Here the data file:
data.xlsx
I noticed that the data values for Ra are large, and after scaling them I performed an equation search - here is my result with code. I use the standard scipy genetic algorithm module differential_evolution to determine initial parameter values for curve_fit(), and that module uses the Latin Hypercube algorithm to ensure a thorough search of parameter space which requires bounds within which to search. It is much easier to give ranges for the initial parameter estimates than to find specific values. This equation works well for both nu_top and nu_bottom, note that the plots are not log scaled as it is unnecessary in this example.
import numpy, scipy, matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
from scipy.optimize import differential_evolution
import pandas
import warnings
filename = 'data.xlsx'
data=pandas.read_excel(filename,sheet_name='Sheet2',index=False,dtype={'Ra': float})
# notice the Ra scaling by 10000.0
xData = data['Ra'].values / 10000.0
yData = data['Nu_bottom']
def func(x, a, b, c): # "Combined Power And Exponential" from zunzun.com
return a * numpy.power(x, b) * numpy.exp(c * x)
# function for genetic algorithm to minimize (sum of squared error)
def sumOfSquaredError(parameterTuple):
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") # do not print warnings by genetic algorithm
val = func(xData, *parameterTuple)
return numpy.sum((yData - val) ** 2.0)
def generate_Initial_Parameters():
# min and max used for bounds
maxX = max(xData)
minX = min(xData)
maxY = max(yData)
minY = min(yData)
parameterBounds = []
parameterBounds.append([0.0, 10.0]) # search bounds for a
parameterBounds.append([0.0, 10.0]) # search bounds for b
parameterBounds.append([0.0, 10.0]) # search bounds for c
# "seed" the numpy random number generator for repeatable results
result = differential_evolution(sumOfSquaredError, parameterBounds, seed=3)
return result.x
# by default, differential_evolution completes by calling curve_fit() using parameter bounds
geneticParameters = generate_Initial_Parameters()
# now call curve_fit without passing bounds from the genetic algorithm,
# just in case the best fit parameters are aoutside those bounds
fittedParameters, pcov = curve_fit(func, xData, yData, geneticParameters)
print('Fitted parameters:', fittedParameters)
print()
modelPredictions = func(xData, *fittedParameters)
absError = modelPredictions - yData
SE = numpy.square(absError) # squared errors
MSE = numpy.mean(SE) # mean squared errors
RMSE = numpy.sqrt(MSE) # Root Mean Squared Error, RMSE
Rsquared = 1.0 - (numpy.var(absError) / numpy.var(yData))
print()
print('RMSE:', RMSE)
print('R-squared:', Rsquared)
print()
##########################################################
# graphics output section
def ModelAndScatterPlot(graphWidth, graphHeight):
f = plt.figure(figsize=(graphWidth/100.0, graphHeight/100.0), dpi=100)
axes = f.add_subplot(111)
# first the raw data as a scatter plot
axes.plot(xData, yData, 'D')
# create data for the fitted equation plot
xModel = numpy.linspace(min(xData), max(xData))
yModel = func(xModel, *fittedParameters)
# now the model as a line plot
axes.plot(xModel, yModel)
axes.set_xlabel('X Data') # X axis data label
axes.set_ylabel('Y Data') # Y axis data label
plt.show()
plt.close('all') # clean up after using pyplot
graphWidth = 800
graphHeight = 600
ModelAndScatterPlot(graphWidth, graphHeight)
Here I put my data x and y in log10 (). The graph is in log scale. So normally I should have two affine functions with a coefficient of 0.25 and 0.33. I change the function func in your program James and bounds for b and c but I have no good result.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from math import log10, log
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
