I run a simple query in SQL:
select count(*) FROM Abattoir.RecordScan_BloodPit
JOIN Abattoir.RecordScan RS ON RS.ScanId = RecordScan_BloodPit.ScanId
WHERE rs.HarvestDate = '07/16/2018'
which gives me a correct number of rows (say 2000)
I then go to my measure editor in Power BI, and enter:
CALCULATE(COUNT(BloodPit[ScanId]))
and get an insane number of around 254000000.
I don't understand why counting on a field so simply would give me a completely Different number.
New to DAX so my Google strings might not be the best when conducting searches.
Here is what the report looks like. Please note the nubers inside the rectangle are what I'm trying to calculate. The numbers vary from day to day...
Related
Situation:
My Report calculates the ranking developments of an accounts in one measure:
Class_Evolution = [Class_Minus_0] & " <-- " & [Class_Minus_1]
Combined with data from the source table the measures show good results per datarow.
The results look like:
...
[Class_Minus_0] and [Class_Minus_1] are measures with X-functions themself that result in a ranking (A,B,C,D) depending on slicer selection.
I also have a measure that counts the rows:
Count Values = COUNTROWS(ExhibitorClass)
This works so far.
Problem:
Now I need to crate visuals with the measures I created. But when I put my measures on a visual they just get summed up:
Need:
I need to built the visuals as in the example below but by using my measured instead of columns.
I have build the report without a slicer on fixed data columns with fixed ranking cutoffs and got a nice result:
However I need to be able to calculate the ranking development with the slicer so I need to build everything with measures.
How should I build my measures to get the visuals I need? Please help me.
Thanks to Andrew, I was able to implement the following solution.
I needed a new Table matching the possible results of the measure:
Then with a VAR variable in a DAX measure the matching values could be counted:
Visual Count Class Evolution =
VAR _rank_evolution = SELECTEDVALUE('Class_Evolution'[Class_Evolution])
return sumx('ExhibitorClass_Details', if([Class_Evolution] = _rank_evolution, 1,0))
The variable was populated form my [Class_Evolution] table and if the measure used on my [ExhibitorClass_Details] details table matched the Class_Evolution it was summed up.
I am trying to create a measure which will calculate the Total Project Revenue
while I have 2 different projects. For each project there is a different calculation:
for Hourly project the calculation should be: Income * BillHours
for Retainer project the calculation should be: Income*TotalWorkinghours
I wrote the below DAX:
enter code here : Total project revenue = IF(max(DimProjects[ProjectType])="Hours",
max(FactWorkingHours[Income])[BillHours],max(FactWorkingHours[Income])*
[Total Working Hours])
the rows are calculated correctly but the total in the table is wrong
what should I fix in DAX so the total of all raw will correct as well.
The total Revenue should be 126,403.33
Thank you in advance
you can find here the table with the results
It's hard to say exactly what your measure is doing because, as written here, that is not a valid measure. I pasted it into the DAX Formatter, which I would recommend for formatting and pasting here into code blocks, and the measure was invalid. It would also be helpful to post the other measures this measure references, eg. [Bill Hours] and [Income Hours].
That being said, I think I can kind of tell what's going on. Your total is probably wrong because the filter context at the total level is being based of the condition where:
MAX ( DimProjects[ProjectType] ) = "Retainer" (or some other value not in your shared snippet)
That is because when you consider the MAX of a string, the higher alphabetical order is considered. Therefore, "Retainer" > "Hours". So at the total level, your table is outputting—more than likely, I can't be certain without more information—the false condition of your measure:
MAX ( FactWorkingHours[Income] ) * [Total Working Hours])
There is a better way to handle your intended outcome. IF statements, in the way you are attempting to use it, are rarely used in a calculated measure. You may be better off trying a calculated column without using the MAX functions. Again, I can't give an exact code recommendation without more context. Hope that sends you in the right direction!
I want to calculate % of two columns which are already in %.
I want to calculate formula like
Target achieved= ACTUAL/TARGET
But here is ACTUAL is already a measure/calculated metrics so I'm not able to divide these two columns.
Any help would be appreciated..
Make sure both target and actual are actually numbers and not strings. You can do it in transform data (aka Power Query) part, before data is loaded into the report.
After that you should be able to create the measure you want, e.g. something like that:
UPDATE : What happens if Actual is not a column, but a measure?
If Actual measure is based on the columns in the same table as target you shouldn't have a problem. You cannot combine measure and column in the same formula. Measure is an aggregated field and needs to be grouped by another field (if you are familiar with SQL,think of SUM and GROUP BY). Coming back to your problem, you need to create measure out of "Target" column as well (notice I have in the formula SUM('Table'[Plan]) which makes it a measure). Than you can use both of them in the formula, but of course you need to "group" them by something(e.g. date) otherwise it will just show you a total.
