I was looking for some information about the function User.destroyAll() which brought me to that page.
Clicking on the link for information about destroyAll sends me to http://apidocs.loopback.io/loopback/#persistedmodel-destroyall
which seems like the right address, except it's actually the beginning of the documentation and the exact same thing as travelling to that page http://apidocs.loopback.io/loopback/ .
This made me realise that there are no documentation pieces about persisted-model anymore.
Is it a bug? Do you know when this will come back?
Thanks for reading :)
Yeah, you are right. There is documentation for PersistedModel for version one before last http://apidocs.loopback.io/loopback/v/3.19.3/ but it disappeared in version 3.20.0 http://apidocs.loopback.io/loopback/v/3.20.0/ So if you need documentation you can use this for version 3.19.3. According to the changelog, there were no changes related to PersistedModel
Update strong-globalize to 4.x (Miroslav Bajtoš)
Update nodemailer to v4.x (Dimitris)
Drop support for Node.js 4.x (Miroslav Bajtoš)
Related
The point of this is to keep notes/urls pointing to particular parts of the documentation that people want to refer to in the future. For example, when something is a complex feature that requires a little bit of review most of the times you work with it.
Let's take an example. I search for Django STATICFILES_DIR:
https://www.google.com/search?q=django+STATICFILES_DIRS
Pretty quickly I get exactly what I want:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/ref/contrib/staticfiles/
which has a STATICFILES_DIR configuration entry.
But, notice from the url, this is for Django 4.1. And it says so on the page too.
But maybe there are a current version? Let's look.
There isn't.
Contrast with Python, which points to a very generic, 3 version. Not to Python 3.10 or 3.11.
https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/datastructures.html#dictionaries
Or postgres (looking for create table):
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/sql-createtable.html
OK, yes, I have a version 14, but...
I can click on that current and that will NOT pin me to a particular version.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createtable.html
In the case of Django, Python and Postgresql, I am pretty confident a generic, version-less documentation page will serve my purposes just fine 90% of the time - those are pretty stable APIs by now.
Often searching gets you to ancient postgresql versions like 9.2, but you can always find a current link.
Am I looking in the wrong places for a permanent link for Django docs?
Yes, there is dev link on the Django versions, but that's living a bit dangerously, I assume people are potentially working updating the docs on the current version on that URL. Or should I use that after all?
Going to use the dev tag for now. Django is stable enough that I expect minimal problems there and I can always go back to my version of interest from there. But at least I don't have bookmarks pointing to a bunch of different historical versions.
I am looking at a content item with many renderings.
I need to move one of the rendering down so it show lower on the page.
I can move it in the Edit presentation settings but as soon as I click ok, the order remains unchanged.
Note, it does work sometimes but is intermittent.
I have looked in the logs and nothing seems bad apart from this:
1032 11:20:45 WARN Long running operation: renderContentEditor pipeline[id={E23237A3-1FEB-4E9A-AEB6-543807ED6CAD}]
I feel this might be a Sitecore bug.
Has anyone experienced this before?
There was a similar issue in 6.5, but I assumed it would have been addressed in an update. Basically, the issue is a result of presentation setting deltas at the item level incorrectly merging with the standard values presentation settings of the item base template.
I would suggest contacting Sitecore support for a workaround or solution. Reference case #387488 and provide detailed steps to reproduce the issue.
I have read several times about the Ember Inspector and habe also seen videos on yotube of it, e.g. example video.
Does anyone know, if it is available yet or when it will be available. This will make debugging so much more convenient, i want to try it :-)
you can get the current version by cloning the github project
found via http://cgcardona.github.com/2013/02/15/playing-around-with-the-ember-inspector/
Yes, it's live!
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ember-inspector/bmdblncegkenkacieihfhpjfppoconhi
(blah blah... stupid minimum answer length requirements... blah blah)
It's released. check below link
But i still get confused how to use it on my site.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ember-inspector/bmdblncegkenkacieihfhpjfppoconhi
I've tried searching around on the site and google with no luck so here goes;
In joomla, using the module mod_articles_latest, what could be the reason for it not showing the latest news? I get 4 news as i requested and i told it to choose by dated published yet it seems that it doesn't update when i add a new article to the category i told it to use.
I'm thinking cache might be the reason but i i have it turned off for the module.
Using joomla 2.5.
Thanks in advance for your suggestions!
First Make sure you haven't modify any files of mod_articles_latest. If you have modified then revert it n check. Second Check the list of articles & their published date. Even if it doesn't work then there are lots of free module which shows the list of latest articles on Joomla extension site. If you have half an hour & you know how to built Joomla module, you can proceed. At the end mod_articles_latest modules works perfectly for me. Thanks
We have a couple cases in FogBugz that have a link to an old wiki via the See Also section. No where in these cases is there a link in the edited text (the normal section where you enter your text), so I'm assuming the link was created through the wiki article (using the Case ### linking method). However, the wiki article appears to be deleted (as clicking the link says This article does not exist). Is there any way to actually remove the link from these cases to the non-existent wiki?
Thanks
UPDATE:
Here's a link to the question on the FogBugz Technical Support forum.
UPDATE 2:
They have fixed this issue and will be releasing it in the next FogBugz update. Many thanks to Ben Kamens, Rich Armstrong, Joel Spolsky and the rest of Fog Creek!
Might be a good idea to ask this one on the FogBugz tech support forum. Likely you'll have to go into the DB directly and edit the records to remove the links. That's my thought.
You're probably aware of this, but this bug was fixed in FogBuz version 7 (possible patched in version 6).