import lmfit
data=pd.read_excel('data.xlsx',sheet_name='Sheet2',index=False,dtype={'Ra': float})
print(data)
plt.xscale('log')
plt.yscale('log')
plt.scatter(np.log10(data['Ra'].values), np.log10(data['Nu_top'].values), label='Nu_top')
plt.scatter(np.log10(data['Ra'].values), np.log10(data['Nu_bottom'].values), label='Nu_bottom')
plt.errorbar(np.log10(data['Ra'].values), np.log10(data['Nu_top'].values) , yerr=data['Ecart type top'].values, linestyle="None")
plt.errorbar(np.log10(data['Ra'].values), np.log10(data['Nu_bottom'].values) , yerr=data['Ecart type bot'].values, linestyle="None")
def func(x,a):
return a*x
maxX = max(data['Ra'].values)
minX = min(data['Ra'].values)
maxY = max(data['Nu_top'].values)
minY = min(data['Nu_top'].values)
maxXY = max(maxX, maxY)
parameterBounds = [-maxXY, maxXY]
from lmfit import Model
mod = Model(func)
params = mod.make_params(a=0.25)
ret = mod.fit(np.log10(data['Nu_top'].head(10).values), params, x=np.log10(data['Ra'].head(10).values))
print(ret.fit_report())
popt, pcov = curve_fit(func, np.log10(data['Ra'].head(10).values), np.log10(data['Nu_top'].head(10).values), sigma=data['Ecart type top'].head(10).values, absolute_sigma=True, p0=[0.25])
plt.plot(np.log10(data['Ra'].head(10).values), func(np.log10(data['Ra'].head(10).values), *popt), 'r-', label='fit: a=%5.3f' % tuple(popt))
popt, pcov = curve_fit(func, np.log10(data['Ra'].tail(4).values), np.log10(data['Nu_top'].tail(4).values), sigma=data['Ecart type top'].tail(4).values, absolute_sigma=True, p0=[0.33])
plt.plot(np.log10(data['Ra'].tail(4).values), func(np.log10(data['Ra'].tail(4).values), *popt), 'b-', label='fit: a=%5.3f' % tuple(popt))
print(pcov)
plt.grid
plt.title("Nusselt en fonction de Ra")
plt.xlabel('log10(Ra)')
plt.ylabel('log10(Nu)')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
With polyfit I have better results.
With my code I open the file and I calculate log (Ra) and log (Nu) then plot (log (Ra), log (Nu)) in log scale.
I'm supposed to have a = 0.25 for Ra <1e6 and if not a = 0.33
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from math import log10
from numpy import polyfit
import numpy.polynomial.polynomial as poly
data=pd.read_excel('data.xlsx',sheet_name='Sheet2',index=False,dtype={'Ra': float})
print(data)
x=np.log10(data['Ra'].values)
y1=np.log10(data['Nu_top'].values)
y2=np.log10(data['Nu_bottom'].values)
x2=np.log10(data['Ra'].head(11).values)
y4=np.log10(data['Nu_top'].head(11).values)
x3=np.log10(data['Ra'].tail(4).values)
y5=np.log10(data['Nu_top'].tail(4).values)
plt.xscale('log')
plt.yscale('log')
plt.scatter(x, y1, label='Nu_top')
plt.scatter(x, y2, label='Nu_bottom')
plt.errorbar(x, y1 , yerr=data['Ecart type top'].values, linestyle="None")
plt.errorbar(x, y2 , yerr=data['Ecart type bot'].values, linestyle="None")
"""a=np.ones(10, dtype=np.float)
weights = np.insert(a,0,1E10)"""
coefs = poly.polyfit(x2, y4, 1)
print(coefs)
ffit = poly.polyval(x2, coefs)
plt.plot(x2, ffit, label='fit: b=%5.3f, a=%5.3f' % tuple(coefs))
absError = ffit - x2
SE = np.square(absError) # squared errors
MSE = np.mean(SE) # mean squared errors
RMSE = np.sqrt(MSE) # Root Mean Squared Error, RMSE
Rsquared = 1.0 - (np.var(absError) / np.var(x2))
print('RMSE:', RMSE)
print('R-squared:', Rsquared)
print()
print('Predicted value at x=0:', ffit[0])
print()
coefs = poly.polyfit(x3, y5, 1)
ffit = poly.polyval(x3, coefs)
plt.plot(x3, ffit, label='fit: b=%5.3f, a=%5.3f' % tuple(coefs))
plt.grid
plt.title("Nusselt en fonction de Ra")
plt.xlabel('log10(Ra)')
plt.ylabel('log10(Nu)')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
My problem is solved, I managed to fit my curves with more or less correct results
I want to create a bounding box out of the following dimensions using meshgrid but just not able to get the right box.
