I'm trying to print elements of a vector of list pair in a hash-table program in C++.
If I use the C++11 auto it's working but if i use a iterator
for (vector<int>::iterator i = arr_Hash[i].begin(); i != arr_Hash[i].end(); ++i)
//for (auto index = arr_Hash[i].begin(); index != arr_Hash[i].end(); index++)
{
cout << i->second;
cout << " ";
}
Error list: https://i.imgur.com/rDejBGG.png
How can I use the iterator here?
vector<int>::iterator i = arr_Hash[i].begin()
You're reusing the variable i here. Call it something else.
std::cout << i->second;
i is a std::vector<int>::iterator. Dereferencing it gives you an int&, which has no second member. You probably just want std::cout << *i;
The iterator for arr_Hash[i] needs to be on the same type as the vector.
Namely, if the type of arr_Hash[i] is vector<pair<int,int>> then it's iterator needs to be vector<pair<int,int>>::iterator.
Howerver, you should Prefer a range-for-statement to a for-statement when there is a choice.
for (auto& e : arr_Hash[i])
cout << i->second << " ";
Related
I do not know, why does it output 1024?
vector<int> default_container = { 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,78,8,1024 };
cout << *default_container.end() << endl; // 0
default_container.pop_back();
for (auto it : default_container)
{
cout << it << ",";
}
cout << endl;
cout << *default_container.end() << endl; // 1024 why？why？why？why？
cout << *--default_container.end() << endl; // 8
Your program has Undefined behavior!
You are de-referencing the end iterator, at the lines
cout << *default_container.end() << endl;
...
cout << *default_container.end() << endl;
which gives you undefined behavior. Form cppreference.com the std::vector::end, std::vector::cend
Returns an iterator to the element following the last element of the vector.
This element acts as a placeholder; attempting to access it results in undefined behavior.
Means, anything can be happened; therefore you shouldn't be relaying on its result and should not be doing it!
That being said, it looks like that you want to access the last element in the vector. If that the case, for a non-empty vector you have multiple other (safe) choices:
Using std::vector::back
// prints first 8 from last; due to "default_container.pop_back()"
std::cout << default_container.back();
Using std::prev
#include <iterator>
// prints first 8 from last; due to "default_container.pop_back()"
std::cout << *std::prev(default_container.end());
Using reverse iterator std::rbegin
// prints first 8 from last; due to "default_container.pop_back()"
std::cout << *std::rbegin(default_container);
As a side note, see: Why is "using namespace std;" considered bad practice?
The previous answer says it all.
In other words you're not supposed to use end() for anything else then comparing an iterator to.
Eg.
for (auto it = container.begin(); it < container.end(); ++it)
Also note that your line for (auto it : default_container)
isn't creating an iterator but literally an int.
// foreach value in container
for(int value : default_container)
{
cout << value;
}
note that if you're not planning to change the values you're iterating over you can use this :
for(const auto value : default_container) {}
or if your containter contains objects (instance of classes)
for(const auto& object : container) {}
So I've started learning vectors for the first time and wrote a simple program which goes like this:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
vector<int> g1;
int n;
cout<<"enter values"<<endl;
do
{
cin>>n;
g1.push_back(n);
} while (n);
cout<<"Vector values are: "<<endl;
for(auto i=g1.begin(); i<g1.size();i++)
cout<<*i<<endl;
}
When I try executing it, an error shows up saying "type mismatch" at the g1.size() part. Why exactly does this happen? I used the auto keyword for the iterator involved and assumed there wouldn't be any problem?
That is the bad side of using auto. If you have no idea what the result of auto is, you get no idea why it is something totally different you expect!
std::vector::begin delivers a std::vector::iterator and you can't compare it against an size_type value which is a result of std::vector::size. This type is typically std::size_t
You have to compare against another iterator which is the representation of the end of the vector like:
for(auto i = g1.begin(); i != g1.end(); i++)
There are at least three ways to iterate through the contents of a vector.
