I created a Deployment Manager Template (python) to create a GKE Zonal cluster (v1beta1 feature). When I run gcloud deployment-manager deployments create <deploymentname> --config <config.yaml>, GKE cluster is created as expected.
I used type:gcp-types/container-v1beta1:projects.zones.clusters in my python template.
However, when I run the delete command on DM i.e. gcloud deployment-manager deployments delete <deploymentname> I get the following error:
Error says that field name could not be found. However, I did specify name in my config.yaml file.
Error in Operation [operation-1536152440470-5751f5c88f9f3-5ca3a167-d12a593d]: errors:
- code: RESOURCE_ERROR
location: /deployments/test-project-gke-xhqgxn6pkd/resources/test-gkecluster-xhqgxn6pkd
message: "{"ResourceType":"gcp-types/container-v1beta1:projects.zones.clusters"
,"ResourceErrorCode":"400","ResourceErrorMessage":{"code":400,"message"
:"Invalid JSON payload received. Unknown name "name": Cannot bind query
parameter. Field 'name' could not be found in request message.","status"
:"INVALID_ARGUMENT","details":[{"#type":"type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.BadRequest"
,"fieldViolations":[{"description":"Invalid JSON payload received. Unknown
name "name": Cannot bind query parameter. Field 'name' could not be found
in request message."}]}],"statusMessage":"Bad Request","requestPath"
:"https://container.googleapis.com/v1beta1/projects/test-project/zones/us-east1-b/clusters/"
,"httpMethod":"GET"}}"
Here's the sample config.yaml
imports:
- path: templates/gke/gke.py
name: gke.py
resources:
- name: ${CLUSTER_NAME}
type: gke.py
properties:
zone: ${ZONE}
cluster:
name: ${CLUSTER_NAME}
description: test gke cluster
network: ${NETWORK_NAME}
subnetwork: ${SUBNET_NAME}
initialClusterVersion: ${CLUSTER_VERSION}
nodePools:
- name: ${NODEPOOL_NAME}
initialNodeCount: ${NODE_COUNT}
config:
machineType: ${MACHINE_TYPE}
diskSizeGb: 100
imageType: cos
oauthScopes:
- https://www.googleapis.com/auth/compute
- https://www.googleapis.com/auth/devstorage.read_only
- https://www.googleapis.com/auth/logging.write
- https://www.googleapis.com/auth/monitoring
localSsdCount: ${LOCALSSD_COUNT}
Any ideas what I'm missing here?
Related
mkdir ${HOME}/environment/grafana
cat << EoF > ${HOME}/environment/grafana/grafana.yaml
datasources:
datasources.yaml:
apiVersion: 1
datasources:
- name: Prometheus
type: prometheus
url: http://prometheus-server.prometheus.svc.cluster.local
access: proxy
isDefault: true
EoF
I get this error when I try deploy grafana to eks cluster
I am experimenting with deployment manager and each time I try to deploy an SQL instance with a DB on it and 2 users; some of the tasks are failing. Most of the time they are the users:
conf.yaml:
resources:
- name: mycloudsql
type: gcp-types/sqladmin-v1beta4:instances
properties:
name: mycloudsql-01
backendType: SECOND_GEN
instanceType: CLOUD_SQL_INSTANCE
databaseVersion: MYSQL_5_7
region: europe-west6
settings:
tier: db-f1-micro
locationPreference:
zone: europe-west6-a
activationPolicy: ALWAYS
dataDiskSizeGb: 10
- name: mydjangodb
type: gcp-types/sqladmin-v1beta4:databases
properties:
name: django-db-01
instance: $(ref.mycloudsql.name)
charset: utf8
- name: sqlroot
type: gcp-types/sqladmin-v1beta4:users
properties:
name: root
host: "%"
instance: $(ref.mycloudsql.name)
password: root
- name: sqluser
type: gcp-types/sqladmin-v1beta4:users
properties:
name: user
instance: $(ref.mycloudsql.name)
password: user
Error:
PS C:\Users\user\Desktop\Python\GCP> gcloud --project=sound-catalyst-263911 deployment-manager deployments create dm-sql-test-11 --config conf.yaml
The fingerprint of the deployment is TZ_wYom9Q64Hno6X0bpv9g==
Waiting for create [operation-1589869946223-5a5fa71623bc9-1912fcb9-bc59aafc]...failed.