My parent dimensions are x = 0 to 19541 and y = 0 to 14394. Out of that, I want to cut a box from x' = 4692 to 12720 and y' = 4273 to 10117.
However, I am not getting the right bounds. Could someone please help me here?
from matplotlib.path import Path
xmin, xmax = 4692, 12720
ymin, ymax = 4273, 10117
sar_ver = [(4692, 10117), (12720, 10117), (12658, 4274), (4769, 4273), (4692, 10117)]
x, y = np.meshgrid(np.arange(xmin, xmax + 1), np.arange(ymin, ymax + 1))
shx = x
x, y = x.flatten(), y.flatten()
points = np.vstack((x, y)).T
path = Path(sar_ver)
grid = path.contains_points(points)
grid.shape = shx.shape # 5845 X 8029
print grid
UPDATE: This is what I tried and I am close to what I want but not exactly. I want to change the original origin from 0 to the image's surrounding box as shown in expected output.
The updated code that I am using is this
from matplotlib.path import Path
nx, ny = 16886, 10079
sar_ver = [(16886, 1085), (15139, 2122), (14475, 5226), (8419, 5601), (14046, 6876), (14147, 10079), (16816, 3748), (16886, 1085)]
x, y = np.meshgrid(np.arange(nx), np.arange(ny))
x, y = x.flatten(), y.flatten()
points = np.vstack((x,y)).T
path = Path(sar_ver)
grid = path.contains_points(points)
grid.shape = (10079, 16886)
grid = np.multiply(grid,255)
int_grid = grid.astype(np.uint8)
grid_img = Image.fromarray(int_grid)
grid_img.save('grid_image.png') # ACTUAL OUTPUT IMAGE WITH ORIGIN NOT SHIFTED
Input geom:
Expected output is this: Doesn't matter if the image is rotated the other way round but will be a cherry on top if its aligned correctly.
However I am getting right now this so my ACTUAL OUTPUT from the updated code posted is this:
So I want to shift the origin around the box.
BOUNDING BOX PROBLEM DETAILS AFTER GETTING THE MASK: This code comes after the line posted in the second update grid_img.save('grid_image.png') # ACTUAL OUTPUT IMAGE WITH ORIGIN NOT SHIFTED
Here im is the matrix of the actual image. What should be the x-y min, max of im to have the same shape as mask and multiply both of them to get pixel values and the rest cancelled out with 0s.
img_x = 19541 # 0 - 19541
img_y = 14394 # 0 - 14394
im = np.fromfile(binary_file_path, dtype='>f4')
im = np.reshape(im.astype(np.float32), (img_x, img_y))
im = im[:10079, :16886]
bb_list = np.multiply(grid, im)
# slice and dice
slice_rows = np.any(bb_list, axis=1)
slice_cols = np.any(bb_list, axis=0)
ymin, ymax = np.where(slice_rows)[0][[0, -1]]
xmin, xmax = np.where(slice_cols)[0][[0, -1]]
answer = bb_list[ymin:ymax + 1, xmin:xmax + 1]
# convert to unit8
int_ans = answer.astype(np.uint8)
fin_img = Image.fromarray(int_ans)
fin_img.save('test_this.jpeg')
My GOAL is to cut out a polygon of a given geom out of a given image. So I am taking the mask out of that polygon and then using that mask to cut the same out of the original image. So multiplying mask's 1's and 0's with the pixel values in the image to just get 1*pixel values.