You can use an index:
for (int i = 0; i < vec.size(); ++i)
std::cout << vec[i] << '\n';
You can use iterators:
for (auto it = vec.begin(); it != vec.end(); ++it)
std::cout << *it << '\n';
You can use a range-based for loop:
for (auto val : vec)
std::cout << Val <<'\n';
The latter two can be used with any container.
g1.begin() returns an iterator to the 1st element, whereas g1.size() returns the number of elements. You can't compare an iterator to a size, which is why you are getting the error. It has nothing to do with your use of auto, it has to do with you comparing 2 different things that are unrelated to each other.
You need to change your loop to compare your i iterator to the vector's end() iterator, eg:
for(auto i = g1.begin(); i != g1.end(); ++i)
cout << *i << endl;
Or, simply use a range-based for loop instead, which uses iterators internally:
for(auto i : g1)
cout << i << endl;
Otherwise, if you want to use size() then use indexes with the vector's operator[], instead of using iterators, eg:
for(size_t i = 0; i < g1.size(); ++i)
cout << g1[i] << endl;
I have two maps. The keys of the two maps are the same. The mapped-value of the second one is a pointer, which points to the mapped-value of the first one. When I erase the element in the first map, the pointer in the second map does not vanish automatically. I should first erase the second map and then erase the first one.
// two maps
map<int, int> a;
map<int, int*> pt_a;
int N = 5;
for (size_t i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
a.insert({ i,2 * i });
pt_a.insert({ i,&(a[i]) });
}
// erase the first element of a
a.erase(a.begin());
// after erase
for (auto& i : a) cout << i.first << " " << &(i.second) << endl;
cout << endl;
for (auto& i : pt_a) cout << i.first << " " << i.second << endl;
Is there anything in C++ can simplify this code? If the element in the first map is erased, the corresponding one in the second map is also erased automatically.
If I erase the element in the second map, the memory of pointer is free or not? Should I use std::share_ptr in this case?
Thanks!
vector<vector<string> > vvs;
vector<string> vs;
vs.push_back("r1-c1");
vs.push_back("r1-c2");
vs.push_back("r1-c3");
vvs.push_back(vs);
for (vector<vector<string> >::iterator vvsi = vvs.begin(); vvsi != vvs.end(); vvsi++) {
vector<string> vec_str = *vvsi;
for (vector<string>::iterator vsi = vec_str.begin(); vsi != vec_str.end(); vsi++) {
cout << *vsi << ", ";
}
cout << "\n";
}
In the above C++ code, to avoid the copy of vector(vector vec_str = *vvsi) i tried the below code
vector<string> *vec_str = vvsi.base(); //Working. which (returns a const pointer&)
vector<string> *vec_str = &(*vvsi); //Working. Assigning the address
But
vector<string> *vec_str = vvsi; //Error. Not able to assign
Error
(build error : cannot convert 'std::vector<std::vector<std::basic_string<char> > >::iterator to 'std::vector<std::basic_string<char> >*' in initialization)
In a case of integer
int a=10;
int *b = &a; //working. Assigning address
int *c = &(*b); //working. Assigning address
int *d = b; //working. Assigning address
*c=11;
std::cout << a<<"\n";
*d=12;
std::cout << a<<"\n";
In the case of vector, why the build error when assigning (can't able to understand from the C++ iterator documentation)?
An iterator is not a pointer. It's interface was made to be used as a pointer, but it certainly is not a pointer.
However, if you simply want to iterate through the elements of each vector in the parent vector, there is no need to assign it to a temporary vector or to a pointer, the iterator itself is good enough:
for (vector<vector<string> >::iterator vvsi = vvs.begin(); vvsi != vvs.end(); ++vvsi) {
for (vector<string>::iterator vsi = vvsi->begin(); vsi != vvsi->end(); ++vsi) {
cout << *vsi << ", ";
}
cout << "\n";
}
Also, since you put c++11 as a tag in your question, I assume you might be interested in a more modern expression:
for(auto& vst : vvs){
for(auto& st : vst){
cout << st << ", ";
}
cout << endl;
}
You're trying to assign the value of an iterator to a pointer. That the iterator points to the same type as the pointer is irrelevant, since RandomAccessIterators, which are the iterator type of std::vector, are not implicitly convertible to pointers.
