How to sample a mip level in glsl using textureLod? - c++

Question

How do I go about sampling a mip level in glsl using textureLod()?
From what I know, mipmap LOD can only be "explicitly" accessed through the vertex shader (although not sure if it's supported in version 420, as most of the documentation is outdated). Second, you need to define the mipmap level-of-detail by setting texture parameters, such as GL_TEXTURE_MAX_LEVEL and GL_TEXTURE_BASE_LEVEL.
In my code, I define these texture parameters after calling glCompressedTexImage2D:
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, min_filter);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, mag_filter);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MAX_LEVEL, 9);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_BASE_LEVEL, 0);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_LINEAR);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, wrap_s);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, wrap_t);
Next, I use this code for each binding each texture sample (types such as albedo map ect):
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0 + unit); // Set active texture type
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, id); // Bind the texture object
Finally, here is my shader code:
Vertex:
#version 420 core
out vec3 _texcoord;
out vec4 _albedo_lod;
uniform sampler2D albedo; // Albedo and specular map
void main()
{
_texcoord = texcoord;
_albedo_lod = textureLod(albedo, vec2(_texcoord.st), 2.0);
}
With the attaching fragment:
#version 420 core
layout(location = 0) out vec4 gAlbedo; // Albedo texel colour
in vec3 _texcoord;
in vec4 _albedo_lod;
void main()
{
gAlbedo = _albedo_lod; // Assign albedo
}
Now for some reason, no matter what LOD value I input, the result always resorts to this:
Which seems to be the very last mip level (despite what value I input). Bearing in mind I'm packing 10 mip levels as a .dds file. When however I manually set the base mip level via the texture parameter GL_TEXTURE_BASE_LEVEL, it works.
So all in all, Why won't it sample the correct mip level in glsl using textureLod? Is this somewhat deprecated in version 420?
EDIT: Here is the code for loading the dds file:
// This function imports a dds file and returns the dds data as a struct
inline GLuint LoadDds(std::vector<std::string> file, size_t &img_width, size_t &img_height, size_t &num_mips, GLvoid* data, GLint wrap_s, GLint wrap_t, GLint min_filter, GLint mag_filter, size_t texture_type, bool anistropic_filtering)
{
// Create one OpenGL texture
GLuint textureID;
glGenTextures(1, &textureID);
// "Bind" the newly created texture : all future texture functions will modify this texture
glBindTexture(texture_type, textureID);
glPixelStorei(GL_UNPACK_ALIGNMENT, 1);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < file.size(); i++) // For each image...
{
FILE *fp;
unsigned char header[124];
unsigned int height;
unsigned int width;
unsigned int linearSize;
unsigned int mipMapCount;
unsigned int fourCC;
unsigned int components;
unsigned int format;
unsigned int bufsize;
unsigned char* buffer;
/* try to open the file */
errno_t err;
err = fopen_s(&fp, file[i].c_str(), "rb");
if (fp == NULL)
return 0;
/* verify the type of file */
char filecode[4];
fread(filecode, 1, 4, fp);
if (strncmp(filecode, "DDS ", 4) != 0)
{
fclose(fp);
return 0;
}
/* get the surface desc */
fread(&header, 124, 1, fp);
height = *(unsigned int*)&(header[8]);
width = *(unsigned int*)&(header[12]);
linearSize = *(unsigned int*)&(header[16]);
mipMapCount = *(unsigned int*)&(header[24]);
fourCC = *(unsigned int*)&(header[80]);
bufsize = mipMapCount > 1 ? linearSize * 2 : linearSize;
buffer = (unsigned char*)malloc(bufsize * sizeof(unsigned char));
fread(buffer, 1, bufsize, fp);
/* close the file pointer */
fclose(fp);
components = (fourCC == FOURCC_DXT1) ? 3 : 4;
switch (fourCC)
{
case FOURCC_DXT1:
format = GL_COMPRESSED_RGBA_S3TC_DXT1_EXT;
break;
case FOURCC_DXT3:
format = GL_COMPRESSED_RGBA_S3TC_DXT3_EXT;
break;
case FOURCC_DXT5:
format = GL_COMPRESSED_RGBA_S3TC_DXT5_EXT;
break;
default:
free(buffer);
return 0;
}
unsigned int blockSize = (format == GL_COMPRESSED_RGBA_S3TC_DXT1_EXT) ? 8 : 16;
unsigned int offset = 0;
for (unsigned int level = 0; level < mipMapCount && (width || height); ++level)
{
unsigned int size = ((width + 3) / 4) * ((height + 3) / 4) * blockSize;
glCompressedTexImage2D(texture_type != GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP ? GL_TEXTURE_2D : GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + i, level, format, width, height,
0, size, buffer + offset);
if ((level < 1) && (i < 1)) // Only assign input variable values from first image
{
img_width = width; // Assign texture width
img_height = height; // Assign texture height
data = buffer; // Assign buffer data
num_mips = mipMapCount; // Assign number of mips
}
offset += size;
width /= 2;
height /= 2;
}
if (anistropic_filtering) // If anistropic_filtering is true...
{
GLfloat f_largest; // A contianer for storing the amount of texels in view for anistropic filtering
glGetFloatv(GL_MAX_TEXTURE_MAX_ANISOTROPY_EXT, &f_largest); // Query the amount of texels for calculation
glTexParameterf(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MAX_ANISOTROPY_EXT, f_largest); // Apply filter to texture
}
if (!mipMapCount)
glGenerateMipmap(texture_type); // Generate mipmap
free(buffer); // Free buffers from memory
}
// Parameters
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, min_filter);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, mag_filter);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_GENERATE_MIPMAP, GL_TRUE);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MAX_LEVEL, 9);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_BASE_LEVEL, 0);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_LINEAR);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, wrap_s);
glTexParameteri(texture_type, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, wrap_t);
// Set additional cubemap parameters
if (texture_type == GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP)
glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_R, wrap_s);
return textureID; // Return texture id
}
And here is an image of each mipmap level being generated using NVIDIA's dds plugin:

Answer 1

Since you sample per vertex this seems to be exactly the expected behavior.
You say the mip level parameter has no influence, but from what I can see the difference should only be noticeable once the pixel density goes under the vertex density and values starts averaging out. This might however never happen if you don't store the entire mipchain, since the lowest resolution might still have enough definition (I can't really tell from the screen capture, and I can only guess the model's tesselation).
Since you're generating the mipchain manually though you could easily test out with different flat colors for each level and see if they're indeed properly fetched (and actually if you're unsure about the importer it might be worth it to try it out in the pixel shader as well first).