I tried the following to cut out the actual image to have the same dimensions so that I can multiply np.multiply(im, mask) but it didn't work as image's shape is not cut into same shape as mask's. I tried your min and max below but didn't work!
im = im[xmin:xmax, ymin:ymax]
ipdb> im.shape
(5975, 8994)
ipdb> mask.shape
(8994, 8467)
Clearly I cannot multiple mask and im now.
I think you got it almost right in the first attempt, in the second one you're building a meshgrid for the full image while you just want the shape mask, don't you?
import numpy as np
import matplotlib as mpl
from matplotlib.path import Path
from matplotlib import patches
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from PIL import Image
sar_ver = [(16886, 1085), (15139, 2122), (14475, 5226), (8419, 5601),
(14046, 6876), (14147, 10079), (16816, 3748), (16886, 1085)]
path = Path(sar_ver)
xmin, ymin, xmax, ymax = np.asarray(path.get_extents(), dtype=int).ravel()
x, y = np.mgrid[xmin:xmax, ymin:ymax]
points = np.transpose((x.ravel(), y.ravel()))
mask = path.contains_points(points)
mask = mask.reshape(x.shape).T
img = Image.fromarray((mask * 255).astype(np.uint8))
img.save('mask.png')
# plot shape and mask for debug purposes
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8,4))
gs = mpl.gridspec.GridSpec(1,2)
gs.update(wspace=0.2, hspace= 0.01)
ax = plt.subplot(gs[0])
patch = patches.PathPatch(path, facecolor='orange', lw=2)
ax.add_patch(patch)
ax.set_xlim(xmin, xmax)
ax.set_ylim(ymin, ymax)
ax = plt.subplot(gs[1])
ax.imshow(mask, origin='lower')
plt.savefig("shapes.png", bbox_inches="tight", pad_inches=0)
It produces the mask:
And also plots both the mask and the path for debugging purposes:
The different orientation comes from the different origin position in matplotlib plots and images, but it should be trivial enough to change it the way you want.
EDIT after latest question edits
Here's an updated script that takes an image, generates a mask for your path and cuts it out. I'm using a dummy image and scaling down shapes a bit so they're easier to work with.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib as mpl
from matplotlib.path import Path
from matplotlib import patches
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import skimage.transform
import skimage.data
from PIL import Image
sar_ver = np.asarray([(16886, 1085), (15139, 2122), (14475, 5226), (8419, 5601),
(14046, 6876), (14147, 10079), (16816, 3748), (16886, 1085)])
# reshape into smaller path for faster debugging
sar_ver = sar_ver // 20
# create dummy image
img = skimage.data.chelsea()
img = skimage.transform.rescale(img, 2)
# matplotlib path
path = Path(sar_ver)
xmin, ymin, xmax, ymax = np.asarray(path.get_extents(), dtype=int).ravel()
# create a mesh grid of the shape of the final mask
x, y = np.mgrid[:img.shape[1], :img.shape[0]]
# mesh grid to points
points = np.vstack((x.ravel(), y.ravel())).T
# mask for the point included in the path
mask = path.contains_points(points)
mask = mask.reshape(x.shape).T
# plots
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8,6))
gs = mpl.gridspec.GridSpec(2,2)
gs.update(wspace=0.2, hspace= 0.2)
# image + patch
ax = plt.subplot(gs[0])
ax.imshow(img)
patch = patches.PathPatch(path, facecolor="None", edgecolor="cyan", lw=3)
ax.add_patch(patch)
# mask
ax = plt.subplot(gs[1])
ax.imshow(mask)
# filter image with mask
ax = plt.subplot(gs[2])
ax.imshow(img * mask[..., np.newaxis])
# remove mask from image
ax = plt.subplot(gs[3])
ax.imshow(img * ~mask[..., np.newaxis])
# plt.show()
plt.savefig("shapes.png", bbox_inches="tight", pad_inches=0)
