Im trying to write a class that stores an id and a value in an container class.
Im using an nested class as my data structure.
When im compiling the code sometimes it prints perfectly, sometimes it prints nothing and sometimes it prints half of the data then stops.
When i debug the code the same weird behavior occours, when it fails during debug it throws an error "Map.exe has triggered a breakpoint.", the Error occours in the print method when im using cout.
cmap.h
#pragma once
class CMap
{
public:
CMap();
~CMap();
CMap& Add(int id, int value);
void print() const;
private:
class container
{
public:
~container();
int container_id = 0;
int container_value = 0;
};
container* p_komp_;
int dim_ = -1;
void resize();
};
cmap.cpp
#include "cmap.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
CMap::CMap()
{
p_komp_ = new container[0];
}
CMap::~CMap()
{
p_komp_ = nullptr;
cout << "destroy cmap";
}
CMap& CMap::Add(int id, int value)
{
resize();
p_komp_[dim_].container_id = id;
p_komp_[dim_].container_value = value;
return *this;
}
void CMap::resize()
{
container* temp_array = new container[++dim_];
if (dim_ == 0)
{
temp_array[0].container_id = p_komp_[0].container_id;
temp_array[0].container_value = p_komp_[0].container_value;
}
for (unsigned i = 0; i < dim_; i++)
{
temp_array[i].container_id = p_komp_[i].container_id;
temp_array[i].container_value = p_komp_[i].container_value;
}
p_komp_ = temp_array;
}
void CMap::print() const
{
for (unsigned i = 0; i <= dim_; i++)
{
cout << p_komp_[i].container_id;
cout << p_komp_[i].container_value;
}
}
CMap::container::~container()
{
cout << "destruct container";
}
Map.cpp
#include "cmap.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void main(void)
{
CMap m2;
m2.Add(1, 7);
m2.Add(3, 5);
m2.print();
}
These two things are a possible reason for your problem:
int dim_ = -1;
and
container* temp_array = new container[++dim_];
When you allocate, you increase dim_ from -1 to 0. That is you create a zero-sized "array", where every indexing into it will be out of bounds and lead to undefined behavior.
You also have memory leaks since you never delete[] what you new[]. I didn't look for more problems, but there probably a more.
And an "array" (created at compile-time or through new[]) will have indexes from 0 to size - 1 (inclusive). You seem to think that the "size" you provide is the top index. It's not, it's the number of elements.
It seems to me that you might need to take a few steps back, get a couple of good books to read, and almost start over.
Related
Trying to learn datastructures, I made this class for a stack. It works just fine with integers but it throws a mysterious error with strings.
The class List is the API for my stack. Its meant to resize automatically when it reaches the limit. The whole code is just for the sake of learning but the error I get doesn't make any sense and it happens somewhere in some assembly code.
#include <iostream>
#include<string>
using namespace std;
class List {
private:
int N = 0;
string* list = new string[1];
void resize(int sz) {
max = sz;
string* oldlist = list;
string* list = new string[max];
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
list[i] = oldlist[i];
}
}
int max = 1;
public:
void push(string str) {
if (N == max) {
resize(2 * N);
}
cout << max << endl;
list[N] = str;
N++;
}
void pop() {
cout << list[--N] << endl;
}
};
int main()
{
string in;
List list;
while (true) {
cin >> in;
if (in == "-") {
list.pop();
}
else {
list.push(in);
}
}
}
string* list = new string[max]; in the resize method defines a new variable named list that "shadows", replaces, the member variable list. The member list goes unchanged and the local variable list goes out of scope at the end of the function, losing all of the work.
To fix: Change
string* list = new string[max];
to
list = new string[max];
so that the function will use the member variable.
Don't forget to delete[] oldlist; when you're done with it to free up the storage it points at.
So I have this structure
struct Data {
int id;
string message;
};
I am trying to create an array of struct pointers and fill it with values using this
Data *stack[10];
for(int i=0; i<10; i++){
stack[i] = (struct Data*) malloc(sizeof(struct Data));
stack[i]->id = i;
stack[i]->message = "message" + i;
}
however, I keep getting an error (segmentation fault when debugging) from stack[i]->message = "message" + i;
Can anyone please help understand what's causing the error and how to solve it?
Below is the working example. You can use smart pointers for automatic memory management, that is the destructor will be called automatically when reference count goes to zero.
