Foundation official document shows the usage of progress bar with text. However, the text is within the filled part, and it breaks once the progress bar has 0% filled (example).
<div class="progress" role="progressbar" tabindex="0" aria-valuenow="25" aria-valuemin="0" aria-valuetext="25 percent" aria-valuemax="100">
<span class="progress-meter" style="width: 0%">
<p class="progress-meter-text">the text is broken here</p>
</span>
</div>
Is there anyway we could put the text at center of the entire progress bar, instead of the filled part?
Related
I'm building a website for a friend's film production company using Foundation 6. I created a top-bar navigation bar with his logo image above the top-bar and made them both sticky. It seems to work fine on large screens and small screens but if viewed on anything in between the logo separates from the top-bar. This is most evident when you stretch and squish the page.
I've tried to include the image in the top-bar div but it aligns it to the left and I haven't been able to align it to the top as it is currently. This is the first time I've worked with the sticky function in Foundation. I've looked through the Foundation docs, Google, and StackOverflow but haven't found anything quite like this.
This is my top-bar section.
<div data-sticky-container>
<div class="title-bar" data-responsive-toggle="example-menu" data-hide-for="medium">
<button class="menu-icon" type="button" data-toggle="example-menu"></button>
<div class="title-bar-title">Menu</div>
</div>
<div class="grid-y">
<img src="images/safe_image.jpeg" style="width: 100%; height: auto"; data-sticky data-options="marginTop:0;">
<div class="top-bar" data-sticky data-options="marginTop:10.2;" style="width:100%; background-color: white; padding-top: 10px;" id="example-menu">
<!-- <div class="top-bar" style="width:100%; background-color: white; padding-top: 10px;" id="example-menu"> -->
<div class="top-bar-right" data-dropdown-menu style="display: table; margin: 0 auto;">
<ul class="dropdown vertical medium-horizontal menu" style="background-color: white;">
<li>Home</li>
<li>Current News</li>
<li>Film/Media</li>
<li>Photography</li>
<li>Publicity</li>
<li>Misc</li>
<li>Contact</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I would like the logo image and the navigation bar to look the way they do at larger screen sizes but minimize together to the point where the data-toggle kicks in instead of separating, as they are doing currently.
I've made use of an off-canvas menu that comes in from the left without any trouble. At the bottom of the off-canvas menu there's a close button. Is there anyway to make the close button on an off canvas menu sticky?
For users, it is awkward (and not obvious) to have to scroll to the bottom to find the bottom, especially on long menus.
EDIT: Added some sample code: On the live site there might be 80 links (rather than 3), and I want the div with the close button to always be visible at the bottom of the current screen when the off-canvas menu is visible.
<div class="row">
<button type="button" class="button hide-for-large" data-toggle="filterCanvas">Filters</button>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="off-canvas-wrapper">
<div class="off-canvas off-canvas in-canvas-for-large position-left float-left" id="filterCanvas" data-off-canvas>
<div class="sidebar">
<p><strong>List of options</strong></p>
<div class="clearfix">
Link1
Link2
Link3
</div>
<div class="buttons hide-for-large text-center">
<button class="button expanded" data-toggle="filterCanvas">Close</button>
</div>
</div>
</div><!-- /filterCanvas -->
<div class="off-canvas-content float-left" style="min-height: 300px;margin-left:15px;" data-off-canvas-content>
<div class="view-content" style="margin-bottom: 20px;">
Page content here
</div>
</div><!-- /off-canvas-content -->
</div><!-- /off-canvas-wrapper -->
</div><!-- /row -->
Would be easier if you posted some code...
But, saying that, you could position the open/close button relative to the viewport, that way you could just have it fixed to the bottom left, and just adjust it when open.
As said, we would need some code though for this to be useful.
Edit: Based upon code sample provided
So given your example, you could do something as simple as the below, and just toggle the 'activated' class when opening/closing the menu.