I tried the open cv2 library and it appears to be faster than meshgrid or mgrid on large images. Posting opencv2 solution:
import numpy as np
import cv2
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.path import Path
sar_ver = np.array([[[1688, 108], [1513, 212], [1447, 522], [841, 560], [1404, 687], [1414, 1007], [1681, 374], [1688, 108]]] , 'int32')
print sar_ver.shape
mask=np.zeros((1439, 1954))
cv2.fillPoly(mask, sar_ver, 255)
sar_ver = np.asarray([(1688, 108), (1513, 212), (1447, 522), (841, 560), (1404, 687), (1414, 1007), (1681, 374), (1688, 108)])
path = Path(sar_ver)
xmin, ymin, xmax, ymax = np.asarray(path.get_extents(), dtype=int).ravel()
plt.imshow(mask[ymin:ymax+1, xmin:xmax+1])
plt.show()
Also, posting mgrid solution helped by Filippo above and on online chat:
import cv2
from matplotlib.path import Path
from PIL import Image
import numpy as np
sar_ver = np.asarray([(1518, 2024), (2018, 2024), (1518, 2524), (1518, 2024)])
imag = cv2.imread('test_image.jpg')
img = cv2.cvtColor(imag, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
h, w = img.shape
path = Path(sar_ver)
xmin, ymin, xmax, ymax = np.asarray(path.get_extents(), dtype=int).ravel()
# create a mesh grid of the shape of the final mask
x, y = np.mgrid[:w, :h]
# mesh grid to points
points = np.vstack((x.ravel(), y.ravel())).T
# mask for the point included in the path
mask = path.contains_points(points)
mask = mask.reshape(x.shape).T
im = np.array(img)
bb = np.multiply(im, mask)[ymin:ymax+1, xmin:xmax+1]
# saving image or we can do plt.show
int_ans = bb.astype(np.uint8)
fin = Image.fromarray(int_ans)
fin.save('crop_test.png')
I have a point cloud in 4 dimensions, where each point in the cloud has a location and a value (x,y,z,Value). In addition, I have a 'special' point, S0, within the 3d point cloud; I've used this example to find the closest 10 points in the cloud, relative to S0. Now, I have a numpy array for each of the 10 closest points and their values. How can I interpolate these 10 points, to find the interpolated value at point S0? Example code is shown below:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
numpoints = 20
linexs = 320
lineys = 40
linezs = 60
linexe = 20
lineye = 20
lineze = 0
# Create vectors of points
xpts = np.linspace(linexs, linexe, numpoints)
ypts = np.linspace(lineys, lineye, numpoints)
zpts = np.linspace(linezs, lineze, numpoints)
lin = np.dstack((xpts,ypts,zpts))
# Image line of points
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(211, projection='3d')
ax.set_xlim(0,365); ax.set_ylim(-85, 85); ax.set_zlim(0, 100)
ax.plot_wireframe(xpts, ypts, zpts)
ax.view_init(elev=12, azim=78)
def randrange(n, vmin, vmax):
return (vmax - vmin)*np.random.rand(n) + vmin
n = 10
for n in range(21):
xs = randrange(n, 0, 350)
ys = randrange(n, -75, 75)
zs = randrange(n, 0, 100)
ax.scatter(xs, ys, zs)
dat = np.dstack((xs,ys,zs))
ax.set_xlabel('X Label')
ax.set_xlim(0,350)
ax.set_ylabel('Y Label')
ax.set_ylim(-75,75)
ax.set_zlabel('Z Label')
ax.set_zlim(0,100)
ax = fig.add_subplot(212, projection='3d')
ax.set_xlim(0,365); ax.set_ylim(-85, 85); ax.set_zlim(0, 100)
ax.plot_wireframe(xpts,ypts,zpts)
ax.view_init(elev=12, azim=78)
plt.show()
dist = []
# Calculate distance from first point to all other points in cloud
for l in range(len(xpts)):
aaa = lin[0][0]-dat
dist.append(np.sqrt(aaa[0][l][0]**2+aaa[0][l][1]**2+aaa[0][l][2]**2))
full = np.dstack((dat,dist))
aaa = full[0][full[0][:,3].argsort()]
print(aaa[0:10])
A basic example. Note that the meshgrid is not needed for the interpolation, but only to make a fast ufunc to generate an example function A=f(x,y,z), here A=x+y+z.