If you're using c++11, there are simpler ways to go about iterating over a vector of a vector even than #A Hernandez's solution (or any container of containers at that), using the range-for syntax available in c++14:
for(auto &&stringVec : vvs){
for(auto &&str : stringVec){
cout << str << ", ";
}
}
cout << '\n';
The && here allows binding to temporary containers as well as existing ones, so you can use this syntax with both existing container containers and container containers returned from a function without storing them.
Pretty new to C++, only at it a week or so, I want to iterate through a set of nested sets and write each element in the inner set to a line in a file.
Each inner set has 3 elements and I want all three elements on the same line.
I have a set up as follows:
// Define "bigSet" and initiate as empty set "Triplets"
typedef set < set<string> > bigSet;
bigSet Triplets;
I tried something of this sort to go through it but it gives me an error...
// Iterate through and print output
set <string>::iterator it;
for(it = Triplets.begin(); it != Triplets.end(); it++){
cout << *it << endl;
}
Any help is greatly appreciated guys thank you!
I would do it this way:
// Iterate through and print output
set < set <string> >::iterator it_ex; // iterator for the "outer" structure
set <string>::iterator it_in; // iterator for the "inner" structure
for(it_ex = Triplets.begin(); it_ex != Triplets.end(); it_ex++)
{
for(it_in = it_ex->begin(); it_in != it_ex->end(); it_in++)
cout << *it_in << ", ";
cout << endl;
}
Triplets is not a set<string>; it is a set<set<string>>; each item in Triplets is itself a set, than can contain several strings.
The iterator must match the type of the container; with two levels of nested containers, you should iterate twice:
set<set<string>>::iterator it;
set<string>::iterator it2;
for(it = Triplets.begin(); it != Triplets.end(); it++) {
for (it2 = it->begin(); it2 != it->end(); ++it2) {
cout << *it2 << endl;
}
}
Triplets is type set < set<string> > and therefore requires an iterator of type set < set<string> >::iterator or bigSet::iterator. It isn't type set <string>. You could also use const_iterator.
Note that iterating Triplets gives you an iterator to another set, and not a string.
Also consider
for (const auto& i : Triplets)
{
for (const auto& j : i)
{
cout << j << endl;
}
}
You have an error because Triplets.begin() is not of type set<string>::iterator, it's set<set<string>>::iterator.
What you need to do is have two loops: one for iterating over the outer set and one for the inner.
set<set<string>>::iterator it;
for(it = Triplets.begin(); it != Triplets.end(); ++it)
{
set<string>::iterator it2;
for(it2 = it->begin(); it2 != it->end(); ++it2)
{
cout << *it2;
}
cout << endl;
}
If you use increment/decrement operators (++/--) on iterators, it might be better to use the prefix versions (++it) instead of the suffix ones (it++). This is because the suffix ones create a copy of the iterator before it is incremented (and that copy is then returned) but in cases like this, you have no need for it.
Moreover, if you're using C++11, you can use the range-based for loops and auto keyword, which simplify things a lot:
for(const auto &innerSet : Triplets)
{
for(const auto &innerSetElement : innerSet)
{
cout << innerSetElement;
}
cout << endl;
}
First: if they're triplets, are you sure that std::set is the type you
want for the inner values. Perhaps a class would be more
appropriate, in which case, you define an operator<< for the `class,
and your simple loop works perfectly. Something like:
class Triplet
{
std::string x;
std::string y;
std::string z;
public:
// Constructors to enforce that none of the entries are identical...
// Accessors, etc.
friend std::ostream& operator<<( std::ostream& dest, Triplet )
{
dest << x << ", " << y << ", " << z;
return dest;
}
};
And then to output:
for ( Triplet const& elem : Triplets ) {
std::cout << elem << std::endl;
}
Otherwise: you need to define the format you want for the output. In
particular, you'll probably want a separator between the strings in the
line, for example. Which means you probably cannot use a range based
for, at least not for the inner loop. You would need something like:
for ( std::set<std::string> const& triplet : Triplets ) {
for ( auto it = triplet.cbegin(); it != triplet.cend(); ++it ) {
if ( it != triplet.cebegin() ) {
std::cout << ", ";
}
std::cout << *it;
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}
(If the set of triplets is large, you'll definitely want to consider
replacing std::endl with '\n'. But of course, if it is really
large, you probably won't be outputting to std::cout.)