Consider the following
int main() {
int a = 8;
int b = 10;
while (true) {
if (a /= 2 && b < 12) {
b++;
std::cout << b << std::endl;
}
else break;
}
return 0;
}
Now c++ is not my main language, but how does c++ evaluate this if statement?
In this case, when b>=12, the compiler throws the "division by zero" exception, but why?
Now if i wrap the states in parentheses i do not get the exception.
if( (a /= 2) && (b < 12))
Does this have something to do with how c++ evaluates the statements?
If evaluation is not the problem:
I am aware of that
a = (a/2 && b<12)
would not hold either.
P Λ Q does not hold for P Λ ¬Q but the state of P should not be affected? Why is it P gets blamed instead of ¬Q?
if (a /= 2 && b < 12)
is the same as:
if (a /= (2 && b < 12))
so:
2 is evaluated, which is converted to true in the context of an operand to &&. This does not trigger short-circuit evaluation so we continue...
b < 12, which in the case you're talking about is false
So 2 && b < 12 evaluates to false overall
a /= 2 && b < 12 is therefore equivalent to a /= false here, which is equivalent to a /= 0.
Related
heyall, just going through some textbook examples for my introductory c++ course and I would really appreciate it if somebody could clarify why the following code produces an output of 51 (I would expect it to not produce any output whatsoever), many thanks!:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
constexpr int a{9};
constexpr int b{1};
constexpr int c{5};
if (a < b < c)
if (c > b > a)
if (a > c) cout << 91;
else cout << 19;
else
if (b < c) cout << 51;
else cout << 15;
else
if (b < a < c)
if (a < c) cout << 95;
else cout << 59;
else
if (b < c) cout << 57;
else cout << 75;
return 0;
}
It seems you expect this expression:
if (a < b < c)
to be true if a, b, and c are in increasing order. But what actually happens is the expression becomes:
if ((a < b) < c)
which is either:
if (0 < c)
// or
if (1 < c)
Either way, that's probably not what you want. In fact, there's no good reason to ever write the above expression.
If you want to check whether the variables are increasing, you need to write something like:
if (a < b && b < c)
In c++, comparisons like 'X<=Y<=Z' do not have their mathematical meaning without parentheses. So, in
if (a < b < c)
we are getting
a < b => 9 < 1 => 0
'0' means the condition is false, which with 'c' is returning
0 < 5 => 1
"1" being returned means that the if condition is True.
Similarly, you can check for the nested if-else loops.
I was trying to solve this problem and from the comments section in the editorial, I was directed to the following solution :
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
#define MAX(a,b,c) max(a,max(b,c))
int n,a,b,c,dp[4001];
int f(int x)
{
if (x == 0) return 0;
if (x < 0 || (x > 0 && x < a && x < b && x < c))
return 0xACCE97ED; // <- **I have doubt here**
if (!dp[x]) dp[x] = MAX(f(x-a),f(x-b),f(x-c)) + 1;
return dp[x];
}
int main()
{
cin >> n >> a >> b >> c;
memset(dp,0,sizeof(dp));
cout << f(n) << endl;
}
I wanted to know:
What is the need of the if statement that returns 0xACCE97ED for the test case:
4000 1 2 3. This test case dosen't work when that specific if statement is missing.
Why specifically 0xACCE97ED is being returned? Because when I tried to return any other number (say 9999), then the output is expected output + 9999.
if (x < 0 || (x > 0 && x < a && x < b && x < c))
return 0xACCE97ED; // -1395746835
Well looking at the dp function, it is basically maximizing values and this specific if statement is saying:
if x < 0
the length of the ribbon you cut is negative (which should be impossible)
or if x > 0 and x < a, b, c which means you can still cut X but all available sizes would result into having a ribbon of negative length
return 0xACCE97ED; return a random negative value which happens to spell out ACCEPTED because this state is invalid
And since the third if statement will try to get the max value, 0xACCE97ED will never be selected as the max value.
0xACCE97ED means "ACCEPTED" in the 1ee7 speech. nothing else specific about this value.
What is the need of the if statement that returns 0xACCE97ED for the test case: 4000 1 2 3
if (x < 0 || (x > 0 && x < a && x < b && x < c))
return 0xACCE97ED; // <- **I have doubt here**
because the function f is recursive, in the next line it calls itself:
if (!dp[x]) dp[x] = MAX(f(x-a),f(x-b),f(x-c)) + 1;
return dp[x];
with a smaller values for x so presumable it will eventually make that if statement true and will return "accepted" (0xACCE97ED).