from scipy.interpolate import interpn
import numpy as np
#make up a regular 3d grid
X=np.linspace(-5,5,11)
Y=np.linspace(-5,5,11)
Z=np.linspace(-5,5,11)
xv,yv,zv = np.meshgrid(X,Y,Z)
# make up a function
# see http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/ufuncs.html
A = np.add(xv,np.add(yv,zv))
#this one is easy enough for us to know what to expect at (.5,.5,.5)
# usage : interpn(points, values, xi, method='linear', bounds_error=True, fill_value=nan)
interpn((X,Y,Z),A,[0.5,0.5,0.5])
Output:
array([ 1.5])
If you pass in an array of points of interest, it will give you multiple answers.
I have the following code to create a 3D plot of a Bivariate Gaussian Distribution:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
class Data(object):
data = None
columns = 0
rows = 0
def __init__(self, path='file.txt'):
self.data = np.loadtxt(path, delimiter=' ', dtype='float32')
self.rows, self.columns = self.data.shape
def _pdf(self, x, mu, cov):
part1 = 1 / ( ((2* np.pi)**(len(mu)/2)) * (np.linalg.det(cov)**(1/2)) )
part2 = (-1/2) * ((x-mu).T.dot(np.linalg.inv(cov))).dot((x-mu))
return float(part1 * np.exp(part2))
def compute_Z(self):
mu = np.array([[2.99413181],[3.05209659]], dtype="float")
cov = np.array([[1.01023423, 0.02719138], [0.02719138, 2.93782296]], dtype="float")
Z = []
for i, j in zip(X, Y):
x = np.array([i,j]).reshape(2,1)
Z.append(self._pdf(x, mu, cov))
return np.array(Z)
if __name__ == "__main__":
data = Data()
X = data.data[:, 0]
Y = data.data[:, 1]
Z = data.compute_Z()
X, Y = np.meshgrid(X, Y)
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
ax.plot_surface(X, Y, Z, rstride=1, cstride=1, color='0.9', alpha=0.9, linewidth=1)
plt.show()
But this is taking a lot of time and also using a lot of RAM. Is there some way to reduce it? Or there is a better method to create this plot?
Thanks!
matplotlib 3D plotting isn't very good for large amount of data.
You can use mayavi, which has very similar interface using mlab.
from mayavi import mlab
mlab.figure()
mlab.surf(X, Y, Z)
mlab.show()
I have an elliptic curve plotted. I want to draw a line along a P,Q,R (where P and Q will be determined independent of this question). The main problem with the P is that sympy solve() returns another equation and it needs to instead return a value so it can be used to plot the x-value for P. As I understood it, solve() should return a value, so I'm clearly doing something wrong here that I'm just totally not seeing. For reference, here's how P+Q=R should look:
I've been going over the docs and other material and this is as far as I've been able to get myself into trouble:
from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.axislines import SubplotZero
from pylab import *
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.path import Path
import matplotlib.patches as patches
from matplotlib import rc
import random
from sympy.solvers import solve
from sympy import *
def plotGraph():
fig = plt.figure(1)
#ax = SubplotZero(fig, 111)
#fig.add_subplot(ax)
#for direction in ["xzero", "yzero"]:
#ax.axis[direction].set_axisline_style("-|>")
#ax.axis[direction].set_visible(True)
#ax.axis([-10,10,-10,10])
a = -2; b = 1
y, x = np.ogrid[-10:10:100j, -10:10:100j]
xlist = x.ravel(); ylist = y.ravel()
elliptic_curve = pow(y, 2) - pow(x, 3) - x * a - b
plt.contour(xlist, ylist, elliptic_curve, [0])
#rand = random.uniform(-5,5)
randmid = random.randint(30,70)
#y = ylist[randmid]; x = xlist[randmid]
xsym, ysym = symbols('x ylist[randmid]')
x_result = solve(pow(ysym, 2) - pow(xsym, 3) - xsym * a - b, xsym) # 11/5/13 needs to return a value
plt.plot([-1.5,5], [-1,8], color = "c", linewidth=1) # plot([x1,x2,x3,...],[y1,y2,y3,...])