<!-- The below button doesnt need to be in a row, as will be fixed,
the activated class will only be present when the sidebar is
open and not by default -->
<button type="button"
class="button hide-for-large off-canvas-button activated"
data-toggle="filterCanvas">Filters</button>
<div class="row">
<-- example code removed for brevity -->
</div><!-- /off-canvas-content -->
.off-canvas-button {
position: fixed;
left: 2em; // change to desired space from edge
bottom: 2em; // change to desired space from edge
}
.off-canvas-button.activated {
left: 6em; // adjust to suit with of sidebar (example is 4em)
}
I have a ember template with 2 sections, where one section is visible by default and other one is hidden until I hit a button.
I am using liquid-fire, most specifically the liquid-if helper to do a simple fade in / fade out of the 2 sections. This works however there is a slide up / slide down that occurs between toggling the 2. As anyone seen this behavior before? I would to prevent this slide effect from happening
Here's sample how template looks like:
{{#liquid-if isPasswordResetLinkConfirmVisible class="lf-fade"}}
<h1 class="text-center">{{t 'reset_password.text.resend_email_header'}}</h1>
<p class="text-center">
{{t 'reset_password.text.resend_email_line_1'}}<br/>
{{t 'reset_password.text.resend_email_line_2'}}
<i class="fa fa-envelope-o email-icon"></i>
</p>
{{/liquid-if}}
{{#liquid-if isPasswordResetLinkVisible class="lf-fade"}}
<h1 class="text-center">{{t 'reset_password.text.expired_header'}}</h1>
<p class="text-center">
{{t 'reset_password.text.expired_line_1'}}<br/>
{{t 'reset_password.text.expired_line_2'}}
</p>
{{mx-button action=(action "sendNewPasswordResetLink") size="large" label=(t 'action.send_new_link') block=true}}
{{/liquid-if}}
Here's a sample of my transition
this.transition(
this.hasClass('lf-fade'),
this.toValue(true),
this.use('fade', {
duration: 600
})
);
Thanks, I was able to find a solution looking at the code. Seems what Im experience is related to fact my content is different size and doing slide animation to resize you can deactivate that by doing by using the enableGrowth param
{{#liquid-if isPasswordResetConfirmVisible class="lf-fade" enableGrowth=false}}
You want to put the two templates into an if/else like this:
{{#liquid-if isPasswordResetLinkConfirmVisible use="fade"}}
<h1 class="text-center">{{t 'reset_password.text.resend_email_header'}}</h1>
<p class="text-center">
{{t 'reset_password.text.resend_email_line_1'}}<br/>
{{t 'reset_password.text.resend_email_line_2'}}
<i class="fa fa-envelope-o email-icon"></i>
</p>
{{/else}}
<h1 class="text-center">{{t 'reset_password.text.expired_header'}}</h1>
<p class="text-center">
{{t 'reset_password.text.expired_line_1'}}<br/>
{{t 'reset_password.text.expired_line_2'}}
</p>
{{mx-button action=(action "sendNewPasswordResetLink") size="large" label=(t 'action.send_new_link') block=true}}
{{/liquid-if}}
Notice too I used use="fade" in the liquid-if which means I don't have to create a transition.
#jpoiri you can read more about the transitions here
I have a web page with a left hand menu. It is made up of many div tags.
I have noticed when my Selenium Python script runs it is not clicking the text I want clicked from the left hand menu. It is clicking something else.
My Xpath is not correct.
I would like to locate the text "Statistics" (it is in a div\span tag) which has the parent div text "Analysis"
It is not clicking the correct text "Statistics" because there maybe another "Statistics" somewhere in the HTML source. If i start from the div tag which has the text "Analysis" and then find the text "Statistics" then I will get the correct element.