ERROR: (gcloud.deployment-manager.deployments.create) Error in Operation [operation-1589869946223-5a5fa71623bc9-1912fcb9-bc59aafc]: errors:
- code: RESOURCE_ERROR
location: /deployments/dm-sql-test-11/resources/sqluser
message: '{"ResourceType":"gcp-types/sqladmin-v1beta4:users","ResourceErrorCode":"400","ResourceErrorMessage":{"code":400,"message":"Precondition
check failed.","status":"FAILED_PRECONDITION","statusMessage":"Bad Request","requestPath":"https://www.googleapis.com/sql/v1beta4/projects/sound-catalyst-263911/instances/mycloudsql-01/users","httpMethod":"POST"}}'
- code: RESOURCE_ERROR
location: /deployments/dm-sql-test-11/resources/sqlroot
message: '{"ResourceType":"gcp-types/sqladmin-v1beta4:users","ResourceErrorCode":"400","ResourceErrorMessage":{"code":400,"message":"Precondition
check failed.","status":"FAILED_PRECONDITION","statusMessage":"Bad Request","requestPath":"https://www.googleapis.com/sql/v1beta4/projects/sound-catalyst-263911/instances/mycloudsql-01/users","httpMethod":"POST"}}'
Console View:
It doesn`t say what that precondition failing is or am I missing something?
It seems the installation of database is not completed by the time the Deployment Manager starts to create users despite the reference notation is used in the YAML code to take care of dependencies. That is why you receive the "FAILED_PRECONDITION" error.
As a workaround you can split the deployment into two parts:
Create a CloudSQL instance and a database;
Create users.
This does not look elegant, but it works.
Alternatively, you can consider using Terraform. Fortunately, Cloud Shell instance is provided with Terraform pre-installed. There are sample Terraform code for Cloud SQL out there, for example this one:
CloudSQL deployment with Terraform
I am creating a yaml config to deploy a gke cluster with multi-node-pool. I like to be able to create a new cluster and put each node-pool in a different subnetwork. Can this be done.
I have tried putting the subnetwork in different part of the properties under the second node-pool but it errors out. Below is the following error.
message: '{"ResourceType":"gcp-types/container-v1:projects.locations.clusters.nodePools","ResourceErrorCode":"400","ResourceErrorMessage":{"code":400,"message":"Invalid
JSON payload received. Unknown name \"subnetwork\": Cannot find field.","status":"INVALID_ARGUMENT","details":[{"#type":"type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.BadRequest","fieldViolations":[{"description":"Invalid
JSON payload received. Unknown name \"subnetwork\": Cannot find field."}]}],"statusMessage":"Bad
The current code for the both node-pools. first node is creates but second one error out.
resources:
- name: myclus
type: gcp-types/container-v1:projects.locations.clusters
properties:
parent: projects/[PROJECT_ID]/locations/[ZONE/REGION]
cluster:
name: my-clus
zone: us-east4
subnetwork: dev-web ### leave this field blank if using the default network
initialClusterVersion: "1.13"
nodePools:
- name: my-clus-pool1
initialNodeCount: 1
config:
machineType: n1-standard-1
imageType: cos
oauthScopes:
- https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform
preemptible: true
- name: my-clus
type: gcp-types/container-v1:projects.locations.clusters.nodePools
properties:
parent: projects/[PROJECT_ID]/locations/[ZONE/REGION]/clusters/$(ref.myclus.name)
subnetwork: dev-web ### leave this field blank if using the default
nodePool:
name: my-clus-pool2
initialNodeCount: 1
version: "1.13"
config:
machineType: n1-standard-1
imageType: cos
oauthScopes:
- https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform
preemptible: true
I like the expected out come to have 2 node-pools in 2 different subnetworks.
I found out that this is actually not a limitation of Deployment Manager but a limitation of GKE.
We can’t assign a different subnet to different node pools, the network and subnets are defined at the cluster level. There is no “Subnetwork” field in the node pool API.
Here is a link you can refer to for more information.
I try to deploy simple example. I didn't change anything except warden.yml file. So, I tried to deploy it to AWS and use elastic IP, so I can access the server with specific IP.
When I deploy it I receive:
Director task 67
Deprecation: Ignoring cloud config. Manifest contains 'networks' section.