#include <iostream>
#include <memory>
using namespace std;
struct Data {
int id;
string message;
Data()
{
std::cout<<"default consructor"<<std::endl;
}
~Data()
{
std::cout<<"destructor "<<std::endl;
}
};
int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello World" << std::endl;
std::shared_ptr<Data> stack[10];
for(int i=0; i<10; i++){
stack[i] = std::make_shared<Data>();
stack[i]->id = i;
stack[i]->message = "message" + std::to_string(i);//make sure to convert the integer to std::string
}
//check the value of id for first element in stack
std::cout<<stack[1]->id<<std::endl;
return 0;
}
You can also use new instead of malloc but then you will have to call delete explicitly. Note the use of std::to_string() to convert the integer i to string.
I get segmentation faults when I use the =-operator to copy a struct that contains a std::vector to uninitialized memory.
The critical code looks like that:
template<typename T>
ComponentContainer
{
T* buffer;
size_t capacity;
size_t m_size;
public:
ComponentContainer();
~ComponentContainer();
size_t size();
void resize(size_t size);
T & operator[](size_t index);
};
template<typename T>
void ComponentContainer<T>::resize(size_t newSize)
{
if(this->m_size >= newSize)
{
this->m_size = newSize;
}
else
{
if(this->capacity < newSize)
{
const size_t newCapacity = capacity*2;
T* newBuffer = (T*)malloc(newCapacity*sizeof(T));
for(size_t i = 0; i<m_size; i++)
{
// checks if this->buffer[i] is valid intialized memory
if(pseudo_checkIfElementIsInitialized(i))
{
// when this is uncommented no segfault happens
//new (&newBuffer[i]) T();
newBuffer[i] = this->buffer[i]; // <- segfault happens here
}
}
this->capacity = newCapacity;
free(this->buffer);
this->buffer = newBuffer;
}
this->m_size = newSize;
}
}
The T-type is a struct with a std::vector of structs when I get the segfault.
I suspect that the std::vector =-operator uses somehow the left side variable newBuffer[i] and the segmentation fault happens since newBuffer[i] is not initialized.
Objects will be created only with in-placement new with the function T & operator[](size_t index). The malloc should only allocate the memory without initializing anything.
I tried to write a simple example but that hasn't worked out so well:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
struct Hello
{
Hello()
{
std::cout << "constructor" << std::endl;
}
~Hello()
{
std::cout << "destructor" << std::endl;
}
std::vector<double> v = std::vector<double>(1);
};
int main()
{
Hello* buffer = (Hello*)malloc(1*sizeof(Hello));
char* noise = (char*)buffer;
for(size_t i = 0; i<sizeof(Hello); i++)
{
noise[i] = 100;
}
auto tmp = Hello();
tmp.v[0] = 6.6;
//new (&buffer[0]) Hello();
buffer[0] = tmp;
std::cout << buffer[0].v[0] << std::endl;
return 0;
}
It works fine without segfault. I assume that is because the uninitialized memory was just by chance ok for the std::vector =-operation.
So
a) is that theory correct
and if yes
b) how to solve this problem without using a default constructor (T()) for every class that i use as T for my ComponentContainer
Well, yeah. You can't assign to an object that doesn't exist.
Uncomment the line that fixes it!
If you can't default construct, then copy construct:
new (&newBuffer[i]) T(this->buffer[i]);
And if you can't do that, then, well, you know the rest.
The malloc should only allocate the memory without initializing anything.
Is it possible that you've underestimated the weight of this statement? You don't just get memory then decide whether or not to initialise it with some values. You have to actually create objects before using them; this is not optional. You're programming C++, not manipulating bits and bytes on a tape :)
I am not allowed to make use of the vector class so I need to make my own. I made a int vector class and it works fine, but when trying to make it for strings it compiles but gives me an error because of the pointers. Any hint where I am making the mistake? All I did was change every int element for string, but aparently that does not work. Please help I am very confused.
public:
StringRow(){
elements = new string;
size = 0;
}
~StringRow(){...}
void push_back(string value){...}
};
You defined pointer to variable, not array of variables.
elements = new string;
Replace it with
elements = new string[size];
You can optimize algorithm with defining initial size. Create bigger array only if it's necessary.
There are several problems:
in the constructor you don't need to allocate anything. You don't even need a constructor here, you can initialize the members directly as you declare them.
if you allocate with string* tmpElementsArray = new string[size + 1]; you need to deallocate with delete [] tmpElementsArray;
Corrected working version:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class StringRow {
private:
string* elements = nullptr;
int size = 0;
public:
// constructor not needed
// StringRow() {
// elements = nullptr;
// size = 0;
// }
~StringRow() {
delete []elements;
}
void push_back(string value) {
string* tmpElementsArray = new string[size + 1];
for (int i = 0; i<size; i++) {
tmpElementsArray[i] = elements[i];
}
delete [] elements;
elements = tmpElementsArray;
elements[size] = value;
size++;
}
int length() {
return size;
}
string at(int index) {
if (index<size) {
return elements[index];
}
}
};
int main()
{
StringRow s;
string str1 = "hello";
string str2 = "hello2";
s.push_back(str1);
s.push_back(str2);
cout << s.at(0) << endl ;
cout << s.at(1) << endl;
}
Doing a delete []elements if elements is nullptr is OK.