plt.plot([xlist[randmid],5], [ylist[randmid],8], color = "m", linewidth=1)
#rc('text', usetex=True)
text(-9,6,' size of xlist: %s \n size of ylist: %s \n x_coord: %s \n random_y: %s'
%(len(xlist),len(ylist),x_result,ylist[randmid]),
fontsize=10, color = 'blue',bbox=dict(facecolor='tan', alpha=0.5))
plt.annotate('$P+Q=R$', xy=(2, 1), xytext=(3, 1.5),arrowprops=dict(facecolor='black', shrink=0.05))
## verts = [(-5, -10),(5, 10)] # [(x,y)startpoint,(x,y)endpoint] #,(0, 0)]
## codes = [Path.MOVETO,Path.LINETO] # related to verts[] #,Path.STOP]
## path = Path(verts, codes)
## patch = patches.PathPatch(path, facecolor='none', lw=2)
## ax.add_patch(patch)
plt.grid(True)
plt.show()
def main():
plotGraph()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Ultimately, I'd like to draw a line to show P+Q=R, so if someone also has something to add on how to code to get the Q that would be greatly appreciated. I'm teaching myself about Python and elliptic curves so I'm sure that any entry-level programmer can figure out in 2 minutes what I've been on for some time already.
I don't know what are you calculating, but here is the code that can plot the graph:
import numpy as np
import pylab as pl
Y, X = np.mgrid[-10:10:100j, -10:10:100j]
def f(x):
return x**3 -3*x + 5
px = -2.0
py = -np.sqrt(f(px))
qx = 0.5
qy = np.sqrt(f(qx))
k = (qy - py)/(qx - px)
b = -px*k + py
poly = np.poly1d([-1, k**2, 2*k*b+3, b**2-5])
x = np.roots(poly)
y = np.sqrt(f(x))
pl.contour(X, Y, Y**2 - f(X), levels=[0])
pl.plot(x, y, "o")
pl.plot(x, -y, "o")
x = np.linspace(-5, 5)
pl.plot(x, k*x+b)
graph:
based on HYRY's answer, I just update some details to make it better:
import numpy as np
import pylab as pl
Y, X = np.mgrid[-10:10:100j, -10:10:100j]
def f(x, a, b):
return x**3 + a*x + b
a = -2
b = 4
# the 1st point: 0, -2
x1 = 0
y1 = -np.sqrt(f(x1, a, b))
print(x1, y1)
# the second point
x2 = 3
y2 = np.sqrt(f(x2, a, b))
print(x2, y2)
# line: y=kl*x+bl
kl = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
bl = -x1*kl + y1 # bl = -x2*kl + y2
# y^2=x^3+ax+b , y=kl*x+bl => [-1, kl^2, 2*kl*bl, bl^2-b]
poly = np.poly1d([-1, kl**2, 2*kl*bl-a, bl**2-b])
# the roots of the poly
x = np.roots(poly)
y = np.sqrt(f(x, a, b))
print(x, y)
pl.contour(X, Y, Y**2 - f(X, a, b), levels=[0])
pl.plot(x, y, "o")
pl.plot(x, -y, "o")
x = np.linspace(-5, 5)
pl.plot(x, kl*x+bl)
And we got the roots of this poly:
[3. 2.44444444 0. ] [5. 3.7037037 2. ]