I'm trying to search the boost documentation for the function boost::date_time::subsecond_duration<boost::posix_time::time_duration, 1000000l>::subsecond_duration(double) now googling boost date_time subsecond duration did not return anything. I was looking for a search field in the official docs and in my version.
Is the boost docu written in a way it does not get indexed by google? Or how come my search query doesn't return anything? Second is there a search to find the function in the boost docu itself?
I could not find one maybe I just missed it. My guess is that it is in some old version but I don't know which one, I'm trying to build an older package that complains about the function missing, but I can't find it.
Sometimes it's easiest for these documentations to use google's site search function which means your query becomes:
"site:boost.org/doc/libs/1_68_0 boost::date_time::subsecond_duration"
This only yields a couple results of which one of them is:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_68_0/doc/html/boost/date_time/subsecond_duration.html
Related
according to the faiss wiki page (link), you should be able to use SearchParameters to selectively include or exclude ids in a search.
Now the information there is a bit strange, because the field "sel" does not exist at all. Also the names were changed, so that "SearchParametersIVFPQ" became "IVFPQSearchParameters" and the old names are no longer findable. Moreover, the search method does not even accept SearchParameters, although according to the wiki it should.
I tried to find a solution with Visual Studio's Intellisense. But this was unsuccessful...
So the documentation seems to be outdated... Does anyone know how this works today?
Is it possible to get access to / modify ColdFusion syntax trees at run time?
I'd wager not, and a 10 minute google search didn't find anything. Fiddling with closures and writing metadata dumps, we can see stringified versions of objects like [runtime expression], for example in the following:
function x(a=b+1) {}
WriteDump(getMetaData(x).parameters[1]["default"]);
Does it allow us to go no deeper than this, or perhaps someone knows how to keep digging and start walking trees?
Default UDF parameter expressions aren't available in function metadata as you've found. Other libraries that have implemented some form of CFML parser are
CFLint (written in Java and using ANTLR)
https://github.com/cflint/CFLint
CFFormat (also uses a binary compiled from Rust)
https://www.forgebox.io/view/commandbox-cfformat
Function LineNums (pure CFML)
https://www.forgebox.io/view/funclinenums
There is also a function callStackGet() docs: https://cfdocs.org/callstackget which might be useful to whatever you are trying to do.
And another CFML parser (written in CFML) here: https://github.com/foundeo/cfmlparser
I am having a hard time finding out how to localize this string that appears to be coming from ember-power-select: "No results found"
This string is nowhere to be found in our app's codebase.
Searching around google did not yield any results, so, while the solution may be in the docs, it'd be nice to have an easy to find stack overflow page linking to it.
EDIT: In the docs, I see I should use the noMatchesMessage: http://ember-power-select.com/docs/api-reference (I'll also be setting loadingMessage and searchMessage)
HOWEVER
I don't know how to set these options globally.
In the docs, use the noMatchesMessage: http://ember-power-select.com/docs/api-reference
I am facing a Search related issue when using Search using Content Search. We are using sitecore version 8.2 and solr 6.3.0 and Content search for searching. My issue is that during normal search, a term boost or proximity or slope of ~0.5 is being applied by default. We haven't configured any such thing in either sitecore or from code end. This thing is causing failure in providing search result. This boost or proximity or slope is found in the query inside the solr log file. When the same query is being copied and pasted manually in the solr search console fails to provide the result but on the other end when we remove the term boot i.e. ~0.5 from the query and then execute the query then it provides accurate result without fail. We have also checked the same thing inside every sitecore configs present in the solution but haven't found anything such. Following is the solr query that is being found in the Solr log file:
"q=((((_template:(2f2a3eec08c54b22bb507df05670abc8)+OR+_template:(bd467624fd054b88a5739541fa43585e)+OR+_template:(0d04820c1352435f80df403bcaebeef5)+OR+_template:(3aba23653fee4baca44ab3a1337af7f7)+OR+_template:(f7bc6f66a8594c9085151459cf8caa2c))+AND+(title_t:("\\"How+Managers+Can+Encourage+Customer\-Focused+Behavior\\"\~0.5")+OR+_content:("\\"How+Managers+Can+Encourage+Customer\-Focused+Behavior\\"\~0.5")+OR+body_t:("How+Managers+Can+Encourage+Customer-Focused+Behavior"~0.5)+OR+abstract_t:("How+Managers+Can+Encourage+Customer-Focused+Behavior"~0.5)))+AND+(-(_template:(0b2afcd689d44ff5ba7e27b294b702d8)+AND+((-date_and_time_tdt:(0001-01-01T00:00:00Z)++:)+AND+date_and_time_tdt:[+TO+2017-07-14T13:34:09.202Z}))++:))+AND+(-(_template:(bd467624fd054b88a5739541fa43585e)+AND+((-date_and_time_tdt:(0001-01-01T00:00:00Z)++:)+AND+date_and_time_tdt:[+TO+2017-07-14T13:34:09.202Z}))++:))&fq=_indexname:(sitecore_web_index)&rows=10&version=2.2"
Please revert back to us as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Lalit Joshi
This issue was being caused as we were using .Contains() which applied the normal proximity of ~0.5. This issue was solved using .Equals() which will query solr in normal manner i.e. without any proximity or boosting.
reference: https://community.sitecore.net/developers/f/8/t/6990
I do C++ and R programming since last 3 years.
I wish to know is there a search engine for C++ commands where I can find all the details regarding the command.
This is the example of what I am looking for:
This is a search engine for R commands:
http://www.rseek.org/
Google works pretty well.
If you only want C++ hits, use the site: restriction, as in "site:cppreference.com emplace_back"
Perhaps "site:cppreference.com pow" is a better example, since pow by itself would normally come up with many unrelated hits.
Of course, keyword search works also, try "site:cppreference.com natural logarithm"
I use this often: http://www.cplusplus.com/. It has a search box.