NB: This is not the most efficient way.
I'm totally lost and confused and could use some help.
I'm currently working on a small command line-based game. For this I wrote a class Inventory, dynamically creating an array of invSpace-objects, each space representing a pair of a pointer to an Item (another class of mine) and a integer, depicting a quantity. Here's the code:
class invSpace {
public:
Item *item;
int quantity;
invSpace() {
item = NULL;
quantity = 0;
}
};
class Inventory {
private:
invSpace* spaces = NULL;
size_t size;
public:
int free_space() {
int free = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
if (spaces[i].item == NULL) {
free++;
}
}
return free;
}
Inventory() {}
Inventory(size_t new_size) {
size = new_size;
spaces = new invSpace[size];
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) { //I know this is obsolete because
spaces[i].item = NULL; //of the invSpace constructor, I
spaces[i].quantity = 0; //just did this for testing
}
~Inventory() {
delete[] spaces;
}
invSpace& operator[](int index) {
return spaces[index];
}
};
There are some more methods in this class, like for adding, deleting and searching for items, but those don't matter now. So this is basically just a simple array within one object, dynamically allocating memory in the constructor and with some extra methods. After being created, the array contains zero elements, or Items, so the free_space() method should return the size of the array. But it doesn't. It returns about half of the size.
My first thought was that something went wrong with the allocation. But at a second glance I noticed that the Inventory is totally fine directly after being created; with exactly as many spaces as requested, all of them set to item=NULL/quantity=0. But after a call of getline() at the start of main() that scans user input and saves it to a string for further analyzing, some spaces get filled with random addresses and integers.
Even stranger, with each new call of getline() some spaces are freed, some others filled. As far as my debugging, experimenting and testing goes, none of these addresses belong to any variable in my program, they are just plain random. Also, at no point is there be any interference with the Inventory and the getline() function or the string it returns. In fact, after being created, no part of this object is used anywhere in the code beside the free_space() method. What's even stranger is that spaces in the Inventory class is marked private, so a method is required to meddle with this pointer/array (or so I would expect).
This problem occurs with getline() and cin but not with any of C's <stdio.h> input stream functions. Using malloc() instead of new[] makes no difference. Of course, I could use something like scanf() for the reading from the console. Still, I just want to know why all these things happen. I have absolutely no idea.
Thanks in advance for every answer!
EDIT:
I narrowed the whole code so that it still produces the same error, also changed free_space() so that it prints adress and integer if present:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <map>
using namespace std;
class Item {
public:
static map<string, Item*> itemlist;
string name;
string description;
Item() {}
Item(const string new_name, const string new_description) {
name = new_name;
description = new_description;
itemlist.insert(pair<string, Item*> (name, this));
}
};
map<string, Item*> Item::itemlist;
/*The more Items are declared, the more random adresses appear in the
inventory*/
Item item01("sword", "A sharp and deadly weapon.");
Item item02("shield", "This will protect you. To a certain extent.");
Item item03("stick", "What is this for exactly?");
Item item04("bottle of water", "A bottle full of refreshing spring water.");
class invSpace {
public:
Item *item;
int quantity;
invSpace() {
item = NULL;
quantity = 0;
}
};
class Inventory {
private:
invSpace* spaces = NULL;
size_t size;
public:
int free_space() {
int free = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
if (spaces[i].item == NULL) {
free++;
cout << i << " = free" << endl;
}
else {
cout << spaces[i].item << " / " << spaces[i].quantity << endl;
}
}
return free;
}
Inventory() {}
Inventory(size_t new_size) {
size = new_size;
spaces = new invSpace[size];
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
spaces[i].item = NULL;
spaces[i].quantity = 0;
}
}
~Inventory() {
delete[] spaces;
}
};
class Player {
public:
string name;
Inventory inventory;
Player(const string new_name) {
inventory = Inventory(40);
name = new_name;
}
};
Player player("Me");
int main() {
string input;
//Inventory inventory(40); //no error when declared outside the Player class
while (1) {
cout << "\n>> ";
getline(cin, input);
if (input == "x") {
break;
}
else {
player.inventory.free_space();
}
}
}
Some things I noticed: No error occurs if the inventory isn't part of a Player-object. If it is but no Items are declared only the first inventory space receives a random adress (and int value) after the first call of getline().
The more Items there are, the more random adresses I get, it seems...