I'm trying to create a measure in Power BI and I'm having some trouble.
I have a table called 'clients' which as a column called 'status' that has multiplies values in it.
I want to create a formula that counts the number of how many times the value 'Kept' shows up in that column.
Total = COUNT('client'[status])
I'm just not sure where to go from here. I don't know if COUNT or SUM would be the correct function. I know this is a simple solution but I can't figure this out.
The CALCULATE function allows you to add simple filters using additional arguments.
CALCULATE(
COUNT('client'[status]),
'client'[status] = "Kept"
)
MWE set up:
1) From the Power Bi visual website: https://app.powerbi.com/visuals/ there is a custom download "Box and Whisker (Jan Pieter)"
2) Download sample.
3) create new measure with dax formula:
Distinct count score = if(distinctCOUNT(Courses[Score]) > 4, average(Courses[Score]), Blank())
4) Add a Stacked column chart with Course as the axis and the newly created 'Distinct count score' as the Value and get the following:
5) compare this graph to the Box and Whisker provided by Power BI:
Here is my problem. I only want to show values in the Box and Whisker where the Distinct Count of Scores is greater than 4 -- So I only want Physics to show up (like the stacked column chart above).
So if I try the solution working with the stacked bar chart using the Dax formula. I get the following--nothing shows up:
And this is what I want to happen:
Question:
Is there a way in Power BI run and distinct count statement within a Box and Whisker chart to only show data with > 4 distinct values (or any if statement)?
I want it to be formula based, I cannot just 'visual filter' items I do not want.
Possible answer:
I thought about going to the source code to try and 'throw in' a if statement. But I went to the developers git hub: https://github.com/liprec -- I couldn't find the repo for this visual.
Basically this is due to the way the box and whisker chart is working. The visuals needs a dataset to calculate the values (mean, median, etc.) and use those values to show the box and whisker.
So in your case you need to create a measure that is on the same level as the scores (because those values are needed) and is only available. See the screenshot for a visual explanation of the needed measure.
I created the measure with the follow DAX measure:
Filter Score = IF(CALCULATE(DISTINCTCOUNT(Courses[Score]), ALLEXCEPT(Courses, Courses[Course]))>4, MIN(Courses[Score]), BLANK())
The Boolean expression of the IF statement calculates the distinct scores per course via a CALCULATE expression and the ALLEXCEPT filter option to ignore everything but the course value. And the TRUE part returns the score which needs to be aggregated, so the MIN and the FALSE part return a BLANK() value so is can be ignored.
When you add the new measure and create a BW chart it will only show 'Physics' course results.
If you need more help, please let me know here or via email.
-JP
BTW: I just updated my PowerBI visual GitHub repository (https://github.com/liprec/PowerBI-custom-visuals) and added my box and whisker chart and my hierarchy slicer to it in the folder oldAPI.
The crux of your problem, as far as I can tell, is that you want to filter visuals to courses that have a particular number of distinct values. Which visual you want to use is almost irrelevant (though it was helpful to have a sample Power BI workbook to follow along with).
The way I'd approach this (and not saying this is the best or only way)
Step 1
Create a new Course dimension table, with one row for each unique course. In the sample workbook, you can click 'Enter Data' and manually type in the data.
Course
------
English
Math
Physics
Step 2
Next, create a calculated column in the new table and calculate the distinct count for each course. This isn't a measure - it's a column in your table, that uses the Distinct Count calculation from your question.
Distinct Count = CALCULATE(DISTINCTCOUNT(Courses[Score]), SUMMARIZE('Courses','Courses'[Course]))
The SUMMARIZE works like a GROUP BY. In essence, creating one row per course with a distinct count of scores.
Step 3
Use this new attribute as a filter on your visual. You can then dynamically alter the number of distinct values as you feel like (4, 3, 2).
I know this isn't quite as good as typing a formula into the visual filter field, though in practice it's still formula driven. The formula is just on an underlying table.
Why so complex?
The reason you have to do this for the Box & Whiskers visual, whereas your 'Distinct Count score' measure works so well, is that on the column chart, you are displaying a single value (the average score). The Box & Whiskers chart, by contrast, is plotting every individual score.
In fact, if you removed the 'Course' from the axis of your column chart, the value changes as it adds back in the courses you filtered out. (The reason for this is that, if no course is on your axis, your formula calculates the distinct count of all the courses, which is 7). Likewise, if you were to filter your column chart to a particular session, your column chart would go blank (since in any given session, no course has more than 4 distinct values).
The technique I've described above fixes those problems, because it filters out the courses Math & English from the get-go. It doesn't matter if you've filtered to a single session, or not filtered by course at all. English & Math will always be excluded as long as their distinct count is below the value you specify.
Hope this helps.