Started preparing deployment > Preparing deployment. Done (00:00:00)
Started preparing package compilation > Finding packages to compile. Done (00:00:00)
Started creating missing vms > webapp/3a8acd3a-77a8-4bad-8de4-fb544d70f76d (0). Failed: Unknown CPI error 'InvalidCall' with message 'Arguments are not correct, details: 'expected string value for member 1 of key values of member 1 of option filters'' in 'create_vm' CPI method (00:00:05)
Error 100: Unknown CPI error 'InvalidCall' with message 'Arguments are not correct, details: 'expected string value for member 1 of key values of member 1 of option filters'' in 'create_vm' CPI method
What is the reason of this error?
warden.yml
name: webapp-warden
director_uuid: <%= `bosh status --uuid` %>
releases:
- name: simple-bosh-release
version: latest
compilation:
workers: 1
network: webapp-network
reuse_compilation_vms: true
cloud_properties:
instance_type: t2.medium
availability_zone: us-west-2a
update:
canaries: 1
canary_watch_time: 30000-240000
update_watch_time: 30000-600000
max_in_flight: 3
resource_pools:
- name: common-resource-pool
network: webapp-network
size: 1
stemcell:
name: bosh-aws-xen-ubuntu-trusty-go_agent
version: latest
cloud_properties:
instance_type: t2.medium
availability_zone: us-west-2a
networks:
- name: webapp-network
type: vip
cloud_properties:
security_groups:
- default
# cloud_properties:
# subnet: subnet-87d256ce
- name: default
type: dynamic
cloud_properties:
security_groups:
- default
jobs:
- name: webapp
template: webapp
instances: 1
resource_pool: common-resource-pool
networks:
- name: webapp-network
static_ips:
- 52.40.58.163
- name: default
default: [dns, gateway]
properties:
webapp:
admin: foo#bar.com
servername: 52.40.58.163
This error is coming because there is an missing properties in network configuration. Provides the subnet id and try it. it will work.
I'm trying to create an unmanaged instanceGroup with several VM's in it via Deployment Manager Configuration (YAML file).
I can easily find docs about addInstances via Google API, but couldn't find docs about how to do this in a YAML file:
instances
instanceGroups
What properties should be included in instances/instanceGroup resource to make it work?
The YAML below will create a compute engine instance, create an unmanaged instance group, and add the instance to the group.
resources:
- name: instance-1
type: compute.v1.instance
properties:
zone: australia-southeast1-a
machineType: zones/australia-southeast1-a/machineTypes/n1-standard-1
disks:
- deviceName: boot
type: PERSISTENT
diskType: zones/australia-southeast1-a/diskTypes/pd-ssd
boot: true
autoDelete: true
initializeParams:
sourceImage: projects/debian-cloud/global/images/debian-9-stretch-v20180716
networkInterfaces:
- network: global/networks/default
accessConfigs:
- name: External NAT
type: ONE_TO_ONE_NAT
- name: ig-1
type: compute.v1.instanceGroup
properties:
zone: australia-southeast1-a
network: global/networks/default
- name: ig-1-members
action: gcp-types/compute-v1:compute.instanceGroups.addInstances
properties:
project: YOUR_PROJECT_ID
zone: australia-southeast1-a
instanceGroup: ig-1
instances: [ instance: $(ref.instance-1.selfLink) ]
There is no possibility right now, to do it with gcloud deployment manager.
This was tested and it seemed that while Google Deployment Manager was able to complete without issue having the following snippet:
{
"instances": [
{
"instance": string
}
]
}
it did not add the instances specified, but created the IGM.
However Terraform seems to be able to do it https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/google/r/compute_instance_group.html
I think #mcourtney answer is correct.
I just had this scenario and i used python template with yaml config to add instances to an un-managed instance group.
Here is the snippet of resource definition in my python template :
{
'name': name + '-ig-members',
'action': 'gcp-types/compute-v1:compute.instanceGroups.addInstances',
'properties': {
'project': '<YOUR PROJECT ID>',
'zone' : context.properties['zone'], // Defined in config yaml
'instanceGroup': '<YOUR Instance Group name ( not url )>',
"instances": [
{
"instance": 'projects/<PROJECT ID>/zones/<YOUR ZONE>/instances/<INSTANCE NAME>'
}
]
}
}
Reference API is documented here :
https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/reference/rest/beta/instanceGroups/addInstances
This is just an example. you can abstract all the hard coded things to either yaml configuration or variables at the top of python template.