I came accross this expression, and can't understand the meaning of line 3 in the following snippet:
int A=0, B=0;
std::cout << A << B << "\n"; // Prints 0, 0
A += B++ == 0; // how does this exp work exactly?
std::cout << A << B << "\n"; // Prints 1, 1
A adds B to it, and B is Post incremented by 1, what does the "==0" mean?
Edit:
Here's the actual code:
int lengthOfLongestSubstringKDistinct(string s, int k) {
int ctr[256] = {}, j = -1, distinct = 0, maxlen = 0;
for (int i=0; i<s.size(); ++i) {
distinct += ctr[s[i]]++ == 0; //
while (distinct > k)
distinct -= --ctr[s[++j]] == 0;
maxlen = max(maxlen, i - j);
}
return maxlen;
}
B++ == 0
This is a boolean expression resulting in true or false. In this case the result is true, true is then added to A. The value of true is 1 so the (rough) equivalent would be:
if(B == 0)
A += 1;
++B;
Note that this isn't particulary good or clear to read code and the person who wrote this should be thrown into the Gulags.
Lets break this expression into pieces: A += value, whereas value = B++ == 0. As later cout suggests, value == 1. Why is that? Here is why: value is result of comparison of B++ and 0, but ++ (increment) operation, when written after operand, is being processed after the comparison, i.e. if you write A += ++B == 0 the later cout should (and does) print 0, 1.
std::cout << (abs(b - c) < a) && a < b + c ? 1 : 0;
I want to check if given values can create triangle. I got warnings:
second operand of conditional expression has no effect [-Wunused-value]
third operand of conditional expression has no effect [-Wunused-value]
What's wrong?
Your code translates to:
((std::cout << (abs(b - c) < a)) && a < b + c) ? 1 : 0;
Firstly, operator<< has higher operator precedence than operator&&.
Only the value of abs(b - c) < a will be printed and the (a < b + c ? 1 : 0) part will be AND-ed together with the return value of std::ostream::operator bool.
But the warning is about 1 and 0 not being assigned to anything nor having any side effects, because && precedes the ternary conditional (?:).
The correct code is either:
std::cout << (abs(b - c) < a && a < b + c ? 1 : 0);
// same as std::cout << ((abs(b - c) < a && a < b + c) ? 1 : 0);
or
std::cout << (abs(b - c) < a && (a < b + c ? 1 : 0));
In fact, they're equivalent (apart that one calls operator<< with bool and the other with int), no ternary operator needed:
std::cout << (abs(b - c) < a && a < b + c);
I am just wondering in C or C++, for the expression:
b == c || b == d
Can I do something like:
b == (c || d)
and get the same behavior?
The first expression
b == c || b == d will give you true if b is equal to either c or d.
The second expression
b == (c || d) will check only if b is either equal to 0 or 1 because the output of c || d is binary.
Consider this code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main() {
int b=10,c=9,d=10;
cout << (b ==c || b ==d )<<endl;
cout<< ( b == ( c || d)) <<endl;
d=11;
cout << (b ==c || b ==d )<<endl;
cout<< ( b == ( c || d)) <<endl;
return 0;
}
The output is
1
0
0
0
Now you can clearly see that both expressions are not same.
No, operators in C and C++ don't implicitly distribute over subexpressions like that. Evaluation is defined strictly in terms of the direct association of operators with operands. There are no "shortcuts" as you might have in mathematics or English.
If you write code that incorrectly assume such implicit distribution, you're likely to end up with an expression that's syntactically and semantically valid, but that doesn't do what you expect.
The || operator yields a value of 1 or true if either operand is true (non-zero) or a value of 0 or false if both operands are false (equal to zero). And the operands needn't be boolean; they can be of any scalar type. (In C the result is of type int; in C++ it's of type bool.) The expression
b == c || b == d
is equivalent to
(b == c) || (b == d)
and yields a true result if b is equal to c or if b is equal to d. But this expression:
b == (c || d)
computes the value of (c || d), and the tests whether b is equal to the result of that subexpression.
A similar possible source of confusion is that
x < y < z
is not equivalent to
(x < y) && (y < z)
Rather, it's equivalent to
(x < y) < z
where the false or true (in C++) or 0 or 1 (in C) result of x < y is compared to the value of z.