My Xpath is:
.//div//span[#title="Analysis"]/following::div[5]//span[text()="Statistics"]
The HTML is:
<div>
<span class="" title="Analysis"
style="white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;empty-cells:show;display:block;">Analysis</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="overflow: hidden;">
<div>
<div>
<div aria-selected="false" role="treeitem" aria-setsize="3" aria-posinset="1" aria-expanded="false"
aria-level="2">
<div class="GJPPK2LBIF" style="padding-left: 16px;">
<div class="GJPPK2LBIF GJPPK2LBKF" style="padding-left: 16px;position:relative;" onclick="">
<div class="GJPPK2LBJF" style="left: 0px;width: 15px;height: 15px;position:absolute;">
<img border="0"
style="width:15px;height:15px;background:url() no-repeat 0px 0px;"
src="http://test1:8080/clearcore/ClearCore/clear.cache.gif"
onload="this.__gwtLastUnhandledEvent=" load";"/>
</div>
<div class="GJPPK2LBLF">
<div style="padding-left: 22px;position:relative;zoom:1;">
<div style="left:0px;margin-top:-8px;position:absolute;top:50%;line-height:0px;">
<img border="0"
style="width:16px;height:16px;background:url() no-repeat 0px 0px;"
src="http://test1:8080/clearcore/ClearCore/clear.cache.gif"
onload="this.__gwtLastUnhandledEvent=" load";"/>
</div>
<div>
<span class="" title="Statistics"
style="white-space:nowrap;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;empty-cells:show;display:block;">Statistics</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Thanks,
Riaz
If you have FireFox with FirePath you can test the xpath and see how many and which matches you get. For instance:
//span[text()="Statistics"]
This may result in 1 matching node but also in more. Let's assume there's two matches and the one you want is the second one. Then you'd choose:
//span[text()="Statistics"][2]
I'm currently using Cycle2 with scrollHorz on full screen (100% width and height) with background images with their size to 'cover', besides that there are no callbacks or much else on the page so its a very basic slider.
I find that when the browser is too big, the slide transition appears jagged, not smooth. However its somewhat better when the screen is smaller. I also do not experience any issues with 'fade', or at least its not noticeable at all.
I have tried with various combination of easing and speed, but haven't had much luck.
I'm not sure if its a css thing or a cycle2 thing, and I'm unable to find a similar issue via google, can someone please shed some light to this?
HTML
<ul id="homepage-carousel" class="hero">
<li class="homepage-carousel-item" style="background-image: url('hero1.jpg');">
<div class="homepage-carousel-info">
<h1 class="homepage-carousel-title">Title</h1>
<h2 class="homepage-carousel-subtitle">Subtitle</h2>
<div class="homepage-carousel-desc">
<p>some info here</p>
</div>
<div class="homepage-carousel-link"><a class="homepage-carousel-url" href="#" title=""><span>Read More</span></a></div>
</div>
</li>
<li class="homepage-carousel-item" style="background-image: url('hero2.jpg');">
<div class="homepage-carousel-info">
<h1 class="homepage-carousel-title">Title</h1>
<h2 class="homepage-carousel-subtitle">Subtitle</h2>
<div class="homepage-carousel-desc">
<p>some info here</p>
</div>
<div class="homepage-carousel-link"><a class="homepage-carousel-url" href="#" title=""><span>Read More</span></a></div>
</div>
</li>
<li class="homepage-carousel-item" style="background-image: url('hero3.jpg');">
<div class="homepage-carousel-info">
<h1 class="homepage-carousel-title">Title</h1>
<h2 class="homepage-carousel-subtitle">Subtitle</h2>
<div class="homepage-carousel-desc">
<p>some info here</p>
</div>
<div class="homepage-carousel-link"><a class="homepage-carousel-url" href="#" title=""><span>Read More</span></a></div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
CSS
#homepage-carousel {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
.homepage-carousel-item {
height: 100%;
background-repeat: none;
background-position: top center;
background-size: cover;
}
}
This isn't a cycle issue
background-size: cover just has horrible performance.
You can ease the pain some by adding transform: translate3d(0,0,0) to the slides as well, but it will still be choppy.
Replacing the background with an actual image normally increases the performance for me, like this fiddle. Though, the larger the image is the slower the performance will be in any browser; rendering large moving images is hard for them.
Then it's just a matter of sizing and positioning the images, for that you could use something like:
.homepage-carousel-item > img, .homepage-carousel-info { position:absolute; }
.homepage-carousel-item > img {
/*img size*/
min-width:100%;
min-height:100%;
width:auto;
height:auto;
/*img pos*/
top:50%;
left:50%;
transform:translate(-50%,-50%);/*offset position based on img size*/
}
If you need to support legacy browsers, then you would run a routine through the images to size and offset like this does.
There are other solutions that only work in certain browsers (like object-fit: cover), but these options should work in all browsers.